hope you relapse on your ed bitch
Hope you have a great day
Not today Justin

oozey mess
One Nice Bug Per Day

Product Placement

shark vs the universe
Claire Keane
hello vonnie
almost home

pixel skylines
todays bird
Sade Olutola

PR's Tumblrdome
d e v o n

Love Begins
$LAYYYTER
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Kiana Khansmith
i don't do bad sauce passes
No title available
Xuebing Du
seen from Malaysia
seen from Indonesia
seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Poland

seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Israel
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from South Korea

seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from Japan
@geramisdeath
hope you relapse on your ed bitch
Hope you have a great day
the fact that liberals are on social media resharing pics of joe and jill biden’s dogs like “omg we did it!!! we’re gonna have doggos in the white house again, everything is going back to normal! 😍🤧” like I really don’t know what to say other than please shut the fuck up
Fucking teenagers with no understanding of how the world works. Yes, we all think the world’s problems are solved now, it’s not just an expression of relief after four years of watching this administration wipe its ass with the constitution. Grow the fuck up.
Both parties are not the same. One side isn’t moving toward reform as fast as they should. The other is embracing terror and repression as policy. Joe Biden is imperfect but basically a decent human being; same with Kamala Harris. They’ve made mistakes. If you think they’ve committed “crimes,” congratulations, you’re dumb enough to buy into right wing propaganda. The alternative was literally dismantling the foundations of American democracy.
We can be an imperfect democracy working to improve and pushing the Biden/Harris administration to make the reforms we need while fixing the damage dive by 45, or we can be a fascist dictatorship. Sounds like an easy choice to me.
Nigga are u serious rn?
Such well-articulated, thoughtful commentary. Go home, child.
Look mistakes only apply to shit like making an off colored joke on twitter when you were 15, not fucking making a bill that managed to incarcerate millions of black people for non violent drug offenses, being an active player in U.S imperialism over the middle east, imposing student debt onto many of us today, being apart of the war on drugs. Hiding evidence that can exonerate men on death row and releasing it only after they were executed, disportionately arresting poor parents who can’t afford to take their children to school for truancy, laughing about the fact that you smoke Marijuana after arresting over 1900+ people for non violent Marijuana charges.
These people have literally ruined lives, and you think nigga Biden’s arthritis was just acting up when he signed those bills. Miss me with that “tHey mAde mIstAkeS!!!” Bullshit.
This shit isn’t a fucking mistake. Ruining peoples lives isn’t a fucking mistake. Killing innocent civilians oversees for fucking money isn’t a fucking mistake.
This is how know y'all will not hold these bitches accountable for their actions your already starting to excuse this bs.
Yes, because they’re not literal fascists I clearly think they shouldn’t be held accountable for their past actions and pushed to do the right thing now. That’s what I said.
Biden already said during the town hall debate that he regrets his vote for the crime bill and he didnt fully comprehend before the damage it did, AFTER people pushed him on it and presented him with the facts. That means activism works and people have the power to effect change. Now people are paying attention more than ever. They have to remain on alert and continue to push for reform to ensure this administration doesn’t get complacent and continues to live up to its promises.
Meanwhile, once again, you have an administration actively encouraging white supremacy, voter fraud, terrorism, treason and violence. And the party that supports it is not only not discouraging it, but indulging it. McConnell and Barr are using the justice department to try to continue to undermine the election, but I’ve seen more people mad here about Biden’s votes 30 years ago and Harris’ actions as a prosecutor than anything about that. One is a direct threat to democracy. One isn’t.
Why are you trying so hard…
So hard, to downplay this man and woman’s horrible actions, as some kind of “mistake”
Do I need to continuously list his sins out to you, to show much he has gotten away with, to show how he played a huge role in building this horrible establishment we see today, do i need to do that?
“They shouldn’t be held accountable for they’re past actions”
I want you to tell that, to millions of people affected by drone strikes from Iraq to Yemen, I want you tell that to the people who have suffered under police brutality, because this literal war criminal, helped create a bill that fuckin militarized the police, the millions of people who had their lives destroyed because of mass incarceration, fuckin Justice Clarence Thomas was smeared by this man, he lied, and painted him as a rapist Just so he wouldn’t be able to be sworn into being a Justice, to millions of people affected by student loans today, he helped with the war on drugs, he was there, he’s the one that built the fucking cages and his been locking kids in there for quite a while, he was pro-segregationist, he labeled blacks “super predators”, he is very inappropriate around women, and you have the gall, to say that sentence.
