I can read anything I want! But not everything I want. ;( So many books, so little time. Here be Queen's Thief (#qt spoilers), Howl's Moving Castle(#hmc spoilers), Lymond Chronicles (#lymond chronicles spoilers), and a sprinkling of whatever else catches my whimsy. Murderbot Diaries at #thatwasalie-tmbd
It has become clear my love of The Murderbot Diaries has more than escaped containment, so we (myself and all my favorite memes and meta) will be moving to @thatwasalie-tmbd in the perhaps vain hope this blog will be mildly more thematically consistent.
Found with the rest of the hoard, the handaxe pictured above was probably found either while digging his own hole for the treasure or maybe earlier in a precious bout of hoarding by some Romano-Briton who thought it was cool enough to bury along with all of his coins and Juliane's bracelet, because cool rock. This was absolutely the correct move.
i cannot overstate how good it feels to watch older movies where the actors were still allowed to look kinda weird and not be conventionally attractive. like it is genuinely healing
i know it's a common talking point by now that our tech overlords read the wrong (by which i mean sexist, racist, colonial, etc.) mid-century scifi or failed to understand the specfic they claim to love (hitchhiker's guide, lotr, etc.) we've all made jokes about how maybe they wouldn't be so awful if they'd read more le guin or butler or delaney.
however i don't think i've seen people talk about the fact that these "techno-optimists" who are so looking forward to a "techno-utopia" never reference, cite, or allude to star trek, which is the single most influential techno-optimistic piece of media ever created.
and i mean, it's obvious why. star trek isn't just about exploring the stars, discovering new planets, creating cyborgs and computers and all kinds of futuristic technologies.
star trek is about about eliminating scarcity so that everyone can thrive. star trek is about a multicultural future of peace and prosperity for all. star trek is about infinite diversity in infinite combinations. star trek is about finding new life forms who look at the world completely differently than we do and learning from them. star trek is about a globalism that is rooted in humanism and peace. star trek is about providing role models for people (especially kids) who have never seen those who look like them in scifi, igniting their imaginations, and helping them think, "wow, there will be people like me in the future! even if i'm black, a woman, blind, trans, queer, not from the u.s.a., etc.!"
these guys HATE all of those things, and star trek is so explicitly about them that they can't even misunderstand it, misappropriate, or misuse it. so we get palantir, m*sk talking about how much he loves hitchhiker's guide, and j.d. vance naming his venture capital company after one of the rings from lotr. but we don't see anyone naming their robot data or their talking computer after majel barrett or talking about how star trek inspired them to get where they are now. because it didn't inspire them. because its vision was not the one they latched onto.
you also don't hear them citing, say, carl sagan. or hedy lamarr or ada lovelace or rosalind franklin. or any of the other stem-y people who were also deeply humanist and who profoundly love our little blue planet. they only care about stories they can believe are about white dudes accomplishing things through a domination mindset and being oh so special. they're obsessed with jung and campbell and their bullshit ideas about ~hero's journeys~ and anything they can twist to be about their misogynist, racist, ableist, queerphobic, imperialist agenda.
why do closed captions keep pretending english is the only intelligible language? when a character speaks spanish what exactly is forcing your hand to transcribe it as "[speaks foreign language]" rather than "Si"
This intersection of Anglocentric bias + ableism and audism makes my blood boil.
People commonly defend this practise with "But the audience isn't meant to understand!" or "It's inconsequential!", neither of which actually address a) their assumption that the [ideal Anglo] audience wouldn't understand, or, perhaps most crucially in the context of CCs, b) that this is a failure of accessibility. A hearing person who speaks that "foreign" language will know exactly what's being said. A deaf or HoH person – the people CCs are primarily intended for – who speaks or reads that language should therefore have the exact same opportunity to understand. It very much feels to me like an assumption that we deaf and HoH people couldn't possibly understand any language but English, so there's no point in getting those languages transcribed for us. I hope it goes without saying how profoundly audist that sentiment is.
