PheonixNest

Not sure yet, probably random. http://www.youtube.com/Pheonix11

[bowlby4]

[bowlby4]

[dd-is-my-guiltypleasure]

✨ David Duchovny, recipient of the Munich International Film festival’s CineMerit Award 2026! 🏆

Being a true all-round talent, Duchovny has delighted audiences of millions for more than 30 years now – including everyone present yesterday at #ffmuc! 🤩

🗯 Director John Lee Hancock delivers the laudatory speech for David Duchovny and presented him with the festival’s CineWave trophy. 🌊

🎤 Following the FilmTalk with Christoph Gröner and Julia Weigl, the audiences at @amerikahaus and @hffmuenchen witnessed the international premiere of SEE YOU WHEN I SEE YOU by Jay Duplass. 🎬

Thank you to everyone involved for making this an unforgettable day! ❤️

📸 Joel Heyd @joelistdort, Kurt Krieger

[notesfromtheidiotbox]

Sisters

[mayo-advance-sp]

Beloved Adam Glenn would be so terrible at hiding his feelings for you that its entirely endearing.

You'd catch him staring and he'd take a full few seconds to notice and react before turning away trying to act nonchalant, face beet red. And if you kept looking you'd notice him glance at you just to see if you're still looking.

Some days after you two would hang out he'd so casually yell out "Love you!" as you walk to your car and even if friends can say it casually his is not because he'll splutter and try to tack on "-r presence in my life!" and he knows hes not slick but you hope he sees the smile on your face.

If you mention that you're even a little tired, or feeling down, or any vaguely not positive emotion he's buying you your favorite foods or trinkets that he thinks you'll like and you know he hears the ladies nearby crooning about "how cute of a boyfriend he is" as he walks away and he allows himself a moment to pretend that's what he is to you.

He nearly faints when you ask him out. You have to talk him down from hyperventilating and he looks up at you with the biggest most pathetic eyes and you know that he's already all yours.

[mrsfoxmulder]

Boom! Here's my masterlist post of all things DD. IN-DEPTH FILE: DAVID DUCHOVNY

(I think you'll particularly enjoy this quote: David Duchovny's Self-Objectification)

@randomfoggytiger

Aaaaahhhhh OMG I AM OBSESSED WITH THIS!

I can’t wait to read all this (possibly while I’m on the clock because it’s a slooooow time of year at work)

THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!

[twiststreet]

She got the idea for the study while walking with her advisor at Stanford to discuss her thesis topic, and the paper she eventually published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology in 2014 is sharp enough that it should have ended the seated meeting on the day it came out.

She ran 4 experiments on 176 people. Same person tested twice. Once sitting, once walking. The creativity tasks were the standard ones psychologists have used for decades to measure how good a brain is at generating novel useful ideas.

81% of participants in the first experiment produced more creative ideas while walking than while sitting. In the second experiment, 88%. In the third, 100%. Every single person walked into a more creative version of themselves. On average, people generated 60% more novel useful ideas the moment their legs started moving.

The skeptical question is the obvious one. Maybe it was the fresh air. Maybe it was the scenery passing by. Maybe it was the change of environment doing the work, not the walking itself.

Oppezzo killed every one of those explanations with one experimental decision. She put people on a treadmill facing a blank wall. No scenery. No fresh air. No environmental change. Just legs moving in place while staring at white drywall. The 60% boost held.

Then she ran the experiment that closed the case completely. She took participants outside in two conditions. Half of them walked through a Stanford courtyard. The other half were pushed through the exact same courtyard in a wheelchair. Same outdoor stimulation. Same scenery passing at the same speed. The only difference was whether the legs were moving.

The walkers produced dramatically more novel high-quality ideas than the wheelchair group. The outdoors did almost nothing on its own. The walking did everything.

She also tested the opposite kind of thinking. Convergent thinking. The kind where there is one right answer and you have to narrow down to it. Word puzzles where 3 words share a hidden fourth word that connects them. The seated participants did slightly better on these. Walkers got slightly worse.

Walking is not a general intelligence enhancer. It does one specific thing. It opens up the divergent search inside your brain. The part that generates options. The part that produces unexpected connections. The part that takes a problem and finds five ways into it instead of one.

When you need to converge on the single right answer, sit down. When you need to find the answer in the first place, get up.

The mechanism is now well understood. Walking selectively activates what neuroscientists call the default mode network, the system inside your brain that runs when you are not consciously focused on anything. The DMN is where mind-wandering happens. Where memories cross-reference each other. Where ideas that have been sitting in separate folders inside your head finally bump into each other.