Kamala Harris, this disgusting piece of shit, manages to somehow offend the very people she supposedly is meant to represent, somehow Biden and Harris have a lot in common on having a jolly old time on arresting Black people for non violent drug offenses, and to add insult to injury, she even laughs about it saying “I smoke from time to time”, she incarcerated thousands of people and proceeds the very thing she incarcerated people for herself, you need to know that these type of charges literally take these peoples lives. They can’t even get out till they hit their 40s or even 50s, for non violent drug charges, she’s not even that great of a prosecuter, like the pig she is, she has blood on her fucking hands, not even releasing evidence for men on death row until after they have been executed, yes she killed them, by simply not releasing evidence that could have saved their lives. She just loves fucking with poor single black mothers who cannot afford to get their kids to school everyday so she’s just gonna arrest them for truancy, she also loves getting people to report undocumented immigrant children to be handed over to ICE, and stripped away from their parents, she doesn’t seem to care much for trans women since she likes to lock them up in the mens part of the prison, which cause the subsequent rape and torture of a trans woman. I could go on and on about these two.
Mistakes. I like how you use that word. As if, he just said some racist statement 50 years ago and tried to retract on it. As if Harris just said some off color joke back then.
You treat these people like they’re old grandpa and auntie with misguided opinions, when one of them is a corrupted career politician that has been in this game of politics for over 50 years. These people have blood on their hands, they ruined tons of lives, they destroyed families, they have managed to fuck over so many people.
War crimes and imperialism, thats just a mistake he can change 🥺
Mass incarceration of black people, it was a mistake people can change 🥺
Do you hear yourself? Do you fucking hear yourself.
These are people with blood on their hands, and the only way I know they feel guilt for their sins, is if they decided to fucking turn themselves in and live the rest of their lives as political prisoners. They need to face what they did. If they felt regret, they would show it. They would.
But because they said it, it totally means they regret it.
Words mean fucking nothing. Your actions prove everything.
People dig up bad things Trump supposedly did in the 80s to damn him, but when it comes to Joe or Harris, the past suddenly doesn’t matter.
> Meanwhile, once again, you have an administration actively encouraging white supremacy, voter fraud, terrorism, treason and violence.
Citation needed. And if you bring up ‘Charlottesville”, you automatically lose, for reasons I am quite willing to explain.
And then I’ll point to the left bailing out BLM rioters and turning a blind eye to its violence.
Was reading Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi and this little bit came up.
Apparently, contrary to popular assumption, under the new religious way of governing, BOTH Men and women had to change their way of dressing, throw away their possession, and behave differently to appease those few in power. Doing anything different meant that you opposed what the government wanted and you would be deemed a traitor (which more often than not got you jailed or executed.)
Just putting that out there.
People oftentimes don’t realize just how shitty life got common men is in Islamic dictatorships.
Oh yeah, how shitty it is to not wear short sleeve shirts, but you can still rape whoever you want and get to marry the girl, probably underage. Like your first wife. Who isn’t allowed to do anything without your approval, and who you can beat on a daily basis if this 17 year old doesn’t birth you a son real fast.
Did you read the book or are you going to continue proving my point that no one cares about how men were affected to the point of even dismissing the notion that they were?
Even in her book, most of the people “taken away and never heard from again” (arrested, interogated, and killed for not adhering to the new rules) were male. The same rules that tons of men (including her father) were actually against and tried very hard to oppose.
Or perhaps the comic page also put into Satrapi’s book about how girls were given an education on how to be a housewife while boys were being taught how to be child soldiers. How the boys and their parents were being taught that dying was the ultimate honor.
Are you truly so offended that people, including the author that lived through the experience, correctly include men as victims?
Did YOU read the book? Because I wonder what the author would have to say of your constant ‘whatabout men?!’ ism? Yes, men were oppressed (still are) too. *Everyone*, really, was oppressed. Oppression is the starting level, the default. Yes, men were conscripted. There isn’t anyone in a fundamentalist Islamic society going to endorse giving a woman a gun. Or any degree of power outside of the narrow and still male-dominated confines of home, for that matter.
