No title available

ellievsbear
Acquired Stardust

JBB: An Artblog!

Origami Around

blake kathryn
Misplaced Lens Cap

pixel skylines
styofa doing anything

Kiana Khansmith
RMH

No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
almost home

oozey mess
🪼
One Nice Bug Per Day

#extradirty
wallacepolsom
Xuebing Du

seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from Lithuania
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela

seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from Japan

seen from United States
seen from Lithuania
seen from Malaysia
@blueflameking
Every action to honor fascism is a decision to protect white supremacy. Firing a women is the misogyny they crave.
DuckDuckGo's new search feature comes as the internet is being flooded with AI-generated slop.
The filter relies on manually curated open-source blocklists, including the ‘nuclear’ list, provided by uBlockOrigin and uBlacklist Huge AI Blocklist,” DuckDuckGo said in a post on X. “While it won’t catch 100% of AI-generated results, it will greatly reduce the number of AI-generated images you see.
Left: AI filter is off Right: AI filter is on
Another tip for DDG - if you want to permanently get rid of DDG's AI features (which you can turn off in settings, but only temporarily) - for now you can just use noai.duckduckgo.com as your search engine. Works as advertised in the name.
on some level it’s so funny how ‘socialist’ and ‘communist’ are still like. horrible terrible scary labels for a person in the US. almost akin to ‘puppy killer’ and ‘serial murderer’. the most evil thing some can imagine. the red scare propaganda worked so well that socialists are still the monster in the closet for a large portion of the US population. “you’re going to vote for a SOCIALIST?” and ‘socialist’ is said with the same scandalized, disgusted, disbelieving weight of ‘pedophile’
well, actually, never mind. apparently socialists and communists are worse than puppy killers and pedophiles to a not insignificant percentage of the US population.
I always liked this quote, especially when you get to the attribution at the end and go "WHO?"
Garbage
Just experimenting with drawing differently
Republicans embracing Nazi authoritarian policies in 2025 across all branches of government and conservative culture like legacy media/social/influencer as they finance prisons, defund health care, and destroy tourism is firmly making all things worse for the country.
Targeting critics of the "make everything worse" movement as they coddle the symbol of child rape and exhausting gaslighting, you would think the party of petty grievances could find one grievance with how bad things are going.
what's that one thing where they asked how ripely from alien was so realistic and believable as a female character in scifi for once and they were like "well we just took the dude from the original script and made him a girl and changed nothing else. it works bc men and women are the same?" and people were like "woah no way" and then didn't learn anything from that for 20 years
"how do you write such believable men as a woman?" "how do you write such believable women a man?" and the answer people who are good at it always give is "i just write people. were literally the exactly the same. do you think the opposite sex is some sorta totally different animal???" and people respond "woah that's wild. yea i do. and im not gonna stop thinking that goodbye :)"
DOGE is cutting federal employees and the vital services they perform in our communities. Meanwhile, Elon's corporations are raking in billions of dollars in government contracts while Trump and his cronies work to extend tax cuts for the rich that will balloon the deficit. DOGE was never about "efficiency."
"Speak fire to power"
Sticker spotted in Arizona, USA
we need personally tailored hormone cocktails. if u want estrogen curves a non functional dick and a flat chest u should be able to get that. if u want huge tits hard cock huge loads we should promote that. when i’m president we’ll kill all real estate agents in the street like dogs.
As an art major, while I know Fountain is a valid piece of art that accomplished exactly what it set out to do, I also think it’s one of the stupidest things. We have a urinal in a museum display. I have yet to see a work I think is dumber.
The thing I love most about Duchamps urinal piece is that it was so “low cost” in terms of creative labour (compared to say, a large scale oil painting or sculpture for example), but it’s absolutely FULL of rage against the traditionalists and the world at that time and it’s SUCH a statement, it’s like, “oh just a mass manufactured item with a signature” but the reality of it is so many layers of meaning and without understanding the history at the time you don’t get it.
It’s an incredibly clever “fuck you” and I love it
An old professor of mine, an expert in Duchamp who has written several books, has a theory. In part, “Fountain” was a prank, a personal “fuck you” to the organization looking for artworks. It’s importance cannot be overstated, and this importance stems from the fact that “Fountain” is /ridiculous/. It is enraging, it is hilarious, and it is very fascinating.
Aside from Duchamp’s readymades, I love “Bride Stripped Bare By Her Bachelors Even”. Pictured below, the work invokes a complex machine, one my professor spent a great deal of time studying. Eventually, he reached his conclusion. My professor had been pranked. He believes “Bride Stripped Bare” is a joke about masturbation, hidden to all except those study it excessively.
