She snapped so hard
styofa doing anything
Jules of Nature
Sweet Seals For You, Always
we're not kids anymore.

JBB: An Artblog!
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
🪼
Misplaced Lens Cap
taylor price
almost home
Game of Thrones Daily

pixel skylines
NASA

JVL
dirt enthusiast

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
trying on a metaphor
h
todays bird

blake kathryn
seen from Taiwan

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Norway

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Chile
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
@cold-sentinel
She snapped so hard
i think ultimately the most vile transandrophobia ive experienced, REPEATEDLY, was the 4 trans women on seperate occasions who either fetishized or supported my domestic abuser, a trans woman, who repeatedly raped me and tried to murder me when i tried to break up with her
"can you give me her number" have you ever had the experience of having to run for your life from your own vehicle you own, call the police, and them say they cant report the car as stolen because you let her drive it because you thought she was going to hurt you?
"well i support womens wrongs" i had nightmares for nearly 3 YEARS following the events, mostly of her either coming back and raping me more or her coming back to finish the job
"hot" she terrorized me in the victims area of the court house that i specifically went to so i wouldnt have to see her. her face haunts me every day
"well youre a man so" i lost my JOB. i lost FRIENDS. MY COMMUNITY COULD NOT HANDLE ME WHEN I NEEDED SUPPORT, BECAUSE THE CONCEPT OF ATTEMPTED MURDER IS SUCH A DISTANT EXPERIENCE TO MOST PEOPLE THAT THEY REFUSE TO EMPATHIZE WITH IT
like ok so we're just supporting domestic violence, rape, and attempted murder if its against a trans man? would you say this if i were a woman? would you say this if she was a man?
This is what happens when you speak up in the trans community. This is exactly the issue I have been talking about.
this happened to OP because she IS a woman, and her ex IS a man. Just stock-standard domestic violence, but the ex gets away with it because he's pretending to be a woman and his victim is pretending to be a man.
Most men get away with it. Trans isn't special there, but what it has ensured is OP's difficulty in finding support amongst women with similar situations, and it's ensured that her ex can gain access to spaces built for women like OP and originally designed to keep men like her ex out.
OP I’m really sorry and I hope you’re safe now. It’s important to understand this was a classic domestic abuse case, male on female violence, regardless of how you and your ex identify. He is a violent male and no amount of respecting pronouns is going to change that. I’m just sorry that your community let you down but honestly I’m not surprised. They don’t care about trans men because you’re female and they hate female people.
nobody gives a fuuuuuuck
i do not concern myself with “men’s mental health”
why do mens mental health advocates act like men have it inherently worse?
there is legitimately a typhoon of psychosis sweeping thru the white queer community that’s the only explanation for why i keep seeing posts like these. in what universe is ICE (ICE???) targeting & abducting white gendery people. this post has nearly 100k notes. whats going on
You know they’re absolutely salivating at some oppression finally coming to them. That “trans genocide” they’re itching for, maybe it’s coming!!
"oh so you want trans people to not exist??" is the terminally online version of men who histrionically threaten suicide whenever they're asked to slightly change their behavior for the benefit of people around them
Have you ever had a pap smear? (I think there should be a "not applicable" option for this one)
Have you ever had a pap smear?
Yes
No
See results - N/A
I had several before a doctor flagged the fact that I don’t need one since I’ve never done anything sexual. And that’s why I don’t tolerate people pushing the idea that every woman needs to get one. And given *gestures at everything* I feel like it’s because people see the female anatomy as responsible for cervical cancer when actually straight women get hpv from a man. Or they don’t like that celibate women get to avoid a procedure that is known for being uncomfortable or painful due to the lack of care about female-specific medical procedures.
HPV is not the only way to get cervical cancer, even if it causes the majority of cases. I've also never been sexually active and have been open about this with my PCP and have never been told not to get a pap smear. They are absolutely lifesaving for women and I think it's a weird take to push people not to get one because of momentary pain/discomfort. There are absolutely improvements that can be made to make the procedure more comfortable but that doesn't mean it should be skipped altogether