And at a feeble least, men in Iran could hope to one day be leaders.
I did read the book. I’m the OP. That picture is literally from the book. The very first sentence of the post mentions that I was reading it. She figuratively said “what about the men” multiple times throughout the book by including experiences that were not her own. By including the opinions of men who disagreed with the government changes. By including that both women AND men had restrictions on their clothing options. That little boys were being trained to fight and die. That tons of men were being taken away and presumably killed for resisting, at least more regularly than women were. Yes, she included men in her story.
Lol you want to hate men so much that merely including men as victims, not focusing on them but merely including them, is seen as a threat. Is seen as misogyny. Dont even try to claim that you support gender equality with that attitude.
I wonder how many women were and are beaten to death by their husbands in Iran, before it ever even got to the point of being out in public? Anyway. No. I don’t hate men in the least. What I could credibly be said to hate, however, is the notion that women don’t have it so bad because hey men suffer too-which is a narrative you continually push. You *don’t* just say ‘men suffer, too’, you point to situations where there is significant or even terrible gender inequality and spout off some stupid horseshit like ‘but the draft!’ Or for instance I noticed you dropped the conversation about which gender works more when actual numbers came up.
Lol. So, that at least I could be said to hold in contempt, if not hatred.
So you’ve pretty much confirmed that you see the inclusion of men as victims as a threat. As a competition. You cant simply say “men and boys also had a lot of stuff to deal with”, no, you went on the defensive.
“You don’t just say ‘men suffer too’”. But that’s the thing. People honestly don’t know that men suffer too. Entire governments don’t understand this. The mere acknowledgement that men face inequalities is often seen as laughable, as misogyny. People get defensive, quite literally like what you’re doing now .
Literally no one says that women “dont have it so bad because men suffer”. Men’s suffering is rarely even recognized. Again, you just proved that you took the inclusion of men in recognized issues as some sort of attack on women.
“ i noticed that you dropped the conversation when I mentioned which gender works more”
I didnt because you didnt mention it. But if you really want to go there, it would be men. It depends in what you define as “work”, but since I mentioned men and boys quite literally conscripted and taught that dying wasnt a big deal, I would say that would be a pretty good indicator. Not that any of that matters. You tried to change the conversation because the original point was lost on you and you couldnt offer any valid counterargunent.
So anyway, the assumption is often that bad things only happened to women. That inequalities only happened to women. Entire governments and activist groups spout this. And someone who actually lived it, literally a picture from her very book, shows that tons of these things happened to men too. You can get all angry and defensive that women aren’t receiving 100% of the attention and sympathy, but don’t you dare say you support gender equality when you discourage talking about half the population, especially when someone who lived them is quite literally exposing inequalities to address.
If your response is you trying to make oppression into a competition, you trying to discourage talking about/recognizing men as victims, you taking offense to the inclusion of men, or you bringing up an irrelevant argument to take attention off of the very clear topic of this post being that men were also targetted; don’t bother replying.
I straight up posted stats from the bureu of labor statistics showing that, no, it’s not men, but whatever. I don’t object to men being included, I object to *your* effort to make it a competition-one that you think men are ‘winning’.
Men’s suffering is *constantly* recognized, which is only natural, since even the most progressive governments on the planet are generally run by men. Are there areas where that suffering is accepted as the status quo or minimized because only the right class of men suffer? Sure, absolutely.
What I object to isn’t refering to the suffering of men. What I object to is that when it’s brought up that, say, it’s legal in a given society to rape a woman and then murder or enslave her if she complains, you’ll say, “But what about conscription!” YOU think it’s a competition.
Reread that last paragraph.
Again, youre angry that men are included. She didnt even focus on men. She just briefly included them. And youre angry. Defensive. Offended.
No, issues men face are not widely recognized. Basically anywhere. Rape is still gendered for a majority of the world’s population, even in much of the US. But include men in talks about rape and you get…well the reaction youre giving now. Men are disproportionately ignored in cases of domestic violence by police, society, and the government. A wildly disproportionate lack of government funded shelters in every country that has them, male victims being more likely to be arrested themselves, and even an entire country (India, with a HUGE population) not eve counting female on male DV as DV. Where issues like police brutality, where men make up an overwhelming dispropirtionate majority of victims, is made entirely about black people. Where setecing disparities that are 6 times larger than sentencing disparities between black and white people, literally backed by gendered crime definitions, is completely ignored.
