
tannertan36
almost home
cherry valley forever
Sweet Seals For You, Always
đŞź
sheepfilms
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă
h
NASA
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
occasionally subtle

No title available
untitled

Andulka
noise dept.
todays bird

bliss lane
One Nice Bug Per Day

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from India

seen from Jordan

seen from Malaysia

seen from Philippines

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from India

seen from Costa Rica
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Morocco

seen from Malaysia
seen from France
@diesel1719
Read Thomas Jefferson & the Barbary Pirates,,barry,you fucking twink đ
ovomit
~The real reason Thomas Jefferson owned a copy of the Quran~
A 232 Year History of our fight against Islam & why it is no longer taught in our public schools⌠When Thomas Jefferson saw there was no negotiating with Muslims, he formed what is now the Marines (seagoing soldiers). These Marines were attached to U. S. Merchant vessels. When the Muslims attacked U.S. merchant vessels they were repulsed by armed soldiers, but there is more.
The Marines followed the Muslims back to their villages and killed every man, woman, and child in the village. It didnât take long for the Muslims to leave U.S. Merchant vessels alone.
English and French merchant vessels started running up our flag when entering the Mediterranean to secure safe travel.
This is why the Marine Hymn contains the verse, âTo the Shores of Tripoli â.
Most Americans are unaware of the fact that over two hundred years ago the United States had declared war on Islam, and Thomas Jefferson led the charge!
At the height of the 18th century, Muslim pirates (the âBarbary Piratesâ) were the terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic.
They attacked every ship in sight and held the crews for exorbitant ransoms. Those taken hostage were subjected to barbaric treatment and wrote heart-breaking letters home, begging their governments and families to pay whatever their Mohammedan captors demanded.
These extortionists of the high seas represented the North African Islamic nations of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers - collectively referred to as the Barbary Coast - and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to the new American Republic.
Before the Revolutionary War, U.S. merchant ships had been under the protection of Great Britain. When the U.S. declared its independence and entered into war, the ships of the United States were protected by France.
However, once the war was won, America had to protect its own fleets.
Thus, the birth of the U.S. Navy. Beginning in 1784, 17 years before he would become president, Thomas Jefferson became Americaâs Minister to France. That same year, the U.S. Congress sought to appease its Muslim adversaries by following in the footsteps of European nations who paid bribes to the Barbary States rather than engaging them in war.
In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships and the Dye of Algiers demanded an unheard-of ransom of $60,000. It was a plain and simple case of extortion and Thomas Jefferson was vehemently opposed to any further payments.
Instead, he proposed to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who together could force the Islamic states into peace. A disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom.
In 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoliâs ambassador to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved American citizens, and why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.
The two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam âwas founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran that all nations who would not acknowledge their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.â
Despite this stunning admission of premeditated violence on non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American leaders, including George Washington, who warned that caving in was both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy, for the following fifteen years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages.
The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to over 20 percent of the United States government annual revenues in 1800. Jefferson was disgusted. Shortly after his being sworn in as the third President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year for every year forthcoming.
That changed everything.
Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his demand. The Pasha responded by cutting down the flagpole at the American consulate and declared war on the United States. Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit.
Jefferson, until now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything beyond coastal defense, but, having watched his nation be cowed by Islamic thuggery for long enough decided that it was finally time to meet force with force.
He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would never forget. Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S. ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to âcause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the state of war would justifyâ.
When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American cowardice and acquiescence saw the newly independent United States had both the will and the right to strike back, they quickly abandoned their allegiance to Tripoli.
The war with Tripoli lasted for four more years and raged up again in 1815. The bravery of the U.S. Marine Corps in these wars led to the line âto the shores of Tripoliâ in the Marine Hymn, and they would forever be known as âleathernecksâ for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy ships.
Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of their prophet and their god disturbed Jefferson quite deeply. America had a tradition of religious tolerance. In fact, Jefferson, himself, had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever seen. A religion based on supremacy, whose holy book not only condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers was unacceptable to him.
His greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States. This should concern every American. That Muslims have brought about women-only classes and swimming times in America at taxpayer-funded universities and public pools; that Christians, Jews, and Hindus have been banned from serving on juries where Muslim defendants are being judged; Piggy banks and Porky Pig tissue dispensers have been banned from workplaces because they offend Islamist sensibilities; ice cream has been discontinued at certain Burger King locations because the picture on the wrapper looks similar to the Arabic script for Allah; public schools are pulling pork from their menus; on and on and on and onâŚ
Itâs death by a thousand cuts, or inch-by-inch as some refer to it, and most Americans have no idea that this battle is being waged every day across America. By not fighting back, by allowing groups to obfuscate what is really happening, and not insisting that the Islamists adapt to our culture, the United States is cutting its own throat with a politically correct knife and helping to further the Islamistsâ agenda.
-
Sadly, it appears that today Americaâs leaders would rather be politically correct than victorious!
-
Never forget 9/11/2001, and Never forgive.
The entire Plandemic Dem-Panic Fake Pandemic is all a hoax, perpetrated to scare the US into allowing mail-in ballots (cuz itâs too dangerous to vote in person) (but not too dangerous to riot, protest - âpeacefully protestâ my ass, to loot, and burn down cities) (all pardoned by Kamala, and paid for by George Soros) then almost 20,000,000 extra ballots come out of nowhere and the FBI and DOJ (most of the agents appointed by Obama, or under control because theyâre pedophiles and being blackmailed - just what in hell was Chief Justice John Roberts doing on the Lolita Express to Epsteinâs Pedo-Island ?)â they all did nothing except yell conspiracy theory!
Read the story. Believe in the story, our future depends on it.
Democrats all need to be out of office and put in prison. For treason.
đşđ¸đşđ¸đşđ¸
Babe wake up chocolate guy has a gun
Chocolate guy has better trigger discipline than the kenosha prosecutor.
#oh this place is HAUNTED haunted
NOW itâs serious
World Heritage Post
Azureâs Corner
Who was Jim Crow and why is this as a rallying cry for Democrats?
When a fictional character in a meets mental illnessâŚ
Jim Crow laws were a collection of state and local statutes that legalized racial segregation. Named after a Black minstrel show character,
Jim Crow was a fictional character in a minstrel act performed by Thomas Dartmouth Rice. Mr. Rice was a white actor in the 1800s. During that time in his 20s, he was a devoted actor who came up with a way to portray a black person on stage. It was a mistaken belief that his style of dress and song depicted a traditional black person from the era. He chose to imitate this and represent a black person on stage.
Now days, this is considered racist. In Thomas Riceâs mind, he wanted to expose the audience to black people who couldnât be on stage. Think about it in the context of it then being illegal for a black person to be on stage and there were no representations of black people. Slap on a bit of ignorance about black people because education wasnât very prolific in a stratified educational system, and you have the birth of black face.
From a historical context, Thomas Riceâs âJim Crowâ was very controversial. By no means do I attempt to apply his views to modern morality and views of black face as a means to defend the practice today. I am also not going to apply the inverse to judge the man by todayâs standards. That would be completely ignorant of the truth.
In the 1800s with racism very prolific as owed to the times, laws were created with the intent to maintain control over the black communities. Toward this end, Thomasâs character was subverted to become the poster child for the movement. Keep in mind that copyrights did not cover his character and therefore, he had no way to maintain control over his likeness. This also led to the very law that allows politicians to use any music and images or likenesses for their political uses without having to get permission or pay royalties. More on this laterâŚ
Alas, Thomas Rice would be overshadowed by his own creation having been abused by ⌠wait for it ⌠the Democrats.
The bulk majority of Jim Crow Laws that came about in the 1800s and maintained their prominence until the 1960s were crafted and defended by the Democrats. Unfortunately this information is often not provided when you read about Jim Crow Laws. You only hear about how these laws stemmed to suppress black people and not who created them. Gee, I wonder why?
The Republicans were staunchly against the Jim Crow Laws. During years where Republicans were in majority, these laws were systematically removed as they could be. In years as they were the minority, the Democrats reinforced Jim Crow Laws not otherwise removed or deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
Donât believe me, then letâs look at who really toppled these laws in the 20th Century.
