La Source des Femmes (2011)
Cosimo Galluzzi

oozey mess
Stranger Things

Kiana Khansmith

JBB: An Artblog!

JVL
NASA
One Nice Bug Per Day

@theartofmadeline
Peter Solarz

shark vs the universe
Game of Thrones Daily
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Sade Olutola
h
will byers stan first human second
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
almost home
KIROKAZE

★

seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Canada

seen from Pakistan

seen from France
@radfemming
La Source des Femmes (2011)
like, i rly dnt understand it wen ppl on here cite th “trans person has 1 in 12 chance to be murdered in a lifetime” statistic bc…im not trying to be mean, but do u understand why that cant possibly be true?
ignoring for now the fact that the 1 in 12 statistic has never actually been reliably sourced and is thought to have originated from a now-deleted article on the hrc america website;
if u understand statistics, then thats an impossibly high rate of murder for any one group of people (and, before u point out ‘yes but this is what makes it shocking!’, its just…impossibly high.)
in USA, about 5.2 per 100000 people is estimated to be murdered. obviously, the rates go up depending on things like race, class, or indeed gender expression. but even for a group with proportionately one of the highest murder rates in the whole world, say, a black young man living in usa, the murder rate is estimated at around 19.4 per 100000. to express that as a fraction, it would be, uh, like around 1 in 5155. and thats only murders that were recorded as murders! the actual number is likely much worse. but anyway, for the recorded deaths, thats a really high number. much higher than pretty much any other group of people when u look at th stats in terms of race, age, sex, nationality etc.
According to the National Center for Transgender Equality, there are around 3,139,000 transgender individuals living in usa. so, applying the 1 in 12 rate to this, that would mean around 261583 murdered trans people in a lifetime. around 25 trans people per year are estimated to be murdered in the united states (but we can probably assume the actual number is much higher), so in a lifetime (lets say 85yrs just to be on the safe side) the total amount of deaths is estimated to be around 2125. thats an appallingly high amount, for sure, but nowhere near the 261583 that would be necessary for the 1-in-12 statistic to be possible. just for some context, the total amount of murders recorded in the usa in 2014, for ALL types of people, was estimated to be around 14,249.
its not possible that trans people are on average murdered at a rate of 1 in 12 in usa. it isnt doing any favours for trans people to run around citing this totally made-up number when ur trying to argue with ppl abt transgender rights n stuff, bc anyone who has a basic understanding of statistics is going to immediately know that this number cannot possibly be accurate and wont take ur arguments seriously any more. the actual rates of transgender people murdered in hate crimes etc are (sadly) high enough, you dont need to cite made-up statistics to prove ur point, the evidence enough is here alrdy.
no hate, and i hope this post was informative, pls correct me if i made any mistake + hav a nice day all
Both prostituted women and black men have a higher murder rate than trans. The purpose of the one in twelve lie is to win the oppression olympics.
who wants to make me banners that say “anyone can interact but if you’re a little in a ddlg relationship please think about why your partner is sexually aroused by simulated childhood and why that might be a red flag”
just a reminder that hugh hefner leaked marilyn monroe’s nudes, which she then had to apologize to society for, and only she was shamed, and it could have ruined her entire career, and then after she died, he paid thousands so his grave could be beside hers, so he could further claim ownership and victimize her even after death
he also called the drugs he made his bunnies take “thigh spreaders” and would pass these drugged women around to all types of men at his parties, including bill cosby. hugh was even question after being directly accused of helping bill r*pe one of his victims
it was a fire-able offence to gain more than 5lbs of their hiring weight, which hugh used to help pit the girls against each other for constant in-fighting until it was time for the night drug induced orgy
just a few lil facts, but you know… “what an icon!”
rot in pieces hugh
When someone says these days sexism and misogyny don’t exist anymore show them this.
Blatant homophobia
I'm sorry but do they know what the word HOMOsexual means?? Like it's literal definition is attracted to same sex.. no homophobia in my house
hey libfems why is rachel dolezal racist but laverne cox isn’t sexist? asking for a friend
The Huffington Post: “60 Stunning Photos Of Women Protesting Around The World”
Please I beg you
If your kids think that they’re trans
Let them take puberty blockers
It’s completely reversible
Puberty is not
Do it for the children
had no idea these were even a thing
Glad to help
people dont understand how important this is. If you can stop the changes before they happen your kid will have a much much easier time as an adult.
