how many sharks does a tornado need to be considered a sharknado
1
2
3-5
10 ????
more ??????
other ????????????
this is the level of analysis we’re looking for here people
No title available
h
Show & Tell
Peter Solarz
Xuebing Du

titsay

ellievsbear
Cosimo Galluzzi
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Product Placement

oozey mess
sheepfilms
dirt enthusiast

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
YOU ARE THE REASON
d e v o n

Andulka
Sade Olutola
Misplaced Lens Cap
Not today Justin
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from India

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Iraq

seen from United States
@chasteblowjay
how many sharks does a tornado need to be considered a sharknado
1
2
3-5
10 ????
more ??????
other ????????????
this is the level of analysis we’re looking for here people
randomly remembered “i have d cups, grandpa. the waitress thinks you have dementia” tonight so i decided to find the original tweet again and
[ID: A Tweet and self-reply by Twitter user Akira.
The original Tweet says "At a certain magnitude of cunt severity, getting misgendered by your family stops hurting and starts being funny. I have D cups, Grandpa. The waitress thinks you have dementia."
The reply reads: "UPDATE: she was right". End ID]
So, one thing I'd like to note here is
One of the lesser known early symptoms of dementia is that people start being more disagreeable.
Part of this is probably the natural result of being increasingly confused and upset day to day constantly. Another possible thing is that the same mechanism that causes dementia is also attacking the part of the brain that does emotional regulation.
And the thing is this is super early stage. By the time they stop remembering when's the last time you met, it's already way too late. But if an older person in your life starts acting way more like a cunt for literally no reason, and it's not particularly in character for them, it really might be worth testing for dementia or Alzheimer's because you have a lot more options catching it earlier.
this is a good argument for not being an asshole: people will notice sooner if you get more argumentative.
^ that is a great point
favorite, favorite moment in the arkham knight novel is when jason (internally) jeers at bruce's choice to wear a cowl that reveals the lower half of his face – a decision jason reads as bruce trying to people-please despite it all, to signal to others that he's still human and trustworthy, and even vulnerable. which is very interesting commentary because jason himself is covered head-to-toe, both in that verse and in his pre-muzzle days in the main verse. i wonder if that has anything to do with jason's dehumanization of himself (and others), the way he lives in service of a pyrrhic mission and intends to burn everyone who gets in the way of said mission. a lack of empathy for others, a lack of empathy for himself. which just makes the last scene of the VIDEO GAME quite insane to think about, because there's a scene where bruce is about to punch jason and jason purposefully turns the visuals of his helmet transparent so bruce can see his face. and it's like. was he testing bruce's vulnerability or his own? was he showing bruce he was still human or begging bruce to show him some humanity? it's both obviously. it's such a frail moment, compounded all the more by this throwaway dialogue about masks and faces. and then you start thinking about how jason always wears his helmet but when he's confronting bruce, he always takes it off and it's so evident how significant it is to him to be showing his face because he clearly believes you shouldn't. he's clearly against that. even in battle for the cowl, his batman suit had a muzzle on it, and yet....every single time he's with his father...the mask has to come off. he has to humanize himself because he wants bruce to humanize him, to make him feel real and not like a shell of himself. it's such an interesting representation of the extremes to which jason takes things – a way of saying, if you're going to be batman, go all the way. which is what he does of course, but, as we know, his desire to be loved makes him waver, makes him back out at the last minute. and what's one of the first things jason does when he sees batman in under the red hood? takes a dagger to the cowl to unmask him. to make him feel weak, to humiliate him yes, but....to bring out his human side as well? most definitely.
I just need the world to never forget that Stephanie Brown was introduced in 1992, died in 2004, and didn't get her first action figure until 2010.
Meanwhile in 2005 DC produced an action figure of Black Mask holding the power drill he used to torture her to death.
why so silent good messieurs
I’m SEVERELY disappointed this post didn’t include the eye witness statement of the mirror crash incident in question
French-Iranian author and illustrator Marjane Satrapi, best known for the book and film “Persopolis”, has died of "sadness", members of her
This one hurt, her work had such a profound effect on my life, thoughts, and politics.
May her memory be a blessing
One of the useful liberal tactics that has led to their continued crushing of the left over the last decade that has been under discussed is the tactic of blaming cooption/recuperation and sheepdogging on the "far left"
For example:
Black Americans put forth a simple demand that we, and ideally everybody else, not be executed by armed members of the state without trial. In a word: equality. Liberals can't answer that demand because it is antithetical to their project of maintaining the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. Instead they give a bunch of shit that nobody asked for which annoys everyone and the right wing of liberalism is able to capitalize on that annoyance to generate a backlash to a demand that was never met.
Instead of dealing with the scourge of killer cops, the democrats kneeled in Kente cloth. This did nothing for Black people and only served to fuel the grievance of white people. Instead of dealing with the effects of redlining, the liberal hegemony got rid of Aunt Jemima. This did nothing for Black people and only served to fuel the grievance of white people. Instead of dismantling white supremacy, the liberals coopted, recuperated, and sheepdogged every movement they could while stoking dissatisfaction and grievance that was then blamed on the "far left"
