(via 53nv61kjasi51.jpg (1125Ă1138))
đ
RMH

ellievsbear
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
art blog(derogatory)
EXPECTATIONS

bliss lane
d e v o n
untitled
Fai_Ryy

Game Changer & Make Some Noise

if i look back, i am lost

@theartofmadeline

titsay
đ©” avery cochrane đ©”
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
hello vonnie
cherry valley forever
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
tumblr dot com
seen from Austria
seen from Germany

seen from Russia

seen from Colombia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Hungary
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Oman
seen from Argentina

seen from China

seen from China
@ididntjustwakeupwithacraving
(via 53nv61kjasi51.jpg (1125Ă1138))
So Kenosha police handed the shooter who killed the protester water and told him that they appreciated him being out there.
They handed him water and thanked him prior to killing 2 protesters.
They handed a accelerationist water and thanked the fascist militia that showed up, essentially deputized them, and offered him water while protesters got tear gas.
Letâs not defund the police. Letâs fucking abolish the police.
A man was defending the local businesses with his fire arm. First guy he shot was in the act of looting second was one of many that tried to jump him because ya know someone not letting you destroy your city is a threat to you and yeah the man was defending himself and his community rightfully so
You are a fucking liar.
First off, the killer wasnât a man. He was 17 years old. And it wasnât his community. He traveled across state from Illinois. Now I doubt any fucking âshop ownerâ(more on that later) would hire a 17 year old kid from out of state to defend a shop unless that shop owner wants to explain why he is using armed militias with a 17 year old from Illinois this breaking the law.
He was just charged with first degree murder btw.
Second there is a video showing that he purposely walked through a group of protesters and killed one with a headshot. There was no looting. He intentionally did this. And then ran away as protesters tried to stop him and he shot two more protesters and killed one of them.
He 17.
Why do you fucking Fascist lie?
Be evil and own that shit. You are a Fascist. You hate black people. You like licking boots. You gave up any hope of suggesting otherwise. You are a Fascist.
Do ppl know about trump actively trying to buy the company thatâs currently working on a covid vaccine and wanting to keep it to American use only or is this a Germany only headline
A source
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8114015/Donald-Trump-tries-pay-German-company-creating-experimental-coronavirus-vaccine-US.html
German officials are trying to stop the US from enticing German company CureVac to move its research to the US, insisting no country should
It gets wierder and more troubling too. Apparently the CEO that met with trump has abruptly stepped down. The company is now being run by one of its founders. Wtf is going on here?
https://www.curevac.com/news/company-founder-ingmar-hoerr-succeeds-daniel-menichella-as-ceo-of-curevac-ag
Daniel Menichella started the month as CureVac CEO, one of the privileged few to discuss the coronavirus response with the U.S. president an
https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/was-it-something-he-said-biotech-ceo-who-met-president-trump-month-exits-without-a-word
have not seen it in america but that IS pretty fuckin horrifying so like hey what the fuck
You really need to see this in the US because everyone else on the fucking planet has been seeing this for nearly a week and we are PISSED
Your government, in the middle of a global fucking pandemic, literally tried to buy the vaccine under development for said pandemic exclusively for the US.
This isnât just a daily fail bullshit squawk, this has been confirmed by multiple sources, INCLUDING THE GODDAMN GERMAN GOVERNMENT. âCAPITALISM HAS LIMITSâ and you have crossed a fucking line.Â
Yeah I donât say this much but Iâm pissed, I got this headline from NYT a couple of days ago and itâs making me more sick than corona ever will
Iâm honesty not surprised at this point
Why it hurts to see Elizabeth Warren go.
Dudes, men, gentlemen, boys, brosâŠ
I need to talk about why a lot of women have the feels about Elizabeth Warren and the primaries.
If youâre already poised over your keyboard, ready to respond and explain things to me, stop. Shut up. Listen. JUST. LISTEN.
