
pixel skylines
almost home
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
$LAYYYTER

Andulka

Product Placement
d e v o n
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Xuebing Du

gracie abrams
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
occasionally subtle
taylor price
ojovivo
Sweet Seals For You, Always
cherry valley forever
★
Misplaced Lens Cap
Sade Olutola

No title available
seen from Gabon
seen from Italy
seen from T1

seen from Russia
seen from Pakistan
seen from Brazil

seen from Australia

seen from Ecuador

seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from Brazil
seen from South Korea

seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from Philippines

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Pakistan
@macisaac-the-seeker
Bram Stoker's Known Sources for Dracula
A compilation of the books Bram Stoker mentioned in his notes outlining Dracula, with links to available online versions of the texts. (Bolded entries had excepts copied in the notes.)
Folklore and Superstition:
The Book of Were-Wolves: Being an Account of a Terrible Superstition by Sabine Baring-Gould (1865) [Google Books] [Archive.org] [Project Gutenberg] [Sacred Texts]
Credulities Past and Present by William Jones (1880) [Google Books] [Archive.org]
Curious Myths of the Middle Ages by Sabine Baring-Gould (1877) [Google Books] [Archive.org] [Project Gutenberg]
The Devil: His Origin, Greatness and Decadence by Rev. Albert Réville (1871) [Google Books] [Archive.org]
The Folk-Tales of the Magyars by Rev. William Henry Jones and Lewis L. Kropf (1889) [Google Books]
Legends and Superstitions of the Sea and of Sailors — In All Lands and at All Times by Fletcher S. Bassett (1879) [Google Books]
On Superstitions connected with the History and Practice of Medicine and Surgery (1844) by Thomas Joseph Pettigrew [Google Books] [Archive.org]
The Origin of Primitive Superstitions: And Their Development into the Worship of Spirits and the Doctrine of Spiritual Agency among the Aborigines of America by Rushton M. Dorman (1881) [Google Books] [Archive.org]
Sea Fables Explained by Henry W. Lee (1883) [Google Books] [Archive.org] [Project Gutenberg]
Sea Monsters Unmasked by Henry W. Lee (1883) [Google Books] [Archive.org] [Project Gutenberg]
Traité des superstitions qui regardent les sacraments (1700-04) by Jean-Baptiste Thiers [Google Books - In French]
“Transylvanian Superstitions” by Emily Gerard (1885) [Google Books][University Louisiana Monroe]
Dreams, Sleep, and Mesmerism
The Natural and the Supernatural: Or, Man — Physical, Apparitional and Spiritual by John Jones (1861) [Google Books]
On the Truths contained in Popular Superstitions – with an Account of Mesmerism by Herbert Mayo (1851) [Google Books] [Archive.org]
Pseudodoxia Epidemica, or Vulgar Errors by Sir Thomas Browne (1646) [Google Books] [Archive.org] [Project Gutenberg] [University of Chicago]
The Other World: Or, Glimpses of the Supernatural — Being Facts, Records and Traditions by Rev. Frederick George Lee (1875) [Google Books: Vol. 1 | Vol .2] [Archive.org: Vol. 1 | Vol. 2] [Project Gutenberg: Vol. 1 | Vol. 2]
Religio Medici or The Religion of a Doctor by Sir Thomas Browne (1646) [Google Books] [Archive.org] [Project Gutenberg] [University of Chicago]
The Theory of Dreams (1808) by Robert Gray and John Ferriar [Google Books: Vol. 1 | Vol. 2] [Archive.org: Vol. 1 | Vol. 2]
Transylvania and Other Regions
An Account of the Principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia: with various Political Observations Relating to Them (1820) by William Wilkinson [Google Books]
Germany, Present and Past (1879) by Sabine Baring-Gould [Google Books] [Archive.org]
The Golden Chersonese by Isabella L. Bird (1883) [Google Books] [Archive.org] [Project Gutenberg]
Magyarland: Being the Narrative of our Travels through the Highlands and Lowlands of Hungary by Nina Elizabeth Mazuchelli (1881) [Google Books: Vol. 1 | Vol. 2] [Archive.org: Vol. 1 | Vol. 2]
On the Track of the Crescent: Erratic Notes from the Piraeus to Pesth by Major E. C. Johnson (1885) [Google Books]
Roumania: Past and Present by James Samuelson (1881) [Google Books] [Archive.org] [Project Gutenberg]
Round About the Carpathians by Andrew F. Crosse (1878) [Google Books] [Project Gutenberg] [Archive.org] [University of Michigan]
A Tarantasse Journey Through Eastern Russia in the Autumn of 1856 by W. A. Spottiswoode (1857) [GoogleBooks] [University College London]
Transylvania: Its Products and its People by Charles Boner (1865) [Google Books] [Archive.org] [University of Washington]
Other:
Anecdotes of Habits and Instincts of Birds, Reptiles and Fishes by Sarah Lee (1853) [Google Books] [Archive.org]
“The Birds of Transylvania” by Charles A. Danford and John A. Harvie-Brown (1875) [Archive.org: Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3]
Fishery Barometer Manual by Robert Henry Scott (1887) [Google Books]
History and Mystery of Precious Stones by William Jones (1880) [Google Books]
Superstition and Force — Essays on The Wager of Law, The Wager of Battle, The Ordeal and Torture by Henry Charles Lea (1878) [Google Books] [Archive.org]
A Whitby Glossary by Francis Kildale Robinson (1876) [Google Books - 1855 Edition]
Possible Sources Not Mentioned in Stoker’s Notes:
Anecdotes of the Habits and Instinct of Animals by Sarah Lee (1852) [Project Gutenberg] [Archive.org]: By the author of Anecdotes of Habits and Instincts of Birds, Reptiles and Fishes; contains a section on vampire bats.
