Dr Michael Biggs, an associate professor at Oxfordâs Department of Sociology claims the Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) has been giving puberty blocking hormones to children, without robust evidence as to the long-term effects.
It comes after the governor of the clinic based in London with the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust resigned last month in protest at its âblinkeredâ response to doctors who had raised the alarm about âwoefully inadequateâ care. There is also another centre in Leeds.
Declaring the trial a success, the clinic has continued to treat over a thousand children with the hormones but Dr Biggsâ research suggests that after a year of treatment âa significant increaseâ was found in patients who had been born female self-reporting to staff that they âdeliberately try to hurt or kill myselfâ.
Parents also reported âa significant increase in behavioural and emotional problemsâ and a âsignificant decrease in physical wellbeingâ in children born female, he claims. According to his research, there was no positive impact on âthe experience of gender dysphoriaâ, the diagnosis given to those who are described as feeling intensely uncomfortable with their biological sex.
Dr Biggs said: âPuberty blockers exacerbated gender dysphoria. Yet the study has been used to justify rolling out this drug regime to several hundred children aged under 16.â
I lived as a trans man for 10 years before detransitioning and reconnecting with myself as a woman and a lesbian.
I'm against transition because it's medically harmful, not because I have any hate towards trans people.
Gender ideology disproportionately affects lesbian and bisexual women and tomboys, and causes us to become divorced from our community of women and disconnected from feminism. This leaves us vulnerable to all forms of abuse as well as psychological and medical distress.
Female people of any identity label are my priority. Youâre beautiful and you deserve love, health, and a happy life.
Note: The Discord server is now closed due to lack of bandwidth to moderate. If you create a new group, DM me and Iâll add it here for others to find!
My Writing | My Comics | Medical Research | Asks
Radfem Library by @ladielabrys2:
Resources for learning about radical feminism.
find me on twitter @ladielabrys2
more on the effects of T in females. vulvodynia and clitorodynia mean that this woman is suffering from chronic, shooting pains in her vulva and clitoris.
âtrusted medical professionalsâ permanently disabled this formerly healthy woman. they knew she trusted them, and they took advantage of that trust.
and even the informed consent paperwork lists atrophy as a side effect of testosterone. why would that be a painless experience? if your arm or your lungs started to âatrophyâ, to become weaker and smaller, couldnât they also start to hurt?
trans guys take testosterone for the systemic, permanent, whole-body effects, right?⊠and you donât believe people when they say âthis drug has systemic permanant effects, all throughout the bodyâ?
i think you should place a little less trust in âmedical professionals,â a little more on your own common sense.
Here is my post on how and why this happens, using a peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Impotence Research.
Here and here are some reddit screenshots both from r/detrans and r/ftm.
Here is my master spreadsheet of reddit testimonials which is currently sitting at 89 entries (don't think I've been sleeping on it! And don't think I haven't started archiving the posts ;)))) they're there forever bb :)))) .
Because of the death/dox threats I recieved at original publishing date, I privated this spreadsheetâYou have to DM me to access it or email me at d3nt4l-d4m4g3@gmail verifying your tumblr username with me. The entries are in order of amount of time on testosterone so you can get a sense of the timeline of destruction.
It's always "believe trans people's experiences without questioning (even online where no one obviously ever lies) uwu" until it's horrible medical conditions and adverse experiences. đ« Then it's "source???? statistics???"
Invite both wolves and sheep to a party and only wolves will show up.
If spaces in which women are vulnerable arenât single-sex, women will not use them. Thatâs why we fought for them. Itâs because without single-sex spaces, women are house-bound with a short leash, or unable to participate in activities without risking their safety.
This is the same thing that applies to the lack of women in STEM and other male-dominated fields. Women protect themselves. We know whatâs dangerous. Itâs men.
Biologists are correcting certain prejudices actively promoted by the transgender lobby.
Link to the article here.
Does anyone have the link to that post explaining how the term "assigned at birth" was originally coined and used by and for intersex people (or people with DSD) before it was completely appropriated by the trans lobby, to the point that the people it was originally about have largely been forgotten?
I reblogged it a few months ago, but I can't seem to find it anymore.
New research, published in October in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, concluded that despite size discrepancy, thereâs no functional difference between menâs and womenâs brains. âMaleâ brains and âfemaleâ brains simply donât exist. In fact, thereâs significant overlap.
This study had 1400 people in it⊠Remember that sample size matters. remember this when someone tries to rebuke this with a study that has 80 participants. Be as scientifically literate as possible so that we can debunk this nonsense one step at a time.
Hereâs an article that talks about a paper which examined 6000 individuals and came up with similar findings.