Weâve all known from the start that Warren, like any candidate, could lose. Itâs simple math â only one person is getting the nomination. We knew this. And we knew it would be an uphill battle under the best of circumstances because being a rich white man is still considered the default qualification for POTUS, and anyone deviating from that has to do extra work to prove the country is ready for them or that they can do the job.
The fact that things have played out the way they have are frustrating in ways previous elections havenât been, though, and itâs not because our preferred candidate didnât make it on to the ballot. I mean, yes, thereâs that part, but thereâs more to it. A large part of it is because we watched Warren jump through the same bullshit hoops weâve all had to jump through in our daily lives, and while we had hope she might prevail anyway, the glass ceiling held.
Iâm sure Sanders voters can relate to the deck being stacked against their candidate. Iâm certainly not saying Warren voters are alone in their disappointment and emotions over how this race has been run. I am just, for this post, focusing on why women who supported Warren feel the way they do right now.
From the start, Warren was scrutinized for her electability. Her likability. Before we could even talk about her qualifications or her plans or her platforms, we had to discuss if she was LIKABLE enough, and that never stopped. A lackluster debate performance meant she wasnât aggressive enough. A stellar debate performance meant she was too aggressive, too loud, too shrill. She ripped out Bloombergâs still-beating heart and showed it to him, and we were back to talking about if she was âlikableâ or âtoo forceful.â
This happens with any female candidate, but for a few shining weeks, we had hope that Warren would transcend it. That the woman who inspired ânevertheless, she persistedâ would rise despite people wringing their hands over if she was likeable, something we never discuss about male candidates.
Through it all, even when the numbers looked great, she was blatantly erased from coverage. News outlets posted graphs of the leading candidates, and just⊠left her off while including those who were trailing her. Analyses of debates, campaigns, etc., simply didnât mention her at all. She was a strong contender, but she was ignored and erased for no reason, and if that isnât something that a lot of women can relate to, I donât know what is. The feeling of being a viable candidate for a task, a job, a committee, whatever, only to be written off from the start because of girl cooties, or of having to work twice as hard to be taken half as seriously as male counterparts, is an all too familiar frustration for a lot of women.
Nevertheless, she persisted, and we had hope that Warren could have a strong finish despite concerted efforts to pretend she wasnât even there.
Unfortunately, questions about her âelectabilityâ became a self-fulfilling prophecy. After months of being told she couldnât win, she didnât⊠and Iâve lost count of the number of people Iâve seen comment that âWarren was my preferred candidate, but I didnât think she could win, so I voted for X.â She could have won⊠if weâd voted for her. She was electable⊠if weâd elected her. Â
When she was winning, she was taking votes away from more viable candidates. When she was losing, she needed to get out of the way. That dichotomy never seems to apply to male candidates, and it strikes a particularly bitter chord for women who have, all their lives, had their achievements and failures filtered through men. Boys donât like girls who are smarter than them. If you beat him at something, heâll feel emasculated. If you arenât better than every boy on the team, then you donât belong there, but if you are better, then youâre making them all feel bad for being bested by a girl. The important thing is not what we do and how we do it, but how it reflects on the men around us or their masculinity.
In the end, if all things had been equal, Warren still might have lost. Maybe the majority of voters wouldnât have been onboard with her plans and platforms. Maybe they would have preferred another candidate. Thatâs how elections go, and we can all live with that. Weâll never know how it would have gone if sheâd been treated the same as her competition. In particular, her male competition. (Because letâs face it, Amy Klobuchar had the same âlikability problemâ)
And if Warren had lost in an election where she was considered an equal to her competition, where she wasnât blatantly removed from coverage as if she werenât there at all, then I think we could all swallow the loss as disappointing but part of the game.
The fact that she had to be twice what her male counterparts were in order to be taken half as seriously, that a white man whoâd only had experience as a mayor was taken more seriously than a woman with Warrenâs resume, that she could destroy Bloomberg onstage and still be questioned about âlikabilityââŠ
THAT is why weâre frustrated. Because on smaller levels, weâve been there.