There is also, I think, a profound misunderstanding or ignorance of Deaf culture at play. Which is to say, CCs in English-language media are written with not only the assumption that the audience will be native English speakers, but that all d/Deaf and HoH people speak English as their first language, so all other languages are as supposedly foreign to them as they are for hearing people. But sign languages are their own distinct language. BSL, ASL, ISL, AusLan, NZSL etc ≠ English (and are indeed different from one another), LIS ≠ Italian, JSL ≠ Japanese, and so on. So, if you follow the captioners' logic to its natural extreme, all non-signed dialogue is "foreign" to many d/Deaf and HoH people and should therefore be labelled [speaks foreign language] / [speaks English] / [speaks own language] / etc. – which is, obviously, a terrible idea that perfectly highlights all the biases implicit in closed captioning.
TL;DR: your accessibility feature fails in its function as soon as you fail to transcribe all spoken languages.
Quick reminder that if you live in an EU Member State, those captions are not compliant with the European Accessibility Act and you can report the platform or company! EU folks please do this if you can; forcing multinational companies to comply with the EAA has a very good chance of making them simply standardize compliance, even in counties that don't have a version of this law.
I really can and will blame the 9-5 for everything. "We're in a loneliness epidemic" well, we have to spend a third of our day interacting with people in a professional way that makes forming real friendships difficult and then we're peopled out by the time we're done. "People are eating more and more unhealthily" people have to spend more than a third of their day doing work related tasks and they don't want to spend their tiny amount of free time making food. "People aren't involved in their local communities" after spending more than a third of their day doing work related things people are tired and also all those community events take place during normal working hours. "People need to get more hobbies" after spending more than a third of their day working, people are TIRED and don't want to do anything that takes yet more energy. "Literacy is dying" to maintain your critical thinking skills you need to read/watch things that make you think and after spending more than a third of your day doing work related stuff you are TIRED and don't want to expend even more brainnpower. "People need to get outside more" People. Are. TIRED. Because they have to spend all of their time working or preparing for work or recovering from work or doing all the chores they couldn't stay on top of because of work. I can blame fucking anything on having to work, it is truly the root of all fucking evil.
It was a huge milestone of scientific and technological advancement. (Plus, at the time, politically significant). Humanity went to space! We set foot on a celestial body that was not earth for the first time in human history! That’s a big deal! I’ve never thought about it before but now that I have, it’s ridiculous to me that that’s not part of our everyday lives and the public consciousness anymore. Why don’t we have a public holiday and a family barbecue about it. Why have I never seen the original broadcast of the moon landing? It should be all over the news every year!
It’s July 20th. That’s the day of the moon landing. Next year is going to be the 54th anniversary. I’m ordering astronaut shaped cookie cutters on Etsy and I’m going to have a goddamn potluck. You’re all invited.
PITCH: We call it Moon Day, and then every 7 years when it falls on a Monday, that's an even BIGGER deal and we call that Moon Day Monday and go absolutely apeshit about it (the next Moon Day Monday is in 2026 so we have a couple trial runs first)
I do think the ability to emoji-react is a net win for human communication. not only does it give you an outlet for 'I see and acknowledge this but don't have a verbal response' but it also adds a pleasing alethiometer element to things
my coworker announces that he's off to the dentist. someone reacts with a tooth emoji. is this a statement of dentist solidarity? a wish for my coworker to return with more (or fewer?) teeth than he set out with? simple word association? who can say
while palpatine sucks as a guy, you do have to appreciate how his wardrobe went from esteemed galactic chancellor to backalley goblin overlord after only about 3 seconds of dictatorship
How much discourse do you think there is in the kpop demon hunters universe over Huntrix's breakup? I assume half the fans are analyzing every second of footage from the last three years looking for signs of tension and arguing about the whose fault it was and half the fans are posting that it's actually kind of fucked up to ruin the Idol Awards with a fake onstage breakup just to build up to dropping a new song, even if it is kind of a banger
@sagewiththyme You know that's a fascinating point because I figure the two options are a) no one really remembers what happened at the end because of magic bullshit or b) they play it off as a really elaborate but fully planned performance.
And the second one - can you fucking imagine.
