child abuse theory

Kiana Khansmith

Discoholic 🪩

shark vs the universe
★
Mike Driver

Andulka
Interview Vampire Daily
Misplaced Lens Cap

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
almost home

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
sheepfilms
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Noah Kahan
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
ojovivo
Keni
tumblr dot com
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from Portugal
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from Greece
seen from Japan
seen from Venezuela
seen from Georgia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from Norway

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany

seen from Greece
@lala-the-unfeeling
child abuse theory
possibly the most important addition this week on Hozier Liked
Indentured servitude is opresssion.
Indentured servitude is not chattel slavery.
The Irish were oppressed and have a history of indentured servitude.
The Irish were not bought and sold or held as property generation to generation.
Please stop confusing the two. Thanks.
Except for the fact
that the majority of sources
about slavery
agree that Indentured Servitude
is actually slavery BY DEFINITION.
Bonded labor is designed to exploit workers. The cyclical process begins with a debt, whether acquired or inherited, that cannot be paid immediately. Then, while the worker labors to repay the debt, the employer continues to add on additional expenses. For instance, a laborer may begin with an initial debt of $200. While working and unable to leave, this worker needs a shelter, food and water. The employer tacks on $25 per day to the debt to cover those expenses. Consequently, the employee only grows his debt while continuing to labor for his debtor, and repayment is impossible.
“ Oftentimes this debt is passed down from generation to generation, making it eerily similar to chattel slavery in the 18th and 19th centuries.“
It’s seen throughout the world when employers force the children of employees to labor in the same situation as their parents in order to help pay off their parents’ debt or when parents or family members pass away and employers require another body to fill the lost role – all under the pretense of a debt owed.
What the Irish Were NOT Allowed To Do By English LAW:
Seek an education
Speak, teach, or read Gaelic (their native language) in order to eradicate it as a language completely
Seek or enter any profession at all
Practice their religion
Vote
Hold any form of political office, at any level of government
Purchase land
Join the army
Hunt or fish for food
Own horses or livestock; they were only allowed to raise them for English masters
Own guns or other weapons
Engage in any form of commerce, meaning they’re not allowed to buy or sell anything
Eat almost any food they raised or grew with exception to potatoes ; and a large portion of the food they grew was directly used to feed black slaves overseas in the West Indies, even when the Irish themselves were starving.
What The Irish WERE Allowed To Do, According To English Law:
Be literal land slaves to English Protestants that worked the land for the profit of English Protestant masters, at their direct mercy with no choice in the matter.
That’s it. That’s the entire list.
Basic Human Rights Who?
The English literally put people in charge of lessening the suffering of the Potato Famine who openly mocked the Irish and declared the “Famine” the “Will of God Sent Down To Kill All The Irish” and basically told them to fuck off and die while it was straight up illegal for Irish to eat other food besides potatoes even though there was plenty of other food.
“The judgement of God sent the calamity to teach the Irish a lesson, that calamity must not be too much mitigated. The real evil with which we have to contend is not the physical evil of the Famine, but the moral evil of the selfish, perverse and turbulent character of the people (the Irish).” – Charles E. Trevelyan, British Famine Relief Civil Servant
Oh and by the way,
The main source of the “Irish were never slaves” debunk is a man named Liam Hogan, who not only doesn’t actually know his Irish history despite supposedly being an “expert” since he apparently thinks the “only” thing Irish weren’t allowed to do was own land and that was it?
But openly mocks Irish suffrage and outright denies a lot of what happened.
“IF slavery existed in Ireland, it ought to put down, and the generous in the land ought to rise and scatter its fragments to the winds,” Hogan asserted, which was followed by loud cheers. “But there was nothing like American slavery on the soil on which I now stand. Negro slavery consisted not in taking away a man’s property, but in making property of him.”
Sure Hogan, except… there was something almost exactly like American Slavery in Ireland.
And a lot of that shitty treatment carried over too when they threw the Irish out. There were a lot of cases where they outright used Irish “Indentured Servants” for jobs they considered too dangerous to waste “valuable black slaves” on.
Let’s be clear: Irish immigrants and African slaves were both treated appallingly in the United States. There is even evidence that, at times, immigrants were hired to do jobs considered too dangerous for slaves. After all, slaves would cost quite a bit of money if they died while productive, while immigrants (see: Indentured Servants) were essentially expendable.
