#Me booping every blog I see on my dash
d e v o n
almost home
RMH

#extradirty

Andulka
Cosimo Galluzzi
dirt enthusiast
Sade Olutola

Origami Around

No title available
Not today Justin
h
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Mike Driver
$LAYYYTER
KIROKAZE
occasionally subtle
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

@theartofmadeline
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Austria

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from South Africa
@handsofham
#Me booping every blog I see on my dash
if you boop someone enough times you can deactivate their blog
no this is called lying
Instead of making up shitty racist headcanons about Miles shoplifting join me in headcanoning him picking up ballet because he thought Gwen being a ballerina was super neat and it would help him in his spiderman job
Spider strength he can’t control + Lifts = Hilarity
Miles, muttering to himself: do not yeet the ballerina. do NOT yeet the ballerina
Jumps. JUMPS.
Miles frantically googling “How high can normal people jump??? How high can ballerinas jump?????? I don’t think I’m supposed to be able to jump straight up to the ceiling and also I keep getting stuck up there please help”
Once Mile’s spider sense pinged lightly about a balcony set and he told the crew master he had a bad feeling about it. The balcony collapsed later. No one was hurt, but now Miles has to go over sets and pronounce them clear of ‘bad feelings’
He’s not even good enough to be in shows yet, but nothing goes out without his seal of approval
honestly I have known so many stage managers and props department people who are Exactly This Superstitious. (And hell, in this case they’re not even wrong he literally has magic danger powers)
I’ve also known a few dancers, and without exception the reaction to finding out this boy can effortlessly hold them in a single arm lift or YEET them dozens of feet in the air (And catch them after!) would be PURE GLEE.
“Okay, Glynda, look, we all know he’s Spiderman. Kid’s terrible at hiding it. But imagine this. None of us tell him we know and none of us tell him how high ballerinas can really throw their partners. And each class we just keep on pretending like we’re impressed with how fast he’s improving but, y'know, he’s still got further to go.”
“Uhuh, yeah, I see that look in your eyes Glynda. You know exactly where I’m going with this. How high do you think Spiderman can throw you?”
“Okay, Glynda, stop giggling, the giggling is creepy. Dessie, please make her stop giggling.”
This is wonderful
Spider-Man gets captured and it looks like he can’t engineer his own escape but then a bunch of ballerinas just show up, kick arse, and disappear without explanation.
The next session they talk loudly in front of him about how lucky it was they all HAPPENED to be in the area when Spider-Man was in trouble and how it’s a pity they couldn’t get to know him and nobody knows anything about him but it’s all in the past now, anyway, let’s start practice.
I love everything about this.
“Spider-Man adopted by a flock of ballerinas” is my new favorite headcanon.
so i’ve seen this around a lot and i always felt like the version i listened to just. didn’t have everything? sO! i edited together my three favourite versions of the tik tok sea shanty! enjoy!!
(listen with headphones if possible!)
(yes i know the ending is bad oKaY-)
i have the most aggressive goosebumps rn
The Need to Stay
(Thought I’d upload my recent comics to Tumblr! I totally forgot it only lets you upload 10 pics at a time, and this is 11, but fingers crossed it works!)
This is astonishingly beautiful. Speaking as one who loves to go. And loves to come home.
I laughed way too hard at this
in case anyone is looking through the notes trying to find the original artist it’s will mcphail !! feel free to check out his site but also here are some other things he made too !!
OOOHHH CLICK ON THAT LINK THIS GUY IS FUCKING GREAT
HOLY SHIT
this guy GETS IT
Vampire NPC was described as gliding rather than walking while bringing over wine and I joked he had heelies under his cloak. Some people can make amazing art of their campaign or characters. I can shitpost.
Everyone who’s been talking to me knows i’ve been working on this comic about wlws and cats for a while and i’m so so happy it’s finally here!!! :D
idea stolen from this post :’3
Girl’s Costume Warehouse (X)
ITS BACK
and frog
every few months I show this to someone new.
Ah yes, time to bring this back for the season. Here y'all go again.
Happy 2019, Girls’s Costume Warehouse.
Sexy 1900s Steel Conglomerate Tycoon is my kind of look tbh
could i offer you some round bears in these trying times?