Imagine one of the most popular bands in the world have this ongoing lore bit that they're actually demon hunters and they're always referencing it in their songs. And then one day a new boy band pops up and gets wildly popular with an over-the-top-cutesy hit. They're so soft and sweet and respectful. They're called Saja (Lion) Boys and they're all like "join the pride!" How cute!
And then they announce a new concert and you get there and it's fucking this. They're all dressed as demons/grim reapers. Surprise, "Saja" meant Jeoseung Saja all along! They're singing about how they're here for your soul and they relish in your pain, just a stunning 180 from their previous personas.
And then while you're trying to process the emotional whiplash the fucking demon hunter band bursts in and beats the shit out of them with the most insane pyrotechnic show you've ever seen in your life. They "kill" the boy band demons and then you never see them again. The whole band was a fucking psyop for Huntrix to play up the "demon hunters" bit.
I would never recover. The cheesiest fantasy power metal band has NOTHING on that level of commitment. I'd be stanning Huntrix for the rest of my life.
[ID: A comment by @sagewiththyme that says, "Didn’t they also say that the Saja boys were fighting onstage and that’s why they swapped time slots with the girls? Double breakup and makeup type thing". End ID]
"Yeah, the Saja Boys were a fake band. We paid them to steal the limelight for a little bit while Rumi's voice was out of commission. We thought it would be a cool setup for a triumphant return, you know? The cute little Lion Boys end up being secret demons trying to steal your souls, and Huntrix steps in and slays them in a triumphant return? ...Yeah. We planned it all, the songs, the heel-turn, the special effects, the whole shebang.
Except, uhhhh. We didn't expect them to get so popular so fast? They For Sure weren't supposed to make it to the final round of the Idol Awards. Like, for Legal Reasons. We were almost visibly panicking on stage when they announced that! I mean, do you know how it would look once it eventually came out that Saja Boys were working for us? "Oh, you planted a fake band so you could win the competition!" No joke. I mean, that is a pret-ty clear conflict of interest there. You know?
The Idol Awards are all about the fan's choices, and we just accidentally rigged the game.
The Saja Boys had to win the Idol Awards, now, but there was no chance. They only had two songs, Soda Pop and Your Idol. We couldn't have them push up the debut--I mean, we thought about it, Your Idol's a banger song and it totally would've given us a run for our money--but we'd have to follow it up with This Is What It Sounds Like, first off, and second, 'killing' the Saja Boys onstage would be like. The Media equivalent of announcing we won, like the Fans didn't have a choice in the matter. At the Idol Awards? Ha. Yeah. That's a no-go.
And I mean. Soda Pop is catchy but not that catchy guys, c'mon. We were totally gonna cream them with Golden.
So we were all scrambling. Rumi and Mira and I were trying to write and choreograph a brand new song, Takedown, something good but not Good Enough To Win, to maybe prolong the Rivalry, you know? To make our comeback all the more sweet. But it was all such short notice, and the song wasn't working, and Huntrix never gives a shoddy performance, on principle. We couldn't do it. But it was looking like the only way we were gonna legitimately lose was if something... happened during the competition.
And then it becomes even more complicated once it’s been awhile, and it becomes clear that no one’s heard anything from any of the “real” boys since the awards.
Like, obviously the Saja Boys weren’t a “real” band, so it makes sense they’re not coming out with new music, and since they’re “dead”, of course all their official band accounts have gone quiet, but like… someone would have had to be portraying the band members, right? Even if you wave that off as them being some of the same actors who portray the “demons” at their concerts, someone would definitely have to be lending their voices for the songs. Who were they? They couldn’t have been well-established in the industry, otherwise they’d have been recognized too quickly and the ruse would have been up, and something like this would have been a huge break for new performers.
So why’d they just disappear?
Where are the actors?
I’d imagine this would never gain too much traction within the fandom, but it still lingers long after the dust has settled and the scandal clears up. Go deep enough into the comments on any HUNTR/X-related posts, and you’ll find someone commenting #WhereAreTheBoys.
This book was a first for me in many ways. First off it's rounded! Which I have never successfully done before (and, many of you may argue, still have not done). This is also my first non-fanfiction bind, but was still hand typeset by me because of the many, many annotations I included in the text. That is my favorite part of this book, so I'm gonna show it off a bit.