The Land Beyond the Forest by Emily Gerard (1876) [Google Books] [Archive.org]: By the same author of “Transylvanian Superstitions.” This book has frequently been cited as a source in scholarship, although Stoker took no notes from it.
Adapted from a list compiled by Elizabeth Miller at Blooferland.com [x]. It is not clear if every source listed was ultimately used, and Stoker no doubt had access to other pertinent texts which may not have been personally noted by him as sources.
London Library Texts Discovered to Have Stoker’s Marginalia in 2018
La Magie et L'Astrologie dans L'Antiquité at au Moyen Age by Alfred Maury (1860) [Google Books - 1877 Edition] [Archive.org - 1868 Edition]
Narratives of Sorcery and Magic by Thomas Wright (1851) [Google Books - 1862 Edition] [Archive.org - 1862 Edition]
Things not Generally Known. Popular Errors Explained, John Timbs (1858) [Google Books] [Archive.org]
As I’ve been bringing up Stoker’s sources/notes a lot over the past weeks, I should probably bring this back again. People who want to have a wild time over on GoogleBooks during the gaps between entries might appreciate this.
Insurance PSA Master Post from a Bitch Who Knows Her Shit and wants to make sure you don’t go bankrupt
Why am I littering your dash with mind-numbing insurance crap?
Because the world of health insurance is complicated, and you can still lose everything if you have coverage and fail to navigate it correctly.
Even if your eyes glaze over instantly at the subject, I suggest you bookmark this as a future reference, because you either have your own insurance now, or you will someday soon, and there isn’t anybody who doesn’t need this knowledge. (Yes, I know there’s a double negative in that sentence. This is a financial post, not a grammar post.)
If you think this is valuable info, I ask you to please share it. You could help somebody save money/sanity.
My cred:
I write health plan docs for a living. I’m an Obamacare expert. I help clients with plan design, so I know the tricks. I implement federal mandates from HHS, IRS, DOL, and state agencies in order to keep my clients legally compliant. I know how to avoid penalties and coverage gaps. I know the tricks of plan design that are implemented to save employers money. I know which laws apply to which types of plans. I know how many ways participants can get severely burned if they don’t know how this works.
1. Your network is everything.
Never visit any type of practitioner without first checking if they are in your network. This is gospel. Many plans have separate INN and OON deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums that do not accumulate together. Some plans have an unlimited OON out-of-pocket limit, so you can still go completely bankrupt if you go OON.
Most plans have network provisions that will cover some OON providers at the INN level: emergency services until you’re stabilized (this is a federal mandate for non-grandfathered plans), No Choice of Provider provision if ancillary services are performed OON (e.g., if an INN physician sends your labs to an OON facility), and various out-of-area provisions. If you don’t know, call the customer service number and ask.
Physicians join & leave networks all the time. Even if your doc isn’t listed in the most recent Provider Directory, it never hurts to ask.
Many plans also have wrap networks that will negotiate with OON providers and facilities, so if all else fails, ask if your plan utilizes one of these to negotiate on your behalf.
2. Understand when your deductible accumulates & resets.
Your deductible is the amount of $ you pay for all services & prescriptions (except mandated preventive care on non-grandfathered plans) before your insurance pays a dime. This is in addition to the $ you pay for your premium. If you’re on an HDHP (high deductible health plan) or CDHP (consumer-driven health plan), your premiums will be very low, but your deductible will be very high. I’m on an HDHP, and my individual deductible is $2,600. Steep.
Deductibles usually reset every January 1, but some plans run off-year. Know your dates. If you’re on an HDHP, use the hell out of the HSA (health savings account) if available.
3. Preventive care is free!! Woohoo!!
The Affordable Care Act mandates certain preventive services be covered with no cost-share.
You can find the list of services here: https://www.healthcare.gov/preventive-care-benefits/
The woman-specific list is here: https://www.healthcare.gov/preventive-care-benefits/women/
These lists are updated frequently, and new services are added every few months. My $500 Mirena IUD is now covered 100%, and the deductible is waived. The HPV vaccine is now covered for everybody between age 19-26. Depressing screening is covered. Tobacco cessation, immunizations, STI screening & counseling….all covered.