I’m telling you that issues men face, even the same issues other groups face, is quite often ignored by society, activist groups, and entire governments. It isn’t considered progressive to care about men for being male (unless they are a celebrity). Including men in equality and standing up for men, regardless of the issue, is typically frowned upon. Again, it typically results in people like you getting offended or defensive.
Again, literally all that was done here was the author (who literally lived through this) mentioning the issue of societal dress codes affecting men too. She didnt say that it only affected men. She didnt make the book about men specifically. She sprinkled in a few comic panels including men as victims. And you had an absolute fit over it.
Youre exactly why it’s so difficult for men to come forward with their legitimate issues, and why people dont take said issues seriously.
Also nice of you to ignore that I brought up little boys, preteens, being conscripted. Not being taught math or history, but survival tactics in school because they were very likely to die, as if it wasnt a big deal. Or perhaps how, even in her book, it was mostly men getting murdered by the government for not conforming to the new rules. You worked really hard to minimalize that, didnt you?
Since you dont seem to be getting it, getting how you’re getting angry at the minor inclusion of a typically ignored group, I am going to let you just get angry. And when you calm down, i will give you time to really go over this conversation, and how you were wrong before your first comment was made. Given the conversation so far, I dont have faith that you will learn, but i’m giving it some time. Take all the time that you need. Just dont reply until you can do that much. This is very tiring.
Of course Tumblr is mad when men are victims.
Even if they’re Muslim.
Tumblr is mad that people think men can be victims for being men. Without trying to twist it into ‘toxic masculinity’ (IE men’s own fault).
the least realistic thing about star trek is that starfleet uniforms don’t have pockets and nobody complains about it
My instinct is to agree with this, but like, when I really think about it…
No money, no credit cards, identification is all vocal/fingerprints/retinal, so no wallet.
Again, doors are voice activated, or just unlocked by entering a code. No keys.
Communication devices are tiny and stick onto clothing starting in Next Gen. TOS had bulkier communication that they carried around or kept in, like, packs and stuff, so the arguments for pockets is a little more valid, and if I remember correctly, those costumes did have pockets, tho I could be wrong about that. But anything post TNG, the point is moot anyway.
Tricorders and phasers are really the only thing anyone’s carrying around, and that’s usually on away missions where they’d be bring their packs/holsters or just have them out. I mean, who wants to stick a phaser in their pocket?
So, yeah. There’s not much little stuff people need to carry around everywhere. And if they are preparing for a longer journey or want to bring bulkier things, well…just bring a bag. It fits more anyway.
what if i find a cool rock and want to take it home with me
Every time a member of the USS Enterprise has found a cool rock and taken it home, it has resulted in eleven deaths, six temporal displacements, the holodecks breaking again, and somebody getting turned into a lizard. Pockets are a privilege, not a right.
I’ve gotten more notes on this comment than anything else I’ve ever posted, but this is the best addition to it I’ve ever seen. Thank you.
Meanwhile Bones has like six rocks and a neat lizard in his fucking pockets… the hypocrite…
I think you’re confusing him with Stephen Maturin.
I just like to put my hands in my pockets
now i'm no american but it sure is interesting how similar the posts telling people not to vote for biden are to the posts that told people not to vote for clinton. ya'know... the psyop posts
So now pointing out that Biden is a pedo means youre a psyop?
Most Popular States for people leaving California
And then they’re gonna vote for the same idiot stuff they’re fleeing.
Ban Californians.
Local gun store has bumper stickers with pictures of California and Arizona that say “Remember why you fled, keep Arizona red”
Same with local Utah one here.
California is a plague. Wish it was it’s own country.
I just wish the partition they were talking about after the 16 election would happen. Give me the state of Jefferson so I don’t have to be associated with the idiots in LA and the Bay Area.
We've got that sticker in Tx also
daily reminder that there is absolutely nothing normal about being expected to waste a majority of your life at a corporation to survive instead of indulging in better life experiences ✨
In the 1960s it was a common speculation that by 1980 the typical work week would consist of 4 days. And by the year 2000 we’d be working no more than 3 days a week.