My doctors do say that you can space them out more if you're not sexually active, but yes every woman needs to get them. I can't tolerate a speculum so my history has been fraught but now there is the self swab method which is a game changer.
Women can use a wand to collect a vaginal sample, then mail it to a lab that will screen for cervical cancer. The device will be available b
So cool!! I didn't know this existed
- In 2020, more than 606,000 women were diagnosed with cervical cancer and around 341,831 women died due to cervical cancer worldwide.
- 3-8% of cervical cancer cases are truly HPV-negative. Cervical cancer cases that are HPV-independent are being reported steadily in clinical practice.
- HPV-negative cervical cancer patients show significantly worse prognosis due to advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage with lymphatic invasion at diagnosis than HPV-positive cervical cancer patients.
some quotes from this study to illustrate how unbelievably dangerous the medical misinformation in unsentimentaltranslator's post is. this study reports up to 8% being hpv negative; from these numbers, we can surmise that roughly 48,000 women were diagnosed with HPV negative cervical cancer in 2020. given the much worse prognosis for HPV negative cancer, it's impossible to determine how many of the deaths were HPV negative, but let's assume 24,000. that is not an insignificant death toll over a single year. other studies place the rate of HPV negative cervical cancer as high as 11%.
on top of this, HPV is not prevented through celibacy. the notion that not having sex with men inoculates you against HPV is dangerous for lesbians. lesbians are at increased risk of death from cervical cancer due to this form of misinformation. this is medical lesbophobia, regardless of whether you intend it that way or not. HPV is highly contagious and spreads via skin to skin contact, not exclusively sexual contact. you can even be born with it if your mother was infected and shedding the virus at the time of your birth. the only reliable way to prevent HPV is the vaccine. and even then, there are over 200 strains, and some low-risk strains are not prevented via the vaccine. low-risk does not mean no-risk.
this misinformation is precisely why HPV-negative cervical cancer is so uniquely deadly, and this misinformation kills lesbians who believe they do not need to get tested or vaccinated because their doctors do not care for homosexual women's health or lives. being a straight woman with a superiority complex is not actually a good reason to spread medical lesbophobia that gets lesbians killed.
source for the study i quoted from, do not know why the hyperlink didn't work: (source)
That source at the end is not good.
Read e.g. where they use ref 31 and it links to a lung cancer study that doesn’t say what they are saying it says??? and weird grammer like “a recent research has shown” and in the same section they just say a therapeutic benefit where before specific clinical endpoints (e.g. OS) were used. Really odd
This may come as a shock, but not every researcher is a native English speaker. Maybe check the author list and then check why you think 'bad' grammar makes someone a worse researcher.
Anyway, get your fucking pap smears. I know a woman who's wife died from cervical cancer. She wasn't fucking men either. Still had cancer that could have been caught earlier.
yeah hi, google, this is the FUNNIEST FUCKING AD I've ever seen
No, I don't have a "praise kink." No, I don't like "gentle doms." I want you to treat me like a thinking, feeling, breathing person instead of a punching bag with a bonus fleshlight. The male desire to treat women as subhuman, especially in bed, is mortifying. I hate that we've had to "pornify" our language to be understood by an entire class with porn addiction.
How did it become normal to choke, hit, and degrade our partners?
I really need once in my life to ask someone why they think Butler is a genius.
Ok, sure, what if men and women were arbitrary category whatever. I can see why this argument interests so many people from every side.
But ultimately, once you close the book and go back to planet earth, these categories exist regardless of the individual action of refusing the label or changing its meaning. And the existence of these categories can be proven by observing what happens to people in one category or the other, what do they do, how the law behaves towards the category and how little impact has on these consequences claiming to be X instead of Y.
I'm reblogging this so I can find this later because I have Opinions on this but no time to elaborate them now!
Ok so, now that I can sit down ten minutes.
I've never once been fascinated with the kind of faux-intellectual writing Butler and her kin do, but I kinda know a thing or two about how these charlatans find followers.