And for one shining moment, we thought we were going to see a qualified, badass woman win despite every effort to make us forget she was there at all.
Wow, what a well-written post.
Not gonna forget about Warren!
literally cannot stop thinking about this
elizabeth warren 2020
5 states in the US have banned abortion from the point of heartbeat detection. Following that logic, I propose two additional policies:
1. Child support starts at the same point, including 50% of all medical bills
2. If the mother dies in mandated childbirth OR the child is stillborn, the father and doctor are charged with involuntary manslaughter.
See how keen they are on their âPro-lifeâ horseshit then.
3. Pregnant women canât be in jail because the fetus would be in jail, and since itâs a full human you would be punishing an innocent person
An exciting and spicy addition
economists really took the divine right of kings and turned it into billionaire CEOs
âitâs kinda fucked up to reject the business practices of jeff bezos when he rightfully earned his position under capitalismâ
âAbout twenty years ago, I attended a lecture by a Harvard professor who talked about how corporations operate like modern-day kingdoms. At one time, she said, people believed kings ruled by divine right, and today we seem to believe the same thing about corporations. Toward the end, she asked, âDo you know what it is that allowed people to let go of, overcome, and reject the notion of the divine right of kings?â I held my breath and got ready to take some notes. Her answer: âThey just stopped believing in it.â
- Frances Moore Lappé
Malthusians: Well if we want to solve climate change we just have to let a lot of poor people die :/ It sucks that all these people are dying of preventable diseases due to climate change but at least it reduces overpopulation so :/ Humanity doesnât deserve to be saved because we caused this so the most vulnerable people who had the least to do with it should be slaughtered :/ Too bad but itâs a sacrifice we need to make :/
ecosocialists, progressives, actual scientists, almost everyone: Actually we could halt climate change just by making exactly one dude (Jeff Bezos) less unconscionably wealthy (but still very unconscionably wealthy) and strategically allocating his wealth to environmental projects
Malthusians: How fucking dare you!!! What gives you the right to judge him and how he uses his money? He shouldnât be forced to make sacrifices for climate change! Thatâs just not fair! What did Jeff Bezos ever do to you???
I see weâre no longer being subtle
This post just shot me between the eyes
[Image Transcription]
Can we talk about the origins of doxxing in the context of trans people and TERFs for a minute? Because it originated with the TERFs, as far back as the 70s. Historically, any passing transwoman holding down any kind of ârespectableâ job could be outed and lose everything.
Once we hit the online era, from the late 90s onwards, transphobes turned to the internet to doxx transwomen. Theyâd post our identities to websites dedicated to shitting on trans people, or on public foruns, and people would contact our employers to out us as trans and get us fired.
Cathy Brennan ran such a site, and her cronies were well known for contacting schools, employers, doctors and therapists of trans men and women, trying to get them expelled, fired, or denied medical treatment. They tried it with me more than once. Iâm still listed.
As trans people have gained more acceptance, this behavior has receded, since it no longer works as well. Iâm out as trans at work; they canât threaten me with that now. But being a transphobe has become LESS acceptable, and many workplaces no longer tolerate bigotry.
The irony isnât lost on me that TERFs are complaining about being outed as bigots to their employers. Knowing the history, Iâm embarrassed on their behalf; because the idea came from them originally - from a dangerous behavior theyâve engaged in for half a century.
But the consequences for them are minor. We historically lost everything. Then had to move across the country and start from scratch, because we canât stop being trans. These transphobes though? They make a choice to engage in bigoted behavior, knowing the consequences.
It reminds me of the Stefan Molyneux video, where he complains his reputation is fucked because one google search will out him as a fucking alt-right bigot. IMAGINE THAT, YOUR ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES! WHO FUCKING KNEW?