4. Preventive care isn’t free under every plan! Booo!!!
If your plan is grandfathered, they will likely opt to cover preventive services at the general benefit percent. The deductible will also apply. They are still allowed to exclude any preventive services they want.
Your plan document will (should) state whether your plan is grandfathered or not. If the doc is silent, call the carrier’s customer service line and ask.
5. Assume every EOB/bill you receive has at least 1 error, ESPECIALLY on hospital visits.
For the most part, claims processors have ZERO medical background. They’re paid just above minimum wage and are paid based on how many claims they process per hour. So you can guess how often errors happen.
I just had a preventive OBGYN claim come back as not covered, even though it should have been covered at 100%. If I didn’t know about the PPACA mandate, I would’ve just paid $219 out of my own pocket for an office visit that is supposed to be free.
You are paying enough/too much already for your premiums and deductibles. Make damn sure your claims are being processed and paid correctly. Raise hell if not, and get familiar with the appeals process.
6. Check your Medical Plan Exclusions before you go for any service.
Can’t stress this one enough.
7. Some plans offer surprisingly generous benefits such as 3-D mammography, genetic/genomic testing, acupuncture, and bariatric surgery.
Look at your Schedule of Benefits, but also check your Covered Charges for details on coverage and limitations.
There are federal mandates like the WHCRA, which requires all plans to cover the cost of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Your plan document should have a section that lists federal notices.
The Mental Health Parity & Addiction Equity Act also requires plans to cover mental health & substance abuse services & facilities at the same level as the medical services & facilities. For example, a plan that covers a skilled nursing facility (medical) must also cover a residential treatment facility (MH). This is a bigger deal than it probably sounds like.
8. Check pre-certification requirements.
This is a cost containment strategy, and a lot of people aren’t even aware that covered charges are often denied/penalized if you don’t obtain pre-cert before the service. Again, check your plan document or call customer service. The most common services requiring pre-cert are: all hospitalizations (excluding routine labor/delivery), surgical procedures, transplants, clinical trials, outpatient rehab therapies, chemo & radiation, speciality drugs, home health care, durable medical equipment, prosthetics, and advanced imaging (MRI/MRA, CT scan, nuclear imaging, etc).
Any penalties you pay for failure to pre-cert won’t apply to your out-of-pocket maximum, so they really super suck. Some plans outright deny all claims for services that aren’t pre-certed.
9. You shouldn’t go broke.
Under PPACA, your in-network out-of-pocket maximum is limited. This means that you will never spend more than that amount in any year for covered services received from an in-network provider. The key here is the network, which I have to mention again since it is so critical.
Watch your EOBs carefully and monitor your accumulators (deductible and out-of-pocket limit). You can’t rely on the claims processors to get it right. I know it sucks and isn’t fair, but it’s the reality, and it’s your money on the line. There isn’t a claims processor or appeals lawyer in the world who will care more about your money than you do, so it really is up to you to be aware.
Godspeed, friends, and good health to you.
THIS NEEDS MORE NOTES
As much as this advice needs to be spread, it makes me so fucking furious that we live in a country where it needs to be spread.
And PSA #1 works adequately (I am not going to say well, because I think in/out of network is some of the worst of the bullshit of US health insurance) for most uncomplicated physical health needs.
Mental health? Not so much.
And if you get charged for failure to pre-cert, that’s the doc’s fault and you shouldn’t be responsible for the charges.
Also if you do get misbilled, don’t pay it - call to complain first, then ask if the doctor can submit anything to help
I once spent a year and half fighting an mri bill that they incorrectly labeled as frivolous until a doctor got involved
Also: keep calling. Get it in writing if you can. I just had a medically-necessary pre-cert-required drug not counted against my annual deductible (and our work shoved us all on high deductible plans which is SUPER GREAT for a family with 3 disabled people in it) because despite my calling multiple times and being assured it was taken care of, my pre-cert wasn’t done. Then I was told I could just pay for it out of pocket, and they would go back and count the drug against my deductible after the fact.
HA HA HA HA LIARS.
Also in my area the hospital is in-network but the ER doctors are out of network.
No shit.
For reference.
They’re also shooting for 100% renewable plastic sources by 2030! All of the soft plant/leaf elements in sets right now and going forward are made out of bioplastic made from sugarcane, and they’re working on getting the regular hard plastic bricks out of that, too.
They’ve done it, actually! The full bricks are in the prototype stage now, and are expected to be 100% biodegradable without the need for a commercial compost facility. It’s very cool. Right now they’re testing the durability and playability of the bricks and seeing what needs to be revised/reworked on their final model.
So its that easy huh
Of course it is
Actually, this isn’t “easy” and is huge news. You see, Lego is absolutely meticulous about their quality control. Their standards for manufacturing are stupidly high, as are their safety requirements. You know that distinctive “click” when you pop two Lego bricks apart? They engineered that. That sound is so distinctive that it can be used to tell genuine Lego bricks from counterfeits and it’s a sound that would be based on shape and material.