It's, matter of fact, incredibly simple and it makes it even more enraging: these people are in no way different than the average conman and they exploit the fact that most people are not that bright and good at spotting (or calling out) obvious lies. Also, many have not a great grasp on material reality and will indulge magical thinking in one way or another.
This is a pattern that's noticeable in every era if you study history of philosophy: at some point, there is a group that is all about subverting the concept itself of truth and observable reality, in order to then assert their own visions on ethics and morality - usually that no such things as accountability or responsibility exist. Sophists were like that (5th and 4th century BCE); libertines during the Enlightenment period were like that; post-modernist and post-structualist thinkers, such as Foucault, Sartre and Butler, are like that. Even Jordan Peterson's bullshit - to mention a person whose politics is opposite to Butler's - is based on this principle.
Their whole skit is that they muddle language and deny objective definitions. This makes them appear smart and rebellious: "oh look how I've questioned the fabric itself of reality, I really really think things through, opposite to you sheep who don't think things through and accept the shallow definition of the flock, I give long, lenghty answers, instead of straightforward ones". When they are asserting that there is no objective definition and they refuse to answer to direct questions (see JP's replies to any interview, or JB talking about... pretty much anything), when they are trying to sell you their useless gibberish, all they have to do is sound confident while doing it.
I used to do it sometimes if I didn't know how to get out of a tricky question at school: bullshitting my answer and sounding absolutely sure of myself while doing it. Since most of my teachers were absolute morons anyway, they did not understand that I was bullshitting, nor they did have the capacity to call me out. Their thought process was something along the lines of "oh well, Alienist is a smart girl and so well-spoken, if she says that the Ottoman Empire fell because of dark magic and dragons with such full confidence it must be true". Now, teenage dirtbag Alienist was a smart girl, but JP is, formally, a licensed psychologist and JB is, formally, a renown University Professor. This also gives them an aura of authority, of well-educated people who Must Know what they're talking about, even when it's adamant to both you and I that they totally don't.
That is the secret: these people muddle the water with language and sound confident in their bullshit, and exploit their authority aura over people who don't have the confidence or the competence to call them out.
The problem is that the few people who do have such competence and confidence have a tendency to be much less likeable and accepted as authorities, because challenging the status quo means you stay an unpopular nobody.
Plus Butler's bullshit specifically has the incredible feature of making the readers-believers fully think that they're doing something countercultural, smart and revolutionary by questioning material reality and asserting the same old status quo, so it's satisfaction and self-righteousness without the hardship and the challenge of actually having to defy your previous beliefs about women, men, and gender hierarchy. Thus, she achieves genius status among a plethora of lazy, cowardly, inept people cosplaying as intellectuals.
I hope this offers some clarity.
Another thing I'd like to add is that whenever you try to reason out with anybody who falls for the post-modernist/post-structuralist propaganda, you get inevitably accused of being mean. If you don't see their vision, then you're mean, no nuance, no discussion, no nothing. You're just a mean person who "believes in outdated concepts". As if the material reality could ever be an outdated concept, but hey. You're a meanie and I won't engage in any constructive discussion because it makes my head ache, amrite? 🤷🏻♀️
1,372 votes and 251 comments so far on Reddit
Go cheer yourselves up, ladies. The comments are absolutely inspired.
Jesus Christ
This teacher made up a writing competition just so their less fortunate student could see the new Jurassic World (OC)
my soft and comfortable mama
official mama post
Mass Effect is one of my favorite franchises of all time, but it can be so difficult at times to reckon with the fact that as a female gamer, they were simply not made with me in mind. And, ultimately, it suffers for it.