There’s a lot of accidental anti-semitism in the world , but sometimes I come across the deliberate and malicious anti-semitism im DND and I’m just reminded that no matter how much I love this game it does not love me back and the original creators never wanted me to play it.
Today’s example is: Phylactery
In d&d:
In real life
That’s right. they named the evil artifact that the evil undead spellcaster hides their soul in after a Jewish ceremonial object.
Actually I want to add something because the genius of this particular kind of anti-semitism is that most gentiles won’t know what a Phylactery really is, The only people who will notice are the Jewish players. Making them instantly feel isolated, alone, and unsafe in their d&d group.
when you come across that you should at the table paralyzed wondering
Do my fellow players know this is anti-Semitic?
If they don’t know and I bring it up will they be mad at me for ruining the fun?
If they do know and I bring it up will revealing myself as Jewish be dangerous?
It’s a tactic to deliberately push Jewish people out of the game. and nobody jump up to tell me it was an accident because it fucking wasn’t. Before d&d Phylactery only had one definitionand I find it impossible that they would know the word without knowing the meaning. Or at least knowing it was Jewish.
Holy shit can this post fucking disappear from my dash please!
Attention goyim: Jews don’t use the word phylactery. That’s stupid and greek. They’re called Teffilin.
I don’t know why articles everywhere say that this is what The Jews™ call their Weird Little Prayer Boxes, but we don’t say that, and it’s not even a super common aspect of prayer (at least where i’m from) and i wish y'all wouldn’t pretend to be offended at this. No jew calls Teffilin phylactery, when i first saw this post i even tried finding out if anyone i knew said phylactery, and they all looked at me like i was a dumbass. We don’t need your fake outrage, and I SEE YOU FUCKIN GOYS IN THE NOTES PRETENDING TO BE JEWISH AND FEEL ALIENATED! GROSS! This is a non issue, dispel it from your mind and stop spreading this horseshit!
I was going to let this slide as someone making an honest mistake, and that you can never be too cautious around antisemitism, but then I find out that OP lied about being Jewish for this post and frankly that’s just pathetic to the point of hilarity.
(Image sources: https://projects.mcah.columbia.edu/treasuresofheaven/)
Also op’s insistence that “before d&d Phylactery only had one definition” is just an outright falsehood. A phylactery is a fancier word for a reliquary, which is an ornate sealed container that holds a fragment of the mortal remains of a Catholic saint, usually a bone.
Gee, what magic item could that have inspired in D&D? Hm?
(Gentile followers, feel free to reblog this not just for the educational aspect, but also for the unexpected faint echo of tumblr bone stealing witch drama)
God I was seeing this post for days and I knew it couldn’t be quite right. I was already sure “phylactery” was just a more archaic way of saying “amulet” but I thought maybe I was just a big dummy because I’m not Jewish, OP was so sure of themselves and anybody questioning them was just getting EVISCERATED. Now that the notes are like 200 real Jewish people saying “excuse me, what the FUCK???” It feels safe for me to point out, as others have already, that whatever the hell OP intended, it’s the kind of misinformation actual antisemitic groups love to perpetuate and use as evidence in their Jewish SJW conspiracy theories.
ok so AOC’s tips for consuming news critically are???? phenomenal??? they’re better than my entire undergraduate education in political communication. it took my entire career up until this point in news media to learn this stuff. she is SPOT on.
to expand on a few of her points:
1) If you like a piece of reporting someone has done, follow the JOURNALIST, not the outlet. Digital news organizations come and go, traditional news lays people off, and freelancers don’t always work for the same place, but someone who really puts in the work that you come to trust their reporting is valuable. You have no idea what it means to be able to say “you know, I don’t know if I believe what all these news outlets are saying on this, but I know X reporter does a lot of work on this and I trust their work on it.”
2) In that same vein, you should trust public radio and print outlets more than TV (or YouTubers - both TV and YouTubers are looking for views and ad money). Seriously, I work in TV, and this is NOT a knock on TV producers at all, it’s just that TV has to work on a 24/7 news cycle, and sometimes they get stuff wrong because they have to do it quickly, or on a certain production schedule, or it has to be visual, or it has to get viewers. It is often the written/print reporters translating their scripts into published articles online who are doing the fact checking, if any. This isn’t to say all print and public radio is gospel (it sure as shit isn’t), but it’s a good place to start.