Furthermore, one of the hard requirements for a Lego brick is that it must be compatible with any other Lego brick. If I buy a set today and pull a set from the 1980s? Those bricks would fit together perfectly. This requires a huge amount of precision engineering and controls on manufacturing quality. (I can’t remember the source, but I’ve at least heard that once the brick molds wear to a certain point, they’re pulled from the line and either melted down or turned into construction material for Lego HQ. Point being, no one is getting their hands on a worn Lego mold)
Recycled and non-petroleum plastics are different from other plastic. The chemistry is different. The timing and process to use them is different. This has been a reason why more companies haven’t moved to them, because there’s a drop in quality for material (so they claim).
What Lego just did is completely obliterate that argument. The corporation with some of the strictest quality control requirements for plastic just kicked the basic foundation of the “bad quality” argument out from under it, because if they feel confident enough to guarantee the same experience as using a brick from over 40 years ago, if they are confident enough that they can meet their own metrics at a huge industrial scale….
Nobody else has any excuse.
Someone should redraw this in the classic TT style!
I think someone whispered my name… without actually whispering my name.
Again, I don’t really think I was asked specifically, but hey, here ya go! ;D
My style = Original Style
The classic Teen Titans style, eh? I’m no George Perez, but…
This is the best post now
The Outbursts of Everett True was a comic strip that ran in papers from 1905 to 1927, wherein the aforementioned Everett True regularly beat the everliving shit out of rude people as a warning to anyone else who might consider being rude. Men have not only been taking up too much room on public transport for about as long as public transport has existed, but the people around them have been irritated about it for at least a hundred years. The next time someone tries to claim that manspreading is a false phenomenon, please direct them to this strip so that Everett True can correct their misconceptions with an umbrella upside the head.
I have never before heard of Everett True, but if he “regularly beat the everliving shit out of rude people as a warning to anyone else who might consider being rude,” I have a strong spiritual connection with him.
I fucking love him
i can imagine this guy’s voice very clearly in my head but i couldn’t put a name to it
He also jabs racists in the eye!
I love the justice grandpa of fists
I’m very lucky to own a book that’s a collection of most of these comics (sadly not all of them) and would highly recommend hunting these down if you can. Sorry for the lack of a scanner but phone photos will just have to do.
He was a enjoyable cuss who didn’t care for war mongering.
Especially profitable war mongering and excuses for it!
He certainly didn’t like selfish husbands and fathers!
Politicians who turned on their words once they got theirs weren’t safe.
He said fuck the police!
He absolutely didn’t like people ruining little things for kids.
He stood up for foreigners. Especially those doing their best to communicate with limited second language knowledge.
He was not having any tomfoolery when it came to gun safety and laws. Especially with youth involved.
You had better not abuse a animal with him nearby. He’d right that wrong real quick!
And best of all him and his wife were both prickly cusses together. Relationship goals.
I have a new role model
“justice grandpa of fists”
It’s nice to see a fat dude in a political cartoon that’s NOT being used as shorthand for greed and corruption.
Hes like the personification of motherfucker unlimited
Reblogging this newer version of this thread with so many more strips I haven’t seen…why did this character ever disappear. Where did you go, Everett.
we need him more than ever…
Grandpa Fuck Around & Find Out. Love him.
At the annual Houston RenFest we’d always get one or two furries that walk around and every time the general reaction from the medieval roleplayers is akin to “BEASTS? BEASTS THAT WALK LIKE MAN? FOUL!”
Last time I went a furry volunteered for an impromptu conversion/exorcism and a guy dressed as a monk gathered a bunch of people and using a Gatorade bottle performed an entire catholic christening while reading off the instructions on his Ipad. When the furry was fully “converted” he removed the head of his costume and everyone in the crowd pretended to freak out and say shit like “GlORY BE HE IS SAVED” “CHRIST HAS BROKEN HIS CURSE”
That’s the best crap i’ve heard in months
Read more here:
"You are no longer licensed to use the software," Adobe told them.
Friendly reminder that GIMP does pretty much everything Photoshop does, and it’s 100% free. Fuck DRM and the license culture, we have plenty of open source options available to us as a consumer.
Lightworks is a freeware video editor on par with Premiere
Blender is an excellent freeware 3D renderer,possibly better than After Effects
Lightzone to replace Lightroom
Inkscape to replace Illustratr
Audacity to replace Audition (I also received a free version of Pro Tools with my Scarlett Solo audio interface)
If Adobe is going to be greedy shitheads, then fuck ‘em. Don’t use their stuff. Freeware can be just as good, if not better, than Adobe CC.
reblog to save a digital arts major
Reblog to save an artist.
oh jEEZ
I will keep saying this: GIMP sucks butts.
- Medibang Paint and Fire Alpaca for more cartoon style illustration
- Krita for painting
- Clip Studio Paint (not free, but often on sale and cheap even at full price) is better than PS for art and I’m about to cut adobe entirely. Even does some photo editing.
- Paint Tool SAI (again, not free but cheap) old but good, there’s a ton of hacked copies around too. Not hard to get for free.
- Open Tunez for animation.
