Came across this art installation, Liza Lou's Kitchen, at the Whitney Museum of American Art, NYC. It's a kitchen made of tiny glass beads, that artist Liza Lou did, taking 5 yrs. to complete, from 1991 - 1996.
My favorite part is the sink.
Game of Thrones Daily

gracie abrams

oozey mess
sheepfilms

No title available
untitled
The Stonewall Inn

izzy's playlists!

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
h
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Claire Keane

#extradirty
art blog(derogatory)
EXPECTATIONS
d e v o n
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
cherry valley forever
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Stranger Things

seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Mexico
seen from Türkiye
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Paraguay
seen from Morocco
seen from United States
seen from Iraq
seen from Brazil

seen from Italy
seen from Brazil

seen from Venezuela
seen from Israel
seen from Czechia

seen from Russia
seen from Tunisia
@mocknot
Came across this art installation, Liza Lou's Kitchen, at the Whitney Museum of American Art, NYC. It's a kitchen made of tiny glass beads, that artist Liza Lou did, taking 5 yrs. to complete, from 1991 - 1996.
My favorite part is the sink.
Academy Award Winners for Best Cinematography: 2004 — Russell Boyd, ACS, ASC Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003) Directed by Peter Weir Aspect Ratio: 2.39 : 1
“Master and Commander — gee, that was a hard film to make. There is no easy film, of course, but Master was very demanding physically — because of the water, even though a lot of it was shot in the tank in Mexico that had been built for Titanic. Peter Weir once said to me — and I’ll never forget it — he said, ‘Come on and do a film of mine, and I’ll take you on an adventure.’ And he does!” — Russell Boyd for The American Society of Cinematographers, February 2018
#every year that passes this movie grows in my esteem #it's like the captain wentworth of films (via)
Unfortunately for me, despite us not knowing what the hell the company actually sells, “oh no a competitor is undercutting our prices and costing us sales what can we do” is a regular problem that comes up at my work and the relatability makes that plotline a bit stressful to watch.
My husband’s on ep 3 of A Dog and a Plane: it needs more airplanes
Me: I don’t think there’s anyone else in the world who’s watching this show for that
Him: other airplane aficionados would be
I try not to fall into the "I never liked their work anyway" ditch when an artist/creator reveals themself to be a terrible person
BUT
a feeling I do have and will stand by is "While I enjoyed their work overall I did have some gripes that I overlooked out of affection and whimsy, but now that my loyalty is gone and my affection tainted there is nothing holding me back from enumerating my many grievances, to which the revelations of the creator's shittiness may or may not provide a new and infuriating context."
#such a good summation of this actually#because yeah there’s usually things that were always present#but which were easy to overlook or give the benefit of the doubt#that suddenly become relevant after a revelation about the creator#and it’s really not the same thing as the self-defensive “’I never liked it anyway’
tags via chimaerakitten
watched the fall for the first time yesterday with friends and was struck with divine purpose at 3 AM ….
please stop trying to convince me the cause is righteous and convince me the tactics are effective
Enemies with Benefits - Episode 1
Even when I'm not drunk, I still want to do this.
JINGJING YU as WINE WAYTHAKA episode 1 of ENEMIES WITH BENEFITS
Why are you zoning out?
JANHAE PLOYSHOMPOO as LAL LALLALIN and JINGJING YU as WINE VETAKA official trailer of ENEMIES WITH BENEFITS (premiering on May 3rd)
TONGARI BOUSHI NO ATELIER (2026) episode 03 ✴ brushbuddy created by shirahama kamome
O Lord you know I have been so good these many years about not getting involved with People Being Wrong on the Internet, why must you test me with a topic that I have specific knowledge in.
Welcome to another round of W2 Tells You What You Should See, where W2 (me) tries to sell you (you) on something you should be watching. Today's choice: 琅琊榜/Nirvana in Fire.
Nirvana in Fire is a 2015 historical series best described as either a complicated succession drama set in the premodern Chinese imperial palace, or the story of a man who didn't die a decade ago and has decided to make it everyone else's problem.
And really, I almost feel silly giving my glib little summary, because Nirvana in Fire is so well-known of a property. It's a classic for a reason, and that reason is that it's legitimately very good. This show is what happens when you adapt a solid story, get a bunch of very talented actors, and throw a huge amount of money at it. It's incredibly popular and highly acclaimed, and it earned all of the hype.