puberty blockers are safe for children btw
I didn’t know that was a thing either.
It’s the first step that an endocrinologist will put a kid on anyway. 👍
http://californiahealthline.org/news/women-fear-drug-they-used-to-halt-puberty-led-to-health-problems/
For years, Sharissa Derricott, 30, had no idea why her body seemed to be failing. At 21, a surgeon replaced her deteriorated jaw joint. She’s been diagnosed with degenerative disc disease and fibromyalgia, a chronic pain condition. Her teeth are shedding enamel and cracking.
None of it made sense to her until she discovered a community of women online who describe similar symptoms and have one thing in common: All had taken a drug called Lupron.
Thousands of parents chose to inject their daughters with the drug, which was approved to shut down puberty in young girls but also is commonly used off-label to help short kids grow taller.
The drug’s pediatric version comes with few warnings about long-term side effects. It is also used in adults to fight prostate cancer or relieve uterine pain and the Food and Drug Administration has warnings on the drug’s adult labels about a variety of side effects.
More than 10,000 adverse event reports filed with the FDA reflect the experiences of women who’ve taken Lupron. The reports describe everything from brittle bones to faulty joints.
In interviews and in online forums, women who took the drug as young girls or initiated a daughter’s treatment described harsh side effects that have been well-documented in adults.
Women who used Lupron a decade or more ago to delay puberty or grow taller described the short-term side effects listed on the pediatric label: pain at the injection site, mood swings and headaches. Yet they also described conditions that usually affect people much later in life. A 20-year-old from South Carolina was diagnosed with osteopenia, a thinning of the bones, while a 25 year-old from Pennsylvania has osteoporosis and a cracked spine. A 26 year-old in Massachusetts needed a total hip replacement. A 25-year-old in Wisconsin, like Derricott, has chronic pain and degenerative disc disease.
“It just feels like I’m being punished for basically being experimented on when I was a child,” said Derricott, of Lawton, Okla. “I’d hate for a child to be put on Lupron, get to my age and go through the things I have been through.”
Puberty blockers are absolutely not reversible, there are side effects and the damage they can do are very real, OP is flat out lying. How sinister do you have to be to spread this kind of misinformation, and try to hide the dangers and potential side effects from people who are considering this?
Stop trying to trans GNC and gay kids so they can be ~gender conforming~
i hope none of you idiots have children because you have to be extremely naive or monstrous to do such a thing or some fucked up combination thereof
I hope the professionals enabling this are barred and sued the hell out of
http://people.com/tv/jazz-jennings-transgender-bottom-surgery-complications/
puberty bloickers are neither reversible nor safe. They are inhumane tools of conversion therapy, and a method of child abuse.
Just use your heads for a second, people. Puberty is an extremely complex biological process and hormone balance is very delicate and can cause a miriad of health complications if disrupted. Why on EARTH would you think halting puberty would have no side effects? On a time where your body is actively growing, your reproductive system is maturing, your brain chemistry is being defined, why the hell would you think messing with this process would be OK? THINK, dude.
if it weren't for trans women there wouldn't be pride at all so why don't you go pee your pants, fash trash
the first pride got organized by two lesbians called ellen broidy and linda rhodes who belonged to the lavender menace, a radical feminist group for lesbians and two gay men called craig rodwell and fred sargeant.
kiss my ass you uneducated idiot lol
You totally schooled that fool.
they will never stop erasing us out of our own history, THE HISTORY WE CREATED. we are the reasons they can go out every june, we are the reason that homosexuality isn’t being seen as a mental disorder anymore. it was always lesbians and gay men. never trans people. i love being a lesbian and i will never let our history go down. 🌈
yall i have pretty controversial opinions about lesbianism apparently but if u think lesbians need to be welcoming to penis in their sex lives please unfollow me
hi this is really unfair to trans women
oddly i don’t really care about using my vagina to be fair to penis
This response is so creepy but they’ll deny it when people say they believe its transphobic to not like penis.
op literally just said “lesbians don’t need to have sex involving penises” and they replied about it being “unfair”. UNFAIR. ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
Life As A Psychic
If you are a feminist it is your job to dismantle the stigma around the movement by calling out bad feminists, like TERFs, TWERFs, misinformation, and blatant lies used to invoke fear into women, men, or just plain people.
Focus not only on women, but on men and non binary people as well. Feminism is an equality movement, which means we need to uplift EVERYONE. Not just women.