1948 - President Harry S. Truman - Republican
1963 - President Lyndon B. Johnson - Democrat
Lyndon B. Johnson, 36th U.S. president, who championed civil rights and the âGreat Societyâ but unsuccessfully oversaw the Vietnam War. A mo
These two Presidents were in different parties. President Truman initiated the call to integrate the military and remove segregation. The Democrats hammered him repeatedly for his views. President Johnson was a moderate Democrat who was attacked for his actions following a study he called upon with Illinois Governor Otto about the race riots. Republicans attacked him because he had lost control of the country. He took action for civil rights for all Americans, especially blacks. While he signed the Civil Rights Act, he ultimately failed at implementation because of his partyâs actions and the Vietnam Conflict.
Why is this important? Well, letâs set the record straight that President Johnson only became President after the assassination of President Kennedy. The Civil Rights Act was President Kennedyâs dream, efforts and position. It was one in which President Johnson attacked the Kennedy family with repeatedly. The Democrats impressed upon Kennedy to select Johnson as his running mate. Then, surprise, Johnson took powerâŚ
So why did he sign the Civil Rights Act?
To appease the public during the turmoil of the 1960s Race Riots, thatâs why. He had the Vietnam War raging. He had riots in the streets that were otherwise making headlines and diminishing his Presidency. So in using President Kennedyâs shadow was to continue his legacy as a beloved public figure. Despite this, President Johnson loathed President Kennedy and is the subject of many theories that President Johnson was selected to take the seat in a planned assassination of President Kennedy by his own party.
In reality, President Kennedy is more responsible for the downfall of Jim Crow Laws than President Johnson. President Kennedy wouldnât have had the capability if it wasnât for President Truman. President Eisenhower, a Republican, helped President Kennedy rise to power.
Why is Jim Crow returning to present day?
The simplicity of it. Democrats need a new piĂąata to beat in front of the realm of the Public Court of Opinion. Theyâre well aware that the bulk majority of those between the ages of 13~30 are unaware of Jim Crow beyond the references to the laws toppled in the 1960s. Furthermore, they lack the context of time. Without President Trump and the realization that their abuse of Godwinâs Law during the past four years has led to an unstably divided society that normalized violence as political action, Democrats needed a fictitious strawman to avoid the public from turning against real people.
Many people Iâve seen, including Hollywood actors, believe Jim Crow was a real person. Funnier yet, they believe Jim Crow was a white politician who instituted these laws. Thatâs why I made it abundantly clear that this is hardly accurate. Democrats are waving the fear flag that Republicans want to bring back Jim Crow Laws.
Do note that the Liberal view is that there are things only for people of color that exclude white people. This isnât segregating white people, this is segregating people of color. The Liberal view is also that people of color are also different from one another and also have things that exclude each other. This is further segregating people by color. All of this is glossed around the ideology that everyone is special and therefore separate from each other. Thatâs called racial segregation, and itâs illegal.
Is it true that Jim Crow Laws can come back?
No. The Democrats created, supported, and defended Jim Crow Laws until President Johnson was pressured into signing the Civil Rights Act that was supported by President Kennedy to save his own Presidency. Jim Crow Laws would never pass todayâs Senate and are already illegal, as deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court rulings against challenges to the Civil Rights Act.
Can a State implement Jim Crow Laws to suppress the Black Voter?
No. Theyâre Constitutionally invalidated and Federally illegal. The 10th Amendment prohibits States from going against the Federal Government. Since itâs Federally illegal to deny any Citizen the right to vote.
Then why are Democrats saying Jim Crow Laws are coming back?
To scare people into allowing Democrats to create laws that allow non-Citizens the right to vote. They also want to make it easier to commit voter fraud by making it impossible to determine if a person is or is not allowed to vote. Specifically, if you need to recount and make sure someone is allowed to vote, you have a tight timeframe to do that. We witnessed this during the last Presidential election. While there were extensive discrepancies, many challenges failed because of the extent to which the delays would overrun mandated deadlines and the patchwork of voter laws which vary by State. It was not for a lack of evidence.
Doesnât Federal Law define voting rights?
Nope. The 14th Amendment (President Abraham Lincoln [Republican]) states in the reverse that the Federal Government cannot impinge the authority of State laws. This is confusing to most people, but letâs say that Kansas says itâs illegal for someone to jump up and down on Fridays between 2 PM to 3 PM. A Federal Law saying itâs legal to jump up and down doesnât override Kansasâs law, it only says that Kansas cannot make it totally illegal to jump up and down. Kansas simply has a restriction on when this cannot be done. However, Kansas cannot make a law that says one can only jump up and down between 2 PM and 3 PM, because this is considered a violation of Federal Law in prohibiting people from jumping up and down. Furthermore, if Georgia passes a law to say that black people canât jump up and down between 2 PM and 3 PM, the Civil Rights Act, 1st Amendment, and all other laws prohibiting discrimination and racial segregation say that that law is Federally illegal and wholly unconstitutional â rendering it null and void.
Also note that The 9th Amendment specifically prohibits the States and Federal Government from exercising the few rights extended to them in the purpose of denying or infringing upon the rights of Citizens. This is very important in the context of voter rights. The Democrats want to make a Federal Law that allows them to define who can vote. The Republicans want to make a Federal Law that defines limitations on the Statesâ ability to define who can vote. Thereâs a big difference here.
The Democrat Voter Rights Law is misleading. You already have the right to vote as a Citizen of the United States as defined by the Constitution. A gray-blue skinned pansexual CIS Female identifying alien Princess with six azure colored eyes who is gender-fluid in a Sapphic relationship and a Citizen of The United States of America, has the right to vote! Democrats want to extend this right to non-Citizens of the United States. This effectively allows people who know nothing about our country and the Constitution to vote on laws that directly impact the rights of those who are Citizens.
The Republican supported Voting Laws, similar to Georgiaâs and New Yorkâs, require States to ensure that voters are Citizens (by presenting a Federally recognized State-issued âReal IDâ) in support of the Constitutional requirement that voters are United States Citizens. Ladies and Gentlemen, The 15th Amendment states that only Citizens have the right and privilege to vote, and it shall not be impinged unless that privileging is revoked by commission of a crime per the 14th Amendment (another reason why Democrats keep calling the Capitol Hill riot an insurrection, despite that this is no longer a requirement to strip someone of the privilege of voting).
To summarize in closing: Georgiaâs Voter ID Law (Republican) is not any more tough as New Yorkâs requirements (Democrat). Both States require that a person present identification as proof of who they are. New Yorkâs law requires that a person provide the same, but specifically indicating from which borough that they reside in. This is actually tougher than Georgiaâs Voter ID law, despite only requiring a utility bill or photo ID with name and address because they can only vote in that borough. Georgiaâs Voter ID Law only requires a State provided, Federally mandated Real ID (Republican) and a person can vote anywhere in the State (Local elections excluded).
Youâre being lied to by Democrats. Donât fall for the propaganda and mouthpieces. Learn the Truth. Understand History and the context of the times.
Contextual Lives Matter.
In before âtHe PaRtIeS sWiTcHeD!â
Excellent synopsis of the current Voting Rights Brouhaha.
DONâT GET BAMBOOZLED BY SLICK LIARS
Doing this today lol!
Youâre so very close to comprehending the theatrics of government actions and how those actions are in fact not aimed at your safety.
Lets boil this down a bit.
They take your shampoo, the guy in front of youâs shampoo, the guy behind youâs shampoo, and put them all in one container.
Catch it yet?
They now have three, count them three âpotential bombsâ in a confined space, in a setting where there are a lot of peopleâŚ.
âFor your safety.â
#LiberalsApproachingThePoint
ACTUAL TERRORIST intent on a mass casualty event takes a cab to the airport. He gets in line for TSA screening. He doesnât have a ticket. He doesnât need one. He DOES have a backpackâwith a bomb in it.