When you sit at a desk and force yourself to concentrate, you suppress the DMN. When you walk at a natural pace, the executive part of your brain gets just busy enough handling the walking that the DMN comes online and starts doing the work that focus was blocking.

The most useful finding in the entire paper is the one almost nobody quotes. The boost did not turn off the moment people stopped walking. Participants who walked first and then sat back down stayed elevated. Their next round of seated creativity work was still significantly better than people who had been sitting the whole time. The rest lingered for at least several minutes after the legs stopped moving.

You do not need to do creative work while walking. You need to walk before the creative work. The brain holds the state.

Edited down a long tweet. (x)

[razed-stoner-deactivated2013020]

[lord-kitschener]

Sorry for putting pictures of boobies on your dash.

[neurotoxinsonline]

I’m not

[luna-reverie]

BOOBIES

[crescentbeams]

sorry guys, i usually don’t post NSFW stuff.. but this is a great pair of boobies.

[sleepysmilesamirite]

I love a bouncing pair of boobies.

[capricornian]

I respond to this gifs of cute boobies with a pair of great tits. 

[killer-queen-gunpowder-gelatine]

omg guys. I’m sorry I usually don’t post stuff like this.

[nubocorvi]

boobies are great

[tinsnip]

yeah, boobies are okay, but i know somebody out there is just dying for some cock.

[gwengrimm]

This is what tumbler was made for

[thegreenwolf]

This post just isn’t complete without a picture of the world’s largest pecker.

[daddyslittleoreo666-deactivated]

I love this

[ogress]

that is one huge pecker you got there

[grumpybeardruid-archive-deactiv]

Needs moar tits

[metachimera-deactivated20170726]

What this post needs is a little ass.

[nico-milo-deactivated20180414]

Sorry guys, I don’t usually post NSFW, but you gotta admit, that ass looks great.

[bguiles]

Don’t forget a little pussy

[regvetdream]

YES.

[baguette-lagguette]

All the NSFW

[celtic-pyro-deactivated20230725]

How about a nice pair of hooters?

[the-1-and-lonly]

Thank you for this blessed post

[rip-paramour]

This wouldn’t be complete without a dik pic…

[void-the-bear]

@hellsite-hall-of-fame

[incorrect-voiceplay]

Im not even sorry this doesn’t fit my blog theme. You know for a fact that you needed this in your life.

[iwouldratherbereadingrn]

What this post needs is a big ass.

[1969chevycamaro]

This is why we tumble

[bnuuwitch]

THIS IS WHY WE TUMBLE 🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥

[johanna-swann]

can i offer you a beaver in this trying time?

[sheldontinydino]

The plush sample has arrived! I'm really happy with how it came out, and as many people requested, the donut can come off! I'm not sure how long production will take yet but once I have a timeframe I'll be opening pre-orders.

It did end up being pretty expensive to produce so the price is going to have to be a little higher (probably $17) I'm afraid but I hope you still look forward to it!

[randomfoggytiger]

(Credit to: Marine/@HerNameIsSpooky on Twitter)

The gang's all here?

[pheonix11]

I love my fandom 💜

[redscharlach]

Happy 100th birthday to the great David Attenborough, and let's remember, amid all the recollections of his many contributions to nature and knowledge, that young Attenborough could definitely get it.

[monamoni]

[quasi-normalcy]

I'm just saying, "We created a computer to make decisions for us, but it assimilated all of the bias that was implicit in the dataset and now makes incredibly racist decisions that we don't question because computers are logical and don't make mistakes" literally sounds like a planet-of-the-week morality play on the original Star Trek.

[twwings]

Star Trek episodes where people have left their decision-making up to machines, with disastrous consequences:

TOS, The Return of the Archons (computer-ruled society has The Purge for some reason)

TOS, A Taste of Armageddon (computer-run war simulations kill real people)

TOS, The Ultimate Computer (they try to replace the command staff with a machine intelligence, doesn't go well)

DS9, A Civil Defense (an automated system whose original purpose was to quash rebellions of enslaved people - programmed with violence and racism, it reacts with violence and racism, and cannot be reasoned with)

VOY, The Thaw (AI supposed to look after people's minds terrorizes them instead)

VOY, Warhead (an intelligent bomb is also hard to reason with) (could also toss the episodes "Prototype" and "Dreadnought" in here as well)

VOY, The Voyager Conspiracy (I wish I could make everyone watch this episode! It's about how training on large sets of data and attempting to force meaning from that data leads to conspiracy theory thinking and it's SO GOOD, still 100% relevant. it's also very gay, you should watch it)

VOY, Critical Care (a machine making health care decisions based on existing social prejudices, so, yup)

DISCO, Perpetual Infinity (and the entire arc that season about Control - this is literally a Large Language Model used for unethical secret ops that Craves Data and a big part of the DISCO plot that season is about trying to keep a huge dataset away from this increasingly powerful AI)

LD, "Terminal Provocations" and "For a Few Badgeys More" (a helpful holographic assistant program gets glitchy and murdery)

LD, "The Stars at Night" (what if we tried AI starships rather than ones crewed by sentient beings?)

