[catchymemes]

[k-cakes-baglez-deactivated20240]

This is so funny what

[articulate-anxious-atheist-deac]

At first I thought it was just a really funny guy giving a tutorial for ppl who didn’t know how to run bc the title didn’t say IN PLACE but when the supermarket came up I was like OH WAIT that make WAY more sense

[deepetch]

This is awesome on so many levels.

Ladies and Gentlemen i present to you John Carpenter’s The Thing, as performed by the claymated, Antarctic cast of the hit children’s animation Pingu. Directed by Lee Hardcastle, in under 3 minutes. Noot, Noot.

[junkyardddog]

Oh my fucking god.

[queerkreep-deactivated20161009]

JESUS CHRIST

[sixthrock]

I’m still amazed at how they got a “noot noot” to sound so much like a “fuck you”

[cozy2000]

time to post my favorite far side comic of all time

[spyglassrealms]

I booted my old laptop to find a file and was once again dealt immediate psychic damage by my desktop wallpaper

I open this thing just infrequently enough that it catches me woefully off guard every single fucking time

[putnamspuppeteer]

OP do you still have the original image. Would you be willing to share it.

[spyglassrealms]

but of course.

[justalurkr]

Truncated text of tweet from MrPitBull, Mar 11, 2026:

She kept finding women in laboratory photographs from the 1800s. Then she read the published papers—and every single woman had vanished. Someone had erased them from history.

Yale University, 1969.

Margaret Rossiter was a graduate student studying the history of science. She was one of very few women in her program.

Every Friday afternoon, students and faculty gathered for beers and informal conversation. One week, Margaret asked a simple question: "Were there ever any women scientists?"

The faculty answered firmly: No.

Someone mentioned Marie Curie. The group dismissed it—her husband Pierre really deserved the credit.

Margaret didn't argue. But she also didn't believe them.

So she started looking.

She found a reference book called "American Men of Science"—essentially a Who's Who of scientific achievement. Despite the title, she was shocked to discover it contained entries about women. Botanists trained at Wellesley. Geologists from Vermont.

There were names. There were credentials. There were careers.

The professors had been wrong.

But Margaret's discovery was just the beginning. Because as she dug deeper into archives across the country, she found something far more disturbing.

Photograph after photograph showed women standing at laboratory benches, working with equipment, listed on research teams.

But when she read the published papers, the award citations, the official histories—those same women had disappeared. Their names were missing. Their contributions erased.

It wasn't random. It was systematic.

Women who designed experiments watched male colleagues publish results without giving them credit. Women whose discoveries were assigned to supervisors. Women listed in acknowledgments instead of as authors. Women passed over for awards that went to male collaborators who contributed far less.

Margaret realized she was witnessing a pattern that stretched across centuries.

Women had always been present in science. The record had simply pushed them aside.

She needed a name for what she was documenting.

In the early 1990s, she found it in the work of Matilda Joslyn Gage—a 19th-century suffragist who had written about this exact phenomenon in 1870.

In 1993, Margaret published a paper formally naming it: The Matilda Effect.

The term captured something that had been hidden in plain sight for generations. Once you knew the term, you saw it everywhere.

Her dissertation became a lifelong mission.

For more than 30 years, Margaret researched and wrote her landmark three-volume series: Women Scientists in America. She examined letters, institutional policies, individual careers. She gathered undeniable evidence that women in science had been consistently under-credited and structurally excluded.

Her work faced resistance. Many dismissed women's history as political rather than academic. Others insisted she was exaggerating.

Margaret didn't argue emotionally. She presented data. Documented cases. Patterns repeated across decades and institutions.

Eventually, the evidence became undeniable.

Her research helped restore recognition to scientists who had been erased:

Rosalind Franklin, whose X-ray work revealed DNA's structure—credit went to Watson and Crick.

Lise Meitner, who explained nuclear fission—omitted from the Nobel Prize.

Nettie Stevens, who discovered sex chromosomes—received little credit.

Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin, who discovered stars are made of hydrogen—initially dismissed.

And countless others whose names had nearly vanished.

Margaret changed the narrative. Science was no longer just the story of solitary male geniuses. It became a story of collaboration that included women who had been written out.

