Performance art is good and listening to people who don't understand art talk about performance art is a unique type of torture.
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Love Begins
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Today's Document

No title available
🪼
occasionally subtle

izzy's playlists!

Kiana Khansmith
No title available
No title available
we're not kids anymore.

No title available

bliss lane

ellievsbear
No title available
todays bird
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
𓃗
One Nice Bug Per Day
seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from Colombia
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
seen from Israel
seen from Singapore

seen from Serbia

seen from Mexico
seen from Netherlands
seen from Iraq

seen from South Africa

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
@wimbleflat
Performance art is good and listening to people who don't understand art talk about performance art is a unique type of torture.
contemporary Marxist orthodoxy is very reliant on the assumption of the US as the sole hegemonic world superpower or however one might put it and so when that inevitably changes in the next decade there's going to be a very strange period of weird positions akin to someone saying Britain is the biggest threat to world peace in 1972
like the core assumption of Marxism for... almost a century? is that the principal contradiction in the world today is not between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat but between the imperialist nations and the colonies and semi colonies. and then the second core assumption is that US imperialism is the dominant form of imperialism (if you read pflp literature from their height they actually identify US imperialism as principle over Zionism in the struggle for Palestinian liberation). and since the fall of the USSR, the sole hegemonic power in the world.
But, obviously, that final assumption is becoming less true in real time, and then of course the second assumption cannot hold if the US undergoes a diminishing akin to postcolonial Britain. but there will definitely be a significant lag time in updating priors as one might say, especially among the louder segments of the anglophone left which do not precisely think thoroughly. so there will be a strange period where the global terrain has obviously shifted but people still act like the CIA runs the world. it might end up being as strange as contemporary neocons invoking soviet communism over gay marriage.
recent oil paintings i've listed on my shop :-)
the thing about trans women is that anyone who isn't one can, at any moment, ideologically dump trans women and jump on the genocide bandwagon. they will, generally, face no social or material repercussions for doing so. the "genocide bandwagon" i mentioned earlier? that's 80%+ of the population who, consciously or otherwise, do not consider trans women to be people.
trans women can't do anything about this. if they try to argue back, they're framed as AMAB freaks wielding their male privilege by the people who are attacking them. it's an unwinnable situation because trans women, as a class, are not capable of oppressing the people who are ideologically dumping them. it's happening in droves in "AFAB queer spaces" by covert TERFs who are literally recruiting them. it's low key incredibly terrifying to see.
Human rights organizations, genocide scholars, and advocates warn that the United States is in the early stages of a genocidal process against transgender people. Experts point to an escalating wave of hostile state legislation, restrictions on gender-affirming care, and public rhetoric aimed at eradicating trans identity from public life.
there was a recent ruling (6 days ago as of my posting this) that states can exclude TRANS WOMEN AND GIRLS SPECIFICALLY from sports teams. this gives LEGAL PRECEDENCE for states to, specifically, discriminate against trans females (in this sense, meaning transsexual women and girls).
i can't write in third person about this anymore because this is terrifying.
we're being sent to men's prisons. those prairieland protestors, including two trans women, got sentenced to 556 total years in prison, essentially life sentences, for "left wing terrorism." in mens prisons we are systematically raped and murdered, including, often times, by the guards.
this shit with the TME qweerz is actively dangerous because its peeling off part of the overall trans community to be used to isolate us. it is an obvious ploy by TERFs to remove the few people who have generally been our allies so that we are more vulnerable. do you think these people don't have think tanks funding these things? they are trying to eliminate trans women from society. the president of the united states has explicitly said such.
if you haven't, read this wikipedia article. there is a concerted effort to funnel all of us into mens prisons where we will be tortured beyond civilian comprehension. please help us.
21 years ago, British journalist Tom Hurndall died after spending 9 months in a coma. Tom was carrying a Palestinian child out of range of Israeli army gunfire when he was shot in the head. We will never forget him, nor his vision of a free and independent Palestine.
ok people say that [tumblr] disproportionately bans trans women. common wisdom. but, like question: has anyone ever, like, proven that? because, what sticks out to me, is that if the rate of tumblr banning users was consistent across all demographics then it would certainly look a lot like the bans were skewed towards trans women, simply because tumblr's userbase is skewed towards trans women.
like if cis women were getting banned at the same rate, how would you even know??? 90% of your mutuals are trans girls!!
I think that it is real, but I think most people have the causation wildly backwards. An ex-employee gave some explanations for this and the current Trust & Safety head largely agreed.
💬 0 🔁 198 ❤️ 312 · so do trans women keep getting banned because theres a handful of moderators who need to get a life, or because theyre
Tumblr's moderation is both very broad and very buggy, and people are fairly cavalier about breaking the rules because most of the time you don't get moderated. Almost every blog has something that could probably get it moderated or banned if it was brought to the attention of the moderation team.
Also Tumblr flags seemingly random images as adult content, some of which are definitely brigading by malicious users and some of which is just glitches in the categorizer.
Tumblr does have an huge brigading issue. Because moderation is so broad and because there are real organized, malicious brigading groups who specifically target people they don't like, and often that's radfem groups, lolcow/kiwifarmers, callouts etc. who want to try and bully people out of their social space. It's also not uncommon in the more heated fandom communities but for this, radfem and kiwifarms brigading are the main factors. You can dig through someones blog and report their porn reblogs, and also just pick on someone until they say something that breaks the rules and then report them, keep doing that long enough to build up the kind of report history that might make a harried moderator press the "ban account" button.