I’m currently using Affinity Photo and it’s a great Photoshop alternative. One time fee only and it’s not really expensive, plus supports PSD formats. Free trial available too! Davinci Resolve for video editing is amazing as well! :)
Another great art program to include in the list is the completely free, no download, browser recreation of photoshop, Photopea! It has the potential/customizability to be as robust as a full copy of photoshop while also being perfectly accessible to anyone looking to just do some quick edits with no strings attached.
Also, heads up to anyone using it,
As of July 5th 2021, Audacity is now considered a potential spyware security risk,
so please approach it with caution and do some research on the situation as things progress.
This is about Sci-Hub. yeah we get it.. gatekeep knowledge and protect the interests of capital…
Listen, this is serious.
Do not use the website called Sci-Hub!
It lets people access scientific articles for free. This is dangerous. It helps the free flow of knowledge and reduces the competitive edge of all the people who worked really hard to have been born into a wealth.
Like, it’s literally a website where you can type in the DOI of an article and read it, without ever having to pay the publisher who exploited the author.
So, again, do not, under any circumstance, use Sci-Hub. I mean, can you imagine a world where knowledge is free and easily accessible to everyone? Even, y'know, poor people?
Libgen also has many books online, including textbooks, searchable by name, author, and ISBN. Can you imagine textbook companies not getting their hard-earned income from poor college students? Here is the link just so you make sure that you never accidentally stumble across this horrible, unethical website.
Oh, and while we’re talking about books, if you’ve managed to stay clear from Libgen, definitely don’t go to zlibrary, where you can also find a lot of textbooks, but unfortunately they’re completely free.
nooo don’t use sites that make academic papers accessible to everyone, why would you do such a terrible thing
oh and in case none of those HORRIBLE sites dont have the article you need, DON’T email the author of the paper. They aren’t paid by the publishing company, and will give you the paper for FREE. HOW HORRIBLE
You know what’s sad? Having to tell my adult patients that they don’t have to be boring fucks who hate everything to be considered adults.
Seriously, people have a very weird idea of what it means to be an adult. I have patients who come to me and tell me they are unhappy with their lives and they don’t understand why, because they have a job, they have a good salary, they can pay their bills, they have a significant other, they’re doing everything right and still they’re unhappy.
And then we start talking and talking and, finally, we reach the real problem: they stopped being themselves.
I have so many patients who stopped doing things they liked - harmless things, fun things - because they felt it was innapropriate for an adult to do them.
Videogames? I’m too old for that.
Comic books? I’m too old for that.
Disney movies? That’s for kids.
Super hero movies/series? I’m an adult, I should act like one.
Going to parks/carnivals? I don’t have kids to do that with.
It’s scary how these people simply gave up on these fun hobbies just because they reached a certain age. And it’s even more scary that they don’t see the problem with this.
Adult life is more than just work, paying bills and marriage. It’s about going out with your friends, it’s about buying silly things that have no purpose but to bring you a little joy, it’s about having fun and living your life to the fullest.
You don’t have to be a boring fuck to be an “acceptable adult”. Fuck society and fuck whoever says you can’t like something because you’re “too old”.
You’re never too old to do the things you like, play the games you want to play and watch the movies/series you want to watch.
Dress up and go to Comic Con. Go to the midnight premiere of your favorite super hero movie. Read the “silly teen books” you want to read. Play that “childish” game you’ve been wanting to play.
Being an adult doesn’t mean you need to forget who you are. Being older doesn’t mean you need to let go of the things you love and enjoy.
Be unapologetically yourself and go live your best life!
I have a full time job, pay bills, and also have plushies on my bed and comic books and cosplays
They can coexist. You should enjoy your life when you can
American Girl stories were the best tbh
Dude, read the books, she and her mom freed themselves in Book 1. We don’t disrespect American Girl in this house
Don’t you dare disrespect Addy, or any of my girls for that matter. American Girl used to be legit. Good stories, good dolls, good movies.
Felicity’s story was set in the beginnings of the American Revolution, and addressed the conflict that she faced when her loved ones were split between patriots and loyalists. It also covered the effects of animal abuse, and forgiving those who are unforgivable.
Samantha’s stories centered around the growth of industrial America, women’s suffrage, child abuse, and corruption in places of power. Also, it emphasises how dramatically adoption into a caring family can turn a life around.
Kit’s story is one of my favorites. Her family is hit hard by the Great Depression, and they begin taking in boarders and raise chickens to help make ends meet. Her books include themes of poverty, police brutality, homelessness, prejudice, and the importance of unity in difficult times.
Molly’s father, a doctor, is drafted during the Second World War. Throughout her story, friends of hers suffer the loss of their husbands, sons, and brothers overseas. Her mother leaves the traditional housewife position and works full-time to help with the war effort. They also take in an English refugee child, who learns to open up after a life of traumatic experience.
American Girl stories have always featured the very harsh realities of America through the years. But they’re always presented honestly, yet in ways that kids can understand. They just go to show that you don’t have to live in a perfect time to be a real American girl.