3) Most people can’t afford a news subscription, however if you can afford Spotify or Netflix, you should subscribe to your local newspaper or public radio station. What AOC doesn’t mention here about newspapers specifically, is that you need to REALLY check if that newspaper has a) been gobbled up by a hedge fund b) has some sort of weird conservative slant. Do some research first. Also, if you can’t afford a local newspaper subscription, 99.99% of the time your library card includes subscriptions to some sort of news service, that will get you behind many paywalls. Check your library system’s digital services for what news services they offer and how to log in.
4) Just think before you share. Before you reblog or retweet something, do a quick Google. Especially when someone is like “the news isn’t talking about this!” when there probably are articles about it, maybe even with further information. It really helps to look.
All of this, cosigned by a newspaper reporter. I am impressed by how clear and nuanced AOC is on this issue. I wouldn’t be surprised if she’s discussed this with reporters before, it has the ring of an insider’s perspective.
I would like to add/expand with:
1. Find out who owns your local newspaper in the city or county where you live. It’s on their masthead. There *are* independent publications still out there. While conglomerate ownership doesn’t automatically mean that a publication is bad - they’re the ones with the resources to dedicate to larger projects, after all - there are absolutely more complications that can be going on behind the scenes. I’ve seen wonderful independent papers turn to trash after a corporate buyout, because they cut their staff, chased off the good reporters, and inserted a corporate atmosphere where it didn’t belong. Also, larger papers aren’t automatically better than smaller ones.
2. Go regional or local as opposed to national news, whenever possible. Local reporters have their boots on the ground long-term and know their own communities. National media outlets are in and out in a short period of time, and they often miss nuance and detail. Local reporters have ins with the people they know, relationships built over time, that often give access to information CNN and etc don’t get.
3. Newspaper editorial pages are a forgotten art. Newspapers have an “editorial voice” of opinion editorials, often written by the editor in chief but occasionally written by an editorial board. Letters to the editor are from anybody and they don’t necessarily represent a publication’s views. The editorial voice -does-. That’s what you want to look at when determining what a newspaper stands for.
4. You can talk to reporters!!!!! Please talk to reporters!!!! We are not shadowy figures, we are people. Usually with very visible contact information. If you see a story that is unbalanced or incorrect, please pick up the phone or send an email to the reporter explaining what’s wrong. We want to know. No self-respecting reporter wants their byline on wrong information. Chances are good they will be happy to run a correction, or even want to do a follow up story to better explain or clarify the issue. Sometimes breaking news is chasing a moving target. That’s just the way life and deadline driven reporting works. We have to keep pushing, keep listening, keep asking. Don’t think you can’t influence that! You absolutely can.
on point 4 - you can find reporters contact info a few ways
a) click their byline (name) at the top of the article and it should go to some sort of author page. it should list their email or have an email button.
b) look for a masthead page. this could be in the “about” “meet the team” sort of sections of the website, those will also have links to author pages or contact info
c) look for the journalists on twitter. some are not very active on twitter but do list their emails in their bio.
on point 2 - this also means that if there’s something going on in your community that you want the news to cover, don’t just @ a news outlet on social media, send a direct tip to a LOCAL reporter. national news outlets monitor local feeds, and local reporters aren’t the ones monitoring the social media accounts anyway. even if you can’t find their email, direct @ ing the reporter on twitter or instagram will go very far (check which platform the reporter uses most, it’s usually twitter).
on correcting a mistake - if you see a headline or part of an article that is wrong, misleading or, yes even bigoted in some way, you can do something about it. again, direct contact with the person who wrote it helps, but you can also look on twitter and the masthead that i mentioned before if you find it on the website to find who the editor might have been. this depends on how big the paper/magazine/digital pub is, and what section it was in, so it might take some guessing. if you find who it probably was on the masthead, you can include their email when you email the reporter, especially if it involves a headline, which reporters often don’t write themselves. if you have to look on twitter, you can search twitter for the @ handle of the publication and then go to the “people” tab of the search and check people’s bios to see who MIGHT be the editor who worked on this, and either email or @ them too.
also, if you’re emailing about something like, let’s say misgendering a trans person, or misleading language about a police shooting, it’s helpful to have backup. include links to things like the AP Style Guide (like how they recently updated to make it clear you should never say “officer involved shooting”, and you should capitalize Black), or the Trans Journalists’ Association style guide. If you’re trying to get them to cover a story you’ve seen on social media, include links to those posts. include links to other news outlets who have covered something to show this is important or to prove that other news outlets already made the correction you are asking for, or got it correctly the first time.