He silently, patiently moves forward until heâs in the center of the mass of travelers (pick a big holiday travel day for maximum casualties). He detonates his bomb. Scores are killed, countless more are wounded. The lives of thousands more, the friends and family of the dead and injured, are forever changed. Air travel throughout the US comes to a screeching halt, interfering in the travel plans and lives of MILLIONS of Americans, as the government take belated action to close the barn door after the horse has already escaped.
Best part? It CANâT BE PREVENTED. Move the screening point farther outside? It doesnât matter. As long as you have crowds being funneled through security theater checkpoints, those crowds can be targeted.And by definition, the terrorists can do it with virtual impunity because theyâre doing it OUTSIDE of the screening area.
The TSA and its enabling legislation are security theater. They donât do a goddamned thing to actually improve security. And the same people objecting to the idiotic COVID 19 precautions have complaining about that for decadesâto no effect. Because fools and cowards donât want to hear it.
Trump getting infected was a matter of when rather than if with the shit he pulled. I'm actually surprise it didn't happen sooner honestly.
China promptly stamps out their outbreak with oppressive efficiency and two seasons later the us president is hospitalized lol
Why are we suddenly buying China's story about it?
Idk, they were using drones to order people inside and putting coughing people into vans. Raccoon city style check points leaving hotspots where you would be arrested the moment your temperature was suspect. They have oppressive fucked up (by western standards) population tracking and surveillance control methods that are being deployed to terrifying effect in xinjiang against muslims. They monitor your phone and are able to, and do, stop you the moment you leave your apartment if you are sick. A similar but much less invasive methodology around phone tracking was deployed in Taiwan and prevented a huge outbreak in their super densely populated little island nation
Cases in Taiwan as a percent of their population:
0.00217%
Cases in china as a percent of their population:
0.00654%
Japan (85,000) and South Korea (24,000) don't even have crazy infection numbers either. So china's numbers are consistent with other densely populated, modern east asian states.
Surely there's a reason why western journos report that kids are back at school in wuhan, mask free, while the Whitehouse and us government currently has more active cases than all of New Zealand.
Do you suspect china is still suffering from pandemic as badly as the USA is and is just hiding that? It's less about the numbers and more about the demonstrable contrast in the government response. It was a failure across the board (cdc is shit, leadership didn't give a shit, population hates being told what to do) and it's simply because the USA can't respond very well to crisis.
Unless it's to reinflate stock prices lol.
Hard disagreement. China's number are too perfect, mathematically speaking. They follow a nice neat curve because they're blatantly false, tailored to resemble other comparable countries.
The truth is that the quarantine of Wuhan only occurred after weeks of spreading during the Chinese lunar New Year travel season, which happens to be the largest human migration event in the world.
On Chinese social media, the sarcastically nicknamed it the "patriotic virus" because cases were showing up in neighboring countries before China even admitted it could be transmitted person-to-person.
The early tests were unreliable. The temperature checks are bullshit because you're contagious before you show symptoms and there's an entire class of over-the-counter medicines that exist purely for stopping fevers.
China only stamped out the pandemic with oppressive efficiency where the cameras were watching. It was security theatre, all for show. Try to remember that they were nailing down a trade deal at the time, and also remember that New Year tourism is worth untold billions. They needed the rest of the world to watch them crack down, to prove they were trustworthy economic partners.
Mike Rowe is one of the best people ever and no one talks about him enough.
He is one of my role models.
Always got to reblog this. Learning a trade, any trade, is on the best things you can do.
Heâs a real man with wisdom and sense. No one under 40 will listen to him.
Always repost!
#SaveTheTrees
I feel like an important message is trying to be communicated to me but I have no idea what it is
Our forests are being cut down 3x faster than they can grow! One acre of hemp produces as much cellulose fiber pulp as 4.1 acres of trees!!! This is super useful for so many things, especially paper production! In addition, hemp takes in carbon dioxide 4x as fast as trees do, which makes it especially valuable in the act of reducing CO2 emissions/greenhouse gases! đ˛đ˛đ˛Â sourceÂ
#the scope of the anti-hemp conspiracy in the united states is terrifying once you start doing research tbh#like it was initially smeared/banned bc lumber lobbyists pushed for it to beâŚ#and a major smear tactic was to associate it with black people#who now a hundred years later are the ones primarily being imprisoned for it#and the plant itself has now been inextricably linked to the drug so people wonât even allow for it to be grown for commercial purposes#like paper making (via literallyfuckeveryone)
Important reminder that industrial hemp canât be used as a recreational drug, so if anyone tries to pull that card you can just stop them then and there. There are no real arguments against using industrial hemp, even if youâre rigidly against the legalization of any recreational drugs.
AYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY I never see pro-hemp on my dash, woo!
Usually the argument on why you canât have hemp is because then people will hide marijuana in it.
yeah, sureâŚ. if they want shitty, shitty marijuana.
It would be like growing sweet corn and dent corn together. Â Yeah, they look similar at a distance and theyâre closely related, but you donât want them next to each other as theyâll cross pollinate and youâll end up with bad versions of both.
Same deal here. Â a patch of marijuana grown in an open field of hemp IS going to get contaminated and itâll lower quality of BOTH crops. Â Your hemp farmer doesnât want that and if likely going rip out any patches trespassers try to add for same reason.Â
and the big issue is not even the THC content. Â Because most quality marijuana is intended to be grown indoors or greenhouses, its a dwarf variety. Short. Â Fiber hemp is bred for height so as to maximize fiber production. Â super tall. Itâs going to be really obvious, really fast if youâve got both in the same field even before you get to the point of pollination. whatâs this runty bullshit doing in my field?
They also have different growing needs with regards to spacing, harvest time, etc. so the argument that you can hide marijuana in industrial hemp fields are basically bullshit.
anyway⌠aside from paper, hemp fiber can also be used to make earthquake resistant concrete thatâs actually LIGHTER than conventional concrete while being stronger. Itâs better at resisting flexing or warping, so ideal for stuff like bridges and highway supports as itâll better resist large temperature swings and vibration. (âhempcreteâ is slightly different, but makes great fire resistant insulation)
You can also use the waste after fiber harvest for animal fodder, including silage. Comparable to corn. and remember, thatâs the waste after youâve harvested for fiber!
Ohhhh my god.. back then, republicans were left leaning and democrats were more conservative. Eventually, republicans had so many wealthy white men in their party that they began working to benefit themselves and their families instead of continuing to be progressive. It was around (if I can remember correctly) the 1920s-30s when the parties began to shift because some republicans didnât like how conservative their party was starting to get. So all the liberal republicans moved on over to the Democratic Party. And then when the conservative democrats didnât like that, they moved on over to the Republican Party. If you donât believe me I can send you multiple sources and video essays. Hereâs one:
https://youtu.be/Z6R0NvVr164
And logically, it just makes sense. Why would the same party that voted for the freedom of slaves also vote against social welfare programs that would greatly improve the lives of POC still recovering from the past?
I will say this time and time again because democrats are not the racists they used to be. If they were, why the heck would they vote for a black president.
