my dad bought a cnc and is going wild
Measure once cut twice
Sweet Seals For You, Always
No title available
taylor price
One Nice Bug Per Day
EXPECTATIONS
Today's Document
d e v o n
KIROKAZE
Xuebing Du
cherry valley forever
$LAYYYTER
𩵠avery cochrane š©µ
Misplaced Lens Cap
Claire Keane
macklin celebrini has autism
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
art blog(derogatory)
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
official daine visual archive

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Colombia

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Colombia
seen from Laos

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Australia
@j-bird614
my dad bought a cnc and is going wild
Measure once cut twice
i have understood so many things about online leftist culture by the fact that when i said "your local community has people you will morally and politically disagree with but you cannot lock them out of accessing any tangible service youāre organising" one of the tags responding said "this isnāt about proshippers in here youāre not welcome" like. folks. focus with me. some of us are homeless here.
There's a disconnect happening here because the primary function of social media for most casual users is to form a circle of friends around the usual things that friendships are built on: shared interests and lifestyles and ideas of what is important and what is unacceptable. When people are mainly doing leftism on social media, this encourages thinking of leftism as centered around establishing high-minded social clubs.
For anyone who still isn't getting it from someone who helps people IRL: There's a difference between whom you're helping to feed at the mealshare and whom you're choosing to hang out with for fun after the mealshare. You don't have to invite a hungry person with opinions you don't like to play board games with you, but you do have to help keep them from starving if you're serious about leftist organizing.
[Image ID: Tumblr reply with username blocked out reading: *volunteering at the soup kitchen, holding a bowl hesitantly to my chest* what do you think about age gaps in ships /End ID]
please behold the 24 Hours of Lemons race, in which you can only spend $500 total on a car to cross country race for 24 hours
named after the legendary 24 hour Le Mans race, Lemons rallies barely legal cars in an endurance race across America. had the privilege of sharing the freeway with this race and seeing the absolute art od this event
This is so American I could CRY
oh this is nothing. some of my favorite lemons entries are:
an airplane stuck on a toyota minivan
this miata built by rocket scientists
the mr2 boat
the nyan cat bmw that i think actually played the song at all times
the homer simpson car built by uranium workers
this limo whose brakes caught on fire
the dumbest corolla and supra wearing funny hats
and so much more. 24 hours of lemons my beloved
friendly reminder that [the most cherrypicked interpretation of the text possible] <3
worst part of being an adult is how often youre forced to nag. you Have to be annoying or youre never getting anything done. which is unfortunate considering how common it is to teach kids to never nag and be annoying ever
a professional i am paying money doesnt show up w zero communication and IM the one who has to feel guilty for having to call him and ask whats going on. because when i was a little kid i would get yelled at for nagging. joke world
Are you free from your curse yet i miss you
One time when my dad was in the hospital they were testing his orientation to time and place and said "Okay and what year is it?" and he said "1995" (he had dementia). And the doctor and I unconsciously exchanged a Look because it was in fact uhhh 2024 š and dad saw that and so when the next doctor did the test a few hours later he said "uhhhh...nineteen...nintetyyyy.......seven...???" and I was like okay, well, that IS closer, you do have to give him that
#he still knew immediately who I was which was deeply funny to me bc I was 7-8 years old in 1997 #"yes that is my daughter who was apparently born in her 20s"
if i was a soccer player i'd simply kick that ball in the goal instead of wasting everyone's time
nakedsasquatch itās ya man
Okay but seriously folks - as often as I joke about this movie stirs my loins and as weirdly popular as this text post got a while back, I wanna rap with you all about why the George of the Jungle remake is a pretty important piece of cinema.
Itās literally the only movie I can think of that is based completely around the unheard of āFEMALE gaze.ā Granted, while Iām a huge movie buff Iāve not seen every movie ever made. But even so, even if thereās another example of the āfemale gazeā in cinema that has escaped me itās still damn impressive that a kids movie from 1997 based on a Jay Ward cartoon from the 60ās managed to turn gender representation in media on itās fucking ass!
First things first, letās look at our leading lady and love interest - Ursula, played by Leslie Mann.