In essence, the "far left" was blamed for the tactics the liberals used to suppress us.
This pattern can be seen across what are now being attacked by the leadership of the democrat party as "groups"
Whether it be women, queer people, black people, the dreaded "Latinx" (remember that "discourse"?), trans people, disabled people, or any other marginalized group: we asked for equality. Liberals can't answer that demand because it is antithetical to their project of maintaining the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. Instead they give a bunch of shit that nobody asked for which annoys everyone and the right wing of liberalism is able to capitalize on the annoyance to generate a backlash to a demand that was never met.
As a result, the left wing of capital can convince itself that it needs to move even further right to win because the spectacle of them fighting against the actual left caused them to do stupid shit that nobody liked that was unpopular and they blame on the actual left whereas the right wing of capital can point at the stupid shit that nobody liked as proof that they are being oppressed by the mere existence of the stupid shit that nobody liked.
The ratchet only turns one way.
"christian characters in movies are poorly written because the writers are atheist" "atheist characters in movies are poorly written because the writers are christian" stop fighting. all human experience is poorly written in movies because the writers are californian
I do think the post that's like "when they torture you to insanity and then torture you for being insane 😂🤣" is one of the most succinct and foundational analyses of interpersonal violence and conflict that had ever been written
The no kill rule exists because the bats absolutelyy could not be trusted. Have you seen these guys. They think theyve pinned the culprit and its the wrong person all the time. Jason would be dead so many times over if they were fine with active killing. Which doesn't work as an argument because that's actively what Jason wants. Is the no kill rule excuses in canon stupid? Am I absolutely still on Jason's side? Yes to both. But like. Bruce? I would not trust Bruce to kill. I do not think he's good at gathering all the proof before making his judgements. Honestly it'd work better in his favor if the explanation "I can't be trusted with that" rather than "I'll kill literally everyone ever" "Killing even once makes you evil and irredeemable forever". It especially is good because it fits in with the fact Bruce Absolutely used to kill. Like not even just in the golden age with a gun or whatever I mean in like the literal 80s comics where Jason was Robin featured Bruce killing people and had killed people before which hurts ALOT of arguments for the no killing ever rule and the weird untainted murder virginity thing they're on about
The Joker should still die though. Like. Despite that. He's not Some Guy killed due to jumped conclusions. He is the Joker. Except of course if this ever happened it'd be revealed the Joker they killed Actually Was Just Some Guy who was forced into thinking he WAS the Joker and he actually was a doctor with a wife and five children and two dogs and he'd been a saint who'd been making leaps and bounds on work to destroy cancer. Still stupid to argue you can't kill Joker to Jason with that in mind though. He has in fact killed several Jokers. Joker natural predator. And we all agree of course that this is comics and making them kill The Wrong Guy is a stupid cop out and plot and I hate it forever. Anyway. Where was I going with this.
Jason is the bat I trust to kill the most and I don't actually think the others should be open to killing for themselves because i don't trust them with that option on the table. and they likely know they cant trust themselves which is why it's avoided.
I prefer this vastly over the murder virginity idea and how killing taints your soul forever so lets retroactively make it so Bruce has never killed ever even once
Jason can be trusted to kill i trust him
Joker should still die no kill rule or not. If Jason sets up a Joker murder trap it's fine you can trust that's the guy. You can generally always trust that's the guy in the eras we work with
I just have to lock in and get through my to-do list and then I'll start my new system with a clean slate and everything will be better.
Me, replying to every malingering email in my inbox: "It's going to be such a relief to clear this out finally!"
Everyone I'm replying to sending a response at the same time because I emailed them at the same time: ...
I'll set a calendar event for two weeks ahead of time and two days ahead of time so I won't forget.
If I just remember to do it every day it'll become a habit and I won't have to think about it.
I'll just stay at my desk until all of my tasks are done for the day and then they won't build up.
That's important, let me write it down on my hand so I can't ignore it.
If I skip lunch I'll catch up a little bit and I won't have to stay late or start early to stay on top of things.
I think if I work late all week that'll get me through the backlog and then I just have to keep up.
I have been out of my ADHD meds for three weeks and won't be able to get new prescription for another two weeks and there is nothing I want more right now than a single massive task that I can drill into for ten hours a day because having thirty small tasks that take twenty minutes each every day is grinding me into a fine paste and piping me onto crackers with a dill garnish.
Burying myself in a bathtub full of this stuff for three weeks would fix me:
Every time I see that last pic, I have to note that the funniest line is the one immediately after the highlight
I know those cens lads saw big dick shane hollander in the showers for the first time and wondered what he did in a past life to be the god of hockey with a huge cock