Oh you poor uneducated naive liberalâŚyet again misses the reality for the lies. YOUR party has not changed since their inception. Democrats have ALWAYS been against blacksâŚperiod. Letâs take a look at that history, shall we. June 17, 1854 The Republican Party is officially founded as an abolitionist party to slavery in the United States. October 13, 1858 During the Lincoln-Douglas debates, U.S. Senator Stephen Douglas (D-IL) said, âIf you desire negro citizenship, if you desire to allow them to come into the State and settle with the white man, if you desire them to vote on an equality with yourselves, and to make them eligible to office, to serve on juries, and to adjudge your rights, then support Mr. Lincoln and the Black Republican party, who are in favor of the citizenship of the negro. For one, I am opposed to negro citizenship in any and every form. I believe this Government was made on the white basis. I believe it was made by white men for the benefit of white men and their posterity for ever, and I am in favor of confining citizenship to white men, men of European birth and descent, instead of conferring it upon negroes, Indians, and other inferior races.â. Douglas became the Democrat Partyâs 1860 presidential nominee. April 16, 1862 President Lincoln signed the bill abolishing slavery in the District of Columbia. In Congress, almost every Republican voted for yes and most Democrats voted no. July 17, 1862 Over unanimous Democrat opposition, the Republican Congress passed The Confiscation Act stating that slaves of the Confederacy âshall be forever freeâ. April 8, 1864 The 13th Amendment banning slavery passed the U.S. Senate with 100% Republican support, 63% Democrat opposition. January 31, 1865 The 13th Amendment banning slavery passed the U.S. House with unanimous Republican support and intense Democrat opposition. November 22, 1865 Republicans denounced the Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting the âblack codesâ which institutionalized racial discrimination. February 5, 1866 U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduced legislation (successfully opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson) to implement â40 acres and a muleâ relief by distributing land to former slaves. March 27, 1866 Democrat President Andrew Johnson vetoes of law granting voting rights to blacks. May 10, 1866 The U.S. House passed the Republicansâ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the laws to all citizens. 100% of Democrats vote no. June 8, 1866 The U.S. Senate passed the Republicansâ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the law to all citizens. 94% of Republicans vote yes and 100% of Democrats vote no. March 27, 1866 Democrat President Andrew Johnson vetoes of law granting voting rights to blacks in the District of Columbia. July 16, 1866 The Republican Congress overrode Democrat President Andrew Johnsonâs veto of legislation protecting the voting rights of blacks. March 30, 1868 Republicans begin the impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson who declared, âThis is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government of white men.â September 12, 1868 Civil rights activist Tunis Campbell and 24 other blacks in the Georgia Senate (all Republicans) were expelled by the Democrat majority and would later be reinstated by the Republican Congress. October 7, 1868 Republicans denounced Democrat Partyâs national campaign theme: âThis is a white manâs country: Let white men rule.â October 22, 1868 While campaigning for re-election, Republican U.S. Rep. James Hinds (R-AR) was assassinated by Democrat terrorists who organized as the Ku Klux Klan. Hinds was the first sitting congressman to be murdered while in office. December 10, 1869 Republican Gov. John Campbell of the Wyoming Territory signed the FIRST-in-nation law granting women the right to vote and hold public office. February 3, 1870 After passing the House with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat opposition, Republicansâ 15th Amendment was ratified, granting the vote to ALL Americans regardless of race. February 25, 1870 Hiram Rhodes Revels (R-MS) becomes the first black to be seated in the United States Senate. May 31, 1870 President U.S. Grant signed the Republicansâ Enforcement Act providing stiff penalties for depriving any Americanâs civil rights. June 22, 1870 Ohio Rep. Williams Lawrence created the U.S. Department of Justice to safeguard the civil rights of blacks against Democrats in the South. September 6, 1870 Women voted in Wyoming in first election after womenâs suffrage signed into law by Republican Gov. John Campbell. February 1, 1871 Rep. Jefferson Franklin Long (R-GA) became the first black to speak on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives. February 28, 1871 The Republican Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1871 providing federal protection for black voters. April 20, 1871 The Republican Congress enacted the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democrat Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed blacks and all those who supported them. October 10, 1871 Following warnings by Philadelphia Democrats against black voting, Republican civil rights activist Octavius Catto was murdered by a Democrat Party operative. His military funeral was attended by thousands. October 18, 1871 After violence against Republicans in South Carolina, President Ulysses Grant deployed U.S. troops to combat Democrat Ku Klux Klan terrorists. November 18, 1872 Susan B. Anthony was arrested for voting after boasting to Elizabeth Cady Stanton that she voted for âWell, I have gone and done it â positively voted the straight Republican ticket.â January 17, 1874 Armed Democrats seized the Texas state government, ending Republican efforts to racially integrate. September 14, 1874 Democrat white supremacists seized the Louisiana statehouse in attempt to overthrow the racially-integrated administration of Republican Governor William Kellogg. Twenty-seven were killed. March 1, 1875 The Civil Rights Act of 1875, guaranteeing access to public accommodations without regard to race, was signed by Republican President U.S. Grant and passed with 92% Republican support over 100% Democrat opposition. January 10, 1878 U.S. Senator Aaron Sargent (R-CA) introduced the Susan B. Anthony amendment for womenâs suffrage. The Democrat-controlled Senate defeated it four times before the election of a Republican House and Senate that guaranteed its approval in 1919. February 8, 1894 The Democrat Congress and Democrat President Grover Cleveland joined to repeal the Republicansâ Enforcement Act which had enabled blacks to vote. January 15, 1901 Republican Booker T. Washington protested the Alabama Democrat Partyâs refusal to permit voting by blacks. May 29, 1902 Virginia Democrats implemented a new state constitution condemned by Republicans as illegal, reducing black voter registration by almost 90%. February 12, 1909 On the 100th anniversary of Abraham Lincolnâs birth, black Republicans and womenâs suffragists Ida Wells and Mary Terrell co-founded the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. May 21, 1919 The Republican House passed a constitutional amendment granting women the vote with 85% of Republicans and only 54% of Democrats in favor. In the Senate 80% of Republicans voted yes and almost half of Democrats voted no. August 18, 1920 The Republican-authored 19th Amendment giving women the right to vote became part of the Constitution. Twenty-six of the 36 states needed to ratify had Republican-controlled legislatures. January 26, 1922 The House passed a bill authored by U.S. Rep. Leonidas Dyer (R-MO) making lynching a federal crime. Senate Democrats blocked it by filibuster. June 2, 1924 Republican President Calvin Coolidge signed a bill passed by the Republican Congress granting U.S. citizenship to all Native Americans.
October 3, 1924 Republicans denounced three-time Democrat presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan for defending the Ku Klux Klan at the 1924 Democratic National Convention.
June 12, 1929 First Lady Lou Hoover invited the wife of black Rep. Oscar De Priest (R-IL) to tea at the White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country.
August 17, 1937 Republicans organized opposition to former Ku Klux Klansman and Democrat U.S. Senator Hugo Black who was later appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court by FDR. Blackâs Klan background was hidden until after confirmation.