This really speaks volumes about the sheer privilege of these people; that they think they have a RIGHT to be indescribably bigoted towards other human beings, without consequences. Well bad news; if youâre a crappy human being, other human beings will hate you. Tough shit, mate.
[Source: @CateSpice on Twitter]
My new favorite post.
isnt that kid a drug addict now?
No. He is a national treasure.
We must protect him at ALL costs.
I canât even fully express my love for Macaulay Culkin. I loved his recent interviews with Jimmy Fallon and with Ellen (in one of them heâs wearing red nail polish and I just love that about him too), I love his website bunnyears.com, I especially love him in Party Monster and in Saved, I love that he was in a Velvet Underground cover band called Pizza Underground that changed all the lyrics to be about pizza, and I love how weird and awkward he is.
He also shows up in Redlettermedia vids and heâs always fun in them
Tabloids said Culkin had a $6,000 a day heroin addiction, Culkin has been very vocal about denying that he was ever addicted to heroin
If you donât know about Macaulay Culkinâs childhood other than âhe was the richest child actor of his timeâ please take a minute to read this
When Home Alone was at the height of its fame I saw him on a talk show saying he slept on the couch at home. His dad, whoâd insisted on being on the panel with him, laughed it off as âweâd fallen on hard times but weâll be moving to a bigger place soon.â Macaulay later said âHe wanted me to know and my brother to know that he was in charge and that if he didnât want us to sleep on a bed, we werenât going to sleep on a bed.â
His father, Kit, was also a child actor but never made it very far. He insisted on being Macaulayâs manager and simultaneously hated him for being talented and pressured him to be famous so he could get richÂ
Macaulay has said he has scars from his fatherâs physical abuse
All the kids were forced into acting but Macaulay and Keiran were the most successful. Thier father would book them for acting work without discussing it with them, and after long days on set theyâd have to sit with their father for hours planning for the next dayâs work. They rarely had any free timeÂ
When his parents filed for divorce the custody battle focused mainly on who would get to be the kidsâ manager because that person got 15% of their earnings. Itâs unknown if his motherâs motives were financial or trying to keep their father from having a position of power over them, but his fatherâs motives were definitely financial
Macaulay hasnât spoken to his father in 25 years and doesnât know if he ever will. In response, his father told reporters âI no longer consider him my sonâ
All the stuff about Macaulay being a has-been who canât find work is untrue. Heâs still persued for acting parts but is very selective about which projects he gets involved in. Heâs turned down roles that went on to make millions, including a lead in The Big Bang Theory. He has no regrets about passing on those roles and says his happiness is worth more to him
I fully support Macaulay Culkin being a goofy guy who does the work he wants to do and uses whatâs left of his childhood earnings to relax and enjoy life
Re: the post you reblogged about Bush. I'm 21 and tbh feel like I can only vote for Bernie, can you explain if/why I shouldn't? Thanks and sorry if this is dumb or anything.
Oh boy. Okay, Iâll do my best here. Note that a) this will get long, and b) Iâm old, Tired, and Iâm pretty sure my brain tried to kill me last night. Since by nature I am sure I will say something Controversial âą, if anyone reads this and feels a deep urge to inform me that I am Wrong, just⊠mark it down as me being Wrong and move on with your life. But also, really, you should read this and hopefully think about it. Because while Iâm glad you asked this question, it feels like thereâs a lot in your cohort who wonât, and that worries me. A lot.