Dont you fucking dare disrespect the American Girls in my house. ESPECIALLY Addy!! That was my first REAL contact with the horrors of slavery, as I read about her father being whipped and sold and her mother escaping with her to freedom, but also how freedom was still a struggle.
A slave doll. Please. Read the books.
Don’t forget Kirsten, the Swedish immigrant who had to deal with balancing her own culture and learning the english language and customs of her classmates, or Kaya (full name Kaya'aton'my, or She Who Arranges Rocks) , the brave but careless girl from the Nez Perce tribe, or Josefina, the Mexican girl learning to be a healer.
And then there are the later dolls, that kids younger than me would have grown up with (I was just outgrowing American Girl as these came out), like Rebecca, the Jewish girl who dreams of becoming an actress in the budding film industry, or Julie, who fights against her school’s gender policy surrounding sports in the 70s, or Nanea, the Hawaiian girl whose father worked at Pearl Harbor.
These books, these characters, are fantastic pictures into life for girls in America throughout the years, they pull no punches with the horrors that these girls had to face in their different time periods, and in many cases I learned more history from these series than social studies at school. And that’s without even mentioning the “girl of the year” series where characters are created in the modern world to help girls deal with issues like friend problems, moving, or bullying. We do NOT disrespect American Girl in this house.
American Girl is probably going to be the only exposure young girls are going to get to history from a female perspective. This is actually kind of important considering that in history classes we dont really get that exposure. We dont hear about what women felt and endured during these time periods cause schools are too busy teaching us about what happened from the male perspective, which is not unimportant, but we need both. Girls need both.
These books were such a crucial part of my childhood and shaped my love of history, which still ensures today. These books can be a young girl’s first lessons in diversity and cultural awareness (hopefully burying that insensitive “we’re all Americans” tripe) and looking at history from more perspectives than just that taught in school. They also are an example of how women have ALWAYS been part of history, which some people would rather us not believe.
I think Kit and Kaya were the newest American Girls when I started “aging out” of the books, but hearing about some of these kinda makes me want to revisit them!
I wasn’t gonna say anything, but you know what?
Nah.
OP (of the tweet thread) was either a actively trying to start shit or is just a huge fucking moron. Probably both.
I’d like to point out that the company that makes American Girl dolls actually doesn’t skimp when doing their research and they don’t make the dolls with the intent to be offensive in any way:
And they departed from the norm in Kaya’s doll to fit her culture! The other dolls all show their teeth, and Kaya does not because that is considered rude in the Nez Perce culture!
It is absolutely true that these books covered the stuff in history that was absent from our history books. I still distinctly remember reading about Addy being forced to eat bugs she missed on tobacco plants, and that started me out from a different perspective and made it easier for me to know to reject the sanitized version of the slave trade we’re taught in school. And these books are targeted at ages 8+, which is a pretty critical time for developing your own thinking and morals.
Reblogging for general awesome
when i was in 3rd grade i was reading the Meet Addy book at school & a couple boys made fun of me for reading a “doll book” - my teacher overheard & started reading Meet Addy to the class after every recess. everyone became extremely invested & by the end of the year we had read the entire collection of Addy books & did a presentation on the civil war at the end of the year that we all presented to the class one by one.
i think back on this & realize that as third graders we were talking about how awful slavery was & because we were simply innocent kids without any societal or institutional influence yet, all of us could kept saying “why would you treat a HUMAN like that ?!” this one girl for her birthday invited all of us for her party & she got the Addy doll - every single one of us (boys included) held her & was in awe of this doll - it was such a touching experience.
i went back home about a year ago & ran into my third grade teacher in the grocery store. she said that year opened up a whole new teaching structure for her. she now reads american girl stories to her students starting day one of class every day to calm them down after recess & she’ll get through maybe four or five sets of books a year. she has the dolls in the room with packets on information from the doll’s time period that her students can “check out” to take home for weekends to care for them.
we oftentimes overlook how powerful toys can be in influencing young children & american girl honestly knew that kids could read intense moments in history & synthesize the issues to learn how to be a better person. my grandma bought me my first doll, molly, when i was only six & the dolls became a huge part of my childhood. when i turned 21 a couple years ago - we were living in minneapolis - she took me to have lunch for my birthday at the american doll place in the mall of america & bought me the Addy doll for my birthday. it was such a powerful moment i hasn’t expected.
i’ve since gotten rid of majority of my childhood toys, but i still have every single one of my dolls & all the books that i plan on gifting to my future children.
I’m white and my first real introduction to slavery and the underground railroad was Addy. She was a young girl like me I could connect to and care about her story. American Girl does a great job of making history relevant to kids.
Also American Girl sells all sorts of books unrelated to the dolls. The Care and Keeping of You books were super important as I started puberty and were the most comprehensive, non judgemental account of what was going to happen.
They also have “the smart girls guide” series which covers topics like crushes, worry, middle school, drama and gossip, sports, friendship, the digital world, communication, money, confidence, etc.
To give my two cents on U.S.American eurovision (statesvision?) or to live on in blissful silence and harmony with the tumblr discourse blogs....