Ironically, the gender gap in the ME trilogy especially apparent when I recommend the games to a male friend. I finally talk them into playing it, and they will, more often than not, have absolutely nothing at all to say about the female characters (or lack thereof). Wandering through the games, you're bombarded with a diverse universe full of unique-looking aliens- but male aliens. Asari are the only female aliens you meet beyond Tali and a couple other female Quarians, until ME3, where we get Eve and Nyreen in the Omega DLC. Which means for two (and a half, let's be honest) games in the franchise, every Turian, Salarian, Krogan, Batrarian, Drell, Hanar, Vorcha, Elcor, and Volus is a male. But what is even more striking than this atrocious worldbuilding oversight is that, handing the games to your average male fan, they barely notice. It escapes them entirely as something worth mentioning. They don't perceive the empty echoes of the female voices we aren't hearing, of the other halves of alien populations completely unrepresented. It's as if the default setting of the world, fictional and not, is male.
Asari- the primary female voices in the game- are poorly written. We know this. An entire race of biotic-wielding, technologically-advanced aliens with lifespans in the centuries and incredibly rich culture and technology, and the most we see of them in the entire trilogy is as strippers and occasional mercenaries. Liara, Samara, Aria and Benezia break this mold, but not without their own flavors of sexualization. After all, Benezia still dies in what is akin to Turian fetishwear under the control of Saren. Her favorite color was yellow, remember?
But beyond Asari strippers, skin-tight Cerberus uniforms, and comically sexualized robots- all valid topics, but talked to death at this point- I truly believe the most astounding, hollow, and disheartening result of this casual misogyny is the Krogan.
The storyline of the Krogan cannot be emancipated from the concept of birth. An entire species near-sterilized, a war crime excused away for the greater good. The Krogan story IS the Genophage, and the horrifying explanations used by those in power to excuse atrocity. And for two entire games, not once are we ever shown what the Genophage has done to Krogan women. Not societally, physiologically, or psychologically. They are conveniently segregated away in briefly-mentioned "female camps," while the men discuss the horrors of a war crime that affects birthing rates. It takes until the final installment of the series to show you one female Krogan (who didn't even get her own model, they just covered her so you wouldn't notice) and to mention the absolutely devastating toll that a cultural pandemic of stillbirths, abuse, and chronic infertility-caused sickness can have on a population. Eve is a fantastic character. Truly. But after two whole games of the Genophage being such a critical cultural touchstone for so much of the galaxy, and so many player choices depending on it, it's incredibly difficult for this omission of perspective to be remedied by a few nuanced lines in the med bay.
On the other hand, I think about the Rachni a lot. The so-called ancient enemy of the Krogan people, the foe that led to them being uplifted by the Salarians (and then, ultimately, discarded by them) in the first place. A massive amount of pre-game lore is devoted to a culture that, interestingly enough, speaks to the player through a queen. In fact, the Rachni queen is one of the first female alien NPCs you encounter in the entire trilogy. And as you encounter her, she speaks of songs of mourning. Not for her, but for her children.
You are offered the chance to spare her twice, once in ME1 and again in ME3. Both times, she has been used for her control of her hive, her children, and the potential army that can be bred out of her. Given the choice to free or kill her, many argue she's too dangerous to be kept alive, her species too volatile to be left to reproduce unchecked. An eerily familiar narrative, echoed by the Krogan, creating very poignant foil to me. A species struggling to give birth, and another, their supposed enemy, constantly being taken advantage of for it. It is a struggle of mothers, being commodified by men, and everyone is losing.
I wonder what narrative depths this series could have discovered in the tragedies of the Krogan and the rich cultures of other alien civilizations if they had considered, even for a second, that female voices could support a story where male voices simply cannot. What would we have learned about Salarian women, and their opinions on fertilization regulations favoring male offspring? About Turian women in the line of duty and their place in the hierarchy? Does the Batarian caste system have a bias on the basis of sex?
Obviously, there is nothing that can be done about the erasure and treatment of women in a game series over a decade old. But, I do believe it can be used as an example going forward to show how cultural and environmental storytelling is genuinely made worse by the oversight of female voices. All that to say, I love this universe and these games. Sometimes, it's just difficult to remember that we were only given half a galaxy to truly appreciate.