June 24, 1940 The Republican Party platform called for the integration of the Armed Forces. For the balance of his terms in office, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (D) refused to order it. August 8, 1945 Republicans condemned Harry Trumanâs surprise use of the atomic bomb in Japan. It began two days after the Hiroshima bombing when former Republican President Herbert Hoover wrote that âThe use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul.â May 17, 1954 Earl Warren, Californiaâs three-term Republican Governor and 1948 Republican vice presidential nominee, was nominated to be Chief Justice delivered the landmark decision âBrown v. Board of Educationâ. November 25, 1955 Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhowerâs administration banned racial segregation of interstate bus travel. March 12, 1956 Ninety-seven Democrats in Congress condemned the Supreme Courtâs âBrown v. Board of Educationâ decision and pledged (Southern Manifesto) to continue segregation. June 5, 1956 Republican federal judge Frank Johnson ruled in favor of the Rosa Parks decision striking down the âblacks in the back of the busâ law. November 6, 1956 African-American civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy voted for Republican Dwight Eisenhower for President. September 9, 1957 President Eisenhower signed the Republican Partyâs 1957 Civil Rights Act. September 24, 1957 Sparking criticism from Democrats such as Senators John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, President Eisenhower deployed the 82nd Airborne Division to Little Rock, AR to force Democrat Governor Orval Faubus to integrate their public schools. May 6, 1960 President Eisenhower signed the Republicansâ Civil Rights Act of 1960, overcoming a 125-hour, âround-the-clock filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats. May 2, 1963 Republicans condemned Bull Connor, the Democrat âCommissioner of Public Safetyâ in Birmingham, AL for arresting over 2,000 black schoolchildren marching for their civil rights. September 29, 1963 Gov. George Wallace (D-AL) defied an order by U.S. District Judge Frank Johnson (appointed by President Dwight Eisenhower) to integrate Tuskegee High School. June 9, 1964 Republicans condemned the 14-hour filibuster against the 1964 Civil Rights Act by U.S. Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd (D-WV), who served in the Senate until his death in 2010. June 10, 1964 Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) criticized the Democrat filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act and called on Democrats to stop opposing racial equality. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was introduced and approved by a majority of Republicans in the Senate. The Act was opposed by most southern Democrat senators, several of whom were proud segregationists â one of them being Al Gore Sr. (D). President Lyndon B. Johnson relied on Illinois Senator Everett Dirksen, the Republican leader from Illinois, to get the Act passed. August 4, 1965 Senate Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) overcame Democrat attempts to block 1965 Voting Rights Act. Ninety-four percent of Republicans voted for the landmark civil rights legislation while 27% of Democrats opposed. The Voting Rights Act of 1965, abolishing literacy tests and other measures devised by Democrats to prevent blacks from voting, was signed into law. A higher percentage of Republicans voted in favor. February 19, 1976 President Gerald Ford formally rescinded President Franklin D. Rooseveltâs notorious Executive Order 9066 authorizing the internment of over 120,000 Japanese-Americans during WWII. September 15, 1981 President Ronald Reagan established the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities to increase black participation in federal education programs. June 29, 1982 President Ronald Reagan signed a 25-year extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.August 10, 1988 President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, compensating Japanese-Americans for the deprivation of their civil rights and property during the World War II internment ordered by FDR. November 21, 1991 President George H. W. Bush signed the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to strengthen federal civil rights legislation.August 20, 1996 A bill authored by U.S. Rep. Susan Molinari (R-NY) to prohibit racial discrimination in adoptions, part of Republicansâ âContract With Americaâ, became law. July 2, 2010 Clinton says Byrd joined KKK to help him get elected Just a âfleeting associationâ. Nothing to see here. And letâs not forget the words of liberal icon Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood⌠â We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We donât want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro populationâŚ. â Only a willing fool (and there quite a lot out there) would accept and recite the nonsensical that one bright, sunny day Democrats and Republicans just up and decided to âswitchâ political positions and cite the âSouthern Strategyâ as the uniform knee-jerk retort. Even today, it never takes long for a Democrat to play the race card purely for political advantage.Thanks to the Democrat Party, blacks have the distinction of being the only group in the United States whose history is a work-in-progress.* In 2010, the Democrat Party website received a face lift and the erroneous statements regarding their so-called civil rights advocacy were removed. https://www.blackandblondemedia.com/2009/01/14/democrat-race-lie/
PS: Lyndon Johnson, after signing the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts of 1964 and 1965, got on an airplane full of governors and told them that after setting those bills in motion, âIâll have those (N-word) voting Democrat the next 200 yearsâ.
So what was that you were saying there, princess snowflake? And just in case you decide to keep biting off more than you can chewâŚand will predictably follow down a path, as the uneducated love to doâŚI will leave you with even more reality and facts. History Lesson: Racist Democrats and the Big Lie In order to escape their truly wretched past , modern Democrats have adopted as an article of faith the bedtime story that, thanks to Tricky Dick Nixonâs âsouthern strategy,â the racists who had been the backbone of their party for the better part of a century suddenly switched to the GOP en masse some time around 1968, with the happy result that now all the racists are on the right. Presto â instant virtuousness and a clean slate! Itâs a lie, of course. National Review colleague Kevin Williamson, who addressed this issue brilliantly last year: Worse than the myth and the clichĂŠ is the outright lie, the utter fabrication with malice aforethought, and my nominee for the worst of them is the popular but indefensible belief that the two major U.S. political parties somehow âswitched placesâ vis-Ă -vis protecting the rights of black Americans, a development believed to be roughly concurrent with the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the rise of Richard Nixon. That Republicans have let Democrats get away with this mountebankery is a symptom of their political fecklessness, and in letting them get away with it the GOP has allowed itself to be cut off rhetorically from a pantheon of Republican political heroes, from Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass to Susan B. Anthony, who represent an expression of conservative ideals as true and relevant today as it was in the 19th century. Perhaps even worse, the Democrats have been allowed to rhetorically bury their Bull Connors, their longstanding affiliation with the Ku Klux Klan, and their pitiless opposition to practically every major piece of civil-rights legislation for a century. As Kevin goes on to point out:If the parties had in some meaningful way flipped on civil rights, one would expect that to show up in the electoral results in the years following the Democratsâ 1964 about-face on the issue. Nothing of the sort happened: Of the 21 Democratic senators who opposed the 1964 act, only one would ever change parties. Nor did the segregationist constituencies that elected these Democrats throw them out in favor of Republicans: The remaining 20 continued to be elected as Democrats or were replaced by Democrats. It was, on average, nearly a quarter of a century before those seats went Republican. If southern rednecks ditched the Democrats because of a civil-rights law passed in 1964, it is strange that they waited until the late 1980s and early 1990s to do so. And yet this myth persists â in fact, itâs just about the only response todayâs Democrats have to their own sordid history: pinning it on the other guy. It makes them profoundly uncomfortable that among the 21 who voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 can be found Albert Arnold Gore, Sr., the founder of the Hillbilly Dynasty; Robert âKKKâ Byrd, the Conscience of the Senate; and Sleepinâ Sam Ervin of Watergate fame. Just for laughs, letâs take a look at the electoral maps for 1968 (Nixon-Humphrey), 1972 (Nixon-McGovern), 1976 (Carter-Ford), and 1992 (Clinton-Bush) to see how the South voted. First, 1968, as the Vietnam War approached its high-water mark and the antiwar movement was starting to roll:
Nixon picked up some of the states of the Old Confederacy, largely because of their pro-military tradition and support for the war. âWallace,â for those of you born yesterday, was Democrat George Wallace, a rabid segregationist who founded the American Independent Party and ran for president on its ticket. He won 13 percent of the popular vote, and carried five states in the Deep South for a total of 46 electoral votes.
Four years later, Nixon faced the first modern Democratic Party presidential candidate, George McGovern, who ran on a âCome Home, Americaâ platform, and on whose campaign many of todayâs radicals cut their teeth. Two items of note in the linked video clip: Missouri Senator Tom Eagleton was McGovernâs first running mate, who got dumped by the Compassion Party after it came out that he had been hospitalized for clinical depression and had undergone shock therapy. The other is McGovernâs extensive quote from âThis Land is Your Land,â a hit for Peter, Paul and Mary written by the communist fellow-traveler, Woody Guthrie.
Yes, the South voted for the Republican â but so did every other state except for Massachusetts, which was the first indication of just how far gone the Bay State already was.