For instance, those of you who have read Game of Kings, did you know that when Lymond made an offhand reference to a beaver he was talking about how he wasn't going to chew off his own testicles, as people in that time believed beavers did? Well, maybe you would know that if you read the excellent Ultimate Guide to Game of Kings by Laura Ramsey, which is where I got nearly all of these annotations from. But it was so frustrating going back and forth between the book and the guide book, and so I just decided to combine the two.
More info under the cut.
The other opportunity typesetting this thing gave me was the ability to add pictures and fancy text, which honestly may have taken more time to pick out than the actual annotations.
The book is separated into four parts, and each part got a full page illustration as seen in the middle picture. The ends of the chapters (if there was space) got a little illustration, mostly of Scotland or pretty English castles. I tried to choose pictures of places that I recognized from the book, but a lot of times prettiness won over accuracy. All images were found on the Internet Archive and printed on my poor little Brother printer. Some are blurry because the source material wasn't great, but most are blurry because my printer isn't great.
The endpapers (which I'm not 100% happy with, they were just printed at a FedEx store and I don't love the paper) are by Scottish artist Alexander Nasmyth. He lived a few hundred years after Lymond but I figured it was okay because I'm not Dorothy Dunnett and I don't care about historical accuracy that much and they are very, very pretty. I don't remember what the first one is but it's a ruined castle and water, so it's good enough for me. The second one is a distant view of Stirling (mileage will vary on exactly HOW distant, as it's barely noticeable) but I just had to put that one in there.
The back cover. Each book will have a different quote (they're all picked out except Checkmate....we'll see if I even get to that book ha ha) but of course this was the easy pick for book 1. And my Imp press logo underneath it!
The spine. Everything was done with HTV as always, although idk if it was the bookcloth or what but this one went down easy. I had hardly any problems at all.
Oh and the title page! With ink reactive gold foil accents.
And because I love sharing my mistakes here's a little bit of the stuff I messed up on:
OMG you guys cutting this thing was a nightmare. I forced my bf to make me a book plough because my guillotine was NOT nearly big enough to cut this behemoth and buying a book plough online is very expensive?! And it went....okay. It was fine. Nerve wracking and the blade needs to be sharpened and I have no idea how to do that but fine. As you can see the pages didn't come out super smooth or even--I think next time I'm going to try sanding A LOT--but it was fine. And the swell on this thing was INSANE. You can probably tell by how curvy it is. I don't know if this is an acceptable amount of swell? Or if I should have used a smaller thread? But it worked out I think, and it feels good in hand and it opens great so I'm very happy with it overall.
The other mess up....we'll see if you can even notice it.
Yeah I don't think you can even see it! You can barely see it in person, really you can only feel it if you run your fingers across the cover. BUT what happened was that when I was putting on the HTV I (so, so stupidly) forgot to weed out the middle part of the O in 'OF'. I tried scraping it off and made it so so much worse. So eventually I just printed out another O in HTV and put it on a scrap piece of bookcloth. Then I (or...I made my bf do it ha ha) verrrrry carefully cut around the outside of the O and we just stuck the whole thing on top of the bad, ruined one. And it worked really well!! Which is good because I was NOT making that stupid cover again. But once it was pressed down you can hardly see it. And does it look like the front cover is uneven by about 2mm between the bottom and top? No it doesn't I don't know what you're talking about.
Anyway, I will talk about this thing until the end of time I'm so happy with it! If anyone has any questions or wants more pictures or ANYTHING I will be so happy to oblige. This book is filled with SO many references and so many foreign languages and reading it while being able to understand all of them is a different experience. My biggest takeaway from a lot of this was that while Lymond does love referencing specifically John Mandeville and Roger Ascham A LOT he also references a lot of common songs and nursery rhymes and lines from popular plays. What I'm saying is that if Lymond were alive today he'd be quoting Marvel movies and Seinfeld.
This book was a first for me in many ways. First off it's rounded! Which I have never successfully done before (and, many of you may argue, still have not done). This is also my first non-fanfiction bind, but was still hand typeset by me because of the many, many annotations I included in the text. That is my favorite part of this book, so I'm gonna show it off a bit.
