this âfeministâ choke me daddy nymphet bdsm culture shit has gotta fuckin stop

blake kathryn
đȘŒ
Peter Solarz

oozey mess

tannertan36
almost home
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

No title available
Acquired Stardust
hello vonnie

JBB: An Artblog!

ellievsbear
I'd rather be in outer space đž
h

Discoholic đȘ©

Andulka
taylor price
todays bird

pixel skylines

PR's Tumblrdome
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Chile

seen from Senegal
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@cece-ligaya
this âfeministâ choke me daddy nymphet bdsm culture shit has gotta fuckin stop
Sheâs so badass!! I love her
âDJing is my passion but I want to become a gynecologist to help women"đ
girl you are amazing I love you!!! achieve those dreams!!!
She is so cool omg
we stan dr dj switch
Letâs talk about why this is problematic
WHERES THE MAN?
Where is Jesus telling the porn supporter that heâs a sinner? Whereâs Jesus telling the guy who objectifies women that heâs a sinners? Whereâs Jesus telling the guy who supports sex work knowing it hurts women that heâs a sinner?
Religion has such a history with punishing only women when men are equally as guilty. I had a professor priest who said when they baptized babies, they had to give the woman a blessing to forgive her sin of having sex and giving birth. Nevermind that the man had sex too apparently. And this is part of why the anti porn movement is lagging, it focuses on women fixing the problem when we need men too.
To my religious followers, please hold men accountable. Our movement depends on it. And feel free to make another version of this!
Logical Fallacies in Trans Activism
No true Scotsman -Â âTrans women arenât violent! Those trans women who committed violent crimes arenât real trans women!â
Ad hominem - [completely ignores other personâs argument] âGo fix your eyebrows, youâre so ugly! Youâre a bigoted idiotic bitch!â
Ad nauseam -Â âTrans women are women. Trans women are women. Trans women are women. Trans women are women.â
Circular argument -Â âA woman is anyone that identifies as a woman.â
Ad misericordiam -Â âDonât you care about those innocent trans kids that are being murdered in the street? Donât you care about the trans women that are being violently raped every day? Trans people are being killed, there is a trans genocide happening!â
Strawman: âIâve never actually looked at a radical feminist blog, but Iâm going to make posts about how theyâre all violent misogynistic and racist bigots who believe that women belong in the kitchen!âÂ
Moral equivalence - âIf you misgender a trans person, even by accident, you are as evil as Nazis and you are responsible for the deaths of trans people!âÂ
Ad baculum -Â âIf you donât completely and blindly support trans people, then youâre a TERF and we beat up TERFs.â
Appeal to authority - âWell, x organization says trans people are valid!!â
Guilt by association - âYouâre wrong because I saw a conservative say something similarâ
Genetic fallacy - âThis movement was started by trans women of colorâ [besides the fact that thatâs blatantly untrue]
Fallacy of equivocation - âTrans women are women, itâs literally in the nameâ
Appeal to tradition - âTrans people have always existed!â
Fallacy of composition - âThis one trans person benefitted from transitioning, therefore everyone willâ
Appeal to the popular - âEveryone hates you stupid terfs, just kill yourselves alreadyâ
there is nothing about me that makes me a woman other than my biology. there is no characteristic inherent in all women asides from biology (the fact that we are all females). there is no single other thing that links women together.
to imply that womanhood is a feeling, or a trait, or something you identify as, is to disrespect females and undermine our literal realities and struggles that arise from being female.
Well if thereâs nothing about you that makes you a woman other than your biology, then doesnât that mean you donât personally identify as a woman?
Why do you need to personally identify as a woman? Thatâs not required to be a woman. Only biology.
On the contrary, despite me having a uterus, I am not a woman. Despite a friend of mine lacking one, she is a woman. Gender is not bound by biology.
What is gender, then?
A spectrum and a choice.
Okay, but a spectrum and a choice of what?
How you feel. There are all kinds of ways your gender can go, be it trans, non-binary, gender fluid, or cis. Your gender is up to you and no one else.
Does that mean the rest of the world will be any less cruel? Unfortunately no. But that doesnât mean my friend who happened to be born with a penis isnât a woman. She decided sheâs trans, and I respect her enough to know how long and difficult of a mental road that must have been to get to that conclusion. Iâm not gonna tell her sheâs not a woman because she doesnât have the right biology.
Your gender is how you feel? Is it all your feelings? Is the word âfeelingsâ interchangeable with the word âgenderâ?
In this case, sure. Gender identity is a personal issue and a personal journey.
As someone else who found this thread pointed out, gender is a social construct. So how you feel and how you want to identify is up to you. This does not however, give you the right to invalidate other peopleâs gender along the way.
How does someone know they are a man versus a woman? What âfeelingsâ distinguish being a woman from being a manâor being neither?
