[recommending something i sincerely love] ok so the thing about it is it kinda sucks
macklin celebrini has autism
Monterey Bay Aquarium
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

No title available
Cosmic Funnies

Discoholic đȘ©

pixel skylines

â
One Nice Bug Per Day

Origami Around
occasionally subtle
Cosimo Galluzzi
Peter Solarz
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available

JVL

izzy's playlists!
Misplaced Lens Cap
đȘŒ
Mike Driver
seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Paraguay
seen from China

seen from Malaysia

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Venezuela
@its-me-hals
[recommending something i sincerely love] ok so the thing about it is it kinda sucks
i bet it feels good as fuck to intend to do something and then actually do it
why can rockstar games institutionalise you for life like nikita kruschev for being autistic
He didn't steal 10 million dollars. They made that number up as a loss, they never fucking had it. Rockstar has spent more than a billion fucking dollars on GTA VI and will likely make billions more when it gets released.
Uber is a fucking shell game of a company designed to leech investor capital and output bootleg cabs.
Nvidia posted a profit in 2023 of $4.37 billion. This is like someone stealing less than a penny from me.
And they lock this kid in a prison hospital for LIFE?
Capitalism is disgusting.
Nobody should buy GTA til they free Arion Kurtaj
What with GTA VI going up for pre-order i'd just like to remind everyone that rockstar conspired with the UK government to lock an 18-year-old away for life for hacking them.
Out of Touch
(to the tune of working on the railroad) iiive been working on the railrooad
Calvin and Hobbes - Itâs July Already
I do think the ability to emoji-react is a net win for human communication. not only does it give you an outlet for 'I see and acknowledge this but don't have a verbal response' but it also adds a pleasing alethiometer element to things
my coworker announces that he's off to the dentist. someone reacts with a tooth emoji. is this a statement of dentist solidarity? a wish for my coworker to return with more (or fewer?) teeth than he set out with? simple word association? who can say
[tumblr] will never tell you to contact a discord account to dispute a report.
[tumblr] will never tell you to change your email to someone elseâs to clear a report.
[tumblr] will never use a gmail account to dispute false reports.
[tumblr] will never ask you to pay for tech support related to your account being false reported. They also donât charge for tech support in general.
Anyone commenting asking you to message them for an urgent manner about your account is running this scam and anyone DMâing you saying they accidentally reported you for anything are also scammers regardless of who the account used to belong to. Do not message the account if they comment asking for a DM. Your mutual/friend is not running that account anymore.
Do not message the Gmail account it is not support.
Do not message the discord account it is not affiliated with tumblr or tumblr staff.
[tumblr] does not use Discord for any official tech support matters do not even think they do just because the screenshot looks official.
If you got hacked by this scam immediately contact actual tumblr support do not wait. Do it immediately. (Link is to tumblr help center)
Please share this post to your friends, mutuals, or random internet strangers. I canât stress enough that people are still falling for this scam because they panic and donât pay attention to the text.
i dont WANT pride months to be over,
on the other hand...
I can't touch grass, I eated it all
Grab this as a shirt or print here! I have a sale going on until July 4th!
maybe you need to ignore the urge to disappear and just exist a little louder instead
my dad bought a cnc and is going wild
Maybe it's naive of me, but whenever I see portraits like this, with just a father and daughter, it restores my faith in humanity a little. Because people seem to love this idea that fathers never loved their daughters in the past and only saw them as bargaining chips for marriage or whatever, but look at the guy in the first portrait on the left, he loves that little girl! And the dad trying to do his work while his daughter bothers him with an Old Timey Barbie. The man teaching his daughter geography, his expression is so soft! The way the man in the last portrait holds the little girl's hand! And none of these are incidental, these aren't photographs, someone (probably the father) paid good money and sat down for hours so that they could have a painting of themselves and their daughter. Probably because they loved their daughter.
From left to right: 1795 MichaĆ Jerzy Mniszech with his daughter ElĆŒbieta - Marcello Bacciarelli; Christopher Anstey and his daughter Mary Ann by William Hoare 1776; A Musician and His Daughter by Thomas de Keyser 1629; The Geography Lesson (Portrait of Monsieur G. and His Daughter), 1812; Jean-baptiste Isabey And His Daughter; Portrait of a Young Girl and Older Man by William Harrison Scarborough
(this is probably somewhat related to my other favourite genre of painting, Husband With Multiple Kids Making Come Hither Eyes At His Wife)