For instance, those of you who have read Game of Kings, did you know that when Lymond made an offhand reference to a beaver he was talking about how he wasn't going to chew off his own testicles, as people in that time believed beavers did? Well, maybe you would know that if you read the excellent Ultimate Guide to Game of Kings by Laura Ramsey, which is where I got nearly all of these annotations from. But it was so frustrating going back and forth between the book and the guide book, and so I just decided to combine the two.
More info under the cut.
The other opportunity typesetting this thing gave me was the ability to add pictures and fancy text, which honestly may have taken more time to pick out than the actual annotations.
The book is separated into four parts, and each part got a full page illustration as seen in the middle picture. The ends of the chapters (if there was space) got a little illustration, mostly of Scotland or pretty English castles. I tried to choose pictures of places that I recognized from the book, but a lot of times prettiness won over accuracy. All images were found on the Internet Archive and printed on my poor little Brother printer. Some are blurry because the source material wasn't great, but most are blurry because my printer isn't great.
The endpapers (which I'm not 100% happy with, they were just printed at a FedEx store and I don't love the paper) are by Scottish artist Alexander Nasmyth. He lived a few hundred years after Lymond but I figured it was okay because I'm not Dorothy Dunnett and I don't care about historical accuracy that much and they are very, very pretty. I don't remember what the first one is but it's a ruined castle and water, so it's good enough for me. The second one is a distant view of Stirling (mileage will vary on exactly HOW distant, as it's barely noticeable) but I just had to put that one in there.
The back cover. Each book will have a different quote (they're all picked out except Checkmate....we'll see if I even get to that book ha ha) but of course this was the easy pick for book 1. And my Imp press logo underneath it!
The spine. Everything was done with HTV as always, although idk if it was the bookcloth or what but this one went down easy. I had hardly any problems at all.
Oh and the title page! With ink reactive gold foil accents.
And because I love sharing my mistakes here's a little bit of the stuff I messed up on:
OMG you guys cutting this thing was a nightmare. I forced my bf to make me a book plough because my guillotine was NOT nearly big enough to cut this behemoth and buying a book plough online is very expensive?! And it went....okay. It was fine. Nerve wracking and the blade needs to be sharpened and I have no idea how to do that but fine. As you can see the pages didn't come out super smooth or even--I think next time I'm going to try sanding A LOT--but it was fine. And the swell on this thing was INSANE. You can probably tell by how curvy it is. I don't know if this is an acceptable amount of swell? Or if I should have used a smaller thread? But it worked out I think, and it feels good in hand and it opens great so I'm very happy with it overall.
The other mess up....we'll see if you can even notice it.
Yeah I don't think you can even see it! You can barely see it in person, really you can only feel it if you run your fingers across the cover. BUT what happened was that when I was putting on the HTV I (so, so stupidly) forgot to weed out the middle part of the O in 'OF'. I tried scraping it off and made it so so much worse. So eventually I just printed out another O in HTV and put it on a scrap piece of bookcloth. Then I (or...I made my bf do it ha ha) verrrrry carefully cut around the outside of the O and we just stuck the whole thing on top of the bad, ruined one. And it worked really well!! Which is good because I was NOT making that stupid cover again. But once it was pressed down you can hardly see it. And does it look like the front cover is uneven by about 2mm between the bottom and top? No it doesn't I don't know what you're talking about.
Anyway, I will talk about this thing until the end of time I'm so happy with it! If anyone has any questions or wants more pictures or ANYTHING I will be so happy to oblige. This book is filled with SO many references and so many foreign languages and reading it while being able to understand all of them is a different experience. My biggest takeaway from a lot of this was that while Lymond does love referencing specifically John Mandeville and Roger Ascham A LOT he also references a lot of common songs and nursery rhymes and lines from popular plays. What I'm saying is that if Lymond were alive today he'd be quoting Marvel movies and Seinfeld.
x files episode but they’re being audited by the financial department so the entire story is done in flashbacks as they look over the weirdest expense report known to man