Feminism isn’t about female superiority. Don’t act like it is and call it out when people act as if women are better than men.
Hi Fae,
No, it is not feminist’s job to protect pro gender-identity politics.
Why? Because, feminism and gender-identity politics are literally two contradicting theories.
The word “gender” was coined in the 1950′s by sexologist John Money (a pro-genderist, mind you) as a literal replacement word for the term “sex-roles”. Gender means “sex-roles”. Feminists in the 1970′s embraced “gender” as this distinction between biological sexes and the power relations that surround the two most common biological sexes, males and females. John Money also attempted to condition a child (David Reimer) into identifying as a girl when the infant suffered from a botched circumcision. He conditioned said child through sexual abuse with his twin brother, Brian Reimer, and believed that pedophilia love was a thing. David and Brian would later both die from suicide in their adult lives.
John Money thought of gender as a “social identity”, much like Tumblr genderists. Genderists support his ideology, and in that, his actions. They also walk over other oppressed groups to support (transwomen) male violence against females which you can observe in nearly every anti-gender post that genderists have commented on. They silence females for talking about reproductive issues, pressure lesbians into having sex with them and call them “transphobic” when they don’t, advocate for sex reassignment surgery (benefiting privately run institutions and capitalistic ideals) to conform to sex-roles rather than safer and healthier treatments for dysphoric individuals (like me), ignore black radical and trans radical feminists by claiming they “hate themselves” (they call this “internalized trans-misogyny” for trans-radicals), do not think of how legally identifying into a social role is going to mess up sociological data on male/female violence, steal ideology from feminist and critical race theory such as the concept of “intersectionality” to use it against oppressed people just to validate their identities, and take terms from the inter-sex community, such as “afab”, and misuse them, advocate for anti-recovery techniques for mental illness such as exposure therapy (something ESSENTIAL to recovery for mental illnesses like Body Dysmorphoric Disorder, anxiety, depression, OCD, phobias, etc).
Feminism is for the liberation of women as an oppressed class. It is not about protecting men at all. Feminism can be a very productive movement without protecting men since Feminism is anti-gender and benefits the oppressed sex. By claiming that feminism is about equality and lifting both men and women up, you are implying (maybe on accident) that women and men are already on the same playing field and that no power relations/oppression exists between men and women. Here are some helpful images that explain radical feminism pretty well (I do not take credit for any of them except for the first one):
>women >oppressed in the first world
Please dig your head out of your ass.
Women are oppressed in the first world. “First-world women don’t have legitimate grievances because other women have it worse” is not an argument. So long as we have the right to vote, drive, go to school and work, women should shut our mouths and be grateful to American men for allowing us to have that much? Many issues that are happening in other countries to women are still happening to women who live in first-world nations. Yes, feminists can and should campaign for international women’s rights. But we do not have to exclude our own country from this.
Shoo, shoo.
How lmao? They’re advantaged in almost every way.
No.
We live in a patriarchy (and not an equal society or matriarchy) because men hold the most power, authority, and wealth. I am going to focus on US only.
In government (2015 statistics):
Source
Women in Congress currently hold 19.4% of 535 seats.
There are only 3 women in the US Supreme Court.
Women hold only 20% of the 100 seats in the Senate.
Women hold only 19.3% of 435 seats in the House.
Women hold only 25% of 312 statewide executive seats.
Women hold only 25% of 5411 seats in the State House/Assembly.
Only 24.3% of women hold 7383 seats in State Legislature.
Only 17% of 100 seats belong to women mayors in the 100 largest cities.
Only 18.4% of women hold 1393 seats as mayors in cities over 30,000.
In Media (2015 statistics):
Source
Film:
Men were 73 percent of all Hollywood TV writers in 2012. Women were 27 percent.
Women television writers earned about 92 cents for every dollar that white male writers earned in 2012, a penny more than the 91 cents women earned in 2009.
Men writing for film accounted for 85 percent of all screenwriters. Women represented 15 percent. That compared to 17 percent in 2009 and meant that men screenwriters outnumbered women screenwriters by a more than 3 to 1 margin.
Women film writers earned 77 cents for every dollar earned by white male film writers in 2012, down from 82 cents in 2009.
The share of minority television writers rose to 11 percent in 2012 from 10 percent in 2009. But, by a 3 to 1 margin, white TV writers outnumbered minority TV writers.