Four years later, Nixon was in San Clemente in the aftermath of Watergate, and a Southern governor named Jimmy Carter, whose only claim to the White House was that he was not RMN, was running against the Accidental President, Gerald Ford:
Yes, twelve years after the Solid South supposedly flipped to the GOP, here it was, back again, helping to elevate a native son past the Michigander. The two Reagan wipeouts of 1980 and 1984 began the alignment of the South with the GOP â but it was partly reversed by Bill Clinton in 1992:Â
Back to Bubba The Republican ascendancy in Dixie is associated with the rise of the southern middle class, the increasingly trenchant conservative critique of Communism and the welfare state, the Vietnam controversy and the rise of the counterculture, law-and-order concerns rooted in the urban chaos that ran rampant from the late 1960s to the late 1980s, and the incorporation of the radical Left into the Democratic party. Individual events, especially the freak show that was the 1968 Democratic convention, helped solidify conservativesâ affiliation with the Republican party. Democrats might argue that some of these concerns â especially welfare and crime â are âdog whistlesâ or âcodeâ for race and racism, but this criticism is shallow in light of the evidence and the real saliency of those issues among U.S. voters of all backgrounds and both parties for decades. Indeed, Democrats who argue that the best policies for black Americans are those that are soft on crime and generous with welfare are engaged in much the same sort of cynical racial calculation President Johnson was practicing when he informed skeptical southern governors that his plan for the Great Society was âto have them niggers voting Democratic for the next two hundred years.â Johnsonâs crude racism is, happily, largely a relic of the past, but his strategy endures.So the next time a Regressive tries to repeat the Thurmond myth, show him the maps â and make the Democrats own their history. They donât like it very much, and who can blame them? And for a final dagger in your âtheoryââŚalbeit a fake made up one. âFor the first time since President Richard M. Nixonâs divisive âSouthern strategyâ that sent whites to the Republican Party and blacks to the Democrats âŚâ began a New York Times story last week. Thus has one of the big lies of U.S. political history morphed into a cliche â that Richard Nixon used racist politics to steal the South from a Democratic Party battling heroically for civil rights. A brief stroll through Bruce Bartlettâs âWrong on Race: The Democratic Partyâs Buried Pastâ might better enlighten us. Where Teddy Roosevelt invited Booker T. Washington to dinner, Woodrow Wilson re-segregated the U.S. government and had the pro-Klan film âBirth of a Nationâ screened in his White House. Wilson and FDR carried all 11 states of the Old Confederacy all six times they ran, when Southern blacks had no vote. Disfranchised black folks did not seem to bother these greatest of liberal icons. As vice president, FDR chose âCactus Jackâ Garner of Texas who played a major role in imposing a poll tax to keep blacks from voting. Among FDRâs Supreme Court appointments was Hugo Black, a Klansman who claimed FDR knew this when he named him in 1937 and that FDR told him that âsome of his best friendsâ in Georgia were Klansmen. Blackâs great achievement as a lawyer was in winning acquittal of a man who shot to death the Catholic priest who had presided over his daughterâs marriage to a Puerto Rican. In 1941, FDR named South Carolina Sen. âJimmyâ Byrnes to the Supreme Court. Byrnes had led filibusters in 1935 and 1938 that killed anti-lynching bills, arguing that lynching was necessary âto hold in check the Negro in the South.â FDR refused to back the 1938 anti-lynching law. âThis is a white manâs country and will always remain a white manâs country,â said Jimmy. Harry Truman, who paid $10 to join the Klan, then quit, named Byrnes Secretary of State, putting him first in line of succession to the presidency, as Harry then had no V.P. During the civil rights struggles of the â50s and â60s, Gov. Orval Faubus used the National Guard to keep black students out of Little Rock High. Gov. Ross Barnett refused to let James Meredith into Ole Miss. Gov. George Wallace stood in the door at the University of Alabama, to block two black students from entering. All three governors were Democrats. All acted in accord with the âDixie Manifestoâ of 1956, which was signed by 19 senators, all Democrats, and 80 Democratic congressmen. Among the signers of the manifesto, which called for massive resistance to the Brown decision desegregating public schools, was the vice presidential nominee on Adlaiâs Stevensonâs ticket in 1952, Sen. John Sparkman of Alabama. Though crushed by Eisenhower, Adlai swept the Deep South, winning both Carolinas, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Arkansas. Do you suppose those Southerners thought Adlai would be tougher than Ike on Stalin? Or did they think Adlai would maintain the unholy alliance of Southern segregationists and Northern liberals that enabled Democrats to rule from 1932 to 1952? The Democratic Party was the party of slavery, secession and segregation, of âPitchfork Benâ Tillman and the KKK. âBullâ Connor, who turned the dogs loose on black demonstrators in Birmingham, was the Democratic National Committeeman from Alabama. And Nixon? In 1956, as vice president, Nixon went to Harlem to declare, âAmerica canât afford the cost of segregation.â The following year, Nixon got a personal letter from Dr. King thanking him for helping to persuade the Senate to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957. Nixon supported the civil rights acts of 1964, 1965 and 1968. In the 1966 campaign, as related in my new book âThe Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority,â out July 8, Nixon blasted Dixiecrats âseeking to squeeze the last ounces of political juice out of the rotting fruit of racial injustice.â Nixon called out segregationist candidates in â66 and called on LBJ, Hubert Humphrey and Bobby Kennedy to join him in repudiating them. None did. Hubert, an arm around Lester Maddox, called him a âgood Democrat.â And so were they all â good Democrats. While Adlai chose Sparkman, Nixon chose Spiro Agnew, the first governor south of the Mason Dixon Line to enact an open-housing law. In Nixonâs presidency, the civil rights enforcement budget rose 800 percent. Record numbers of blacks were appointed to federal office. An Office of Minority Business Enterprise was created. SBA loans to minorities soared 1,000 percent. Aid to black colleges doubled. Nixon won the South not because he agreed with them on civil rights â he never did â but because he shared the patriotic values of the South and its antipathy to liberal hypocrisy. When Johnson left office, 10 percent of Southern schools were desegregated. When Nixon left, the figure was 70 percent. Richard Nixon desegregated the Southern schools, something you wonât learn in todayâs public schools. For history is a pack of lies agreed upon.
So run away now. Donât come on here pretending you know history, when clearly you do not. You look like a complete and utter fool. Stick to cartoons and your fantasy world, because truth and facts are not something you know how to search for and it is obvious you donât want to know. Malcolm X was right thoughâŚ.If you are black and vote for a Democrat, you are a political chump. And if you try and claim I made that one up..hear it in his voice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkgA2rUAY-o&t=20s
Hot damn that got my juices flowing đđşđ¸đşđ¸đşđ¸
Bringing this back again.
Still
âdigging up bad things people did in the past is only okay when we do it!â-Neolibs
Please. Letâs not pretend that has been anything less than a strategy used by one party to make themselves look like the big damn heroes.
But if the goal here is really honest self-reflection:
@gop-tea-pub
Care to speak up on the shameful actions of Republicans in the past?
Why bother? Everyone else and their mother does it 24/7. The problem is that youâre not allowed to criticize the Dems without your life and reputation being at risk, which makes it that much more important to do so.
Just wanna add that this is the same patriot who went on national television and personally told Feinstein that he would not be registering his firearms. During an interview on CNN, he also made one of the greatest statements Iâve heard on gun control, and when his interviewer asked, âso if these gun control bills become law, youâll break it?â to which he replied,
âAn unconstitutional law is not a legitimate law.â
The left does not take it seriously when gun owners say that if it came to it, theyâd fight the government. Throughout the interview, the interviewer was very disrespectful, she smirks and even laughs at some of his statements. Check out the interview for yourself.
âVideo terminated.â Color me surprised.
Over 95% of the pipeline is completely safe itâs when assholeâs donât leave it alone or look for a way to destroy it then cause a environmental hazard problem. The rest is from dumbass people stopping safety first groupâs from maintaining the lines
30+ year nurse, I have fully supported all of the precautions with COVID-19. But this post really made me think,... I share it here for your consideration as well:
Thank you to whoever wrote this.
******
What is the end game with the ârona? Anyone? đŚ
What is the magic formula that is going to allow us to sound the âall clear?â Is it zero cases? For a while, the goal was to simply âflatten the curve,â but now that we are disconnecting utilities for gatherings in California, setting up check points in New York, and recommending goggles (whatâs next?), it seems as if there is, in fact, no end game. And, truthfully, the only way that we will see numbers drop is if we cease testing and stop reporting. Keep in mind that hundreds of thousands have shown up to be tested, registered, left due to long waits, and still come up positive when they received their results. đ¤ˇđźââď¸
Is it a vaccineđ? It took 25 years for a chicken pox vaccine to be developed. The smallpox inoculation was discovered in 1776 and the last known natural case was in 1977. We have a flu vaccine that is only 40 to 60% effective (thatâs generous- the last two years it was more like 20-25%), less than half of the US population chooses to get one, and roughly 20,000 Americans still die annually due to flu or flu complications.
Oh, you'll mandate it in order to attend school, travel to some foreign countries, etc.? We already have a growing number of vaccine researchers refusing proven, tested, well-known vaccines that have been administered for decades! Do you really believe the majority of people will flock to get a fast-tracked vaccine, whose long-term side effects and overall efficacy rates are anyone's best guess? How long are we going to cancel? Postpone? Reconsider?
Now we are advised against in-person school until second quarter? What if October's numbers are the same as August's? Then what?
Move football to spring? What if next March is worse than this March?
When do we decide quality of life outweighs risk?