The Matilda Effect became standard terminology. Scholars used it to examine how credit is assigned, how authors are listed, who receives awards, who gets left out.

[allthingslinguistic]

There’s a theory that early Europeans started saying “brown one” or “honey-eater” instead of “bear” to avoid summoning them, and similarly my friend has started calling Alexa “the faceless woman” because saying her true name awakens her from her slumber

English has an avoidance register used in the presence of certain respected animals, which sounds fancy until you realize it’s spelling out w-a-l-k and t-r-e-a-t in front of the dog.

Mx. Leah Velleman on twitter

[a-book-of-creatures]

Icelandic folklore requires you avoid saying the names of evil whales, otherwise you’ll draw their attention.

[fidoruh]

Yall have evil whales?

[a-book-of-creatures]

Iceland does! They are the illhveli, literally “evil whales”, and they live to kill you. They love nothing more than killing and eating humans and sinking their ships. Their greatest enemy is the steypireydur (that’s blue whale to you), which is the greatest of the good whales and the protector of sailors.

All evil whales are, well, evil. So evil that if you speak their name at sea, they will hear it and home in on you. So instead you use all sorts of euphemisms for their names. Also if you try to cook their meat it literally disappears from the pot. That’s right, they’re so evil, you can’t even eat them.

They include such types as the hrosshvalur (horsewhale), with big eyes and a red mane and tail. This is probably the best known and most feared of the lot.

The raudkembingur (redcomb) is especially cruel and bloodthirsty even by illhveli standards. If you manage to escape it, it will die of frustration.

Good luck escaping the mushveli (mousewhale) though, it has legs! And will clamber onto the beach in pursuit!

Or what about death from above? The stökkull (jumper) leaps high into the air and pile-drives boats to pieces.

Meanwhile the skeljungur (shellwhale) sits in the path of boats and lets them get wrecked on its shelly hide…

… while the sverdhvalur (swordwhale) slices through boats with its dorsal fin.

The katthveli (catwhale) is relatively harmless though. It meows.

The same can’t be said of the lyngbakur (heatherback), a classic island fish that lets sailors get on its back and then dives, taking them to a watery grave.

The nauthveli (oxwhale) on the other hand specially targets cattle, attracting them into the sea with its bellow before tearing them apart.

How can you avoid all these murderous whales, like the taumafiskur (bridlefish) here? Any of a number of ways, including getting a steypireydur to help. There are substances, ranging from angelica to sheep dung and chopped fox testicles, that they find abhorrent. And you can distract them with loud noises and barrels.

For more, I assure you this link will answer all your questions.

https://abookofcreatures.com/category/illhveli/

Illhveli – A Book of Creatures

Posts about Illhveli written by abookofcreatures

[fixyourwritinghabits]

This is also why fairies were referred to as the ‘Good Neighbors’ and why there are so many nicknames for Satan.

The concept of avoidance speech is endlessly fascinating and rife with plot points for writing, but honestly I’m just thrilled about the EVIL WHALES.

[stuckinapril]

I think part of getting better is complete ego death. Like you’re not above setting a timer for 5 minutes and focusing on a task. You’re not above doing a very simple 3 minute workout to start. You’re not above reading for 10 minutes a day when you first get out of your reading slump, even if you used to read for hours. You’re not above starting slow and then building up to where you want to be/where you once were. What you are above is total inertia. Doing something really is better than doing nothing. Radically accept where you are, radically accept your limits, and go from there. Don’t let your ego get in the way.

[mimosa-sexypeople-contests-2026]

Tumblr Sexyman Contest 2026 Final Round

Senshi (Dungeon Meshi)

Ryland Grace (Project Hail Mary)

Mr. Ant Tenna (Deltarune)

Voting ended onJul 20

Tenna art by @9Aaaalt29 on twt

[probablyasocialecologist]

On the Difference Between Rest and Idleness | The Idle Gazette

Why the wellness industry loves rest, fears idleness, and has spent a great deal of money to keep you from noticing the difference.

