So I think this is where I post to prove I’m not a bot? Is that something a bot would say?
*gets on podium*
hello peoples of tumblr. I am not a pornbot. Sorry if that is a disappointment to some of you.
i don't do bad sauce passes
Show & Tell
Game of Thrones Daily
$LAYYYTER
No title available

shark vs the universe
Misplaced Lens Cap
Today's Document
ojovivo

Origami Around
hello vonnie
cherry valley forever

No title available

Love Begins

Product Placement

izzy's playlists!
wallacepolsom
Acquired Stardust

blake kathryn
almost home
seen from Malaysia

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from Bulgaria

seen from United States
seen from Finland
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from United States
@existenceisimplied
So I think this is where I post to prove I’m not a bot? Is that something a bot would say?
*gets on podium*
hello peoples of tumblr. I am not a pornbot. Sorry if that is a disappointment to some of you.
In 2026, the chicest thing a gay actor can do is never explicitly come out as gay but also make it abundantly clear that he is. Coming out is too modern. Staying closeted is too old fashioned. But this method merges contemporary freedom with Old Hollywood glamour and allure, and it weeds out the dumbest people who truly don’t get it. I call it the Pascal Method.
Taylor Swift does this
no she doesn’t
You clearly don't go here or to queer history and signaling, or both, enough to have this conversation and I'm not going to explain it to you. You could have asked questions, you could have done even a modicum of research. You didn't and you made yourself look ignorant. Goodbye.
#I'm fucking crying#this is an instant classic#this is the next meme#i can't believe I'm here to see a baby copypasta nary two hours old#I can't#lol#i laughed way too hard#iconic
i went to queer history and signaling and i didnt see taylor swift
op turned off reblogs from this post and i am so fucking heartbroken bc how else will people know about quacking in my boobs. what the helley
so are we keeping our glasses on or off during sex
glasses on or off during sex
on
off
i do not wear glasses (u better rb this)
just saw a deactivated mutual's post on my dash. that's my dead wife's corpse you're all dragging around
I also reblog this guys dead wife.
So like... it's a Thing in all fandoms where fans sort of latch onto fanon versions of characters and their dynamics with each other that are actually completely off-base, right? I don't know if this phenomenon has an official name, but I've seen it so many times and it's fascinated me every time. Especially when a character's popular fanon selves don't end up just diluted from their source material, but straight up OPPOSITE their canon portrayal.
So one of my "favorite" variations on this was how the early PotC fandom used to get Will EXTREMELY wrong, especially in comparison to Jack, and it made finding in-character fics SO. DAMN. DIFFICULT.
I've talked about this MULTIPLE times before, as have several other fans. It's a dead horse being beaten. But basically certain prevalent takes on fanon!Will have in the past leaned towards a personality that was very patient and grounded and even demure to contrast against Jack's off-beat personality and Elizabeth's fiery rebelliousness. Because Elizabeth has the drive to push back against social norms, Will became the foil who fell back to his pre-pirate version, reluctant to break rules unless she pulled him into it, even in post-CotBP timelines. Likewise, Jack was the one with the WTF decision making, while Will was more rooted in reasonable decisions.
And by their appearances, archetypes, and certain elements of their world views, you'd THINK that's how it works. When we meet Will in the governor's foyer, Will is so lovestruck and doe-eyed and subservient to the governor, I think that people thought that's just Who He Is. Especially because he often acts as Jack's straight-man foil in the comedic elements. Straight-laced. Rigid. Even boring or timid.
But if you actually pay attention to the movies, it's very much the opposite. In canon, Jack's USUALLY the level-headed one who just happens to have chaos follow him, because of the way he can wield it. He thinks in long run, tries to solve problems with words and as little fighting as possible as often as he can. Ideal situations for Jack are more like a thief--he wants to be in and out of the job as silently and slick as possible. The scenarios he's in are insane, because the way he throws other people around with those scenarios is kind of insane, but he himself remains largely cool and collected.
That's Jack.
THIS is Will:
Canon!Will starts out literally so impulsive and rash, Jack has to physically manhandle him at certain points to keep him from blowing up his plans--and then still gets taken out because he underestimates his listening skills and impatience. Will corners Jack into what is functionally a cage match to the death by sanely locking the door with his sword and very nearly wins. He is constantly at 11, constantly demanding things be done faster, more directly, and at the same time quietly scheming behind Jack's back almost from the get-go. He does flashy jumps and flips off of things because using the stairs is too slow or whatever. He shows up in DMC yelling at Jack to give him his compass at the point of the sword, and insisting he'll get Davy Jones' key by just "cutting down everyone in his path."
Even when Will mellows out significantly in AWE, there are remnants of this contrast still there. Jack's plan for leading Beckett to Shipwreck Cove seems to have been a very reasonable and underhanded effort to deliberately make sure Elizabeth is inside the Cove while Will is on Beckett's ship, in command of the Compass. Meanwhile Will's plan was to leave a breadcrumb trail of vulture-sea gulls feasting on dead soldiers' corpses.
What I'm getting at is, yeah, Jack's a charismatic "rogue" and Will's a "romantic hero" TECHNICALLY. Jack makes quippy jokes, and Will glares and scowls and WTFs back. But not only are they are both more alike than people give them credit for, they are also totally opposite their roles' traditional personalities in ways that the fandom tends to overlook.
TLDR; Jack's crazy, Will's a sweetheart. But Will is also a manic gremlin, and Jack doesn't always know what to do with him about it, so they often end up something like this:
And more fans need to play with this fact, the end.
Tactical reloading of things that don’t need tactical reloads
I lost it at the toaster and couldn't make it past the smoke detector before reblogging
This is so satisfying to watch—
her eyes were the sickly green of the sky before a tornado, and to his horror he discovered she could throw cows around just as easily
to his horror? weak shit. outta my way gayboy im boutta get it
all of our trobles seem so small from up here
May I request a Squirrel Eldrazi?
You may request it.
My signature is worth negative 2 dollars and 82 cents.
"I actually misunderstood the question, which is your fault, so my answer isn't wrong, it's really extra double right and you're kiiiind of problematic for making me look wrong in the first place."
YOU'RE TYPING ON THE SEARCH ENGINE MACHINE
just saw someone get something (factual and easy to check) wrong, get corrected, and snottily rejoin that 'not everyone has the privilege of higher quality education'. infantile. I would go so far as to say contemptible. pick up your mess. find some dignity.
there's a lot I don't like about the increase of people feeling the need to offer kneejerk diagnoses of moral OCD on here, but one of the biggest flaws in it to me is that it feels so dismissive and incurious. if you can write off any troubling belief as the result of a disorder (as if people with compulsions and disordered thinking form their ideas in a bubble, without any outside influence) then you never have to actually engage with those beliefs or try to understand how a person might arrive at such a conclusion, you can just sweep it under the rug of nebulous discrediting mental illness. I wouldn't go so far as to call it a silencing tactic, although it does have shades of trying to politely call someone crazy, but I think it's a real easy out for people who have a knee jerk negative response to a very polarized take and don't want an immediate way to strip it of any potential validity.
to cite the example most salient to me and my educational practice, a lot of people, especially young people, have extremely regressive and conservative ideas about sex right now. even those who aren't trying to enforce bioessentialism and restrict human autonomy display reactionary tendencies towards the sexual expression of others and high levels of anxiety around their own sexual appetites. this is a very widespread trend, and I see it wash up in my own inbox with some frequency. and let me tell you it! seeing someone in the replies rushing to write off askers by saying "oh you have moral OCD, get help" is not helpful, ever. and trying to dismiss an generational attitude shift as Mental Illness(TM) (the kind you can ignore because it's not a cute aesthetic identity marker) rather than seriously scrutinizing the forces at play to make people think this way is sticking your head in the sand about it as best
okay, I made a comment about this but I realized I’m still not done. I am someone with moral ocd. My anxiety has put me in bad situations where I am hurting myself and others because my puritan ancestors start talking crap about me in my head. (I call my moral obsessions Ol’ Jebediah, let’s me laugh at them a bit.)
And before I had formal treatment, I had friends and family who loved me but didn’t know what to do with the fact that “looking at a girl wrong”, “not doing my homework on time”, and “touching someone on accident” all triggered a level stress in me that humans are supposed to reserve for running from grizzly bears.