If gender identity is just feelings, then allowing trans-identifying male people into womenâs spaces is prioritizing male feelings over womenâs rights and safety.
If gender identity is just feelings and not a mental health condition, then thereâs no reason for insurance companies to cover transitioning costs and procedures.
Having feelings doesnât make you oppressed, and saying you are something doesnât make you that something. Iâm not a leaf regardless of how many times I repeat that I am one.
âWomanâ is not a gender identityâitâs not a feeling. Thatâs absolutely sexist and, quite frankly, a form of science denialism.
First off, science disproved the gender binary a long time ago. Second, how the hell is gender identity a mental health condition? And on that note, I can guarantee you that insurance companies do not cover transitioning cost and procedures. Least not any Iâve ever heard of.
Admittedly, âfeelingsâ is over simplifying it. For those who do not identify as cisgender, it is a long and hard road that a lot of people donât even make it off of. Imagine looking in the mirror and seeing someone else. Imagine feeling like your skin isnât yours. Imagine feeling like youâre broken because the you you are physically isnât the you you feel that you are.
I personally am non-binary, so while I canât speak for everyone I can tell you this; it took a long road of depression, anxiety and self harm to get to wear I am now. I felt like an alien. Like I was playing a character in a video game instead of being the real me. Back then I didnât even know what non-binary was, so I kept trying to play the role I was put in. But I still itched like I had chicken pox every time I had to wear a dress. I still kept my hair up because Iâd flinch every time Iâd feel it on my neck. I tried boy things for a while. The clothes still didnât feel right, I count ride a skateboard, and at the time I was living in a fairly traditional neighborhood so my behavior got me bullied.
Am I saying that all my mental health problems were based on my gender identity? No, but figuring out there was a word for what I was feeling and there were other people like me certainly made a world of difference. If someone else tells me theyâre trans, non, or gender fluid, Iâm not going to invalidate the struggle it took them to get to where they are because Iâve been through similar.
If you havenât, congratulations. Iâm glad youâre comfortable with who you are. But that doesnât mean that people like me donât exist.
First off, science disproved the gender binary a long time ago.
Source me the research you are thinking of and Iâd be happy to correct misinterpretations. Speaking as someone in the life sciences and as somebody passionate about following this research, no, science has not disproved the âgender binaryâ.
I can guarantee you that insurance companies do not cover transitioning cost and procedures. Least not any Iâve ever heard of.
The following insurance carriers have available plans without blanket exclusions for transgender surgery and other trans-related healthcare.
I donât have to imagine the circumstances youâve described, Iâve lived them.
But, again. This is my question:
How does someone know theyâre a man, rather than a woman? How does someone know they are neither? What âfeelingsâ distinguish being a man vs. being a woman vs. being non-binary?
You mention feeling uncomfortable while wearing a dress and relate this to being non-binaryâbut femininity, such as dresses or having long hair or behaving a certain wayâdoes not make someone a woman. These are sexist stereotypes.
Rejecting these sex-based norms (because this is what they areâcultural norms attributed to oneâs sex) or disliking them doesnât make you any less of a woman. Do you believe that female people uncomfortable with their sexual characteristics/general body who dislike and/or reject culutural sex-based norms arenât real women?
I am not a phycologist or any kind of professional. All I am saying is that trans people are valid, non-binary people are valid, and gender fluid people are valid. I have no right to deny or question someoneâs existence and neither do you.
And thatâs fine and well-intentioned. I hope you realize, though, that many of these peopleâs belief systems rely upon very sexist, anti-feminist, homophobic and anti-scientific ideas to exist. There are many trans people who feel their own selves are being erased by the âtucuteâ movement, and many more women whoâs rights are being threatened by it. When people canât answer the simple questions of âwhat is a woman? what distinguishes a man from a woman from a non-binary person?â without resorting to sexist stereotypes, circular logic, or spirituality in their answerâitâs a form of female erasure, which benefits exploitive socio-structural conditions.
You can support trans peopleâs rights to healthcare, housing, jobs, etc. without being anti-feminist, anti-science, homophobic, and everything else the âtucuteâ movement seems to believe in.
I have no right to deny or question someoneâs existence and neither do you
I do have the right to question what other people believe in, and so do you. Question everything. If the act of asking questions threatens somebodyâs self-identity or denies their existence, then their identity is rooted in faith and not science. Donât let anyone tell you to not be curious and ask questions about anything or anyone that exists or doesnât exist.