Rest can be sold, because rest promises a return. Buy the mattress, the app, the retreat, the supplement, and you will work better, earn more, perform at your peak. The promise is always, in the end, a promise about your output. The product is rest; the pitch is productivity. Even the language of self-care, which sounds like permission to do nothing, is in fact a tightly conditional permission: care for yourself so that you may continue to function, maintain the machine so the machine keeps running. It is the logic of the factory applied to the soul, and it has been astonishingly successful, because it allows a person to feel rebellious and indulgent while doing exactly what the system requires of him, which is to keep himself in good working order. Idleness cannot be sold this way, because idleness refuses the premise. It does not promise to make you better at anything. It offers no return on investment. Its only product is itself: the hour spent, the light watched, the thought followed nowhere in particular, the afternoon allowed to pass without producing evidence. There is no pitch in it. You cannot monetize a man staring at rain. You can sell him a meditation app that promises the rain-staring will lower his cortisol and improve his quarterly performance, but the moment he accepts that pitch he is no longer idle. He is resting, strategically, on the advice of his wellness coach. The rain has become a tool. The idleness has been quietly converted back into work. The conversion is the whole game, and it is happening constantly, and most people never notice it.

[...]

A life in which every hour serves work, including the hours of rest that serve work by restoring you for more work, is a life that belongs entirely to work, even in its leisure, even in its sleep. Such a life has no outside. It is productive all the way down, optimized in its very relaxation, and a person living it has never once, not for a single hour, simply been alive without being also, somehow, useful. The idle hour is the one hour that has an outside. It is the one hour that does not belong to the project of your own improvement. It is, in the most literal sense, free time: not time freed up for other tasks, but time that is genuinely free, owned by no purpose, answerable to no return.

30 May 2026

[greseadraws]

dungeon meshi but they end up in the back rooms, a cursed idea that was eating away at my brain

[nitewrighter]

Peer-reviewing @monikoishi's tags because they're banger.

[gatheringbones]

tbh a lot of my advice boils down to “hey you know that terrible horrible looming thing you’re doing your best to avoid and distract and escape as much as possible but no matter what you do it just keeps looming and looming and ruining your life”

“just, fuckign, run straight at it screaming.”

[quasarkisses]

i needed this as a background

[spectrexviiii]

[acti-veg]

‘While bats can only sense the outer shapes and textures of their targets, dolphins can peer inside theirs. If a dolphin echolocates on you, it will perceive your lungs and your skeleton. It can likely sense shrapnel in war veterans and fetuses in pregnant women. It can pick out the air-filled swim bladders that allow fish, their main prey, to control their buoyancy.

It can almost certainly tell different species apart based on the shape of those air bladders. And it can tell if a fish has something weird inside it, like a metal hook. In Hawaii, false killer whales often pluck tuna off fishing lines, and “they’ll know where the hook is inside that fish,” Aude Pacini, who studies these animals, tells me. “They can ‘see’ things that you and I would never consider unless we had an X-ray machine or an MRI scanner.”

This penetrating perception is so unusual that scientists have barely begun to consider its implications. The beaked whales, for example, are odontocetes that look dolphin-esque on the outside—but on the inside, their skulls bear a strange assortment of crests, ridges, and bumps, many of which are only found in males.

Pavel Gol’din has suggested that these structures might be the equivalent of deer antlers—showy ornaments that are used to attract mates. Such ornaments would normally protrude from the body in a visible and conspicuous way, but that’s unnecessary for animals that are living medical scanners.’

-Ed Yong, An Immense World

[namu-the-orca]

Cetacean echolocation is one of those things that boggles your mind once you really start to think about the implications. They can see each others' hearts beating fast with fear or excitement. They can see if another dolphin is healthy, or pregnant; how the fetus is doing; if they have ingested debris. Their echolocation is also incredibly precise: a bottlenose dolphin could discriminate between cilinders differing in wall thickness by just 0.23 mm (0.009 inch) from 8 meters away!! And they certainly notice when something is off.

