@theartofmadeline
Love Begins
Not today Justin
đȘŒ
Discoholic đȘ©
Jimmy Eat World
hello vonnie
No title available
cherry valley forever
Claire Keane
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available
Product Placement
untitled
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Fai_Ryy
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Sade Olutola
Game Changer & Make Some Noise
ojovivo
seen from Colombia
seen from Germany
seen from Bulgaria
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands
seen from Spain
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from France
seen from Germany
seen from Spain
seen from Germany
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Bangladesh
seen from T1
seen from Spain
seen from Moldova
seen from T1
seen from Switzerland
seen from Pakistan
seen from United States
@apricot-antlers
Nintendo Power issue 113 (October 1998)
To everyone saying itâs not real:
This post is how I've learned that the sexual meaning of "spit roast" has now become more well known than the literal meaning of roasting something on a spit, and the slangy way of using it to describe an ass kicking or a humiliating defeat is completely forgotten
Why do kiwis have such massive fucking eggs âitâs because they are related to ostriches and-â yeah ok but like why didnât they evolve smaller eggs if I was in charge I would do that shit pronto. Thoughts?
their big eggs are actually that size for a similar reason to human babies having massive heads!! being bigger at birth can be important.
kiwi are trying SO HARD to become mammals. fur-like feathers, whisker-like feathers, little beady eyes, nocturnal, great sense of smell.... that's basically a mammal!! they're well suited for life on the forest floor.
their big eggs work alongside these adaptations to give them a leg up in the bird world. their young hatch already feathered! they're precocial, which means they're born with the ability to open their eyes and move around. like foals.
big egg = more powerful offspring from the get-go. babies don't need to spend precious time vulnerable while they develop on the ground when they've already done all that in the egg!
(unfortunately, with the introduction of mammals to aotearoa, these adaptations are a little less useful...)
Important addition: baby kiwi come out of the egg looking like they've come out of a shower with a hangover
They look like one of the downsides of emerging from an egg fully formed is how aware you are off just having come out on egg. First minute alive, already dealing with some fucking experience.
it would kill half of this site to understand that kids start jerking off and looking at porn the moment they hit puberty and get any kind of sex drive.
w-what do you mean kids arent sexless and pure beings??? i-i thought sexual thoughts only appear when you're 18.... or, no, 21......
i saw smth along the lines of "minors shouldn't see porn, their brains are developing!!!"
this argument only makes sense if you
1. dont understand how any of human biology works
2. think of porn, depiction of the sexual act, as containing the primordial fucking sin, something that corrupts the minds of anyone looking at it
deeply fascist shit
i need people to understand the fact that the stigma surrounding being a child looking at porn was the very first step into terrifying me into being unable to speak about the sexual violence i endured, which in turn allowed for it to continue happening.
Official graveyard post
âofficial graveyard postâ so i want to remind yâall this was posted like a month and half ago, i was magicalgirlbait. ive had 8 blogs since then. tumblr really really doesnât like it when victims talk about their experiences
they really dont like it
At this point, I'm thinking we need to find new ways to responsibly talk to adults about sex.
Listen, fellow trans women, I love you all, but if you think that trans men or transmascs are an oppressor class you need to log the fuck off because you are being brainpoisoned by discourse-mongers. That is a legitimately rocks for brains take
There is a HUUUUUGE gap between "transfems experience a unique intersection of oppressions which are not experienced by transmascs", which is true, "some passing trans men benefit from male privilege", which is true, "trans people are not immune to transphobic rhetoric and this can sometimes take the form of transmascs engaging in transmisogyny", which is true, and "transmascs should be treated as equivalent to cis men because trans men are men and therefore as men they are a danger to trans women" like do you see where the gigantic leap of logic comes in here?
There is something personally offensive to me about accounts that go out of their way to post about transmascs being dangerous or untrustworthy or transmisogynistic when the primary danger to trans women right now is the goddamn United States government. Like we've got people in the white house who would outlaw all HRT if given the opportunity and you're gonna post about trans men?? I don't even mean this in a "we have bigger fish to fry" sort of way I mean this is the sense that building solidarity is one of the most important things you can do when faced with a hostile government and society. It's not just that the claims being made are bullshit and transphobic it's that the whole thing feels actively self-destructive toward creating any kind of community that's of any use to anyone
Let me tell you, I've taken lots of vacations by myself, and I've also taken lots of vacations with other people, and by far vacationing solo is the easiest, most stress-free vacation you can imagine. There's some kind of societal stigma against this. Ignore this. Vacationing by yourself is amazing. There is zero negotiation or compromise. You do exactly what you want to do when you want to do it. You eat whatever you want to eat, whenever you want to eat it. You pursue whatever tourist attraction you want, or none at all. It is the purest release from all obligations and responsibilities. You don't need to worry about whether anyone else is walking faster than you or slower than you and you've lost them in a crowd, did they want to do something different, have you railroaded them into doing what you want to do?