Because of computerization, automation, and better efficiencies in workflow.
Guess what happened instead?
Believe it or not the 8 hour workday is a result of workers protesting 12 to 14 hour workdays. Businesses would work you forever if they could--and they still outsource jobs to countries where they can get people to work up to 16 hours a day.
>40 hours a week
>week has 168 hours
>” a majority of your life”
This just in; Tankies are still bad at math.
I also like how OP is based entirely on presenting a subjective opinion as an objective truth.
Hell even with 8 hours of sleep a day and 8 hours of work, youre at barely over half a week. That's not counting vacation days. And youd sleep atleast the same if not more without working so its a bit unfair to count sleep.
‘The Poser’ at Freedom Plaza, Washington DC by Bryan Buckley
some more pics done by the Trump Statue Iniative
Boy sure is great to spend money on these statues. Way to stick it to the man.
Money that could have been spent helping a lot of people and not as a giant middle finger to a man who clearly gives no fucks.
“I’m so oppressed!” Screeches the assholes with enough money to commission multiple statues for pure spite.
This is peak cringe and privilege.
The same people erecting these will say he’s a Fascist Dictator in the same breath as talking about why it’s vital to berate Trump at every turn.
📸: abortion embroidery
Support LiveAction instead of supporting murder.
Yeah, there’s a reason for that.
It’s called: antisemitic caricature.
I don’t understand what’s Jewish about mother gothel… she has a typical Disney face doesn’t she? Is it the curly hair..? I mean her nose and everything else seem normal?
I’m sorry, I’m just trying to figure it out, you don’t have to answer if you don’t want to.
dark curly hair - long hooked nose - darker complexion than the blond blue eyed heroine 9and really the rest of the cast - portrayed as greedy and evil.
Lisa Edelstein is Jewish. As are Idina Menzel and Amy Winehouse, both of whom I have seen compared in looks to Gothel. Gothel’s design is a pretty clear caricature of ethnically Jewish women.
This is a pretty good contrast between Rapunzel and Gothel. Rapunzel has the “typical Disney face”:
Here’s a more close up look at her features.
The hooked nose becomes even more pronounced as she becomes “eviler.”
If you wanted to claim that there was noting out of the ordinary for Disney animation when it came to Gothel’s features, you would have to find at least one Disney princess or heroine with similar characteristics (long hooked nose and dark curly hair, etc).
But here is what we have is -
small noses that turn up at the end:
wide, flatter noses (though cheers to Disney for not putting button noses on their characters of color, although Esmerelda’s clothing design deserves another essay on Rromani stereotypes and there are some major issues with Pocahontas as well)
And then a few misc noses (again, props for Jasmine’s nose not being a button):
Apart from just the design of Gothel, there’s also the whole: “obviously ‘other’ (read Jewish) woman kidnaps the pretty blonde (read: gentile) kid to use her for ritualistic/magical purposes”
Like that right there on top of the aesthetic Jewish-coding is what pushed the antisemitic caricature over the top for me. It harkens back to antisemitic blood libel that claimed that Jews stole gentile children for all manner of nefarious reasons. Even when Gothel is in “mother” role to Rapunzel, she’s is shown as nagging and passive aggressive, both antisemitic stereotypes of Jewish women.
There is no one thing that makes her an antisemitic caricature, but the design, plus the storyline she plays out, plus her characterization cement the overall character as antisemitic.
Jew-coding a villain is not in itself always antisemitic when there are also Jewish coded heroes. Rapunzel does not have that.
Having a villain steal a baby for magical/ritualistic reasons is not always antisemitic as long as the villain is not Jew-coded. Rapunzel fails this as well.
Having a nagging and passive aggressive mother character is not antisemitic provided that she is not, again, coded as Jewish. Rapunzel fails once again.
Hope this helps.
EDIT: @ariminak pointed out that some of my wording made it sound like Gothel’s features only stereotypically caricatured Ashkenazi women when in fact that is not the case. I changed the language to remove that phrasing and make it clear that any ethnically Jewish women can be affected by this type of aesthetic trope. If you reblogged the old version, could you please delete it and reblog this one instead.