I'm not sure if I ever shared this story before here, but in Curacao, when I was allowed to assist in a guest interaction programme, there was suddenly consternation in the pool behind us. A guest had entered the water and the dolphins were going crazy, paying no heed to the trainers anymore. The lead trainer that was with me gave the dolphins to me to watch over while she went to help. When she came back she told me what had happened. The guest that had caused so much uproar had left the water again and was asked if he had done anything to upset the dolphins. He hadn't, and he couldn't imagine what was wrong... until he mentioned he had a pacemaker. The younger dolphins in the pool had never seen someone with a pacemaker before and apparently it rocked their world.

It was such a wild experience, and offered such a cool insight into how dolphins experience their world. I'll never forget it.

[libraford]

Googled something about quick hydration and it suggested big jug of water, couple tbsp pickle juice, dash of lime juice.

Its surprisingly tasty????

[libraford]

Pleased to report that after a day of this i am not longer craving caper brine and my mouth is not dry as usual. There's some good suggestions in the notes too that I want to try.

-ancient roman posca: water, red or white wine vinegar, honey, salt, herbs (coriander, mint, thyme)

-switchel: water, ginger, vinegar, sweetener, lemon, salt

-ayran: yogurt, water, salt, mint

-Agua pepino: water, cucumbers, lime, sugar, optional mint.

[libraford]

I have been reminded of:

-shrub: vinegar, sida water, elderberry (or other berry), sugar.

[libraford]

I have now been informed of

-sekanjabin: honey, vinegar, mint, water.

[libraford]

"Wow, I wonder why this post was popular this week."

-sees the reports of the heatwave in Europe-

"... ah."

[annabelle--cane]

in order to move the overton window to something more reasonable I am now going to run for office on the single issue platform of ushering in the one-day work week

[razielim]

@lovesongs4robots — #as a union organizer who wrote proposals for and bargained contracts #you don't start with what you want and what's “reasonable” #be realistic demand the impossible #if you are starting with something you would settle for you've already lost #politics #txt

this is why it's important to keep hammering on in your town halls, board meetings, calls to your reps about what you DO want, not just want you don't want.

knowing and communicating what you want requires you to think about and develop your own personal narratives and ideas about what should happen next in this country no matter what narrative is currently showing up in news or conversations, both if it's something you disagree with or something that seems "good enough." examples:

i don't want ICE gathering up people without due process -> i WANT an egalitarian entrance process for anyone who wants to work in this country, fair treatment of all residents as guaranteed by our constitution, and a much more viable path to permanent residence and citizenship

i don't want women to lose the right to abortion -> i WANT women to have full control over their bodies, in particular their reproductive health, and for this autonomy to be enshrined as an inalienable right and a medical necessity. i WANT women to be trusted by law as fit to exercise this autonomy at any point in their lifetime or pregnancy

i don't want disabled people, gay couples, or interracial couples to lose/continue to be denied marriage rights -> i WANT any two grown adults to have the option of entering into the legal union known as marriage

i don't want conservatives to get their way and make trans people use incorrect documents/bathrooms -> i WANT all people to have access to privacy and safety in public bathrooms without fear of vigilantes, policing, or other forms of assault, and i WANT everyone to have access to identifying documents that similarly take every precaution to ensure a person's privacy and safety

and now let's take the training wheels off and forget about what we "don't want" entirely and try some more examples:

i WANT all people to have all their medical and disability needs met in a timely manner, to the level of the currently best available treatment, regardless of financial means, employment status, or difficulty of treatment. i WANT us to prioritize investing in the infrastructure, educational programs, and financial incentives needed to make this happen (enough medical students -> staff, enough locations, well-funded public research, drug, and protocol development, etc.)

i WANT the end of legal slavery (prison labor, H-2A visa labor, etc.). i WANT arrest/ticket quotas to be eliminated across the country as they are in violation of our 4th amendment rights. i WANT there to be a guarantee of humane treatment for all individuals for the entire period that they are in government custody, including: guaranteed protections against assault, guaranteed investment by the government to ensure the person can rejoin the rest of society as swiftly as possible for their circumstances, having been equipped with the education, medication, employment, or other social support that had been previously missing from their life, in order to meet their basic needs and empower them to contribute meaningfully to society, if able, or participate harmlessly in society otherwise

i WANT the government to guarantee that each person, regardless of means, has access to the education and compensation necessary to meet their basic needs, as well as extend that guarantee to any of that person's dependents. i WANT the government to explicitly recognize that dependents are not burdens, possessions, or punishments upon their responsible individual(s), but that the responsible party in question is rather deputized by the government, and relied upon by all of society, to ensure the best possible quality of life and future for their dependents. for the common good of the nation, the government and society shares in this responsibility for dependents by providing financial assistance and/or social services. in addition to food, shelter, and k-12 education, this includes any childcare, adolescent or adult vocational training, and disability/medical support that the responsible party and/or their dependents require.