And it's easier to buy solo tickets to things. It's easier to squeeze into crowded bars. Everything about it is just so incredibly relaxing. Don't let society talk you out of it. It's obviously good to socialize and have friends and family who you want to hang out with and see, etc., etc., and it's okay if traveling solo just doesn't appeal to you at all. I'm just saying, I was just on vacation with people, and I had a great time, but we were out to dinner at the hotel restaurant and at the table next to us was a woman by herself having a glass of wine and eating spinach and artichoke dip for dinner while she read a novel and I was just like, honestly, I know that kind of dinner and it's so great lol. If you've ever wondered what it's like to travel solo, it's like that: dip for dinner and a glass of wine and a book lol
*trying to remember the word "masturbatory"* that argument is a sort of conceptual fleshlight
the human mind is prone to catastrophizing when left unoccupied. And thatâs why itâs important to always have a little Blorbo to rotate in your head. It acts as a protective charm of sorts to redirect your imagination away from harmful spirals
thoughts without Blorbo: oh my god I was so cringe in seventh grade why did I do that
thoughts with Blorbo: I havenât considered the interactions with bleebus; I must rectify this immediately
Tags By @friend-dogor : #like a worrystone for thoughts. running my thumb over the little guy in my head over and over until hes smooth and slightly indented
don't let being born a girl stop you from being the man your father never was
Families attacked on the street for speaking Hebrew
Polish soccer fans doing a Nazi salute at Israeli fans at a match
Synagogues and Jewish centres targeted
Politicians & celebs spreading conspiracy theories
Yep all totally normal , just opposing the Israeli government đ
My grandma used to say that some poles were worse than the Nazis âŠ
kind of insane to think that within a decade or so, being able to write well without the aid of any generative AI at all is going to be an endangered skill. all my girls promise youâll stay posting organic homegrown bullshit on this website so your brains wonât fall out of practice!!!
My toxic trait is that I am far more interested in the socio-economic and geopolitical implications of ABO settings than the smut.
For example: I can't read any ABO AUs set in England or France because while I can suspend my disbelief far enough for a gender trinary set up, I can't suspend it enough to believe those two countries would still be distinct entities in a alternate history where Richard the Lionheart could have impregnated Philip II.
If there was a viable dynastic future with Richard, Philip would have climbed him like an oak and dragged him to the altar if he had to. It's a match that makes perfect sense from both their points of view: Philip gets Aquitaine back under French rule, the best general in Europe on his council, and a powerful check on the Angevins... then unexpectedly (after Henry the Young bites it) the entire Kingdom of England for his Capetian dynasty. Richard meanwhile gets to stick it to his father, secure Aquitaine's prosperity, and gets the leverage to start pushing for his mother's release. Then when Henry kicks the bucket Richard doesn't actually have to be King of England in anything but name: Philip can run the countries and unify the Crowns and what not while Richard runs off to go Crusading.
Plus they also like, loved each other and stuff and being able to get to be together long term instead of being torn apart by politics would have been cool. But I'm mainly obsessed with the historical and dynastic implications.
All this to say any ABO au set in England or France that doesn't have them united as a singular Anglo-Frank empire is doing it wrong.
The concept of A/B/O also introduces the question of what succession law would look like under a gender trinary. England historically used cognatic succession, where female scions and their descendants could inherit titles if there were no surviving males from the previous dynastâs line, whereas France used agnatic succession, where succession could only pass through male lines.
In this AU, itâs unlikely that an Anglo-Frank union could last due to differences in succession laws between the two realms. What would happen if an Alpha died without an heir? Would Betas be treated similarly to Alphas for succession purposes? Could succession pass through Beta or even Omega lines? Succession laws were quite difficult to change, with modifications to royal succession often resulting in civil and/or international wars.
So I see your A/B/O geopolitical hypothetical and raise you that while Philip WOULD climb Richard like an oak and bear him multiple viable heirs, the Anglo-Frankish Union wouldnât last long due to differences in how the kingdoms would be inherited by the descendants of those multiple heirs. And with the complexities of succession laws in a gender trinary, the War of the Roses would only be more insane.
This is literally what the Schleswig-Holstein Question was about. Well, the âconflicting laws of successionâ bit, anyway. Not so much the ABO stuff. (But with the Schleswig-Holstein Question, who knows? Well, Lord Palmerston and two other people. But you see my point.)
What being on this site is like: every so often one of the flaming dumpsters floating by drops a fully realized academic paper overboard, and it floats over to you and you read it and it upends your understanding and revolutionizes your appreciation of a major geopolitical underpinning of European history upon which the very shape of modern civilization rests.
It's got medieval-style illustrations of Richard the Lionheart balls deep in Philip the Second, and they're thematically relevant.
"a moment on the lips a lifetime on the hips" is so fucking crazy to me because that just sounds like a win/win
prev you're changing my brain chemistry
eighteen inch nails: i want to fuck you like two animals
instead of "people pleaser" it might be better to think "disapproval fearer" if that's the emotional stick that's motivating action; important to consider at least three reasons to do something:
it's a good thing to do
I want to do the thing
people will be mad if I don't do the thing
and if 3. is the most weighty reason then that's a potential problem.
I donât know who needs to hear this today, but intrusive thoughts are basically your brainâs (sometimes very upsetting) way of saying âIf there were two guys on the moon and one of them killed the other with a rock would that be fucked up or what?â
Iâve personally found that adding the âwould that be fucked or what?â part in myself really helps put the more disturbing thoughts we sometimes get into perspective. Helps me say âyeah thar sure would be fucked upâ and move on with my day.
Itâs not not a secret desire, itâs not something that only occurs to you because youâre a bad person. Itâs just your brain deciding to process the fact that it knows an uncomfortable thing exists in the world by feeding it to you in an absurd âwhat ifâ with you as the main character.
Words cannot describe how happy I am that this resonated with so many people.
#something that really helps is i used to verbalize these thoughts in that way to my brother #like wed be cooking and id just go âi take your big chef knife and stab u. yeah?â and hed respond w smth like âi perfectly block. loser.â
This might be my favorite coping mechanism of this genre I've heard yet. Sibling goals.