First, not to sound utterly old-woman-in-a-rocking-chair ancient, people who came of age/are only old enough to have Obama be the first president that they really remember have no idea how good they had it. The world was falling the fuck apart in 2008 (not coincidentally, after 8 years of Bush). We came within a flicker of the permanent collapse of the global economy. The War on Terror was in full roar, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were at their height, we had Dick Cheney as the cartoon supervillain before we had any of Trumpâs cohort, and this was before Chelsea Manning or Edward Snowden had exposed the extent of NSA/CIA intelligence-gathering/American excesses or there was any kind of public debate around the fact that we were all surveilled all the time. And the fact that a brown guy named Barack Hussein Obama was elected in this climate seems, and still seems tbh, kind of amazing. And Obama was certainly not a Perfect President âą. He had to scale back a lot of planned initiatives, he is notorious for expanding the drone strike/extrajudicial assassination program, he still subscribed to the overall principles of neoliberalism and American exceptionalism, etc etc. There is valid criticism to be made as to how the hopey-changey optimistic rhetoric stacked up against the hard realities of political office. And yetâŠ. at this point, given what weâre seeing from the White House on a daily basis, the depth of the parallel universe/double standards is absurd.
Because hereâs the thing. Obama, his entire family, and his entire administration had to be personally/ethically flawless the whole time (and they managed that â not one scandal or arrest in eight years, against the legions of Trumpistas now being convicted) because of the absolute frothing depths of Republican hatred, racial conspiracy theories, and obstruction against him. (Remember Merrick Garland and how Mitch McConnell got away with that, and now we have Gorsuch and Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court? Because I remember that). If Obama had pulled one-tenth of the shit, one-twentieth of the shit that the Trump administration does every day, he would be gone. It also meant that people who only remember Obama think he was typical for an American president, and he wasnât. Since about⊠Jimmy Carter, and definitely since Ronald Reagan, the American people have gone for the Trump model a lot more than the Obama model. Whatever your opinion on his politics or character, Obama was a constitutional law professor, a community activist, a neighborhood organizer and brilliant Ivy League intellectual who used to randomly lie awake at night thinking about income inequality. Americans donât value intellectualism in their politicians; they just donât. They donât like thinking that âthe elitesâ are smarter than them. They like the folksy populist who seems fun to have a beer with, and Reagan/Bush Senior/Clinton/Bush Junior sold this persona as hard as they possibly could. As noted in said post, Bush Junior (or Shrub as the late, great Molly Ivins memorably dubbed him) was Trump Lite but from a long-established political family who could operate like an outwardly civilized human.
The point is: when you think Obama was relatively normal (which, again, he wasnât, for any number of reasons) and not the outlier in a much larger pattern of catastrophic damage that has been accelerated since, again, the 1980s (oh Ronnie Raygun, how you lastingly fucked us!), you miss the overall context in which this, and which Trump, happened. Like most left-wingers, I donât agree with Obamaâs recent and baffling decision to insert himself into the 2020 race and warn the Democratic candidates against being too progressive or whatever he was on about. I think he was giving into the same fear that appears to be motivating the remaining chunk of Joe Bidenâs support: that middle/working-class white America wonât go for anything too wild or that might sniff of Socialism, and that Uncle Joe, recalled fondly as said folksy populist and the internetâs favorite meme grandfather from his time as VP, could pick up the votes that went to Trump last time. And that by nature, no one else can.
The underlying belief is that these white voters just canât support anything too âun-American,â and that by pushing too hard left, Democratic candidates risk handing Trump a second term. Again: I donât agree and I think he was mistaken in saying it. But I also canât say that Obama of all people doesnât know exactly the strength of the political machine operating against the Democratic Party and the progressive agenda as a whole, because he ran headfirst into it for eight years. The fact that he managed to pass any of his legislative agenda, usually before the Tea Party became a thing in 2010, is because Democrats controlled the House and Senate for the first two years of his first term. He was not perfect, but it was clear that he really did care (just look up the pictures of him with kids). He installed smart, efficient, and scandal-free people to do jobs they were qualified for. He gave us Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor to join RBG on the Supreme Court. All of this seems⊠like a dream.
