Show & Tell

titsay
ojovivo
Fai_Ryy
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

if i look back, i am lost

ellievsbear
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

Andulka
No title available

oozey mess
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Game of Thrones Daily
NASA
h
The Bowery Presents
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

tannertan36

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

gracie abrams
seen from Belgium
seen from France

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from Australia
seen from Chile
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Ecuador

seen from Mexico
seen from Oman
seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Greece

seen from United States
@thetinymm
This doesn't apply to me because my strategy only fails when I don't have perfect control over my immediate surroundings and routines! Hah!
I’m making myself sick imagining a Steve Harrington who was raised in the kind of household where boys don’t cry, where men were “strong”, where being in charge meant being the loudest.
where his mother didn’t comfort him when he cried or scraped his knee, where his dad told him to man up.
he carried that shitty mindset into adulthood, he was strong, he didn’t talk about that uncomfortable weight on his chest, he didn’t cry about the ache in his throat or the pounding in his skull. Steve was a man after all.
at first he doesn’t like Eddie, the guy talks about everything, every thought in his head, even the unpleasant ones. What kind of guy tells people about those things? Why did Steve feel a tug in his gut when he heard Eddie complain? Why did a part of him want to fix it all?
and why did he start crying on that late night in eddies van when he turned to him, stopping his constant talking for once, to ask if Steve was alright?
who had ever cared about Steve being alright?
LIKES TO CHARGE REBLOGS TO CAST
you people aren't CASTING
Not only is this person using AI, they are stealing other people’s art and feeding them into ai generators. This account is going to HELL
I saw this video about a doctor who performed an MRI on a 5 year old and discovered she essentially had “brain damage” from excessive iPad use, as the white matter in her brain couldn’t form properly due to an understimulated environment.
Hmm it’s almost like there’s supposed to be adult figures responsible for monitoring her screen time and making sure she develops properly… certainly this isn’t the result of neglect at the hands of her parents…
“This 5 year old is brain damaged by excessive iPad use”
Translation: This 5 year old is developmentally impaired by neglectful parents who used an iPad as a stand-in for social and environmental stimulation / interaction for hours at a time during critical early stages of child development. The iPad is the cop-out.
“Children don’t have the strength to hold pencils anymore because they only use screens.”
Translation: Parents aren’t making the conscious effort to help their children develop necessary skills and letting iPads raise them.
When are people going to realize the iPads and whatnot are the instruments through which the neglect is happening through and not the cause? How the fuck do you let your child have such a severe lack of physical strength in their hands that they can’t hold a pencil properly?
maybe possibly robby’s s3 look?
oh ok
For anyone wondering, the PhD student's name is Myra Cheng.
Here's a link to an article about the study from the Stanford Report: link.
Across three preregistered studies, participants interacting with sycophantic AI became more convinced of their own rightness and less willing to repair relationships. Yet at the same time, participants rated sycophantic AI models as higher quality, more trustworthy, and more desirable for future use, which may explain why this behavior has persisted despite its harmful impacts.
Myra Cheng et al. "Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence." Science 391, eaec8352 (2026).
Perhaps I’m being dramatic, but it almost feels as though the original phrasing (that I see being reflected quite heavily in the comments) focuses on Cheng’s inspiration from AI-generated breakup texts. The article goes much further than that; Cheng and her team clearly spent time acquiring data and then processing it to tell the story of how AI-dependence is fundamentally shifting how people interact with others. This change in human interactions didn’t happen overnight. We are witnessing a fundamental shift in how we interact with other people and a simultaneous diminishing of how long people will spend on any given task. Focusing in on the more click-worthy problem of breakup texts overlooks the underlying issue that, after being discovered, can actually influence policy change as Cheng discusses
You know how wealthy people turn into stupid arseholes by surrounding themselves with vapid yes-men? ChatGPT is vapid yes-men on tap. Now you, too, can subject yourself to the phenomenon that we've all long known turns people into giant toddlers who are impossible to deal with.
omg. Just finished penciling the first chapter of Check, Please! Year 5 🥹