Spread this version so people recognize that this stuff harms all Jewish women.
omfg can y’all chill the fuck out, any race can be portrayed as hero or villain, it’s a fucking kids movie not a political statement
So I’m guessing you’re white and a gentile. As such, you’ve more than likely grown up looking at tv and movies and fairytales and seeing your face in those of the heroes.
Jewish people don’t get that. When we are portrayed in live action, our characters are more often than not whitewashed and in other media, our features are used and caricaturized to create “evil looking” villains.
You don’t see it because you’ve been ingrained with the idea that “ethnic” features are just “how you make a character look evil.” You don’t look at Gothel and see your mother. You don’t see yourself and your people. You don’t see decades of propaganda aimed at fostering hate against you and ultimately seeking to destroy you.
But seeing how you also seem to think that saying you’re not attracted to an entire race of people ISN’T racist, you really don’t get any say on any of this.
So really, you need to chill the fuck out and stop telling marginalized people to stop talking about the tools of our own marginalization.
Let’s play a game I like to call: Movie Villain or Antisemitic Propaganda:
Many “evil witch” tropes were built on European antisemitic stereotypes, not just in appearance but in the storylines they play out as well. Greediness, stealing children, killing children, hunger for power, etc. Every time a movie villain design uses stereotyped Jewish features to communicate “evilness” to an audience, they perpetuate the marginalization of the people they are using.
One big issue I have is that Gothel’s didn’t start out as the antisemitic caricature that made it to screen. Much of the early concept art has a more dark romanticism feel.
They changed the original design. Presumably to make Gothel more “other” from the good characters in the movie. At some point, a decision was made that dark curly hair and a hooked nose wound better convey their villain.
It really doesn’t matter if any of this was intentional, I’d actually bet that it wasn’t. However, antisemitic tropes are so engrained in our societies that people like you, even when confronted with a step by step break down of what it is, feel comfortable thinking that there’s nothing wrong with it and mocking those calling it out as if we are overreacting.
You seem to have completely ignored the majority of my post. It is the character design, plus the characterization, plus the story line that mirrors blood libel that makes Gothel an antisemitic character. It’s not just about someone of a certain race or ethnicity being a villain. It’s about how stereotypes of a certain ethnic group are understood as “villainous” due to villains being repeatedly coded as Jewish over decades of film and tv.
And contrary to your naive belief, all media is political to some extent. Every time a historically present minority is not included in film (ex: lily-white Harlem in Fantastical Beasts) or when a minority character is whitewashed, or when the “ethnic” features of a minority are used almost universally to portray bad guys, it is a political and social issue. When you never see yourselves as the people who play the hero or even see your people existing in a portrayal of a place where they should be, it is not benign.
Reblogging again for these additions.
Got into an argument a long time ago with a white man about a very similar issue (dark skin, curly hair, wide hips being portrayed as ugly in kids shows and the harm in it)
This does a good job explaining Why it’s so harmful for those who have never experienced it themselves
Okay, I didn’t have the chance to reblog it this morning, but maybe that’s a good thing because let me say I was VERY ANGRY (And I still slightly am) over how oblivious some of you are to Mother Gothel’s design process by calling the artists, people you have NEVER MET, racist, and deeming the character “Jewish-coded” because no one bothered to research the character and figure out WHY she was the way she was.
Now, please bear with me because now that I’ve gotten my emotions out of the way, I’m going to try to be more mellow in what I’m about to lay out:
First, Mother Gothel’s visual appearance. Before everything else, I want to ask how she’s darker complexion?
In fact in some scenes, she even looks paler than Rapunzel, like she has less color. I don’t know where you’re getting that, and this is a genuine question.
As for the dark curly hair part… Mother Gothel was physically based off of two people.
1. Her actress, Donna Murphy:
Who, shockingly, has dark curly hair and somewhat of a hooked nose.
2. Cher. Honestly I doubt there’s a lot of people who don’t know who Cher is, but either way:
So Gothel is based off of two very real people, but somehow that’s a caricature and somehow that MIGHT be racist. Not to mention a quote: “The directors also strived to make it obvious that Mother Gothel and Rapunzel are not related. Greno told Animation World Network, “When they’re standing together, it is very clear that this is not a mother and daughter, just by the frames of their bodies, their hair, the pigments of their skin…”
A lot of people aren’t aware of this, but when Disney characters undergo redesigns, it’s usually after the character’s actor gets cast, the character designers get a sample of their voices, and they want to rework the character’s physical appearance to match the actor or actress along with an unrelated famous person. The same thing happened to Yzma from Emperor’s New Groove when Eartha Kitt was cast to play her:
And Ursula is based off of a drag queen by the stage name of Divine.