That said: here we are in a place where Biden, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren are the front-runners for the Democratic nomination (and apparently Pete Buttigieg is getting some airplay as a dark horse candidate, which⊠whatever). The appeal of Biden is discussed above, and he sure as hell is not my favored candidate (frankly, I wish heâd just quit). But Sanders and Warren are 85% - 95% similar in their policy platforms. The fact that Michael â50 Billion Dollar Fortuneâ Bloomberg started rattling his chains about running for president is because either a Sanders or Warren presidency terrifies the outrageously exploitative billionaire capitalist oligarchy that runs this country and has been allowed to proceed essentially however the fuck they like since⊠you guessed it, the 1980s, the era of voodoo economics, deregulation, and the free market above all. Warren just happens to be ten years younger than Sanders and female, and Sandersâ age is not insignificant. Heâs 80 years old and just had a heart attack, and thereâs still a year to go to the election. Itâs also more than a little eye-rolling to describe him as the only progressive candidate in the race, when heâs an old white man (however much we like and approve of his policy positions). And hereâs the thing, which I think is a big part of the reason why this polarized ideological purity internet leftist culture mistrusts Warren:
She may have changed her mind on things in the past.
Scary, right? I sound like Iâm being facetious, but Iâm not. An argument I had to read with my own two eyes on this godforsaken hellsite was that since Warren became a Democrat around the time Clinton signed Donât Ask Donât Tell, she sekritly hated gay people and might still be a corporate sellout, so on and etcetera. (And donât even get me STARTED on the fact that DADT, coming a few years after the height of the AIDS crisis where it was considered Godâs Judgment of the Icky Gays, was the best Clinton could realistically hope to achieve, but this smacks of White Gay Syndrome anyway and that is a whole other kettle of fish.) Bernie has always demonstrably been a democratic socialist, and: good for him. Iâm serious. But because thereâs the chance that Warren might not have thought exactly as she does now at any point in her life, the hysterical and paranoid left-wing elements donât trust that she might not still secretly do so. (Zomgz!) Itâs the same element thatâs feeding cancel culture and âwokeness.â Nobody can be allowed to have shifted or grown in their opinions or, like a functional, thoughtful, non-insane adult, changed their beliefs when presented with compelling evidence to the contrary. To the ideological hordes, any hint of uncertainty or past failure to completely toe the line is tantamount to heresy. Any evidence of any other belief except The Correct One means that this person is functionally as bad as Trump. And frankly, itâs only the Sanders supporters who, just as in 2016, are threatening to withhold their vote in the general election if their preferred candidate doesnât win the primary, and indeed seem weirdly proud about it.
OK, boomer Bernie or Buster.
Hereâs the thing, the thing, the thing: there is never going to be an American president free of the deeply toxic elements of American ideology. There just wonât be. This country has been built how it has for 250 years, and itâs not gonna change. You are never going to have, at least not in the current system, some dream candidate who gets up there and parrots the left-wing talking points and attacks American imperialism, exceptionalism, ravaging global capitalism, military and oil addiction, etc. They want to be elected as leader of a country that has deeply internalized and taken these things to heart for its entire existence, and most of them believe it to some degree themselves. So this groupthink white liberal mentality where the only acceptable candidate is this Perfect Non-Problematic robot who has only ever had one belief their entire lives and has never ever wavered in their devotion to doctrine has really gotten bad. The Democratic Party would be considered⊠maybe center/mild left in most other developed countries. Itâs not even really left-wing by general standards, and Sanders and Warren are the only two candidates for the nomination who are even willing to go there and explicitly put out policy proposals that challenge the systematic structure of power, oppression, and exploitation of the late-stage capitalist 21st century. Warren has the billionaires fussed, and instead of backing down, sheâs doubling down. Thatâs part of why theyâre so scared of her. (And also misogyny, because the world is depressing like that.) She is going head-on after picking a fight with some of the worst people on the planet, who are actively killing the rest of us, and I donât know about you, but I like that.