This is my first time hearing of this and I’m going to pretend I didn’t
Good luck!!
Better yet, consume content about it exclusively through Eurovusion blogs!!
“Americans will never understand pitting neighboring countries of different cultures against each other on stage” have you ever had the pleasure of putting a new yorker and new jerseyan in the same room
Ok I just want to preface that most my sadness at the hot takes on this event are when arguments against it are based in the belief that all of the regions of the US are too similar to have “representative” or fun performances. Please leave your favorite american cultural phenomena or state rivalry below
Results are still pouring in but here’s what I’ve gathered from the tags:
In addition:
Me, a Michigander:
Alaska:
Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia
this post means nothing to me but i can replace all of these with european countries so i support the general feeling
american leftists seem extremely focused on anti imperialism (good) but rarely- if at all- discuss decolonization in their own fucking country, despite acknowledging that it is a settler colonial state.
im serious about this though. as an urban indian, i definitely cant speak on this as much as a rez indian could. but i know from talking to rez friends i have and from what the american indian movement has screamed for over the years that we need land we can grow on, we need clean water, we need to allow the wildlife that once lived in this land to live here again (meaning you need to listen to us before building those high speed rails you all get so hard over).
you cant drool over the zapatistas while ignoring people in your own country who have a similar goal
silly me I never provided things to read on the topic of decolonization! I’d personally suggest the following as “beginner level” essential reading to understand decolonization:
Discourse on Colonialism (Aimé Césaire) - this is more a focus on colonization, but I feel it’s a necessary read in my opinion as in order to understand decolonization I believe it’s important to first understand colonization.
Wretched of the Earth (Franz Fanon)
Decolonization is Not a Metaphor (Tuck, Yang)
also an “easy to process” read, to understand landback specifically here in Turtle Island, I’d suggest reading The Red Deal (there is a pdf, I don’t mean the article with the same title)
Discourse on Colonialism (PDF, ebook, mobi)
The Wretched of the Earth (PDF, ebook)
Decolonization is Not a Metaphor (PDF)
The Red Deal (PDFs of Part 1, Part 2, Part 3)
@abpoli
If anyone is interested in decolonization from a library standpoint, here is some reading material on the issue:
Decolonizing Academic Libraries
What It Means to Decolonize the Library
Decolonizing Knowledge
The Language of Cataloguing: Deconstructing and Decolonizing Systems of Organization in Libraries
Reflections On Resistance, Decolonization, and the Historical Trauma of Libraries and Academia
Making Meaningful Connections and Relationships in Cataloguing Practices: The Decolonizing Description Project at University of Alberta Libraries
Ethnic and Racial Diversity in Libraries: How White Allies Can Support Arguments for Decolonization
Thank you so much for these resources!
Why can’t the British Museum repatriate anything?
Something I see a lot in museum discourse in public spaces is people wondering why museums don’t just do repatriation/decolonization. The argument is that if museums had an interest in restorative justice, they’d initiate these procedures on their own, and they’d do so immediately. Failure to initiate indicates disregard for marginalized and exploited societies and reinforces colonial power structures, which makes museums nothing more than a tool for capitalist/colonial entities.
And… this isn’t exactly wrong! But it’s not a particularly well-informed take because it assumes that museums exist independently of other governing bodies (and a lot of other stuff but we’re going to focus on that right now). Museums do not exist independently of other governing bodies. Tonight, we’re going to talk about everybody’s least-favorite marble-stealing museum, the British Museum, and how it’s not just museum policy keeping its holdings there.
The British Museum is famous for a lot of things, including:
-stealing the Parthenon marbles
-stealing the Rosetta stone
-stealing a ton of artifacts from what is now Nigeria thanks to the Punitive Expedition of 1897
and many other things! But here is something important to remember about the British Museum: They did not commission these thefts! Rather, they are an entity essentially formed to house military spoils. (Well, sort of- in its earliest incarnation in the 1750s it was mostly Hans Sloane’s cool natural history stuff. It was really post-1800 where the military campaigns started looting things, but the point remains that the primary sources of artifacts were a.) military expansion and b.) colonial resource extraction.) The museum itself didn’t steal the stuff. Primarily, they just received the stolen goods. And that’s actually an important distinction to make! It doesn’t release them of any culpability, mind you. What it does do is give you some context for why they behave the way they do as an educational entity and as a political organization.
Another thing that will help explain what is going on in Britain is a piece of legislature called the British Museum Act of 1963 (which I’ll be calling the BMA 63 from here on out). (Also, that link is to the full text of the act. I won’t be reproducing the whole thing here, but it’s worth looking at to understand the depth of control the British government has over the British Museum.)