Anyway I already wrote a whole ass post on this before so y’all can go educate yourselves there. I’m tired of repeating myself.
Plus. In 1855, Frederic Law Olmsted, the landscape architect who designed New York’s Central Park, was in Alabama on a pleasure trip and saw bales of cotton being thrown from a considerable height into a cargo ship’s hold. The men tossing the bales somewhat recklessly into the hold were Negroes, the men in the hold were Irish. Olmsted inquired about this to a shipworker. “Oh,” said the worker, “the niggers are worth too much to be risked here; if the Paddies are knocked overboard or get their backs broke, nobody loses anything.”
A Journey in the Seaboard Slave States; With Remarks on Their Economy. By Frederick Law Olmsted, 1822-1903
Thanks, Frith it was really interesting
You’re welcome
Given that Dublin used to be a major slave trading hub in the area of people all though northern Europe as well as other Irish, the idea that the Irish were never slaves lads is clownish.
Second, given that much indentured servants regularly included children kidnapped expressly for the purpose of being sold to the slave traders and then to sugar plantations…you know that old thorny issue of children not being able to sign contracts on top of being kidnapped.
Aaaand an question I have never seen others raise but I already know the answer to I will pose to the class. “Indentured servant” woman has her “indenture sold” to a plantation, but she births a child while in the indentured period…does that child owe service to the indenture holder or are they free?
Fuck this whole retarded issue. It is all a hustle and we are the target because we are rich and stupid enough to fall for it. The but muh Atlantic slave trade!!! crowd can line up to slurp my crack.
I just love that they said lads. Like “hello, fellow paddies”
Why is saying that the Irish were slaves so controversial suddenly? The Irish having been slaves does nothing to lessen the fact that other peoples have been or are slaves too. This isn’t an oppression competition; it’s history.
Progressive brainrot.
Irish being slaves in the past hurts the narrative of how slavery was the ebil white devil’s method of oppressing pure poc people.
Literally “you can’t be slaves because you’re white, only black people can be slaves”. Completely ignoring how other cultures wouldn’t even bother with skin color, a slave could just be someone in debt or a POW.
Also, nobody tell these people who sold African slaves to the Europeans who took them across the Atlantic.
“The Irish weren’t slaves, lads, they were just the victims of genocide.”
“they can’t be slaves because they’re white!”
Mixed signals, is it okay to be racist or not?
Would you explain what you mean by birth controlled women does the stuff really mess them up or something I thought that was a mene
But to answer your question anon: yes, birth control really does mess women up. It causes severe personality changes, mood swings, anxiety, and (this is the craziest part) literally alters their libido and who they find attractive. There are numerous recorded cases of women coming off the pill and no longer finding their partners attractive (because they met them when they were on the pill).
Also, it is anecdotally thought to cause bone problems (due to the effect on hormones) and infertility.
So yes, birth control is very bad. It’s not just a meme.
Ah, yes. A semi-automatic shotgun.
yknow. for hunting.
Yes. The cyclic rate of a shotgun has no bearing on its shot per shot lethality.
These guns use the same exact round as every other shotgun.
In truth, due to gas system energy losses, they actually have (very marginally) less kinetic energy.
I wonder if perhaps the OP has a misunderstanding about the nomenclature? And thinks that "semiautomatic" means what we know as "automatic."
Especially consisting that modern authority figures have a vested interest in confusing people about gun terms so they can ban common items based on emotions.
That is certainly a significant possibility.
What is it about the irrational fear of guns that makes people believe they can just make up stupid shit and expect to be taken seriously?
People like OP don't even realize people do hunt with shotguns, from birds to deer.
You telling me people DON’T hunt with shotguns? That seems like a waste, then.
FUCKING CHUCKLEHEADS ON TWITTER: Your argument is false because we don't know what an assault weapon is.
Everyone else does. Semantics doesn't save lives. Pushing old bullshit talking points doesn't save lives.
The 90s Assault Weapons Ban SAVED LIVES.
No it didn’t. The cdc did a study at the end of the assault weapons ban and they determined it effected close to 0% in the homicide rate.
And the definition of "Assault weapon" then is completely different than what they're using now, because statist shills know fuck all about fire arms.
“I don’t know a fucking thing about what I’m talking about BUT LISTEN LISTEN YOU JUST GOTTA TRUST THAT I KNOW THE SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM THAT I DONT UNDERSTAND!”
Shut up OP, the “assault weapons ban” didn’t save lives the Columbine shooting literally happened in the midst of it, it just created a huge black market for ‘assault weapons’.
Very funny that OP malds about pushing old bullshit talking points though, most aware gun control shill.