Minorities represented 6 percent of film writers for the decade ending in 2009, when that rate fell to 5 percent. In 2012, the figure remained at 5 percent, which meant that minorities were outnumbered by 7 to 1.
While writers aged 41 to 50 got most of the gigs in Hollywood, that reality largely reversed itself once those writers turned 60.
Facebook’s Workforce is:
69 percent male overall, and 77 percent male in the leadership ranks.
57 percent white, 34 percent Asian, 4 percent Latino, 3 percent bi-racial or multi-racial and 2 percent Black overall.
Of workers in tech jobs, 85 percent were male and 15 percent were female.
Of all those tech workers, 53 percent were white, 41 percent were Asian, 3 percent were Latino, 2 percent were bi-racial or multi-racial and 1 percent was black.
Of workers in non-tech sectors, 53 percent were male and 47 percent were female.
Of non-tech sector jobs, 63 percent were held by whites, 24 percent by Asians, 6 percent by Latinos, 4 percent by bi-racial or multi-racial persons, 2 percent by blacks and 1 percent by people of some other race.
Google’s Workforce:
70 percent of all workers were male and 61 percent of them were white.
Additionally, men accounted for 79 percent of Google executives, 83 percent of tech workers and 52 percent of its non-tech workers as of January 2014, the month for which Google calculated data it released to the public in August 2014.
LinkdIn:
75 percent of LinkedIn’s leaders were male.
Of all company leaders, 65 percent were white, 28 percent were Asian, 4 percent were Latino, 3 percent were bi-racial or multi-racial, and 1 percent each was black or some other race.
53 percent of all LinkedIn workers in the United States were white, 38 percent were Asian, 4 percent were Latino, 2 percent were black, 2 percent were bi-racial or multi-racial and 1 percent was of some other race.
83 percent of LinkedIn workers in tech jobs were male.
Racially, 60 percent of tech workers were Asian, 34 percent were white, 3 percent were Latino and 1 percent each were black, bi-racial or multi-racial, or some other ethnicity.
Of those in non-tech jobs, 53 percent were male and 47 percent were female. Racially, 63 percent of non-tech job-holders were white, 26 percent were Asian, 5 percent were Latino, 3 percent each were black or bi-racial/multi-racial and 1 percent was some other race.
Yahoo:
Of Yahoo employees who were at least vice presidents or even higher up the corporate ladder, 77 percent were men, according to Figures Yahoo Chief Development Officer Jacqueline Reses released in June 2014.
Yahoo has a female CEO, Marissa Mayer.
Men held 85 percent of Yahoo tech jobs and 47 percent of non-tech jobs.
Yahoo provided a racial breakdown for its U.S. workforce only: 50 percent of employees were white, 39 percent were Asian, 4 percent were Latino, 2 percent each were black, of mixed race or did not disclose their race. In the C-suite of Yahoo’s U.S. offices, 78 percent of executives were white; 17 percent were Asian; 2 percent each were either Latino, of mixed race or did not disclose their race; and 1 percent was black.
Apple:
Men comprised 70 percent of computer, mobile giant Apple’s workforce Apple reported that seven out of 10 members of its global workforce are men. The Cupertino, California-based company’s announcement was based on summer 2014 personnel data.
Apple reported that females accounted for: 28 percent of its leader ranks. 35 percent of its non-tech employees.
20 percent of its tech employees.
On-screen development:
By race, 74 percent of female characters were white, 14 percent were black, 6 percent were Asian, 5 percent were Latina and 1 percent were some other ethnicity.
Women actors had 42 percent of all speaking parts, a drop of 1 percent from 2012-13 but higher than 1997- 98’s 39 percent.
As women characters aged, they were less likely to be cast. Of all female characters, 32 percent were in their 30s and 17 percent were in their 40s. The respective Figures for male characters were 33 percent and 25 percent.
Males directed 86 percent of all TV episodes.
White males directed 7 out of 10 episodes.
All women and minority men, combined, directed 3 out of 10 episodes.
Men of color directed 17 percent of all episodes, an increase over the previous year.
White women directed 12 percent of all episodes, the same rate as the previous year.
Women of color directed 2 percent of all episodes, the same rate as the previous year.
Overall, by age, 59 percent of female characters were in their 20s and 30s, while 58 percent of male characters were in their 30s and 40s.
Of all characters, 3 percent of females and 4 percent of males were older than 60.
Females accounted for 46 percent of characters in programs with at least one female writer and 39 percent of characters in shows with no female writers.
Females accounted for 47 percent of the cast in shows with at least one female creator and 39 percent of the cast in shows with no female creators.
In that cumulative category, these researchers concluded that in 2013-14 women were: 40 percent of producers, which was up from 38 percent in 2012-13. 26 percent of writers in 2013-14, down from 30 percent in 2012-13. 21 percent of executive producers, down from 24 percent in 2012-13.
19 percent of creators, down from 23 percent in 2012-13.
16 percent of editors, which was unchanged from 2012-13.
13 percent of directors, up from 11 percent in 2012-13.