*** oh and one last thing i forgot to mention! stop sharing screenshots of articles! if the article reported on something valuable share the link! you can share a screenshot with the link, but these days, clicks mean everything and reporters are screwed over when a post of a screenshot of their article goes viral but not the article itself. especially if its about a less visible issue, lots of clicks will tell the editors this is something they should allow their reporters to pursue more often. the only time you should share a screenshot rather than the article is when they are like a terrible outlet like f*x news that does not deserve your clicks but you’re holding them accountable, or its some awful opinion column you’re commenting on that you dont want to give any clicks. if you’re sharing an article on instagram, share a screenshot and pop that link in your bio/link tree at least! people worked hard to report on that!
I love that a person who dresses like this still listens to their mom.
"I am death and sorrow, and I love my mom."
aesthetics and kindness levels are unrelated
That’s seriously like most goths I’ve ever known in real life.
Yup. There’s a vast difference between adaptations that make thoughtful deliberate changes with regards to the new medium, current audiences and that present an interpretation of the original work where it’s obvious that it’s born out of an affection/ genuine interest in the original work and “adaptations” that take the name and changes it to the point it’s unrecognisable and, in fact oftent run directly counter to the core philosophy, ideas and themes of the original work, where you are left wondering if the “adapters” even read/watched the original and you certainly can’t see any critical engagement with or affection for it remaining in the new work.
I actually take great joy in the first category and look forward to seeing how and where they’ve changed things. I also really enjoy thinking about the changes made, and speculating on what the thoughts behind them were. And seeing which bits I prefer from each.
The second category on the other hand feels like an incredibly cheap and cynical short-sighted attempt to cash in on existing fan bases without any actual affection for the material that drew them to it in the first place. It’s almost guaranteed to disappoint that group no matter if the rest is skillfully done because it breaks the expectations promised by the name.
This is PARTICULARLY true of IPs like Discworld that grapple with philosophy and comment deeply on ethics and injustice and the nature of humanity (good and bad), and where the fanbase is very engaged with the source material and its philosophy.
Basically if you want to do the second just admit you wrote your own thing and don’t pretend that it’s an adaptation.
also like hard shoutout to the guy who rolled up to not only pratchett’s daughter but a writer who has, herself, worked on multiple different mediums in the same franchise, just going like “yeah i know you had a comment on how you feel the adaptation of your father’s work changed it significantly but…. have you considered………. books and tv are different things?”
The problem with a lot of these adaptations is that the people doing them think “this would be more marketable to a larger audience if it weren’t so weird,” and they get rid of a lot of the idiosyncrasies in an effort to make something with a broad appeal to non-fans.
The thing is, that larger audience doesn’t know what a Discworld is, and probably doesn’t care enough to look it up. If, on the other hand, they have friends who know about Discworld, they’ll hear about it from word of mouth.
Let’s look at me as an example. I know a little bit about Discworld because I’m, y’know, on Tumblr, you pick things up by osmosis. I am the exact sort of person who would ask a friend, “Hey, you read Discworld – you heard anything about this Watch show?” And if the production had shown reasonable respect for the source material, my Discworld friend would be excited to tell me about it.
As it stands, I don’t even need to ask, because my Discworld friends have been SCREAMING IN RAGE – which means me, and probably most of the other nerds who only know a little bit about Discworld, have now decided it’s not worth the time.
(By contrast, I knew even less about Good Omens before they made the miniseries, but word of mouth persuaded me to watch it, and you all know what happened then.)
i had tried a dozen times to read good omens over the years and never could get further than a couple chapters, it just did nothing for me. but the show literally changed my life. it changed how i interact with the world on a fundamental level! and i only watched the show BECAUSE of the explosion of enthusiasm from book fans.
i wish producers would wrap their fucking heads around this.
reblogging my commentary commentary from my main blog bc it’s relevant here, too.
Watch the whole thing