Still, while I bet there are few people adjacent to c-drama stuff who've never heard of Nirvana in Fire, I'm sure there are plenty who haven't watched it. After all, it looks like one of those slow, serious shows with a lot of ponderous talking and no joy. If that's the impression you've been given, I could imagine looking at the 54-episode commitment and saying, I don't need that in my life.
I am here to tell you you're wrong. It is a banger of a show. It's tense. It's funny. It's heartbreaking. It’s exceptionally clever. It’s jaw-droppingly stupid. It’s romantic. It’s tragic. It has smart plots and bizarre subplots. And that's not even touching the thing with the yeti.
So in case you're one of those people who's heard of Nirvana in Fire, but has put off watching it for one reason or another, I'm here with five reasons I think you should try it.
1. Epic Shit
Did you like the Lord of the Rings? More specifically, did you really like the second Peter Jackson film? Great, then you're all set for this.
I guess I could have called this Game of Thrones without the dragons, but that's not actually the vibe at all. Game of Thrones is much more sensational and salacious, with all the blood and butts and what-not. The Tolkien comparison is more apt, I think, because Nirvana in Fire is equally about as wholesome as you can get in a property where dudes are still getting stabbed all the time.
This is a show about vengeance. And yeah, justice for the fallen, sure, that's fine too. But mostly it's about a bunch of good people joining forces to make sure the bastards who did wrong pay, with their lives as necesary.
The problem, though, is that these bastards are incredibly powerful, which means that a pure brute-force approach isn't going to work. Accordingly, this quickly becomes a story about the power of smart teamwork to exact retribution on some people who can (and did!) legally get away with murder -- and our heroes are some of the people with their necks most on the line if anything goes wrong.
Don't let the Middle Earth comparison fool you into thinking this is all epic swordfights. It's not. (I mean, for one thing, as well-funded as this project is, it doesn't have Peter Jackson Money.) The vast majority of the tension in the show comes from dialogue and slow, terrible realizations. The fight scenes are almost a relief from the nail-biting intensity of intimate conversations about getting a letter from somebody's ex-wife or returning a book.
All told, the show has that incredible almost-RPG vibe of going through all the little subquests and cutscenes you find along the way to defeat the final boss. The plot carefully unravels a multi-tendriled mystery told to you by people in incredible costumes. It doesn't get much more epic than that.
(Nirvana in Fire is also a cautionary tale about how you should be very careful with who gets invited to your birthday party.)
please do yourself a favor & watch this rock climbing–themed drag king/burlesque performance set to “roxanne” by the police with all the lyrics but “rox” edited out
via @edithwigglesandgiggles on instagram
The thing about art is that it's not a one-sided relationship.
I mean, it can be, you can stand in front of a piece of art and go "ok, make me feel things, tell me the point of you", but it's going to be a generally limiting and unsatisfying experience.
And it's not necessarily innate or easy, the ability to really engage with something, to consider both what it seems to be saying and what it is about yourself that brings you to that interpretation. It takes practice, and a lot of thought. Our immediate response is not always the truest one. Real reflection takes time.
But it opens things up, in both our internal and external worlds, taking the time to reflect and engage. It's not about like or dislike, though examining why you react the way you do is part of the equation and can tell you a lot about yourself. It's about decentering yourself to focus on someone else's vision and/or perspective, to really think about what pieces of their inner world they are showing us and why, while also knowing that you will bring a piece of yourself to the experience that is uniquely you, and no one else will ever see it the exact same way. That's such a beautiful thing.
It's not bad to not always know what to think...but it's not great to assume that that equals there being nothing to think about.
Like all relationships, how we engage with art can be simple, complex, funny, sad, frustrating, all the things. But it's not going to really work if we aren't willing to play a part.