â95-100% of girls who âpersistâ in gender dysphoria at adolescence are same-sex attracted; these girls are typically offered cross-sex hormones by age 16, and surgeries as young as 18. The typical age that a young lesbian has her first sexual experience and/or claims her sexual orientation is between the ages of 19 and the early 20s.
Let those two statements sink in for a moment.â - source
Sisters, some of you may lack experience evaluating scientific evidence, yet are confronted with TRAs saying âscience proves trans people exist!â and providing links to scientific studies claiming to have found a biological basis for trans identity, or proof that transition is beneficial to trans people.
Iâd like to outline a few concepts that may help you understand the problems with the science that has been conducted on the subject of trans people. I am not a scientist, so Iâd much appreciate any feedback or corrections.
1. Begging the question
Here are some of the studies being held up as proof that trans people are âvalidâ:
A study of the brains of trans women, trans men, cis women and cis men, and the potential for gender-based differences: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/01/150107082133.htm
Our sense of belonging to the male or female gender is an inherent component of the human identity perception. As a general rule, gender ide
A study on the brains of some trans men, and some cis men and cis women, claiming to show that the brains of the trans men had more similarities to the cis male brains, relative the cis female brains: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022395610001585
Some gray and white matter regions of the brain are sexually dimorphic. The best MRI technique for identifying subtle differences in white m
Youâve heard it before, Iâm sure. Are you ready to learn why these studies were giant wastes of time? And no, itâs not even because of the obvious problem right off the bat (How did they know there were no closted trans people in the âcisâ groups? How could they be sure there were no future detransitioners in the trans groups?).
Itâs because, if you want to do science, you cannot start by assuming what you are trying to prove. This is known as the fallacy of âbegging the question.â They relied on the self-reports of trans people to sort them in a group apart from cis people. In attempting to prove the biological basis for the category âtransâ, they assumed the category âtransâ had a biological basis. This is what pseudoscientists do.
This fallacy comes up a lot in arguments with the devoutly religious: âThe human eye is too complex to have evolved, it must have been designed. Therefore, God exists.â Sir, noâŠ. you cannot assume that the eye is too complex to have evolved that way. You must prove that to me.
What they should have done, right from the start, is study the brains of self-identified trans people, and from there predict the future detransitioners. Or they could have studied the brains of self-identified non-trans people, and predicted which ones were closted trans people. That would have been real science.
âI am not convinced. After all, they found something that looks âfemaleâ in the brains of the trans women! Maybe their methods are flawed but they must have found something!â
Not necessarily. I think what may be going on is known as:
2. P-hacking
When I was a young child, I saw a History Channel Special that claimed to prove that the Bible predicted the JFK assassination. I think the letters of a certain translation were arranged in grid form, and certain words related to the JFK assassination were grouped in close proximity. Stupid, right?
But I was just a kid, so I told my dad âDad! Did you know the bible predicted the JFK assassination?â And my father recognized that as an excellent opportunity to teach me about p-hacking.
âNo,â he said, âthose are just coincidences.â
âDad, are you blind? What are the odds that those exact words would be found together like that?â
âNot very high. But donât forget⊠they werenât looking for evidence that the bible predicted the JFK assassination. They were looking for evidence that the Bible predicted anything, in the history of ever. Itâs actually quite unlikely, using their methods, that youâd find NO uncanny predictions of anything thatâs ever happened in human history. And youâd probably find a few uncanny predictions in the Harry Potter books, using this method.â
These researchers in the second study cited did not set out to find whether trans men had similar fractional anistropy levels in posterior part of the right superior longitudinal fasciculus to cis men. They were looking at whether the white matter patterns of trans men had any similarity to cis men (of course, in doing so they flagrantly beg the question, but I digress).
The brain is highly complex. When you conduct an MRI scan, you generate mountains of data. And if you set out to prove that a similarity exists somewhere in this mile-deep well of data you have generated for these individuals, you are going to find something that appears statistically significant. Itâs actually unlikely that you will find no similarities between any two groups of people who have their brains scanned. And, if you are engaged in anti-scientific motivated reasoning, you will take this and claim to have found evidence for a biological basis for trans identification.
âPerhaps there is faulty science going on but you canât argue with the results! Transition saves lives! Studies have shown that it makes people feel so much better!â
Well, thereâs a problem with that, too.
3. The placebo effect
The neurological basis of the placebo effect has been extensively studied. We know, for example, that it can be augmented or dampened by certain drugs. We know that it exists even when you know you are being given a placebo. And we know that the more elaborate a placebo is, the more effective it is: so a surgery will be more effective than an injection, which will be better than a pill.