And they tried their best, they really did. But saying “that’s your anxiety talking, it isn’t real” only made it worse. Because now I wasn’t only scared out of my wits, but everyone around me was telling me that *I could not be trusted to know what was right for me*. I am very lucky that the person I was dating at the time was not abusive because I genuinely believed they knew what I needed emotionally and I didn’t.
As tempting as it may be, you cannot tell someone they are incapable of making wise decisions and should instead let someone else tell them what to think. The key to improvement for me is gaining the tools to interrogate my anxieties and identify *what I’m actually responding to* rather than insisting that my fear is popping up ex nihilo because I’m one of the crazies.
is jake gyllenhaal gay??
why would you ask us, a narnia blog, this
You can write a fandom wiki from an in-universe perspective, or you can have your fandom wiki adhere to Wikipedia citation standards, but you cannot do both. Trying to have it both ways is how you end up with articles that hedge on whether penises exist in-universe because no canon media directly addresses the topic.
Are you sure about that? https://tardis.wiki/wiki/Penis
I don't feel like Doctor Who is any sort of exception to the general principle here; even having nine hundred episodes spread over sixty years to draw from and copious licensed prose besides, trying to cite from an in-universe perspective still results in a model of the world with all sorts of strange gaps in it. I will, however, give it full credit that the in-universe existence of penises is not one of those gaps.
I mean, Tardis wiki famously used to have the alphabet out of order because of a flubbed line by an actress in the one episode the whole alphabet was spoken all the way through. They are the poster child of the penis hedge. If anything, the act of having an article on the subject is the result of how hard they hedge.
once my friend made a drink he called turpentine that tasted like every worst college night out rolled into one and felt like getting whacked in the head with a hammer, and I woke up in my own apartment with my phone wallet keys clothes and absolutely zero memory of the night before, and when I checked my watch I'd walked over 60k steps.
60k steps in the middle of the night in heels for reasons entirely unknown to me. what was I doing. where did I go. where did I come from. cotton eye joe. or whatever.
people are theorizing what happened so here's what I know:
the club we went to closed at 2am and 45kish steps were after 2am, meaning I wasn't still dancing at the club. we got there at 11:30pm. I don't know when we left.
none of us had any charges on our cards or venmos after getting into the club and none of us were missing cash
we all woke up with all our things and no injuries except some bruises (to be expected from a night out)
I woke up smelling like salt water which would make me think I'd ended up in the ocean(??) except my hair was still straight, none of my things were water damaged, and I was completely dry
from our camera rolls we know we were all together until around 4am, but not where we were because they're all too dark to see, which is fucking weird because we live in a city with tons of lights all night
I didn't wake my roommates up when coming home, managed to take out my contacts, cooked mac n cheese, and passed out on the living room floor
me and everyone else who'd been wearing heels had crazy blisters
my friend found a bunch of rocks in his pockets
two of my guy friends were wearing each other's shirts when they woke up (in their separate apartments)
we all got back to our apartments around 6am which we know for a fact because we all texted pictures of ourselves being home safe to the group chat, so being unbelievably hammered didn't stop us from having enough common sense to make sure we were all okay
if we'd been able to sherlock holmes together what happened it'd just be a funny night out but the fact we all have no fucking clue means we have conspiracy theories about it. and we don't let my friend make turpentine anymore.
OP went dancing with the 12 dancing princesses pass it on
everyone go home this guy solved it
@professorsparklepants
shoutout all my neurodivergent folk who Dont have autism or adhd
hey fellow autistic folk and adhders. this post isn't about you. this post is about all the other neurodivergence that is specifically Not autism or adhd. maybe the clearest post on the site about that actually. i'm autistic and have adhd too, but this post is specifically not about that. stop making it about your autism or your adhd.
it's about npd, bpd, psychosis, schizophrenia, dyslexia, dyscalculia, dyspraxia, dysgraphia, epilepsy, DLD, did, osdd (and any other plurality/multiplicity), depression, brain damage, anxiety, tourettes, down syndrome, ptsd, and everything else. it's specifically about neurodivergence that ISNT autism or adhd.