đ I like your shoelaces.
im glad this website truly understands us
đȘŒ

JVL

â
AnasAbdin
Game of Thrones Daily

ç„æ„ / Permanent Vacation
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
wallacepolsom
Not today Justin
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

titsay

if i look back, i am lost

Janaina Medeiros

Discoholic đȘ©
art blog(derogatory)
Three Goblin Art
taylor price

Origami Around

ellievsbear
Cosimo Galluzzi

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from South Africa
seen from Argentina

seen from Iraq
seen from Argentina

seen from India

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
@somewhatbyronically
đ I like your shoelaces.
im glad this website truly understands us
GIVEAWAY: sex toy survival kits for the apocalypse
Fight your existential dread with orgasms. Enter to win one of 10 sex toy survival kits to get you through this dystopian nightmare, each worth $400+!Â
Every kit is stocked with 4-5 outstanding items: legendary vibrators, hand-poured dildos, perfect butt plugs, thrusting toys, porn, my favorite lube, and more. These highly-curated kits contain only toys I know and love, and most are available to my international readers!
Giveaway ends 10/30. Enter to win on my blog â and donât forget to pack your bug-out bag for extra entries!Â
cheating is not âbound to happenâ iâve been alive almost 24 years and not once have i ever thought âhey i wonder what itâd be like to go outside of my relationship and destroy a persons self esteem and ability to trustâ
never bitch
cheating is an active choice. its not second nature. and if it is second nature to you, then you need to do some real soul searching and figure out what the fuck went wrong in your life
Any comments, @i-raised-you-danker-than-this, you fucking cheating bitch? đ
Ok i didnt expect people to message her, so to be clear @i-raised-you-danker-than-this is in fact not a cheating bitch and is a lovely person
Youâre my least favorite sister
sister âŠâŠ??!!!?
I should explain. Weâre nuns.
Reading this post was like being kicked in the shin repeatedly
how could yâall forget to tell me, a non binary filipino, this very important fact
facts are jameela jamil and lizzo are doing some of the most important and groundbreaking work in terms of challenging body norms and disordered eating - work that is WELL overdue in that industry - and regardless of ur opinion on them personally, regardless of the fact that yes they r still part of the inherently flawed capitalist institution of celebrity, regardless of missteps they might make along the way (bc they are human and also under way more scrutiny bc theyâre both women of colour), what they are doing will, with no exaggeration, save lives
âyou have to stop buying every mug you think is cuteâ whatâs that? i canât hear you over the sound of all my mugs clinking together in the cabinet as i try to find space for this new mug i bought
@under-palemoonlight
iâm gonna be honest i didnât even read the tweet because i had to hit reblog too fast when i saw this guyâs name is âi like hitting police because i am homosexualâ
can confirm that is legit what that says lmaooo
much like tim, i too would follow a herd of bulbasaurs into the deep forest, no questions asked
everyone who reads this post will get some big spicy joy within 24 large minutes (hours)
Ok y'all but like Iâm not even kidding about this I read this post yesterday and today I got an email from the peeps at hamilton and I won the lotto gor $10 tickets and I would like to give all my thanks to the internetâs favorite fish, Goldie Gurston, for making this possible because I totally believe they did this with their amazing gay powers
So I know this is likely a coincidenceâŠbut I reblogged this and just now discovered Iâve been given a $150 amazon gift card as a bonus at work. So thank you, fish!
If it worked for them I hope it works for everyone else
Some big spicy joy pls
SOME BIG SPICY JOY PLEASE
One helping of some big spicy joy please!
[Image: Screencap of the Hamilton ticket lottery win alert]
Yes hello, Iâll take what theyâre having, and if you could double it for anyone accessing this post with a screenreader, that would be great, thanks.
the safety town goof from the MBMBaM tv show is fucking gold, but I was rewatching it and half the comedy comes from the dramatic camera angles and âin the hall of the mountain kingâ blasting in the background
which is good
but Iâm just saying, it must have been either deeply disturbing or completely hysterical to hear, one quiet sunny afternoon in Huntington, West Virginia, a baton scraping on the ground in the distance and someone screaming âNEW DUCKBERGGGGG!!!! COME OUT AND PLAY!!!!!â at the top of their lungs
just. out of nowhere. the zombie apocalypse is here, and youâre scanning the streets looking for enemies, and in the distance you here the tiny engine of a fake gas-powered car meant for a child echoing off the buildings. haunting
monster factory men:
monster factory women:
Reblog in 10 seconds and $1700 will come your way
I have nothing to lose and 1700$ to gain
give me the money
Something amazing will happen to you in May 2019.
Yes, give me this energyâš
No such thing as rebloggin this too many times
Lemme hop on this frequency đđŸđđŸđđŸ
Something AMAZINGLY GOOD!