Oh yeah this thing is terminally retarded, talk about “old bullshit talking points” amirite?
My boomer ass liberal aunt was spouting this shit back in 1990 get new material OP
OP certainly needs a daily dose of something.
🥁
If the Government told OP to kill his family and blow up an orphanage in one night or else he’d be killed, OP would kill his family and blow up an orphanage all in one night.
some good tags on this one fellas
@p0etryassassin Wham Bham Island baby!!!
Norzelia in Triangle Strategy aka Westeros with magic and without the patriarchy.
NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE
THE AURORA OF METRO EXODUS?!
MGS3… I don’t consider Cold War Era Russia, specifically Tselinoyarsk and Grazny Grad, to be a good vacation spot…
DbD. Hopefully I don’t have to participle.
I REALLY dont want to go to Oregon.
Miami. Hope I’m not walking with a hit on my name.
Most children who think they’re transgender are just going through a …
I don’t say this often, but good job NHS!
Better late than never.
A couple good excerpts:
NHS England has announced plans for tightening controls on the treatment of under 18s questioning their gender, including a ban on prescribing puberty blockers outside of strict clinical trials.
The services, which will replace the controversial Tavistock clinic, will be led by medical doctors rather than therapists and will consider the impact of other conditions such as autism and mental health issues.
Found this interesting because I’ve seen anecdotally that a large percentage of “trans” kids are autistic/ on the spectrum. Something about not feeling like you belong or fit in and then seeing LGBTQ+ people put on a pedestal…
NHS England says that the interim Cass Report has advised that even social transition, such as changing a young person’s name and pronouns or the way that they dress, is not a “neutral act” that could have “significant effects” in terms of “psychological functioning”.
Ah, infantilizing autistic people and following literal conversion therapy tools in banning social transition as a way to pray the gay trans away
Groom them instead, right?
I'm taking the word "groom" away from you people because you have no idea what it actually means anymore.
You just hop further and further away from sanity, don't you?
Dasha doesn't know what grooming actually means, clearly
Dasha isn’t being rational. Well, Dasha never has been, but shhhhhhh.
(via oj7bf0y20dv91.jpg (JPEG Image, 1170 × 2283 pixels) — Scaled (50%))
….No one tell Wesley here this is doing the opposite of proving his point.
And on one tell them about how Antifa in German and Italy caused such chaos in the streets it caused the citizens to flock to the fascists in the first place
C'mon, it’s Wesley, having him understand that ‘the violent extremists are already inside the party and have been for over seven years, encouraging violence and dubbing anyone who disagrees with them ‘fascist’’ is asking FAR too much of him.
He must be tired of hearing “Shut up, Wesley”.
Hey, you guys remember when Wheaton had a career?
I barely do.
Wait, Wheaton had a career?
found this on a cringe sub. i am in love w her
we have to stan 💝💝
It doesn't sound like he was ranting about his ex all through the date? He just sounds like he was making a small comment about his dating preferences? Also what's wrong with taking things slow?
"I would like to take things slowly, because I have been hurt in the past."
"Actually you are now designated Damaged Goods and should not be allowed to have any relationships ever. How dare you speak to me?"
"Okay, uh, be safe I guess?"
"Fuck you don't tell me what to do. Blocked."
dude dodged a fucking bullet.
Honest to god, this kind of behavior (From image, OP, and first response) are very much red flags.
Women who only want to date perfect blank templates with no past or problems which might require "emotional labor" from them will end up only wondering why there are no good men.
My dude dodged a massive bullet. Keep going, and better luck next time.
This man dodged a psycho. He was being emotionally open (on a second date no less) and even after how she treated him, he wanted to make sure she was safe. What a gentleman.
Man I never say this but my Lord what an absolute bitch
She’ll be baby crazy after 40, you can guarantee it.
i was not made for hookup culture. love me for an eternity or do not touch me at all
BOOST!
People like Mr. Mayorkas are evil and should be rotting in fucking federal prison for the rest of their goddamned lives.
All for socialism and the destruction of capitalism, fascism and whiteness.
reminder that you should hate cops
He chained the gates shut and refused to get out of the way so people called the police on him
Christopher "Fidelis" Moscinski is accused of using five locks to chain the gates of a Planned Parenthood before lying down in front of it t
Based
It is not
16 years for hardcore loitering seems extreme
whores pissed they couldn’t get abortions for a bit.
Is the current wave of feminism considered 3rd or 4th?
4th, last I heard. But I think with the rise of TERFs it's probably going to be 5th soon. There seems to be a rising tide of trans hate to go along with the usual radafem man hate these days.
Can’t believe I agree with feminists...
This will always be my favorite gifset. Ever.
im morally obligated to reblog this every time i see it
Columbus Day
reblog if your tumblr is more popular than the Metaverse
GOD IS GOOD