Not where I think I’m supposed to be going with this but in a past life I think Shane was an extremely devout mentally ill monk in some kind of hardcore very ascetic sect and he had st. Theresa style ecstasies from denying himself all worldly pleasures and wearing nothing but sackcloth and eating gruel and whipping himself or calcifying one of his limbs and he was like slightly superior about the other monks struggling with their vows of chastity because he’s never even been tempted to lust after a woman and then he kills himself via a months long self mummification ritual using those juniper berries and his last dying deranged thought on this earth is “I did it. I won. 🥰”
Sniles so sneetly
Btw I loooove starting a post like "also" "by the way" "and another thing" when there was fully no conversation or preceding thought. U will experience my posts en media res
Apparently someone got their car stuck on the light rail tracks at Mt. Baker. For those unfamiliar this is 35 feet up in the air
Fun fact! this is likely due to racism. Not the drivers, to be clear, but this is a not-entirely-unsurprising result of systemic racism in the greater Seattle area and the influence it has on infrastructure spending.
I'm a huge proponent of public transit, rail in specific, and I'm very glad that the greater Seattle area is finally starting to see some solid light rail infrastructure sprouting up in the form of the 1 and 2 lines, but that in no way stops me from critiquing the decisions made in planning and implementation.
Light Rail, in it's colloquial form here in the US, is basically always a compromise solution. It's cheaper than subways, can make good use of existing right-of-way around freeways, and can function as a kind of low-capacity commuter rail in the subways while behaving more like a tram or streetcar in downtown areas. It is crucially, however, not a streetcar, nor is it a commuter rail. Streetcars make frequent stops and are optimized for dense areas with lots of traffic. Commuter rails are larger and stop lest frequently, optimized for bringing suburban residents into city centers. Commuter rail should, however, be independent of street traffic so it can travel at higher speeds. For this reason, most of the Link light rail system in seattle is actually not at-grade (street level), but on either elevated or sub-grade track. Downtown, the lightrail actually functions as a low-capacity low-frequency subway system in what used to be the bus tunnel (we don't have time, but yes it was stupid). Everywhere else, it's up on elevated tracks that largely follow the freeway system.
There are three stations, all immediately south of that Mount Baker elevated station, where the Link actually runs at-grade. These stations run through the historic low income immigrant neighborhoods of southeast seattle. Here, the trains are forced to stop at red lights, interact with crossing and left-turning traffic, and even cross through terrifyingly narrow pedestrian islands. They could have built elevated track here, as they did everywhere else, but they didn't. they didn't want to spend the money. I have personally watched light rail cars carrying hundreds of people have to wait two full minutes for cars turning left in front of them, delaying trains so like, 5 people could drive there. Once it reaches the end of this low income immigrant-dominant neighborhood, however, the Link returns to it's above-grade status, with Mount Baker being the first elevated stop. You want to know how this woman, who claims she was misdirected by her GPS, probably ended up here? I would bet anything she tried to make a turn at the intersection just before the stop and got confused. The intersection, for reference, looks like this:
I'm not saying it's an easy mistake to make, but given the number of people who drive through here every day, it's honestly not that surprising that someone, especially someone who is from out of town, or someone who is used to shared streetcar lanes, would eventually make this mistake. When you're dealing with a city of hundreds of thousands of people, it's only a matter of time before a mistake like this happens. but it is only possible for it to happen because of the decisions made in the planning process, and one of those decisions was "we can save money if we make everything worse in that part of town where all the foreign poors live", and so they built the thing at-grade, instead of keeping it elevated like everywhere else.
and yes, those tracks are in the middle of a four lane road, and no, there is no way to get to any of the at-grade stations without crossing at least two lanes of traffic on a very busy avenue. and those tiny little pedestrian islands are not only terrifying to walk on, but a man in a wheelchair was clipped by a passing train car a while back because his chair didn't really fit through the tight turns well and one of his feet was sticking slightly out when the train passed by. This is not a problem at like, any other stops in the Link system. Just here. Just in this neighborhood. And it's a fucking disgrace.
not only was the section of the 1 line built at grade for the purpose of cutting costs, it was directly appealed by a citizens initiative. The Save Our Valley movement (SOV), after not being taken seriously by Sound Transit, sued for race based discrimination and an unfair distribution of public works funding resulting in discriminatory safety hazards, which were argued to be at odds with protections provided by the Civil Rights Act. And guess what. the claims were dismissed anyways. the court dismissed them on grounds that congress could ONLY regulate "intentional discrimination" per the civil rights act and was not authorized to regulate "discriminatory effects", that while the at-grade construction of the light rail line would likely have a disproportionate effect on the minority-dominant area of Rainier Valley, there wasn't any grounds that it was done with racial intent. which, given that the ONLY reason the claims were dismissed was that the discrimination argued couldnt be proven to be intentional, is, ironically, pretty clear evidence of intentional race based discrimination when Sound Transit went ahead with the at grade construction of the Rainier Valley section of Line 1 anyways
i've been phasing the phrase 'google it' out of my vocabulary and going back to 'look it up'. fuck you youve lost your generic trademark privileges