They very much did warn us about the torment nexus, is all I'm saying

[black-fist-order]

By Jamie Hoo...

I can't even with this anymore.

Tell me I'm not the only one who noticed.

🔴 Shooting: 8:35 PM

🔴 Trump at podium reading from prepared notes: 9:30 PM

ONE HOUR.

Active shooting. Evacuation. Motorcade.

And he showed up READING FROM SOMETHING WRITTEN.

Trump doesn't do that.

Speaking off the cuff is literally his whole identity.

So I have one question that nobody is asking.

When was that written?

There are only 3 answers. 👇

1️⃣Written in the motorcade

30-45 minutes of pure chaos.

And somehow it's polished.

Structured.

Prepared.

Sure.

2️⃣ Written BEFORE the event

As a contingency.

Meaning someone specifically planned for a shooting happening there.

Before it happened.

They predicted it.

And they prepared for it.

3️⃣ It already existed before they walked in.

But THIS is what broke me. 👇

His opening line.

Dude.

I gasped.

I laughed.

And then I said no effing way ~ what the hell is going on.

It looked like a spoof.

Like a scene straight out of Idiocracy.

And then I realized. That's exactly the problem.

"That was very unexpected."

That is called an objection killer.

It's a sales technique.

You name the objection before anyone raises it.

You neutralize the skeptic before they speak.

You get ahead of the question before it's even asked.

That line was not shock.

That line was not relief.

That line was crafted.

By someone who had time.

Who was thinking clearly.

Who knew exactly what people would be thinking.

One hour after an active shooting.

❌ The notes existed.

❌ The opener was deliberate.

❌ The timeline doesn't work.

Not one person in mainstream media is talking about this.

Go watch it.

Then come back and tell me I'm wrong.

💾 Save this so you can show people.

♻️Share this before it disappears.

Because this is getting out of hand...

[goshdoggett]

The X-Files (1993–2018)

@pscentral​ event 48: silhouettes

[charlesoberonn]

"Oh you had a plague? Come back to us when you had a World War, brand new unconventional weapons, and a new international order."

[charlesoberonn]

I apologize.

[noroquian]

[demareth]

insert that YOU chihuahua post where theyre being pinned down i cant for the life of me find it

[charlesoberonn]

This one?

[schwazombie]

[ruffboi-mags]

Oh, Charles. The hubris. Honey. You had to know this was a possibility. Why would you tempt Apollo like that.

[dzamie]

I love how we don't even need Apollo to be captioned, it's just "he's holding a dodgeball and looks Greek statue, of COURSE it's Apollo delivering the gift of prophecy unto unsuspecting tumblr users"

[nebulous-nebuli]

[sour-charity]

[blueelectivire]

Absolute fucking trainwreck of a post

[seven-very-hot-fish]

Oh gee I wonder why this is going around again

[zack-creeper]

Art

[the-doctor-and-the-asshole]

How. Interesting

[rainbow-dash-the-ultimate]

Absolute bog standard post

[oli-bird]

@charlesoberonn

How about now?

[charlesoberonn]

Still not as bad as 1910s and 1940s but definitely getting there

[demareth]

[grandexcessivecoremode]

I feel like this is going to go around like 5 more times before someone deactivates or something breaks.

[toppettehat]

Some tiny, evil part of me kinda sorta wants things to get worse JUST so this post can keep getting updated

Just a little

[ciel-of-vault-111]

Oh way more than a little for me I’ve not got much else left to keep me entertained to why not watch it all go down the shitter :3

[mentally-unstable-bagel]

status update: uh. hmm. well

[zeta-finnish]

What am i doing here.

[imightbeafaerie-official-offical]

Well this aged terribly.

[cherries-of-wrath]

woah-oh we're (over) halfway there! woah-oh! living on a pra-ayer!

[absolutelyspockedtohearthat]

This is a declaration of love.

And in a very real way, what has been at stake in so many debates about marriage, love, and legal and formal recognition of partnerships is not weddings, but the chance to chose who can legally be with you at the worst times in your life. And Scully CHOOSES Mulder EVERY TIME.

Love.