1 percent of directors of photography, down from 2 percent in 2012-13.
Women in video game development:
Overall, 48 percent of gamers were female.
Women and men each purchased 50 percent of video games.
Women aged 18 and older were 36 percent of gamers, while boys aged 18 and younger were 17 percent of gamers.
On average, all adult gamers have been playing for 16 years; women have been playing for 13 years, on average, and men for an average of 18 years
Online Harassment:
Of young women aged 18-24, 26 percent said they had been stalked online and 25 percent said they were sexually harassed online, and that some of those threats were sustained over an extended period.
In addition, women said “they do not escape the heightened rates of physical threats and sustained harassment common to their male peers and young people in general.”
Women were more likely than men to find their most recent experience with online harassment extremely or very upsetting; 38 percent of those women and 17 percent of those men described their suffering in those terms.
Although they hold almost 52 percent of all professional-level jobs, American women lag substantially behind men when it comes to their representation in leadership positions (source):
They are only 14.6 percent of executive officers, 8.1 percent of top earners, and 4.6 percent of Fortune 500 CEOs.
They hold just 16.9 percent of Fortune 500 board seats.
In the financial services industry, they make up 54.2 percent of the labor force, but are only 12.4 percent of executive officers, and 18.3 percent of board directors. None are CEOs.
They account for 78.4 percent of the labor force in health care and social assistance but only 14.6 percent of executive officers and 12.4 percent of board directors. None, again, are CEOs.
In the legal field, they are 45.4 percent of associates—but only 25 percent of nonequity partners and 15 percent of equity partners.
In medicine, they comprise 34.3 percent of all physicians and surgeons but only 15.9 percent of medical school deans.
In information technology, they hold only 9 percent of management positions and account for only 14 percent of senior management positions at Silicon Valley startups.
White men–by overwhelming numbers–hold the majority of power, wealth, and authority in the US.
Now that we have covered how women are oppressed by men in America, let’s look at the demographics of US women vs. other regions worldwide in violence statistics.
Regional data (source):
The report represents data regionally according to WHO regions.
For intimate partner violence, the type of violence against women for which more data were available, the worst affected regions were:
South-East Asia - 37.7% prevalence. Based on aggregated data from Bangladesh, Timor-Leste (East Timor), India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Thailand.
Eastern Mediterranean - 37% prevalence. Based on aggregated data from Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Palestine.
Africa – 36.6% prevalence. Based on aggregated data from Botswana, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Rwanda, South Africa, Swaziland, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
For combined intimate partner and non-partner sexual violence or both among all women of 15 years or older, prevalence rates were as follows:
Africa – 45.6%
Americas – 36.1%
Eastern Mediterranean – 36.4%* (No data were available for non-partner sexual violence in this region)
Europe – 27.2%
South-East Asia – 40.2%
Western Pacific – 27.9%
High income countries – 32.7%
Violence against women in high-income countries:
In Canada a study of adolescents aged 15 to 19 found that 54 per cent of girls had experienced “sexual coercion” in a dating relationship. v
In the United States, 83 percent of girls aged 12 to 16 experience some for of sexual harassment in public schools. xviii
The United States is the third country with the highest rape statistics.
Another source on how the US has awful sexual assault rates.
The United States is rated one of the highest countries in the world for violence.
The US is a terrible place for women.
22 countries where the gender wage gap is smaller than the US
U.S. women are more likely to die during childbirth than women in any other developed country, leading the U.S. to be ranked 33rd among 179 countries on the health and well-being of women and children.
US women paid less in every industry.
The U.S. ranks high on education and economic opportunities for women. But it ranks 60th on political empowerment, compared to Canada’s (ranked 20th overall) 42nd position.
And this is only the tip of the iceberg. So, yes, we still have a lot of need for feminism in first world countries.
I love when a bullshit spewer gets slammed by an avalanche of data lol.
That was so much fun to read.
This was amazing I feel like I was reborn
this must have felt like a punch in the throat i love it
today i’m doing a digital purge and i unfollowed a load of inactive radfem blogs and sadly now i follow less than 450 blogs so like
idk reblog this if you’re a radfem and i don’t follow you
This is what radical feminists mean when we say that feminism isn’t about equality, but is about the liberation of female people from male people. We don’t want to be as violent as men are.