Do you see where Iâm going with this? Have you ever heard of a more elaborate treatment than gender transition: surgery, hormones, clothing, hair, name, pronouns, every aspect of your life can change.
But transition has not been proven to be any more effective at treating gender dysphoria than some kind of equally elaborate placebo. Thatâs the piece thatâs missing, that would usually be accounted for when studying any sort of medical treatment.
âBut there are a lot of health benefits to placebos. If they help people, then they help people.â
This is true. Thereâs a problem, though. Transition is not tumeric pills or reiki or like⊠journaling frequently. In fact, it comes with risks of absolutely nightmarish consequences. Trans women are walking around, right now, with colostomy bags because of botched vaginoplasties. Trans men are stuck with chronic kidney infections from phalloplasties, as well as the risk of gangrene and lifelong weakness in their donor sites, as well as phantom pain and progressive tightening and sclerosing from their mastectomies. Puberty blockers disrupt brain development and put a child at risk of osteoporosis, sterility, and sexual dysfunction. Hormones cause powerful and systemic changes that have not been fully studied, but consider this: what happens when the cartilagenous valves on a male-sized heart become thinner and more flexbile under the influence of estrogen? What happens when the cartilage structures in a female sized brain become larger and tougher in response to testosterone? Do you know?
You donât, because nobody knows. We arenât studying these treatments. We are experimenting on human beings, just like they did in the Nazi camps, and for what: treatments that have not been proven to be better than a placebo, that are based on faulty science, and that donât even hold up to common sense. Why would you amputate a healthy young womanâs breasts? Because she begged you to? Is that how medicine works?
âBut why does the trans rights movement need to lean on junk science? Why donât they do real science instead?â
Because it is a religion. Thatâs it, thatâs the only explanation left. They believe that they have gender identities, that are at odds with their physical bodies. Theses gender identities have not been demonstrated to exist. These gender identities seem to want things of trans people, and they seem to be placated with certain rites (going to the beach after top surgery, standing to pee after phalloplasty) and certain prayers (compelled pronoun usage). Gender identities act similarly to the members of any polytheistic pantheon.
I have no problem with anyoneâs religion. But it is time the scientific establishment, and the government, understand that in âaffirmingâ trans people, while defacing the scientific method, logic and common sense, they are in fact respecting an establishment of religion. They do this to the ultimate detriment of trans people, who have come to them for help, for answers, and are made a mockery.
âWhy do you care so much about trans people?â
Because theyâre human beings and they deserve better than this horseshit. Because I used to be one. Because if not me, then who?
A shocking new development has emerged in the case of Algerian boxer Imane Khelif after a French journalist reportedly gained access to a da
Khelif and Lu Ting have been proven to male for like the fifth time
He isnât returning to boxing now that sex tests will be mandatory
Khelif and Lu Ting have male specific Disorders of Sexual Development meaning they were not observed as male at birth but went through male developmental pathways at adolescence giving them unfair male physical advantages
Both male sports cheats refuse mandatory sex testing even though they could shut down peopleâs well earned suspicion on their biological sex
Instead these woman bashers opted to play the victim like they didnât punch women in the face and make Angela Carini cry on a global stage
âBitch deserved itâ according to Khelif supporters while crying âbullyâ
IOC forced her to apologise for crying after a man cheated and punched her in the face like an abusive husband
Did Khelif have to touch her breasts after punching her on an international stage? đ
Like I told you, Khelifâs sex was already under question before that because his female counterparts were already complaining about him injuring them
Shocking news out of the Olympic boxing controversy as the Technical Commissioner of the Spanish boxing team reveals that Algerian boxer Ima
IBA officials revealed that Khelif and Lu Ting failed two sex tests and were banned from an Indian boxing competition
Now if you wanna talk corruption
The International Olympics Committee did not sex test athletes and ignored the IBAâs warnings about two male athletes with intersex conditions
The same Olympics committee that allowed that Dutch pedophile to compete allowed men into hard contact sports to assault women
Steven Van de Velde was released one year into a four-year sentence for raping a 12-year-old girl.
Bringing up the fact IBA are Russians is a lame, irrelevant red herring when IOC are responsible for endangering female athletes with gross negligence and ideological dishonesty
Turns out men posing as women and punching women and taking their medals is not as popular as social media told you
Before you block like a little bitch and double down
Donât pretend to be pro feminist online
You support men punching women and obvious cheating in womenâs sports
I kept the receipts from the shit fit you threw after being proven wrong in real time
I bet if you actually did your research you would still deny it and go back to playing bibeo games
gummygunk
prguitarman
areudirty
stormborns
blakekathryn