Okay, then let me throw your questions back at you. What is a woman? What distinguishes a man from a woman or from a non-binary person? Because if the answer is biology or genitals then you are the one being transphobic and sexist here, not me. If someone tells me what their gender is Iâm not going to tell them their wrong. Thatâs erasure right there.
I have no illusions. I know the world is biased against anyone who isnât a cis white hetero male. But to fix it we need to look for equality for every human being.
What is a woman?
To answer your question I want to first back up and borrow this personâs well written description of biological sex:
Itâs probably worth noting that sex describes reproductive roles. Any description of sex that does not take into account reproduction at some level is clearly unanchored and absurd. Specifically, when someone says their sex is X, a coherent and material explanation is that they are saying their bodies have developed along one of two pathways towards the production of specific gonads that produce specific gametes associated with each sex.
For many people, succesful production of gametes and reproduction does not occur â this is contingent on environmental and historical factors â a boy child may die at five before sperm are produced â they are still male â their development is still clearly along the male pathway. And of course, like any biological pathway, problems can occur and atypical development can occur due to chromosomal/genetic issues. Sometimes misleadingly called intersex conditions, these disorders of sex development are still variations on the development of one of two sexes.
What makes someone a woman?
The distinguishing factor as to whether someone develops down a male pathway of reproductive development versus a female pathway is the presence of the SRY gene, which in the absence of medical anomalies is found in the Y chromosome.
âWomanâ historically is a word that provides personhood and age to âfemaleâ. It is a word meant to describe people who are female, adult, and human. When scientists say âwomenâs healthâ they are referring to the health of adult people who have developed along a certain and specific reproductive pathwayâthe female reproductive pathway.
This isnât misogyny (which is defined as the hatred of female people, by the way)âitâs biology. Feminist theory, which is rooted in sociology, centers on the observation that female people (women) are globally oppressed on the axis of biological sex by male people (men).
Why do you think that distinguishing men from women by biology is misogyny or sexist?
I donât. I think itâs transphobic.
Why should we care more about whether something is âtransphobicâ than if itâs true? Can you actually argue against any single point in the comment above? You admit to being uneducated in the sciences and yet you continue to act like an authority in this conversation, why?
While weâre at it, why does transphobia trump every other kind of oppression in your weird hierarchy? You likely think Iâm transphobic, I know I think youâre a misogynist, a homophobe, and likely biased against the genuine interests of dysphoric people, why does your opinion matter so much more? Why do we have to let trans identified males be racist and sexist and homophobic because thatâs ânot as badâ as being transphobic against them? Let alone how often the community covers for abusers and criminals just because theyâre transâŠ
Is it because you view this as a competition, a club to join, or a prize to be won? Its a performance and a thought exercise for you?
shiiiit, yall got all the words! đ
ah toasted
Funny how that works
I am so pleased at how many notes are some version of âI donât fear the science, I fear the corporations who control itâ because that is EXACTLY the attitude you should have. GMOs can save us. Monsanto will kill us.
what people fear about GMO- âtheyre gonna make frankencarrots that crave human flesh and cause diarrhea â what GMO actually is- âwe made rice crop that is both drought resistant and flood resistant which will prevent about 20% of major famine disasters, also it now makes vitamin A because vitamin A deficiency in poverty stricken areas is a major killer of kids as most vitamin A rich foods dont grow thereâ what people SHOULD be upset about- âi made all crops sterile so all farmers have to buy the seed from me in perpetuity and i will sue anyone who tries to go back to crops that produce their own seedâ
^^^ THIS
While I love the general public becoming aware of the horrors of capitalism, I wanna talk more about that response about software?? Because the more I know about software the more I absolutely will not put unnecessary smart devices in my home. Catch me on an Amish style homestead with only a Nokia flip phone.
Elie Saab | Spring/Summer 2020 Couture
Lundy Bancroft: Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men
This guy is transphobic so take what he says with whatever grain of salt you will. I do think he makes a lot of very accurate points (Iâve read âWhy does he do that?â) and I think some valuble insights can be gained from him. Like many other things, nuance and critical thinking are important.
wait, so you mean to tell me that a man who has made an entire career out of recognizing the manipulative behavioral patterns of menâŠ.recognizes the manipulative behavior of men thinking that they can be women, and that actual women must kiss their ass once they start claiming to be women?
you donât fucking say.
Silent, but deadly. An anonymous fear submitted to Deep Dark Fears - thanks!
You can find my two Deep Dark Fears books at your local library, at your local bookshop, and wherever books are sold! More info HERE!
