Saw an op-ed that was on the surface a complaint about kids not wanting to take on family heirlooms but read like an elegy to dying traditions. The hardest part was the anxiety without recognizing that they didnât pave the way for the decisions they assumed their kids would make.
(This is written entirely within the dominant white/western culture - about traditions that have neglectful stewardship rather than those actively suppressed)
The anxiety makes sense. Youâre seeing, too late to do anything about it, that thereâs no foundation - no space - for the traditions you expected to pass on. Your kids _canât_ take your momâs fine china. So now instead of enjoying what you have you worry about its future.
I see a pattern in these op-eds though - a pattern in whatâs left unsaid. There were responsibilities tied to these traditions. You collectively assumed they _would_ be passed along. So collectively, what did you do to ensure those traditions _could_ be passed along?
Op-eds never speak for everyone, but itâs worth acknowledging the pattern in what speech is deemed worth sharing widely. Â And in this particular pattern, thereâs an answer: that answer looks like ânothing.â
You want the china passed down but your kids have no room in their rentals. You want grandkids but your kids donât have the financial stability. You want that cross-country RV neverending road trip but youâve had decades of wanting lower taxes more than you wanted infrastructure.
The bleak outlook for traditions is a direct result of the unmaintained foundations for them. The second best time is always now - if itâs important enough to op-ed about, what are you willing to change to get it back? What will you give up or re-prioritize?
I kinda think that world-defining assumptions are always gonna break without maintenance. So rather than getting mad at whoeverâs next for not carrying on the norms we didnât do upkeep on, when itâs my turn, I hope Iâm introspective enough to help instead of externalize & blame.
This.
The bleak outlook for traditions is a direct result of the unmaintained foundations for them. The second best time is always now - if itâs important enough to op-ed about, what are you willing to change to get it back? What will you give up or re-prioritize?
I follow a Facebook group of âMemories of âŚâ for my hometown - a rustbelt community that has gone from a thriving hub of industry to a much-less-thriving place.
The group is a collective lament.  Decades-old pictures of well-kept churches. Aerial shots of the main intersection downtown, lined with big cars.   Scanned advertisemetns from local stores featuring pictures of their interiors.  These alternate with the drumbeat of news: the Catholic diocese is closing churches. Selling them.  Tearing them down.  STores downtown are closing.  The traffic light has been replaced with a four-way-stop.
âThatâs the church my parents were married in!â âHow could they tear down that beautiful building. Such memories!â âAll the businesses are closing. It must be the taxes.â âTheyâve sold the old lodge downtown.â âTheyâre not opening the skating rink this year. We always used to go.â
And sometimes I chime in.Â
âDo you attend that church? Do you give? Or do you just want the building to look pretty for you? â âDo you volunteer at that park? Why not?â âDid you vote for that recreation bond issue?â âAre you a member of that Lodge? Why not?â âDo you shop downtown?  Or did you start shopping at Walmart and Amazon to save a few bucks?â
If you feel something is worth preserving, why do you not participate in its preservation? Â
Community is not a spectator sport.Â
Community is not a spectator sport
Oh yeah.
A lot of the people I knew from high school and university (now in their late twenties to mid thirties) are doing the âsettling downâ thing. Except between what theyâre forced to do b/c of economic things, what theyâre now allowed to do, and what theyâre choosing to do, their lives are looking a lot different.
