"i'm a socialist" this; "i'm progressive" that

"our founding fathers" "marx says" "i wonder if it's possible"

no, what do you WANT? can you communicate what you WANT? can you agree and work with people who call themselves some other term, or conceptualize the economy with a different framework, on a common GOAL?

have you thought about what other goals your stated goals imply? when someone says they don't want something, like "universal healthcare is bad bc then the wait times are too long," and you get anxious in your heart of hearts bc you realize prompt care is as important as universal care, have you thought about what must happen in order to hit both of those goals?

do countries with long wait times incentivize enough people to train as doctors and nurses in the disciplines or populous regions that are most choked up? do they financially and logistically support clinics in areas where the local population is too sparse to keep services open as a solvent business? where will we, in our country, get the money to cover these basic life essentials? what financial priorities must urgently change? where are we spending too much tax money with the least amount of public good?

do your reps know you WANT that money used for something else?

do they just how MANY of you actively WANT this very specific goal?

have they seen that you WANT this so much that you're willing to be EXTREMELY annoying and inconvenient about it, willing to completely upend their desire for smooth sailing and a good public image?

not having the spoons to get out there and agitate, make calls, etc. is one thing.

if possible for your particular situation, yes, you can periodically ask yourself if you've been using some spoons on things you care less about and test out if it's more rewarding to reallocate those spoons to agitating for liberation/change. (also worth asking if you've lately not been allowing yourself to rest properly to recover your full amount of spoons. just in general, not just for politics lol)

but it's a whole other matter to not entertain any serious thoughts regarding your own wants

not having a clear picture of what you, yourself, would like to stand for according to your values and letting the narratives of others drag you along — all of that can leave you so much more drained than simply taking the time to find your spot in the political landscape and parking your butt in that place firmly. take a look around at who's planted themselves next to you, smile and exchange names, and don't let anyone shoo you elsewhere according to their whims

[azspot]

“Because the truth is, tech doesn’t have an image problem. It doesn’t have a message problem. It has an intention problem. What’s wrong with the axe murderer who broke into my house is not that he hasn’t successfully persuaded me to buy into his narrative. What’s wrong is that he’s trying to kill me with an axe. Similarly, when you launch a product that’s designed to put millions of people out of work, block access to sources of verifiable truth, replace human creativity with slop, and lower the barriers to every sort of atrocity, the problem isn’t that you haven’t told the public a good story about those things. The problem is that you are trying to do them.”

— The 40 Most Rage-Inducing Problems in Tech

[santhipoma]

[glasshomewrecker]

Everyone should be aware of nitter.net

for any address to twitter you can replace the “x.com” with “nitter.net” and you will be able to browse as if you have an account. Lifesaver.

Similarly, imginn.com works for most Instagram addresses. I still haven’t found one for Facebook.

[ms-demeanor]

hey, don't cry. one cup heavy whipping cream, two tablespoons granulated sugar, three tablespoons cocoa powder and whisk until stiff peaks form for three ingredient chocolate mousse, okay?

[ms-demeanor]

i realized that i like the format because it's the exact opposite of the recipe blogs with 1000 words before they get to an ingredient list.

[sweetcardamom]

To save one william years, whisk with electric beater/mixer.

[redstonedust]

crazy how you can get used to working around problems that have very easy fixes. for like 6 months we used a hand towel to jam a kitchen cabinet closed because the hinges were broken and it turns out fixing it took me like $5 and 20 minutes. bedroom door has been squeaky for years and all it needed was a lil wd40. im sure this can apply to mental health too but i wouldnt know about all that.

[willo-or-something]