Let me just say that while Leslie Mann is adorable and a talented actress, she does look a little less conventional and a little more plain compared to the bombshells that Hollywood likes to churn out. Leslie, in comparison, looks much more like a real women youād meet on the street. She dresses pretty conservatively and plain throughout the filmĀ ; Wearing outfits that are more functional than fashionable for trekking through the jungle, pulling her hair back and so forth. Not that if she was dolled up and more scantily clad it would give her character any less integrity, but can we appreciate how RARE that is in the male dominated industry of film? Just think about all the roads a film about a woman in the jungle COULD have taken but didnāt - no scenes with her clothes strategically ripped or anything! You can say this is a kids movie, intended for children and thatās why the sensuality of the female lead is so downplayed but there are PLENTY of kids movies that handle women in a very objectifying and sexualized manner despite the target audience is pre-pubescent. Like, a disgusting amount. So I donāt think āitās a kids movieā is why the film doesnāt take ANY, let alone EVERY, opportunity to showcase the main female characterās sex appealā¦
ā¦especially considering the sex appeal of the film rests squarely on the well defined shoulders of our male lead, George of the Jungle played by Brendan Fraser in the best god damn shape of his life!
*Homer Simpson Drooling Noises*
Whenever members of the reddit community try to compare the sexualization of women in fiction to the design of characters such as Batman and Superman, I always want to just sit them down and show them this movie. Because THIS is what the female sexual fantasy looks like, and Batman and Superman are male power-fantasies. Look at him - his big blue eyes, his soft hair, his lean, chiseled physique built for dexterity rather than power. Heās wild and free, but gentle. Itās like he fell right out of that steamy romance novel your mom tried to hide from you growing up.
Hell, the whole plot seems to be designed around how damn hot he is! First, for the majority of the film, he wears only a small strip of cloth to cover the dick balls and ass. Everything else is FAIR GAME to drool over for 40 minutes. Then, after he meets Ursula she takes him with her to San Francisco just so we can enjoy him in a well-tailored suit (as seen in the gif set), running around in an open and billowy shirt along side horses while Ursula and all of her friends literally crowd around and make sexual comments about him, and my personal favorite, ditch the loincloth entirely and have him walk around naked while covering his man-bits with various objects while one of Ursulaās very lucky friends oogles him and makes a joke along the lines of āSo THATāS why they call him the āKING of the Jungleāā¦ā
And yes, itās also a very cute and funny little movie. Out of all the movies based on Jay Ward cartoons, it was the most faithful to the fast-paced humor and wit of the original source material (yes even the new Peabody and Sherman movie which honestly I thought was too cutesy-poo.) But thatās not why this movie is popular with the gay community or why we all became women in 1997. Itās just really cool that thereās a film out there where the sensuality of the female form takes a back seat for the oiled up, chiseled, physique of Brendan Fraser (in his prime that is)
One thing to add: in the scene mentioned above where the ladies are watching him in the billowy shirt running with the horses, it pans back to about 50 feet away to two guys in suits at this party looking at the women and one of the guys says, āMan, what is it with women and horses?ā So not only does this movie highlight the female gaze, but it blatantly points out that western male sensibilities donāt have a clue what actually appeals to women.
ALSO
heās non threatening
as mentioned above, he looks built for dexterity rather than power, but heās still a 6+ foot tall extremely muscular man, and not once are you worried for Ursula when heās with her
ALSO
letās take a look at his rival - Lyle is a cravat-wearing trust-fund kid (who, interestingly, is into Ursulaās fortune more than her, which kind of makes this a gender-swapped gold-digger thing too). Heās blonde and Ursulaās mom LOVES him. Heās more uncomfortable and less prepared to cope with the jungle than Ursula is, in his pastels and shiny shoes.