One of the most important things I learned in my Language and the Law class is that law enforcement will intentionally misinterpret every type of statement asking for a lawyer as not asking for a lawyer. Even directly saying it like this âI will not speak to you without a lawyerâ can be taken as a simple statement of fact rather than a request for a lawyer. You literally have to state âI am now invoking my right to a lawyerâ and every time they try to proceed with an interrogation you have to answer every question with âI am invoking my right to have a lawyer presentâ. You canât just tell them you wonât talk without a lawyer or that you want a lawyer. You have to state that you are invoking your rights. Otherwise they could just say âwell they just said they wouldnât speak without a lawyer present. Thatâs not invoking their rights to a lawyer. Itâs just stating a fact.â even just stating your right to a lawyer doesnât count!
PLEASE share this addition. I am a lawyer who works in criminal defense, and this is one of the most avoidable things that people consistently get wrong about the Miranda rights.
Here are some more âambiguousâ phrases which courts have found DO NOT invoke your right to a lawyer:
âMaybe I should speak to my lawyer first.â
âI might like a lawyer.â
âI think I should have a lawyer present for this.â
âCould I speak to my lawyer first?â
âHow long until my lawyer gets here?â
And perhaps most egregiously â âGet me a lawyer, dawg â âcause this is not whatâs up.â
Here are the magic phrases which you need to know if you want to invoke your Miranda rights:
1) âAm I free to leave?â
Itâs worth asking this even if the answer is obvious. Even if the officer does not let you leave, by forcing them to admit that you are not free to leave, you are creating a record which your attorney can use to prove that you were in custody. Miranda rights only apply if the interrogation is custodial, meaning that police officers will frequently claim that their suspects were ânot in custodyâ to get around their Miranda rights.
2)Â âI am invoking my right to remain silent.â
Simply staying silent will not invoke your right to remain silent. As absurd as this is, you must explicitly say that you are invoking your right to remain silent in order to invoke that right.
3)Â âI am invoking my right to an attorney.â
As stated above, you must be not only clear and unambiguous, but clear and legally unambiguous. Donât get cute. Donât get sassy. And on the flip side, donât get intimidated and use verbal ticks to minimize your request. Say the line with those words exactly â say it clearly, and say it once, and then say nothing else.
Because even after youâve done all this, the police can still try to get you to talk. Theyâre not supposed to interrogate you, but theyâre allowed to make casual conversation, and if that conversation just happens to circle back around to the thing they wanted to question you about, well, thatâs really your fault for talking after you said you wouldnât, isnât it? Canât possibly fault the poor officers when you initiated â if you really wanted to have your rights respected, you wouldnât have talked to them in the first place.
The police know this, and they will mercilessly exploit this loophole. So, once youâve successfully invoked your Miranda rights, any and all conversation you have with police officers will put those rights back into jeopardy.Â
Putting it all together:
Ask: âAm I free to leave?â
If they say no, say:Â âI am invoking my right to remain silent and I am invoking my right to an attorney.â
And then shut up and do not say a single thing to them for any reason whatsoever until you have actually spoken to an attorney. Yes, even if it takes hours. Yes, even if they start talking to you about something else.
Finally, a very important disclaimer:
I may be a lawyer, but Iâm not your lawyer, and I cannot guarantee that what Iâve just laid out here will always work for every situation. We didnât get to this bizarre and absurd place overnight â we built this ridiculous system piecemeal, by deciding on a case-by-case basis that certain phrases were âtoo ambiguousâ or certain types of questioning werenât actually questioning at all. The law is still in flux, and is still fundamentally out to get you, and willing to bend plain meaning beyond all recognition to do it. Even if you invoke your rights perfectly, exactly as I have specified above, thereâs a chance that your invocation of rights will be disqualified on some new technicality that no oneâs even thought of yet â and thatâs precisely the problem.
Watch this video: âDonât Talk To The Policeâ
this is very good advice!!!
i think itâs worth noting that even if you âmessed upâ and said things because you were intimidated by the police, it wasnât your fault. They were being assholes to you on purpose - you were not stupid just because you instinctively fell back on behaviour that usually protects you in social situations. it wasnât your fault that your rights were stripped from you by an unjust system. you deserve just and fair treatment.
I hate how indoctrinated young women are into the whole Toxic Masculinity violent men have trauma <3 thing. Those men are not even TRYING to empathize with you
Yessss my sister!! Repost, share, and like!! Equality is we want.
THE PHILADELPHIA STORY (1940, dir. George Cukor) HIGH SOCIETY (1956, dir. Charles Walters)
Been there.
ABSOUTELY FABULOUS (1992, dir. Bob Spiers)