oh I love those! People being people is one of my favourite kinds of paintings and an important reminder that people in past times were not all that different. There were dads who loved their daughters fiercely. There were fathers who happily looked after their babies too. The German reformer Philip Melanchton for example had a cradle in his office. His wife was busy organising a household for 20 people- she was out and about, he mostly worked in his office, it made sense for him to look after their babies too babies while she dropped by at snack time.
in fact often if it was kind of safe dads had the babies in their workshops for just that reason as we can see in these paintings:
The left is âthe busy fatherâ by Theodore Weber, the right one is âAt the china repairerâs â by Wenzel Tornoe. All dads who are actively involved in childcare and a painter who thought it was a cute topic rather than anything ridiculous.
I raise you:
First Lesson by Akseli Gallen-Kallela (1865 - 1931)
Un Coup De Main (The Helping Hand) by Ămile Renouf (1845 â 1894)
Italian Winegrower And His Daughter by Francesco Baratta (1590-1666)
man "ship and let ship" kinda stops working when ppl are actively shipping minor and adult characters together like hello?? same with the "dont like dont read" mentality, some shit shouldn't be fetishised maybe??
You've got a lot going on in this ask, anon, and it's obviously not asked in good faith. If I were a smarter human being, I'd delete it and move on with my life, but it's 9am on a Saturday morning and I'm still on my first cup of coffee so I'm just dumb enough to take the bait and respond.
Ship and let ship doesn't mean you need to approve of what other people are shipping. It doesn't mean you need to like what other people are shipping. It means that what other people ship is their business and what I ship is my business.
If I don't like a ship, I don't read it. I don't search out the tag. I don't try to find creators for it. I don't watch youtube compilations or stare at gifs or read meta analysis about how the ship is supported by canon.
If I don't like a ship, I just... don't think about it. It really is that easy. And when I do think about it, I might be annoyed for a moment, but then I move on with my life because guess what? Shipping is a meaningless hobby that I engage in during my free time and I don't want to waste my free time feeling pissed off.
I've seen a lot of bizarre definitions of "minor/adult" shipping, but even if we use the definition of an adult sexually abusing a child, it's still very easy for me not to read that story on AO3. I'm assuming this is all about AO3? It always seems to be in this kind of ask.
AO3 requires people to use one of two warnings in those cases. Either Underage or Creator Chose Not to Use Archive Warnings - or both. I use the filter system to remove works with those warnings from my search results and guess what? Those works might as well not exist for me because I've never seen one. And I've been on AO3 since about 2013.
The thing about these kinds of opinions is that they only ever come up in relation to shipping. I never see these opinions related to violence or drugs or swearing or whatever else you might find morally repugnant. But the handy thing about "don't like, don't read" is that it applies across the board.
I don't think I'm going to like the new Jurassic Park movie, so I'm not going to go to a movie theatre, spend $15, and sit in a dark room with strangers for two hours to watch it. I'm not going to read reviews of it. I'm not going to watch the trailer. If a friend of mine invites me to go see it, I'll pass. I won't stop my friend from going to see it, though. If they're going to enjoy it then they should - and they're not going to fetishize dinosaurs or paleontologists or the tourism industry when they do.
If you're not able to control your own reading habits, then you should probably be more careful on the internet. Use Net Nanny or other content filtering tools to make sure that you can avoid the content that you're unable to resist through willpower alone. But don't make your inability to stay away from things you don't like my problem. That's all on you.
So this was originally asked/answered in 2022 and I just wanted to reblog it with an update for 2025:
I think I might want to see this new Jurassic Park movie.
Justo to add, anon's comment reminded me of this quote by Sinnott-Armstrong:
"When people canât win an argument with reason, they often try to win it by finding victims. If you can claim that your opponentâs position harms someone, then you donât have to argue on the meritsâyou can just appeal to morality."
So something-something about purity culture and its prevalence nowadays.
yesterday i had a nice southern teenager call me "ma'am" and then look at me and go, in a well-meaning tone, "uhhhh, if you go by ma'am. sorry if not." and i had to be like yeah man ma'am is fine. appreciate you being inclusive though. i could almost see the little warning pop up in his UI-- hold up! people with blue hair often have pronouns. are you sure you want to address this individual with a gendered term?