It just kills me when writers create franchises where like 95% of the speaking roles are male, then get morally offended that all of the popular ships are gay. Itâs like, what did they expect?
#friendly reminder that I once put my statistics degree to good use and did some calculations about ship ratios#and yes considering the gender ratios of characters#the prevalence of gay ships is completely predictable (via sarahtonin42)
I feel this is something that does often get overlooked in slash shipping, especially in articles that try to âexplainâ the phenomena. No matter the show, movie or book, people are going to ship. When everyone is a dude and the well written relationships are all dudes, of course weâre gonna go for romance among the dudes because we have no other options.
Totally.
A lot of analyses propose that the overwhelming predominance of male/male ships over female/female and female/male ships in fandom reflects an unhealthy fetishisation of male homosexuality and a deep-seated self-hatred on the part of women in fandom. While itâs true that many fandoms certainly have issues gender-wise, that sort of analysis willfully overlooks a rather more obvious culprit.
Suppose, for the sake of argument, that we have a hypothetical media franchise with twelve recurring speaking roles, nine of which are male and three of which are female.
(Note that this is actually a bit better than average representaton-wise - female representation in popular media franchises is typicaly well below the 25% contemplated here.)
Assuming that any character can be shipped with any other without regard for age, gender, social position or prior relationship - and for simplicity excluding cloning, time travel and other âselfcestâ-enabling scenarios - this yields the following (non-polyamorous) possibilities:
Possible F/F ships: 3 Possible F/M ships: 27 Possible M/M ships: 36
TOTAL POSSIBLE SHIPS: 66
Thus, assuming - again, for the sake of simplicity - that every possible ship is about equally likely to appeal to any given fan, weâd reasonably expect about (36/66) = 55% of all shipping-related media to feature M/M pairings. No particular prejudice in favour of male characters and/or against female characters is necessary for us to get there.
The point is this: before we can conclude that representation in shipping is being skewed by fan prejudice, we have to ask how skewed it would be even in the absence of any particular prejudice on the part of the fans. Or, to put it another way, we have to ask ourselves: are we criticising women in fandom - and letâs be honest here, this type of criticism is almost exclusively directed at women - for creating a representation problem, or are we merely criticising them for failing to correct an existing one?
YES YES YES HOLY SHIT YES FUCKING THANK YOU!
Also food for thought: the obvious correction to a lack of non-male representation in a story is to add more non-males. Female Original Characters are often decried as self-insertion or Mary Sues, particular if romance or sex is a primary focus.
I really appreciate when tumblr commentary is of the quality I might see at an academic conference. No joke.
This doesnât even account  for the disparity in the amount of screen time/dialogue male characters to get in comparison to female characters, and how much time other characters spend talking about male characters even when they arenât onscreen. This all leads to male characters ending up more fully developed, and more nuanced than female characters. The more an audience feels like they know a character, the more likely an audience is to care about a character. More network television writers are men. Male writers tend to understand men better than women, statistically speaking. Female characters are more likely to be written by men who donât understand women vary well.Â
But itâs easier to blame the collateral damage than solve the root problem.
Yay, mathy arguments. :)
This is certainly one large factor in the amount of M/M slash out there, and the first reason that occurred to me when I first got into fandom (I donât think itâs the sole reason, but I think itâs a bigger one than some people in the Why So Much Slash debate give our credit for). And nice point about adding female OCs.
In some of my shipping-related stats, I found that shows with more major female characters lead to more femslash (also more het). Â (e.g. femslash in female-heavy media; femslash deep dive) Iâve never actually tried to do an analysis to pin down how much of fandomâs M/M preference is explained by the predominance of male characters in the source media, but Iâm periodically tempted to try to do so.
All great points. Another thing I notice is that many shows are built around the idea that the team or the partner is the most important thing in the universe. Watch any buddy cop show, and half of the episodes have a character on a date that is inevitably interrupted because The Job comes first⊠except âThe Jobâ actually means âMy Partnerâ.
When itâs a male-female buddy show, all of the failed relationships are usually, canonically, because the leads belong together. (Look at early Bones: she dates that guy who is his old friend and clearly a stand-in for him. They break up because *coughcoughhandwave*. That stuff happens constantly.) Male-male buddy shows write the central relationship the exact same way except that they expect us to read it as platonic.
