
oozey mess

titsay
noise dept.

gracie abrams
occasionally subtle

blake kathryn
official daine visual archive
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

roma★
𓃗
YOU ARE THE REASON
NASA
RMH
Cosimo Galluzzi
cherry valley forever
🪼

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Cosmic Funnies
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from Argentina
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Peru

seen from Türkiye
seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Ireland

seen from Italy

seen from Venezuela
seen from Croatia
seen from Germany

seen from Netherlands
seen from Colombia

seen from Türkiye
@reyiosa
unfortunately i dont think its queerbaiting if the creator is just so terminally heterosexual that they never remotely considered the same gender relationship their show is centered around could be read as romantic. it is deeply painful however.
Maybe accidental queer baiting? The way someone may not mean to say something rude, but it may come off rude, so it's rude. Frustrating either way.
Not being a dick, just a friendly clarification.
By definition you can't accidentally queerbait. Queerbaiting is specifically using a same sex pair from the show to market the show to queer audiences with no intention of ever following through on a romantic relationship.
There is officially licensed Destiel merch signed off on by Kripke. Teen Wolf had a commercial with the actors for Derek and Stiles draped over each other talking about being "on a ship." Both shows actively used scenes between them as marketing while actively mocking fans for wanting them together. Sherlock has multiple characters refer to Johnlock as a couple, including characters we're supposed to believe are never wrong about human behavior and pushed those scenes in marketing. Then they acted insulted when fans saw them as a couple.
That's queerbaiting.
Done on accident it would just be queer subtext. Done because they had no other choice due to censorship is queer coding.
The specific meaning of the word is really starting to get lost and it's a pretty important one to keep accurate. It describes a very specific phenomenon that was done repeatedly and maliciously for decades and is meant to examine that specifically.
Doing it on accident sucks, but it isn't a tactic of capitalism intentionally intended to suppress queer representation while making money from queer fans.
Reblogging to keep the accurate definition and examples of queerbaiting circulating in the world
explained to an 8 year old that once a fruit is ripe you only have so much time until it rots so you have to eat it soon and she said so i'll never be able to keep it perfect like this forever? no and there are about a million pieces of art for you unrelatedly
just received the best text message I’ve ever had. from my mom
2 pics. no caption
tumblr that's me. you're recommending me to me
i fucking hate the “this is the good luck post.” Girl stop contributing to a superstitious environment with ur anecdotes there’s a million goddamn notes on it it’s statistically reasonable that a bunch of people remember the good things that happen after they reblog it
this is the statistically reasonable post, reblogging it will have no effect except for putting this post on your blog
guys this post really works! I reblogged it and it really did put the post on my blog! you need to try it!
You can make a movie with where the only white character is a man named Ray Cism whose one line of his 16 seconds of screen time is “I seriously hate women and minorities.” and you’ll find fifty bajillion reader x Ray Cism fanfics and renaissance style drawings of him with a halo of golden light
THISSSSSSS!!!!!!! curate your own internet experience. block them because they’re allergic to peanut butter, block them because they have what you don’t, block them because they dislike your favorite food, block them because you don’t like their layout, block them because you can.
blocking is NOT a personal attack against someone. it’s you curating your own internet experience and catering for your comfort, and you have every right to do that.
you, yes, you!!! you CANNOT tell other people to censor themselves for your own comfort and personal likings. you CANNOT tell them what they can or can’t post. you CANNOT tell them what they can or can’t write. you CANNOT tell them what they can or can’t draw. BUT you CAN block them for whatever reason.
that block button is offered to you for free. use. it.
now let’s see him getting triggered during sex
The goalies cradle the ball because they believe it to be an egg and are trying to keep the other players from breaking it. Unfortunately they have also been led to believe that the egg's True Mother is one of the players and feels obligated to return the egg. Needless to say the winning team will get to hatch the Great Serpent.
local matchmaker losing it over yet another unrealistic demand from the clientele 🤣🤣
Translation by me. :))
New bumper sticker 🕺
“I never had a mother.” “What are you talking about? You had two.”
friends watching with mild concern while i repeatedly attempt to stand up in the sea
This sweet photo from 1963 has an unusual amount of writing on the back. “That’s the cat I’ve had since last year and he’s big and beautiful now. And that’s the dog we got from the ASPCA (American Society for the prevention of cruelty to animals). He was the ugliest and skinniest there and Jack didn’t like him, but he was affectionate. That was three weeks ago. Now he’s fat and still affectionate. He’s seven months old. A mongrel (spaniel – beagle – terrier) dog but obedient and gets along well with the cat.” ❤️
Writing on the back of this one says “I don’t like this program”. Photo from my collection, 1961.