But he talks over Ursula, insists he knows whatās best for her, ignores her autonomy. In spite of the fact that Lyle Van de Groot is a rich, educated, social climber who cares deeply about his clothing and appearances he is a point-by-point checklist of unhealthy masculinity in a way that beefy, inarticulate, uneducated George could never be. Ursula is off on her own doing her own thing and Lyle hires two FUCKING POACHERS to track her down in the middle of the jungle while sheās working (or on vacation? Itās never made clear because he interrupts her before she can explain why she went on the expedition). Lyle ignores the local guides, claiming his experience with a bridge in Maui means the bridge theyāre on is safe - which leads to a significant injury for one of the guides. He then tells Ursula the guides are conspiring against him, trying to make himself and his poachers seem safe and the Africans who make up the rest of their party seem dangerous.
Check that body language! A post above points out that weāre never worried about Ursula when sheās around George. Thatās because Lyle talks to her like this. Look at his aggressive lean! Look at him literally looking down at her! Sheās tilted away from him in the least threatening position possible and heās so aggressive about whatever point heās making. When he finds her after he pushed her toward a damned lion he kisses her and she pushes him away. Want a textbook example of gaslighting? Here you go: she saysĀ ādonāt get all smoochy with me! I remember what happened with that lionā and he respondsĀ āWhat are you talking about? I was fighting that lion the whole time - you were just so terrified you donāt remember.āĀ Then he shoots George! And then he kidnaps Ursula and attempts to force her into marriage!
Now look at how George and Ursula interact (slightly NSFW):
Even though heās a big strong dude and he thinks heās doing whatās okay he lets her set the tone for their interactions. He accepts that heās out of his wheelhouse and even if he doesnāt understand it he does what she says is culturally appropriate. He learns from her! He listens to her! Compare Lyle leaning into Ursula above to this image of George and Ursula talking:
Heās listening to her, all of his attention is on on her, but heās totally nonthreatening. His torso is turned toward her but heās not invading her space, his hands are clasped, heās smiling, and sheās the one leaning into him. Look at that smile she has, look how happy she is to be listened to. Her posture in both images is vulnerable but in this one with George sheās vulnerable because she has chosen to share with him instead of because she feels threatened.
When George rescues Ursula from Lyle at the end of the film it isnāt a typical damsel situation - George doesnāt have a knock-down-drag-out fight with Lyle, he swings into a tree and offers Ursula a hand so she can reach up and save herself (and before he does it he acknowledges how much itās going to hurt and *whimpers* and looks human and scared). And youāve gotta remember that George rescues everybody. Itās not just Ursula - he also rescues a parasailer and gets shot rescuing Shep and Ape. He just likes helping, dammit!
AND this movie offers a perfect counter to the ānice guyā thing - Ursula starts engaged to a jerk who her mom thinks is a ānice guyā the moves on to actual nice man George who isnāt *just* nice - heās also patient, listens to her, has his own skills and talents, is okay with being goofy, has his own social circle and isnāt totally dependent on Ursula, and looks amazing. Ursula doesnāt go with George just because heās a *nice* guy who rescued her from an asshole, Ursula goes with George because heās an interesting, fun person who is supportive of her different way of being an interesting, fun person. AND heās emotionally available. Google image search George of the jungle and see how many smiles you can find, see how many open looks of confusion there are, see how much sadness you can see in Georgeās face. Now look for images of Lyle. His two expressions are a smirk and cartoonish fear. I know this is a cartoonish kidās movie, but it is SO powerful that the hero shares his emotions while the villain masks every emotion but fear. Lyle doesnāt want to open up, he doesnāt want to be vulnerable, he wants CONTROL. George wants to learn, to protect people he cares about, to explore new places, to laugh when heās happy and to be sad when heās sad, and that he does that while being a broad-shouldered, physically powerful dude who is NOT totally self-involved is justā¦
Like, look, I didnāt sign on to tumblr dot com for George of the Jungle discourse, but Iām just now realizing that this movie may have done the most for destroying my conception of stoic masculinity and gender roles as a child.
Like
Damn.
2nd reblog because this is even better.Ā
you gotta read, you gotta write, you gotta draw, you gotta watch films and shows. there is literally NO time to be employed
give me your most controversial music opinion
the beatles were one ugly guy moving really fast
"grackle" really is a perfect name for a bird. knocked it out of the park w/ that one
You guys need to see this because my brain has decided "have you heard of seventy dollars??" is a widely known meme I can reference regularly (it is not)