Long before it becomes canon, the potential ship of Mulder/Scully or Booth/Bones or whatever lead male/female couple consumes the fandom. Itâs not about the genders involved. Rizzoli/Isles was like this too.
If canon tells us that no other relationship has ever measured up to this one, why should we keep them apart? Donât like slash of your shows, prissy writers? Then stop writing all of your leads locked in epic One True Love romance novel relationships with their same-sex coworkers. Give them warm, funny, interesting love interests, not cardboard cutoutsâŠ
And then we will ship an OT3.
Iâm going to bring up (invent?) the concept of subjectification.
As in, people gravitate to the characters given the most depth, complexity, and satisfying interactions for their shipping needs, because those characters are most human, and we want the realest characters to play with.
In a lot of media, the most depth gets handed to male characters.
And, oftentimes, even when the screentime and depth and interactions are granted equally well to female characters, there can be a level of, for lack of a better word, dis-authenticity to those female characters: they are pared down, washed out, or otherwise made slightly less themselves than they could be, in the interest of making them decorative, or likeable, or âgood,â or keeping them from upstaging or emasculating their male companions, or just that the writer whose job it is to write them doesnât know how to write women the way they write men.
And you get the characterization equivalent of that comparison chart where so many animated female characters have the same facial features because the animators and designers are so worried about not letting them be ugly.
When you have a group thatâs allowed to be themselves, warts and all, and another group that has to be decorative at all costs, the impression given on some level is that the decorative quality is making up for a shortcoming. That they wouldnât be enough in their own right.
And sometimes that cost is authenticity. The interesting, striking, awe-inspiring, bold and glorious unapologetic selfhood that draws the viewer most particularly to those characters who are unapologetic in their particular existence, standing clear of the generic and bland and unchallenging âsafeâ appearances.
It is authenticity, not beauty, which powers subjectification. The love for a character, not because they are perfect, but because they are them.
They can be pretty, sure. They can be sweet. But being pretty and sweet is not a replacement, and too many female characters have been written by writers who think it is, while the interestâin appearance, in personality, in interactions, in plot developmentâgoes to the men.
And when that happens, well. Surprise, surprise, thatâs where the shipping goes.
Yeah I donât really ship but I do write a fair amount of fanfic, and in most franchises working with the female characters is a chore.
You have to do so much of the work yourself, because the canon left them unfinished, with huge gaps or unexplored contradictions that you have to somehow resolve. Every female character you decide to integrate into your fanwork in some major role constitutes an undertaking in her own right as you patch together an understanding of her sufficient to model a consistent set of reactions and priorities &c.
The dudes just get handed to you. Even the ones whose canon is a mess have properly developed character cores.
That you donât have to unearth and piece together like some sort of volunteer archeologist coming up with theories way more complex than the available artifacts truly support.
Her tuition so damn high she can wear whatever tf she wants
Spite goals
Thereâs a better thing to her story. She CONTINUED her thesis in her underwear and afterward her professor said âwhat would your mother think wearing those kinds of clothesâ
And she responded âmy motherâs a feminist also a gender and sexuality studies professor. Sheâs fine with my shortsâ
i think the best part is that a majority of the class also stripped with her in solidarity
Just to give a little more perspective after reading the story:
The sequence of events is a little jumbled in the telling above. The actual chastising from the teacher came days before the womanâs thesis, during a practice run of her presentation. This was not a spur-of-the-moment thing where she just whipped off her clothes for the sake of being angry. Chai took the time to think things through before deciding this was the way she wanted to protest. She used critical thinking and level-headedness to decide instead of becoming volatile and aggressive, she would choose non-violent protest.Â
I just donât like the way the storyâs being told by others because it makes her come across as âoverly-emotionalâ and âerraticâ (as women often do in the media, because itâs easier to attribute extreme action to âhysteriaâ), whereas in actual news reports, she had time to think about her decision and choose the best way to handle what happened to her.Â
Sources:Â
New York Post
CBS
Huffington Post
I was wondering why her name tag was already on her bra.