Of course: none of this will mean squat if she (or the eventual Democratic winner, who I will vote for regardless of who it is, but as you can probably tell, sheâs my ride or die) donât a) win the White House and then do as they promised on the campaign trail, and b) donât have a Democratic House and Senate willing to have a backbone and pass the laws. Even Nancy Pelosi, much as sheâs otherwise a badass, held off on opening a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump for months out of fear it would benefit him, until the Ukraine thing fell into everyoneâs laps. The Democrats are really horrible at sticking together and voting the party line the way Republicans do consistently, because Democrats are big-tent people who like to think of themselves as accepting and tolerant of other views and unwilling to force their membersâ hands. The Republicans have no such qualms (and indeed, judging by their enabling of Trump, have no qualms at all).Â
The modern American Republican party has become a vehicle for no-holds-barred power for rich white men at the expense of absolutely everything and everyone else, and if your rationale is that you canât vote for the person opposing Donald Goddamn Trump is that youâre just not vibing with them on the language of that one policy proposal⊠well, Iâm glad that you, White Middle Class Liberal, feel relatively safe that the consequences of that decision wonât affect you personally. Even if weâre due to be out of the Paris Climate Accords one day after the 2020 election, and the issue of climate change now has the most visibility itâs ever had after years of big-business, Republican-led efforts to deny and discredit the science, hey, Secret Corporate Shill, am I right? Canât trust âer. Letâs go have a craft beer.
As has been said before: vote as far left as you want in the primary. Vote your ideology, vote whatever candidate you want, because the only way to make actual, real-world change is to do that. The huge, embedded, all-consuming and horrible system in which we operate is not just going to suddenly be run by fairy dust and happy thoughts overnight. Select candidates that reflect your values exactly, be as picky and ideologically militant as you want. Thatâs the time to do that! Then when it comes to the general election:
America is a two-party system. It sucks, but thatâs the case. Third-party votes, or refraining from voting because âit doesnât matterâ are functionally useless at best and actively harmful at worst.
Either the Democratic candidate or Donald Trump will win the 2020 election.
There is absolutely no length that the Republican/GOP machine, and its malevolent allies elsewhere, will not go to in order to secure a Trump victory. None.
Any talk whatsoever about âprogressive valuesâ or any kind of liberal activism, coupled with a course of action that increases the possibility of a Trump victory, is hypocritical at best and actively malicious at worst.
This is why I found the Democratic response to Obamaâs âdonât go too wildâ comments interesting. Bernie doubled down on the fact that his plans have widespread public support, and heâs right. (Frankly, the fact that Sanders and Warren are polling at the top, and the fact that theyâre politicians and would not be crafting these campaign messages if they didnât know that they were being positively received, says plenty on its own). Warren cleverly highlighted and praised Obamaâs accomplishments in office (i.e. the Affordable Care Act) and didnât say squat about whether she agreed or disagreed with him, then went right back to campaigning about why billionaires suck. And some guy named Julian Castro basically blew Obama off and claimed that âany Democratâ could beat Trump in 2020, just by nature of existing and being non-insane.
This is very dangerous! Do not be Julian Castro!
As I said in my tags on the Bush post: everyone assumed that sensible people would vote for Kerry in 2004. Guess what happened? Yeah, he got Swift Boated. The race between Obama and McCain in 2008, even after those said nightmare years of Bush, was very close until the global crash broke it open in Obamaâs favor, and Sarah Palin was an actual disqualifier for a politician being brazenly incompetent and unprepared. (Then again, she was a woman from a remote backwater state, not a billionaire businessman.) In 2012, we thought Corporate MormonBot Mitt Fugginâ Romney was somehow the worst and most dangerous candidate the Republicans could offer. In 2016, up until Election Day itself, everyone assumed that HRC was a badly flawed candidate but would win anyway. And⊠we saw how that worked out. Complacency is literally deadly.