Even with Gothel’s actress “Murphy revealed that scenes with Gothel and Rapunzel were actually recorded opposite one of the directors impersonating Moore,[5] who also explained to Murphy that Gothel’s design will continue to evolve as the character begins to adapt the actress’ mannerisms.”
Now, as for the characterization of Mother Gothel… “ You don’t look at Gothel and see your mother.” That’s not true, because the artistic directers Byron Howard and Nathan Greno interviewed several female Disney employees and asked them to tell them about negative traits that their own mothers had.
“Seeking inspiration for Gothel and Rapunzel’s “bizarre” relationship, Greno and Howard conducted a series of interviews with several female Disney employees,[3] asking them to list qualities in their mothers that “they found annoying and cloying or restricting”,[8] specifically “the things that their mothers would do that made them feel trapped or made them feel smothered” to make the villain appear more relatable.[7] Gothel’s “Mother Knows Best” line “Getting kind of chubby” was in fact borrowed from one of these interviews.” Which also lead into the characterization argument.
The movie has to have a villain. The classic story of Rapunzel had a villain. They took a blend of EVERYTHING: Physical looks based on real people, character traits based on real people, and the story’s backbone that there was an evil sorceress who had locked Rapunzel in a tower.
So after all of this, I guess what my main question to you guys is this: What would you RATHER Disney have done with the character, keeping all of this information in mind? What do you do to make her less of “a caricature” or “Jewish coded” when absolutely nothing has come from a specific Jewish source?
Miss ya Mags, thanks for these though
horseshoe theory real
Indeed
The mental gymnastics is impressive.
What’s true? This.
What’s the issue? Don’t worry about it.
gotta love the propaganda department and their distortion in the name of splitting hairs
Listen up. There is literally an app that can help you avoid self harm and I don’t know why we aren’t talking about it.
Calm Harm can be tailored to your needs and will provide strategies to help you get past those crucial moments of wanting to harm.
It’s also totally FREE.
once again, it’s called CALM HARM
Again, screw gender stereotypes. Let's just let everyone do what they like, as long as it doesn't hurt others.
I love these memes
thatfunnyblog:
We found you
potterheads, grab your wands
whovians, hop in your TARDISes
supernatural fans, get the shotguns
sherlockians, hire your consulting criminals
tributes, knock an arrow
avengers fans, assemble
lotr fans, unsheath Sting
we’ve got a few people to track down
Les Mis fans, build a barricade? Yes?
Gleeks, grab your slushies
Rizzles fans, grab your guns and scalpels
Wizards and Witches, time to kick muggle ass.
NCIS fans, grab your gear.
Castle fans, alakazam that jackass
The Last Airbender fans master your bending
Assassin’s Creed fans, ready your hidden blades.
Falling In Reverse fans, get Charlie.
BVB Army, get on your warpaint.
Slash gash Terror Crew, grab your chainsaws.
VE! Coven, show your fangs.
Directioners, get the fucking glitter
beliebers,get the supras.
Of Mice and Men fans, get squidgy.
Motionless In White fans, get Officer Peppercorn and some PCP.
Pierce The Veil fans, get the Sheepcat.
Sleeping With Sirens fans, get Sam Link..
Naruto fans, grab your kunai
Bleach fans, ready your zampakuto
Homestucks get your Strife Specibus
no fucking way its the actual post
I’m shaking this post was never meant to be seen outside of screenshots and jokes
this is one of the worst posts on tumblr
this is one of the best posts on tumblr
Holy shit I never thought I would ever see this
A relic from the dark times
This is like watching how people want to attack area 51
this is hands down the one post on the internet that sums up why fandoms, all of them, are trash and should burn
All of these people got bullied in high school
A comic about my upcoming birthday.
Fixed it for ya
@sirartwork we’re all proud of you. Congratulations on surviving another year. May this year be better than last.
It may only be 9AM my time, but cheers.
Don’t give up!
We love you Sir!