We understand this virus can be deadly for SOME, but so are shellfish, peanut butter, and bee stings. We take risks every day without a second thought.
We know driving a car can be dangerous, but we don't leave it parked in the garage for months on end. We know the dangers of smoking, drinking, and eating fried foods, but we do it, none-the-less. We speed on highways, some idiots still don't buckle their seatbelts, we take medications more than âas directed,â and a good number of individuals don't think twice about unprotected sex.
Is hugging Grandma really more dangerous than rush hour on the freeway? Is going to a bar with friends more risky than four day old gas station sushi? Or operating a chainsaw?
When and how did we so quickly lose our free will?
I want a waiver that says, "I understand the risks, but I choose a life with hugs, smiles, college athletics, the state fair, concerts, and school dances."
I understand that there is a minuscule possibility I could die but, more probable, I will end up feeling like junk for a few days.
I understand I could possibly pass this virus onto someone else, but I can pass ANY virus onto someone else at any time until the end of time.
Are we busy living or busy dying?
Itâs hard to tell these days.
The Post Office Controversy is More About Bailing Out a Government Agency Than It Is About the Election
By Kevin Ryan There is nothing new about the reduction in public mailboxes. According to a 2009 Washington Post article, between 1985 to 2009, the number of the iconic blue mail collection boxes nationwide declined from 395,000 to 177,000. And in the years since, the number has declined another 20%, to 141,900 as of last year. For decades, the Post Office has been slowly shifting away from letter collection, which has seen a 30% decline in demand over the last decade due to the rise of email, text messaging, and competition. Nevertheless, the issue has been politicized in recent days by media and politicians claiming itâs a threat to the upcoming November election, and demanding the congress allocate billions to prevent disaster. The reality, however, is that the public is being goaded into picking sides in a political battle over funding the Post Office. As Rahm Emmanuel once said, âNever let a good crisis go to waste.â And the coronavirus pandemic has provided just such an opportunity. Here are the facts. ⢠THE USPS IS AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY. In 1971, the Post Office was reformed to remove it from the direct control of the president. It has a Board of Governors that, although appointed by the president, is bipartisan. The Board appoints the Postmaster General, who reports to it. However, most of its employees are unionized, and the unions are heavily Democratic. Its more than 600,000 people are organized by seven different unions. The largest postal worker union, The National Association of Letter Carriers, which consists of 300,000 workers, just last week endorsed Joe Biden. ⢠THE POST OFFICE HAS MORE THAN ENOUGH RESOURCES TO HANDLE MAIL-IN BALLOTS. Every year during the week before Christmas, the Post Office processes and delivers 2.5 billion pieces of first-class mail. Thatâs about 500 million cards and letters a day (not to mention packages), or about four times more in one day than the entire number of ballots (in-person included) cast in the 2016 election. âFrom a sheer numbers perspective, none of the experts I spoke with doubted that the Postal Service could handle a vote-by-mail election, even if every one of the nationâs more than 150 million registered voters stuck their ballot in a mailbox,â Russell Berman writes in The Atlantic. âAs one noted to me, a presidential election might be a big deal, but in postal terms, itâs no Christmas.â ⢠IT DOES NOT OPERATE ON TAXPAYER MONEY. The Postal Service receives no tax dollars for operating expenses, and relies on the sale of postage, products and services to fund its operations. USPS may request an appropriation for âpublic service costsâ for up to $460 million annually. However, it has not requested or received this reimbursement since 1982. ⢠THE PROBLEMS AT THE USPS ARE NOT DUE TO A LACK OF GOVERNMENT FUNDING, BUT INSTEAD TO STRUCTURAL ISSUES EXACERBATED BY POLITICAL MANDATES. The aforementioned public shift away from first class mail has hurt revenues at the Post Office, but an increase in parcel delivery has helped offset it. But while private sector companies have been able to adjust and remained profitable, the Post Office has been stymied by ill-advised political mandates. The USPSâs price increases on letters and junk mail, for example, are capped at the rate of inflation, meaning it cannot adjust its prices as effectively as its private sector competition. Also, the Postal Service has billions in assets for retiree health care, but itâs barred from investing them except in U.S. Treasurys. And a 2006 law compels the USPS to pay in advance for the health and retirement benefits of all of its employees, which has cost an estimated $55 billion over the next 10 years. The USPS unions with their 600,000 workers have repeatedly pushed congress to stop most attempts at reform. In 2013 it quashing an attempt to save $2 billion a year by stopping Saturday delivery for regular mail, but not packages. And Congress nearly always refuses to allow closure of even the least active branches for fear of angering constituents. All of the above has led the agency to slide closer and closer toward insolvency with every passing year. In FY2019, the USPS reported an annual net loss of $8.8 billion, its 13th straight multi-billion dollar loss, and more than double the $3.9 billion loss in fiscal 2018. $3.5 billion of the loss came from an increase in workers compensation expenses. The USPS projects losses will continue âat accelerating rate.â However, the USPS has enough liquidity to operate through the election and into next year, meaning itâs not the upcoming election that requires more funding, as politicians would have you believe. Instead, politicians are attempting to lure the public into an existing political debate over whether the USPS should remain self-sufficient via badly needed structural reforms to address the above-mentioned issues, or whether it should essentially become another bailed out government program that relies on taxpayer funds. And so far, the politicizing has worked. White House negotiators offered $10 billion for the Postal Service as part of their recent talks with Pelosi and Schumer over another COVID relief bill. Democrats want $25 billion in taxpayer funds, and Nancy Pelosi has called the House back into session to negotiate it. Private sector shipping competitors, meanwhile, faced the same technological headwinds. But instead of just racking up losses, companies like UPS and FedEx have innovated, cut costs, and became more efficient⌠and managed to stay profitable, all while routinely outperforming the USPS. SOURCES: https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/financials/10k-reports/fy2019.pdf http://about.usps.com/who-we-are/financials/10k-reports/fy2018.pdf http://about.usps.com/who-we-are/financials/10k-reports/fy2013.pdf http://about.usps.com/who-we-are/financials/10k-reports/fy2010.pdf http://about.usps.com/who-we-are/financials/10k-reports/fy2007.pdf https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/FDX/fedex/net-income https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/UPS/ups/net-income https://multichannelmerchant.com/operations/usps-net-loss-doubles-2019-package-volume-slightly/ https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-postal-service-and-the-2020-election-what-you-need-to-know-11597619119 https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-post-offices-problem-isnt-trump-11597360885 https://thehill.com/homenews/house/512320-democrats-plan-saturday-vote-to-prop-up-postal-service https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/n7wk9z/the-post-office-is-deactivating-mail-sorting-machines-ahead-of-the-election http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/07/24/ST2009072403875.html https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/the-case-of-the-disappearing-mailboxes-14907467/ https://facts.usps.com/table-facts/ https://apnews.com/5d02ef9cbbeddb977200eb20d9acc019 https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/512128-union-representing-postal-union-endorses-biden-citing-threats-to-usps https://www.businessinsider.com/us-postal-service-delay-funding-crisis-mail-election-trump-explainer-2020-8 https://money.yahoo.com/usps-handles-500-million-letters-132504195.html https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/08/how-postal-service-preparing-election/615271 https://medium.com/@nharpermn/stop-panicking-about-the-post-office-8bcd689b9601 https://about.usps.com/newsroom/national-releases/2019/1114-usps-reports-fiscal-year-2019-results.htm https://www.uspsoig.gov/sites/default/files/document-library-files/2019/RISC-WP-20-001.pdf
âI cannot tell you that Hitler took Austria by tanks and guns; it would distort history.
If you remember the plot of the Sound of Music, the Von Trapp family escaped over the Alps rather than submit to the Nazis. Kitty wasnât so lucky. Her family chose to stay in her native Austria. She was 10 years old, but bright and aware. And she was watching.
âWe elected him by a landslide â 98 percent of the vote,â she recalls.
She wasnât old enough to vote in 1938 â approaching her 11th birthday. But she remembers.
âEveryone thinks that Hitler just rolled in with his tanks and took Austria by force.â
No so.