in general I think that highly visible users are much more likely to get banned, because people get mad at them and report them, and they make a lot of posts that are more likely to give you something to get banned over.
I mean, even taking all of this as true I think the distinction here does not make an important difference.
That a system was not consciously designed to be transmisogynistic does not let it off for being that way in practice! If the system lets any group of mildly coordinated people to get someone banned by using mass reporting to control selective enforcement, that's bad and it's discriminatory.
Additionally, there's a decent amount of theory crafting in the notes about what may actually be causing this (death threats/NSFW posting, being highly visible, etc) that are missing more solid evidence than I'd like, and I really like to encourage everyone to remember that a comfortable explanation is not the same as a supported one
the role of brigading in bans is definitely something a lot of people talking about the disproportionate banning of trans women have pointed out. i remember a common complaints during the whole predestrogen car hammer saga was specifically that staff was banning trans woman who were targetted with mass reporting, that is how she herself described part of the process of what happened to her (also as to OP, this site is *not* skewed transfem in a way that matters here. transfems are around more than genpop, sure, but are still a minority on the site, whose major demographics from everything ive seen lead toward cis women and transmascs far more than transfems)
You can tell a lot about a person by entering their mind palace and encountering their greatest fears and darkest hopes in a labyrinth reflective of their subconscious thoughts.
Can anyone explain wtf is going on here especially a Korean speaker
someone on reddit explained 😭
That is one of the most astronomical fuck up translations I have ever seen.
So wait where’d the “step” part come from? Did the ai arbitrarily decide to censor it so it’s not actual incest?? It can do that but not detect common shortenings???
I'm pulling this out of nowhere, but I have to imagine that most of the info that the AI has re: mothers and "hard loads" probably comes from scraping porn sites. So stepmother porn is probably just more common than mother porn, would be my guess.
watching a show about a group of girls who are friends and one of the girls is more serious and less visibly comfortable around her peers, always puts herself down in comparison to them, doesn't initiate contact with any of them rather she mostly joins into what they propose first and only if they make it very clear she's allowed to participate, all the eyecatches and artwork and stuff make her look like a wolf in sheep's clothing so to speak, and in one of the final episodes of the first season you find out it's because she's the only character in the group who likes driving a car
I've seen a bunch of "fandom etiquette" posts on my dash today and I'm going to say something that is maybe going to be unpopular but;
The absolutely pervasive mentality that unwanted criticism or critique shouldn't be given and should be ignored is why fans of color don't stay in fan spaces.
And I am not going to mince words here:
A lot of you are racist. A lot of your fan works are racist.
That might have been difficult to hear. And if it was, you should probably reflect on why that was.
"Fandom etiquette" has created a space where fans of color either bite our tongues and eventually leave or say something, get dogged on, and then eventually leave.
So much of "fandom etiquette" seems to be about insulating creatives from Feeling Bad and hostility to any kind of negative feedback is a pretty big contributor to why bigotry festers in these spaces.
drew more sweaty elf
thats what the glasses are for
IBM 5150
(Addressing someone I've only really been civil to in order to sustain my psychologically load-bearing but increasingly fragile self-image as a guy who is, if nothing else, always civil to everybody) Listen man I've been nothing but civil to you
there is no "epstein class". perhaps you mean capitalists, or men, or adults, or white people. all of those are classes, and membership in any of those classes gives an individual more power that they can use for sexual violence. the random parent or sports coach or whatever that sexually abuses the kid they have power over has no ties to epstein, and i can't help but feel that reducing it all to epstein is functionally a way of defending people like that by pretending the problem is Big News-Worthy Conspiracy and not a society that's extremely full of violence at all levels
When people say the Epstein class, they very intentionally are referring to Jews.
When I refer to the Epstein Class I am referring to oligarchs who have enough money that they have turned to depravity, Caligula style, while destroying the world for everyone else and it seriously has nothing to do with Jewish anything.
Bill Gates is a WASP, ffs.
"This is an antisemitic dogwhistle"
"Well not when *I* use it!"
Fuck. Off.
Interesting that they bring up Bill Gates as a reason why it’s not antisemitic, despite the fact that they’re clearly calling it “the Epstein Class” and not “the Bill Gates Class”.
Anyways, Bill Gates’ inclusion in conspiracy culture, and all the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” style “New World Order” / “Cabal” conspiracy theories that have been built around him and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is due to the conspiracy theory that he is secretly Jewish.
Representing Jewish Communities In 100 Countries Across Six Continents
Doesn’t matter if the end user is unaware of the antisemitism that built the structure of their beliefs. It’s there regardless. Likewise, the theory of opulent degeneracy is still literal Nazi rhetoric.
This post and the reblogs beautifully illustrate what I’m always trying to argue: anti-Semitism is built into Western thought and rhetoric to the point, that most people don’t know when they’re engaging in anti-Semitic narratives. That’s how we get self described leftists using rhetoric popularized and promulgated by such luminaries as: Cossacks, Henry Ford, and Adolf Hitler.
Listen to Jews when we/they explain this shit. There are some individual bad faith actors out there, but generally? We don’t care what you think of [issue], we just want non-Jews to stop kicking us in the genitals and then screaming at us about Palestine when we ask them to please stop kicking us in the genitals.