I was born when Reagan was still president. Iâm just old enough to remember the efforts to impeach Clinton over forcing an intern to give him a BJ in the Oval Office (This led by the same Republicans making Donald Trump into a darling of the evangelical Christian right wing.) Iâm definitely old enough to remember 9/11 and how America lost its mind after that, and I remember the Bush years. And, obviously, the contrast with Obama, the swing back toward Trump, and everything that has happened since. We canât afford to do this again. Weâre hanging by a thread as it is, and not just America, but the entire planet.
So yes. By all means, vote for Sanders in the primary. Then when November 3, 2020 rolls around, if you care about literally any of this at all, hold your nose if necessary and vote straight-ticket Democrat, from the president, to the House and Senate, to the state and local offices. I cannot put it more strongly than that.
every fucking word of this.
I literally just sat naked in a drained bathtub with an empty glass of whiskey sitting next to me on the fast-drying floor of the tub, to make sure I read this whole thing word for word.
Because itâs that spot on and that worth reading.
TLDR: Vote your beliefs during the primaries, no matter what they may be. Vote top to bottom Democrat against Trump on 11/3/20. Because thatâs the only way his orange ass is leaving our white house.
We donât have the luxury of voting third party or staying home next year. Straight ticket Democrat if you actually want a livable planet.
Since once in a blue moon I actually discover a decent rule for adulting, and since I know I have followers a few years younger than me who are just entering the workforce, I want to tell you about a very important phrase.Â
âI wonât be available.â
Imagine youâre at work and your boss asks you to come in on Saturday. Saturday is usually your day offâcoming in Saturdays is not an obligation to keep your job. Maybe you were going to watch a movie with a friend, or maybe you were just going to lie in bed and eat ice cream for eight hours, but either way you really, really donât want to give up your day off.
If you consider yourself a millennial youâve probably been raised to believe you need to justify not being constantly at work. And if youâre a gen-Z kid youâre likely getting the same toxic messages that we did. So in a situation like that, you might be inclined to do one of three things:
Tell your boss youâd rather not give up your day off. Cave when they pressure you to come in anyway, since youâre not doing anything important.
Tell your boss youâd rather not give up your day off. Over-apologize and worry that you looked bad/unprofessional.
Lie and say youâve got a doctorâs appointment or some other activity that feels like an adequate justification for not working.
The fact is, it doesnât matter to your boss whether youâre having open heart surgery or watching anime in your underwear on Saturday. The only thing that affects them is the fact that you wonât be at work. So telling them why you wonât be at work only gives them reason to try and pressure you to come in anyway.
If you say âI wonât be available,â giving no further information, youâd be surprised how often thatâs enough. Be polite and sympathetic in your tone, maybe even say âsorry, but I wonât be available.â But donât make an excuse. If your boss is a professional individual, theyâll accept that as a ânoâ and try to find someone else.Â
But bosses arenât always professional. Sometimes theyâre whiny little tyrants. So, what if they pressure you further? The answer isâpolitely and sympathetically give them no further information.
âAre you sure youâre not available?â âSorry, but yes.â
âWhy wonât you be available?â âI have a prior commitment.â (Which you do, even if itâs only to yourself.)
âWhatâs your prior commitment?â âSorry, but thatâs kind of personal.â
âCan you reschedule it?â âIâm afraid not. Maybe someone else can come in?â
If you donât give them anything to work with, they canât pressure you into going beyond your obligations as an employee. And when they realize that, theyâll also realize they have to find someone else to come in and move on.
IMPORTANT!! PLEASE READ!!
Just like with many other parts of life, learn to say ânoâ to people. You are important. Donât kill yourself for another person, esp. if they are your boss.
What if they're right... what if rich people ARENT all that ba-
Oh hmm. Hmmmm.
Link to her saying this shit as part of a gameshow on BBC with an audience laughing at How Funny She Is: (X)
I think the goose game is so successful because it captures a fundamental human desire to be absolutely but harmlessly bastardous
it's the same reason we gleefully smash pots in zelda games
sometimes you just need to be a moderate to severe nuisance
we are all poltergeists in meat suits
what a horrifying way to phrase this thank you