At first blush, Duchamp’s works are stupid. Upon further study, they’re very complex. And, upon true understanding, Duchamp is laughing at you. To me, it seems the closer you come to truly understanding Duchamp, the more he slaps you in the face with a large fish.
Let me rage about “traditionalism revival” here. This is a dogwhistle.
As a lover of art, there are many complex and technically impressive works being created today, which both embrace different artistic traditions and break from them. To ignore those is to ignore contemporary art.
Here, OP is raging against conceptual art, which stimulates thought and challenges tradition. He wants his followers to believe that art has “degenerated”, because the West has “degenerated”. OP is intentionally engaging with fascist ideas of “degenerate art”.
If OP wanted to be accurate, he would seek to restore the Salon System, the Beaux Arts Academy, and classical training in the arts. The collapse of this specific system allowed for Modernism to evolve. Of course, that’s not what OP is talking about. He’s evoking beauty as a moral standard, telling his followers to “restore Western tradition”, to fight against aesthetic “degeneracy” in culture.
(By the way, Duchamp is commenting ON MODERNISM with “Fountain”. Duchamp submitted the work to the Society of Independent Artists’ salon in New York, who would accept any work by any artist, for a small fee. In part, Duchamp is saying, “Is this what you Modernists want? A urinal? Look me in the eyes and prove this is not art.”
If OP dared to use his brain, perhaps he would agree with Duchamp here.)
The thing is that it isn’t even a urinal! It doesn’t match any model manufactured at the time. Also Duchamp was an accomplished ceramicist. It’s likely that he made the sculpture and absolutely everyone is like “I know what a urinal looks like. This is sufficiently urinal-shaped for me to assume it is one without looking at it closely!”
Duchamp had other readymades, like his snow shovel, where if you actually look at the photos, the handle is square and the bowl is way too flimsy. Why would manufacturers make a snow shovel with a squared-off handle? It’s impossible to hold! Duchamp slapped the “readymades” label on all these items and the hoity-toity art people who were so good at looking at things didn’t see it (probably because they’d never had to do labor like shovel snow imo, amongst other things).
Marcel Duchamp. In Advance of the Broken Arm. Museum of Modern Art. (4th Version [Ed.!!!] after lost original of November 1915)
wait what. there… what?!?! IT ISN’T AN ACTUAL URINAL?!? or might not be anyway. what the fuck.
if the dude seriously did that, his troll game is out of everyone’s league except Leader Kibo.
My favorite thing about Fountain (besides the fact it has been pissing off fascists for over a century, natch) is that the original was lost and he made a bunch of official editions to sell to various museums (after the original was lost, possibly on purpose).
And they’re different! If it was a real “readymade” he could have just bought some more at his local hardware store, but no. He changed them in OBVIOUS WAYS.
See the triangle of holes?
Here’s the one from the Tate Modern:
Oh hello, cross-holes. Fancy seeing you here.
SFMOMA’s edition has the triangle holes, but it also has a line of holes at the top that are completely different from either other version.
Here’s one from Moderna Museet. Line and a circular set of holes!
Duchamp definitely intentionally made these different on purpose. It’s a “readymade” but it’s not, really, each of these is a specific custom creation.
It’s not even clear if he made it! He wrote a letter to his sister claiming that a female friend sent it to him, and he just enrolled it in the art exhibit under his own name. There’s also a possibility that that female friend was himself, since he later had a female pseudonym of Rrose Sélav.
This whole piece of art is a fractal troll, and it’s a beautiful one.
art is a creative statement.
sometimes that statement is ‘go fuck yourself’
Art has a message and sometimes that message is “die mad about it.”
Art has a message
and sometimes that message is
“die mad about it.”
Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.
i hurt myself with Big Jack by Pet Foolery (can find on instagram) again and no one seems to have posted the whole comic so. here. someone reminded me of it and i tracked it down. gonna go cry in a corner now.
did not know part 2 existed, here you go. another stab
hooooly shit livestock guardian dog comic oh my gosh oh my gosh
hooooly shit livestock
guardian dog comic oh
my gosh oh my gosh
Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.
Terms & Conditions May Apply: Marriage as a Subscription Service
Terms may vary. Batteries not included. Emotional bandwidth sold separately.
Marriage is not a contract. It is a subscription.
There’s no progress bar. No “Streaks” tab. No AI voice chirping, “Your empathy score is up 3% this week, keep it up, legend!” No, this is a full-systems marriage subscription that includes sudden updates to your personal boundaries, patch notes for emotional triggers, and a surprise quiz on “what we talked about last Tuesday.” Weirdly, the only predictable feature is her ability to pretend unflattened Amazon boxes don’t violate basic recycling bin etiquette.
Welcome to the Premium Plan
You start with a free trial, also known as dating. The terms are vague, the playlists are flirty, and everyone’s still applying deodorant with intention. The “movie nights” are suspiciously short. You pretend to like hiking. It’s charm, curated. Hormones, hopeful. Everyone’s still pretending they sleep like normal people. You do not, under any circumstances, bring up bowel-related emergencies.