Hitler is welcomed to Austria
âIn 1938, Austria was in deep Depression. Nearly one-third of our workforce was unemployed. We had 25 percent inflation and 25 percent bank loan interest rates.
Farmers and business people were declaring bankruptcy daily. Young people were going from house to house begging for food. Not that they didnât want to work; there simply werenât any jobs.
âMy mother was a Christian woman and believed in helping people in need. Every day we cooked a big kettle of soup and baked bread to feed those poor, hungry people â about 30 daily.â
âWe looked to our neighbor on the north, Germany, where Hitler had been in power since 1933.â she recalls. âWe had been told that they didnât have unemployment or crime, and they had a high standard of living.
âNothing was ever said about persecution of any group â Jewish or otherwise. We were led to believe that everyone in Germany was happy. We wanted the same way of life in Austria. We were promised that a vote for Hitler would mean the end of unemployment and help for the family. Hitler also said that businesses would be assisted, and farmers would get their farms back.
âNinety-eight percent of the population voted to annex Austria to Germany and have Hitler for our ruler.
âWe were overjoyed,â remembers Kitty, âand for three days we danced in the streets and had candlelight parades. The new government opened up big field kitchens and everyone was fed.
âAfter the election, German officials were appointed, and, like a miracle, we suddenly had law and order. Three or four weeks later, everyone was employed. The government made sure that a lot of work was created through the Public Work Service.
âHitler decided we should have equal rights for women. Before this, it was a custom that married Austrian women did not work outside the home. An able-bodied husband would be looked down on if he couldnât support his family. Many women in the teaching profession were elated that they could retain the jobs they previously had been required to give up for marriage.
âThen we lost religious education for kids
âOur education was nationalized. I attended a very good public school.. The population was predominantly Catholic, so we had religion in our schools. The day we elected Hitler (March 13, 1938), I walked into my schoolroom to find the crucifix replaced by Hitlerâs picture hanging next to a Nazi flag. Our teacher, a very devout woman, stood up and told the class we wouldnât pray or have religion anymore. Instead, we sang âDeutschland, Deutschland, Uber Alles,â and had physical education.
âSunday became National Youth Day with compulsory attendance. Parents were not pleased about the sudden change in curriculum. They were told that if they did not send us, they would receive a stiff letter of warning the first time. The second time they would be fined the equivalent of $300, and the third time they would be subject to jail.â
And then things got worse.
âThe first two hours consisted of political indoctrination. The rest of the day we had sports. As time went along, we loved it. Oh, we had so much fun and got our sports equipment free.
âWe would go home and gleefully tell our parents about the wonderful time we had.
âMy mother was very unhappy,â remembers Kitty. âWhen the next term started, she took me out of public school and put me in a convent. I told her she couldnât do that and she told me that someday when I grew up, I would be grateful. There was a very good curriculum, but hardly any fun â no sports, and no political indoctrination.
âI hated it at first but felt I could tolerate it. Every once in a while, on holidays, I went home. I would go back to my old friends and ask what was going on and what they were doing.
âTheir loose lifestyle was very alarming to me. They lived without religion. By that time, unwed mothers were glorified for having a baby for Hitler.
âIt seemed strange to me that our society changed so suddenly. As time went along, I realized what a great deed my mother did so that I wasnât exposed to that kind of humanistic philosophy.
âIn 1939, the war started, and a food bank was established. All food was rationed and could only be purchased using food stamps. At the same time, a full-employment law was passed which meant if you didnât work, you didnât get a ration card, and, if you didnât have a card, you starved to death.
âWomen who stayed home to raise their families didnât have any marketable skills and often had to take jobs more suited for men.
âSoon after this, the draft was implemented.
âIt was compulsory for young people, male and female, to give one year to the labor corps,â remembers Kitty. âDuring the day, the girls worked on the farms, and at night they returned to their barracks for military training just like the boys.
âThey were trained to be anti-aircraft gunners and participated in the signal corps. After the labor corps, they were not discharged but were used in the front lines.
âWhen I go back to Austria to visit my family and friends, most of these women are emotional cripples because they just were not equipped to handle the horrors of combat.
âThree months before I turned 18, I was severely injured in an air raid attack. I nearly had a leg amputated, so I was spared having to go into the labor corps and into military service.
âWhen the mothers had to go out into the work force, the government immediately established child care centers.
âYou could take your children ages four weeks old to school age and leave them there around-the-clock, seven days a week, under the total care of the government.
âThe state raised a whole generation of children. There were no motherly women to take care of the children, just people highly trained in child psychology. By this time, no one talked about equal rights. We knew we had been had.
âBefore Hitler, we had very good medical care. Many American doctors trained at the University of Vienna..
âAfter Hitler, health care was socialized, free for everyone. Doctors were salaried by the government. The problem was, since it was free, the people were going to the doctors for everything.
âWhen the good doctor arrived at his office at 8 a.m., 40 people were already waiting and, at the same time, the hospitals were full.
âIf you needed elective surgery, you had to wait a year or two for your turn. There was no money for research as it was poured into socialized medicine. Research at the medical schools literally stopped, so the best doctors left Austria and emigrated to other countries.
âAs for healthcare, our tax rates went up to 80 percent of our income. Newlyweds immediately received a $1,000 loan from the government to establish a household. We had big programs for families.
âAll day care and education were free. High schools were taken over by the government and college tuition was subsidized. Everyone was entitled to free handouts, such as food stamps, clothing, and housing.
âWe had another agency designed to monitor business. My brother-in-law owned a restaurant that had square tables.
âGovernment officials told him he had to replace them with round tables because people might bump themselves on the corners. Then they said he had to have additional bathroom facilities. It was just a small dairy business with a snack bar. He couldnât meet all the demands.
âSoon, he went out of business. If the government owned the large businesses and not many small ones existed, it could be in control.
âWe had consumer protection, too
âWe were told how to shop and what to buy. Free enterprise was essentially abolished. We had a planning agency specially designed for farmers. The agents would go to the farms, count the livestock, and then tell the farmers what to produce, and how to produce it.
âIn 1944, I was a student teacher in a small village in the Alps. The villagers were surrounded by mountain passes which, in the winter, were closed off with snow, causing people to be isolated.
âSo people intermarried and offspring were sometimes retarded. When I arrived, I was told there were 15 mentally retarded adults, but they were all useful and did good manual work.
âI knew one, named Vincent, very well. He was a janitor of the school. One day I looked out the window and saw Vincent and others getting into a van.
âI asked my superior where they were going. She said to an institution where the State Health Department would teach them a trade, and to read and write. The families were required to sign papers with a little clause that they could not visit for 6 months.
âThey were told visits would interfere with the program and might cause homesickness.
âAs time passed, letters started to dribble back saying these people died a natural, merciful death. The villagers were not fooled. We suspected what was happening. Those people left in excellent physical health and all died within 6 months. We called this euthanasia.
âNext came gun registration. People were getting injured by guns. Hitler said that the real way to catch criminals (we still had a few) was by matching serial numbers on guns. Most citizens were law-abiding and dutifully marched to the police station to register their firearms. Not long afterwards, the police said that it was best for everyone to turn in their guns. The authorities already knew who had them, so it was futile not to comply voluntarily.
âNo more freedom of speech. Anyone who said something against the government was taken away. We knew many people who were arrested, not only Jews, but also priests and ministers who spoke up.
âTotalitarianism didnât come quickly, it took 5 years from 1938 until 1943, to realize full dictatorship in Austria. Had it happened overnight, my countrymen would have fought to the last breath. Instead, we had creeping gradualism. Now, our only weapons were broom handles. The whole idea sounds almost unbelievable that the state, little by little eroded our freedom.â
âThis is my eyewitness account.
âItâs true. Those of us who sailed past the Statue of Liberty came to a country of unbelievable freedom and opportunity.
âAmerica is truly is the greatest country in the world. âDonât let freedom slip away.
âAfter America, there is no place to go.â
Kitty Werthmann
***Re-read the part where she says âeverything was freeâ - healthcare and so on. Very much worth reading twice.****