Casablanca (1942) dir. Michael Curtiz
almost home
YOU ARE THE REASON

@theartofmadeline

gracie abrams
No title available
Keni

Product Placement

No title available
ojovivo
Show & Tell
Today's Document
noise dept.
Fai_Ryy
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

roma★
RMH
Monterey Bay Aquarium
One Nice Bug Per Day
EXPECTATIONS
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from Australia
seen from Latvia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
@windmillcrusader
Casablanca (1942) dir. Michael Curtiz
oooooh i got plany of disk space
Gregor, wondering what to do with Miles after Miles has fucked up badly enough trying to solve a problem nepotism can't protect him from consequences so he no longer has a job
Miles, kicks down door: Gregor! I need one of your eight nepotism guys who can do anything they want to solve a problem!
Gregor: (lightbulb)
tags via sroloc--elbisivni
HACKS 4.07 "D'Christening"
Fred, you had a part people loved. I mean, my TV Guide interview was six paragraphs about my BOOBS and how they fit into my suit. No one bothered to ask me what I do on the show.
Sigourney Weaver as Gwen DeMarco in Galaxy Quest (1999)
Jadzia Dax + being a menace + Trials and Tribble-ations
The four most interesting parts of time loop are when the person kills themselves for the first time, when they kill someone else for the first time (in a fuck around kind of way, this doesn't count if they already were killing people outside of the loop), how they break the loop, and the weeks afterward where they loose their fucking minds in an entirely different, significantly more damaging to the world around them way. And yet I rarely see anything done with that last one. People leave time loops and are all happy go lucky 'oh boy'. Where's the grappling with people you know who will never know you? Where's the knowledge that the safety of the loop is gone, and you can't fix any mistakes you make? That's the good angst I want
Reblog this and tell me what was your biggest crying over a piece of fiction. You can be vague if you don't want to spoil.
Shit man, this soldier war is fucked. I just saw a guy kill another guy, with a gun. I gotta get the fuck outta here.
"STAR TREK" S1E23 - "A Taste of Armageddon"
harry kim and b’elanna torres sweaty, dirty, bloodied, and showing skin is proof that someone involved in 90s trek loved the gays
How did all this happen? Oh, well, that was just, you know, hard work, timing, and you know, a lot of luck. No, you got better.
HACKS: Season 4, Episode 6 "Mrs. Table"
“Let He Who Is Without Sin…” (5x07)
Some Gregors and some Ivans with a little Miles mixed in
a ‘plain simple garak’ for the person who requested it in my inbox :)
my petty gripe about anachronism in historical/fantasy/spec-fic worlds is attraction language.
We’ve all heard the “should you use modern queer labels or not” argument but honestly even when people go “true, they wouldn’t use the labels ‘aromantic’ or ‘asexual,’” so often the characters describe their experiences as “I never felt romantic attraction” or “I don’t feel attracted to anyone” in ways that makes me go. You are stilllllll thinking about this in an extraordinarily modern online way. That 19th century steampunk detective man will NOT be angsting about having never felt romantic attraction, he would be angsting about being unable to feel moved by the beauty or charm of a woman, or something. And I do think that “attractiveness” language is different from the identity-level idea of experiencing attraction—Sherlock Holmes does not talk about not experiencing attraction, but when Watson says “What a very attractive woman!” Holmes responds “Is she? I did not observe.” (And then Watson calls him an inhuman automaton and calculating-machine and Holmes calls Watson’s judgement biased). Never swayed by the attractiveness of a man or woman, never desirous of marriage, never charmed by the delights of love, all of these feel like some of the variety of ways that someone in this milieu might describe an ace- or aro-spectrum identity more than “never felt attraction” does. Mostly because, like the terms for aromantic and asexual themselves, nailing down an exclusively attraction-based definition of a-spec identities is a relatively new and extremely post-AVEN thing. And yet in fiction everybody knows to articulate their experience as feeling sexual/romantic attraction. And I always want to go nooo how would THIS character think about it?? Not how you think this character SHOULD think about it, how would THIS person in THIS context articulate their feelings?
I need to make something really elaborate and cool (doesn't move