Then comes the subscription pitch: a proposal.
“Would you like to upgrade to Forever?”
There’s a ring. There’s champagne. Someone’s crying, it might be you. You say yes, or you black out slightly and come to while nodding into a Cheesecake Factory napkin that now legally counts as your betrothal certificate. Either way, the relationship just got upgraded to Marriage Pro™, and nobody gave you a manual, a heads-up, or even a vague idea of what happens in Year 7. You just unlocked a lifetime subscription with zero onboarding and infinite opinions about towel folding.
Subscription Perks
- Unlimited unsolicited advice
- Co-managed trauma
- The ability to detect tone from three rooms away
- Shared passwords, shared finances, and shared passive-aggressive dish placement
- An exclusive in-home critic for your every thought, outfit, and use of the word “moist”
And the best part?
You can’t cancel by clicking a button. You gotta sit down and talk about it. Possibly while making intense eye contact over a vision board featuring the words “Compromise” and a picture of a weird-looking black dog that resembles Yoda.
The Glorious Features of the Marriage Subscription
1. Automatic Renewal
Every morning, you wake up and renew without even realizing it. You look at the person, possibly mid-snore, drooling slightly onto a pillow they’ve likely had since middle school, and think: Yeah. Let’s do this again. Another 24 hours of this exact weirdness.
2. In-App Purchases
“Let’s get another dog, why not?”
“What if we tried couples salsa dancing?”
“Do we need a third throw pillow?”
These are not suggestions. These are emotional micro-transactions.
3. Push Notifications
“Did you call your mom yet?”
“The trash is still full.”
“Did you pooper scoop the back yard?”
“I love you, but if you chew that granola bar with your mouth open one more time, I will start a podcast about your flaws.”
4. Software Updates
You will both change. One day you like IPA. The next day, you’re trying to ferment your own kombucha and learning Arabic on Duolingo because she said Morocco once in 2019, and you took it as a vision quest.
5. Customer Support
This is just you, at 1 a.m., whisper-yelling at yourself in your brain: “I wasn’t ignoring her texts. I was updating my fantasy baseball lineup and then got emotionally invested in a stats debate about stolen bases since 1978.”
Common Bugs in the Marriage App
- Misinterpreting silence as judgment
- Assuming emotional ESP is a thing
- Using sarcasm as a primary love language
- Believing “I’m fine” means literally anything useful
Data Sharing Policy
Everything is shared.
Your deepest secrets. Your weird mole updates. Your irrational vendetta against your neighbor’s wind chimes. The time you cried during a Pixar Up movie and then blamed it on spicy air.
Your spouse now has all this intel. Forever. They are both your safest place and the person most likely to roast you in front of friends using this exact data.
And yet…
You stay subscribed.
You stay because she knows you don’t actually like cilantro, and you know exactly how to stir her brown sugar oat milk creamer into the coffee so it doesn’t “do that weird separation thing.” You stay because love isn’t the promo video, it’s the buggy beta version, full of glitches and unsaved drafts, but you’re still committed to running updates and rebooting together.
Sometimes there are outages
Sometimes communication fails not with a fight, but with a Dyson. It’s Saturday afternoon, the Cubs are down 8–1, so you start to nod off, and that couch has molded perfectly to your body like God intended. She walks in and says, “I thought you were going to clean out the garage today?” You respond with something bold like, “I still might,” even though you are horizontal, covered in snack crumbs, and currently losing a silent staring contest with the ceiling fan.
She doesn’t argue. She just starts vacuuming. In the room you’re in. Slowly. Methodically. Like a passive-aggressive Roomba powered by righteous indignation. She “accidentally” bumps the coffee table leg, jostling your water bottle and what’s left of your dignity. You are now both awake and fully on trial.
But then you fix it. You patch the code. You update the app.
Love, in the subscription model, is not convenience. It is not efficiency. It is not user-friendly.
It is effort.
And repetition.
And finding new ways to laugh at the same damn arguments.
Bonus Content
- Whisper-fighting in IKEA
- Tag-teaming awkward holiday dinners
- She wants to get things done. You want to disappear into a blanket burrito and pretend Monday isn’t coming. Suddenly, the vacuum starts again.
- Perfecting the double eye-roll when someone says, “You two are so cute.”
So yes. Marriage is a subscription.
But not like Netflix. It’s more like that weird indie streaming platform your friend told you about that only shows documentaries on obscure birds and 1990s cooking disasters.
You don’t get it at first. You question the price. You lose interest and come back. But over time, you realize it’s your favorite thing.
Not because it makes sense.
Because it doesn’t.
And every time that renewal prompt comes up, you click yes.
Terms accepted. Forever.
Love you babe.
P.S. This post? Yeah, it counts for The Long Game. Because marriage is the long game. No glory, lots of repetition, and the occasional heroic play at home that no one else saw but you’ll both remember forever.
Source: Terms & Conditions May Apply: Marriage as a Subscription Service
Unfortunately, no one will go to prison. Crime is legal now with a simple trip to Mar-A-Loco.
The SEC is gutted.
But if this were a Democrat or critic of First Felon using insider info, then the full force of the law would be unleashed.