BMA 63 is an update to the original legislature of BMA 1753, which is the act that brought the museum into being. There have been updates between then and now, but BMA 63 made some massive changes to the way the collection is managed. One thing it did was to split the museum into Natural History and the British Museum. Another thing was it wrote the provisions for collection divestment into law in Section 5 of the act:
5 Disposal of objects (1) The Trustees of the British Museum may sell, exchange, give away or otherwise dispose of any object vested in them and comprised in their collection if - (a) the object is duplicate of another object, or (b) the object appears to the Trustees to have been made not earlier than the year 1850, and substantially consists of printed matter of which a copy made by photography or a process akin to photography is held by the Trustees, or © in the opinion of the Trustees the object is unfit to be retained in the collections of the Museum and can be disposed of without detriment to the interests of students. Provided that where an object has become vested in the Trustees by virtue of a gift or bequest the powers conferred by this subsection shall not be exercisable as respects that object in a manner inconsistent with any condition attached to the gift or bequest.
In plain English, that means that an object can ONLY leave the British Museum’s collection if it’s a copy of something, if it’s paper material written after 1850, or if the object is damaged substantially enough that it can’t be studied. The British government has intentionally made repatriation impossible. And notice that says in the opinion of the trustees. NOT the curators, but rather this board of 25 people who are appointed by the British government to further British interests. Does this deck seem a little stacked to you?
So let’s say that the British Museum wanted to give the Parthenon Marbles back.
Simply put… they couldn’t. They legally could not. There is no way for them to divest their collection thanks to the provisions of BMA 63. The stuff in the British Museum… isn’t really owned by the British Museum. The Board of Trustees owns and controls everything in the museum. The linked comments from their current chair are indicative of their attitude- they see their role primarily as a way to keep the entire collection in Britain on a permanent basis. The curators, the museum staff? They honestly don’t have control over what’s going on with the stuff in the collection. They’re allowed to set up loans, but they cannot transfer ownership of anything away from the museum. This is not an accident. This was a way to reinforce a certain type of colonial power and to ensure that war trophies remained where they were: in London. This law was upheld in court as recently as 2005, when the high court ruled that no, actually, the British Museum was not allowed to return art stolen by the Nazis. DESPITE the fact that the museum WANTED to give the looted art to the family from whom it was stolen, they were barred from doing so by the British government. This is not an accident. The court ruled that “the British Museum Act - which protects the collections for posterity - cannot be overridden by a “moral obligation” to return works known to have been plundered.” Or in other words, the court knew that it was the right thing to do to return the work, but because the law is the way it is, they couldn’t do the right thing. The museum tried for years to give the pieces back but they were stopped from doing so. This is one major way that the government of the UK furthers their own national interests. By insisting that the looted artifacts don’t belong to an educational institution but instead to a primarily government-appointed board of trustees who benefit from the prestige and aren’t beholden to public consequences, the British government has essentially incorporated the British Museum as a colonial treasure-house and they’re not even trying to hide it. This means that while Berlin’s Ethnological Museum can just straight-up give the Benin Bronzes back, the British Museum cannot.
Again, this does NOT mean the museum itself is innocent! It does not mean that they’re heroes who would loooove to give stuff back but they’re being thwarted by the evil government! This whole scenario here is just an illustration of some of the complexities behind museum policies. Hopefully what I’ve done here is shown you that museums are political entities. The people who make the decisions aren’t always the people you think they are. When you are thinking about looted artifacts, you have to look up the chain. Museums have a lot of power as institutions, but when they’re backed by a national government, they lose a lot of their autonomy towards more equitable ideals. Just saying that the British Museum is racist/colonialist/capitalist isn’t enough- we need to look at it as what it is. A tool of the UK government to further the narrative they want to tell.
And this is important because in the US and in online spaces, museum discourse is really bad at understanding the logistics of repatriation. Which is completely understandable, because there are a lot of moving parts when it comes to safely and equitably restoring cultural sovereignty! But at the same time it’s also frustrating because there’s a lot of demand to just give stuff back. What I hope people realize after reading this little essay is that when you’re calling for repatriation, the situation might be legally messier than you think. That doesn’t mean you should give up, and it doesn’t mean you’re wrong- it just means that you need to strategize and think carefully about how you go about it.
(PS: Sources are linked in the text. I highly recommend reading them!)
Reblogging to add, because the point is made a couple of times here that the museum is still culpable in its own way, that while museums like this are responsible for putting their collections in context, including what holdings are ethical and what aren’t, that is not an excuse to harass the educators who are poorly paid and just there to teach you about history and art. They have no say in the matter and are often just as angry about the situation as you are.
I make a lot of anti-colonialism jokes at the British Museum’s expense, but this is actually very true: it’s incredibly difficult for all museums to deaccession artefacts, and there’s even more legal red tape here. Even when you’re dealing with relatively new pieces within one country’s borders, it’s still often illegal for museums to just get rid of items at will. There usually has to be a vote by collections staff and board members and approval from government revenue services, and sometimes the original donor, too. Like yeah, that shit is all stolen and I’ll point that out forever, but it’s not as simple as popping the Elgin Marbles into the post.
Well, shit.
this tip tho!!!!!!!!
I need to try this for trips I only bring a carry-on to.
I use to do this all the time in the military. Just forgot how to over time o.o
I wish I’d known about this when I was homeless.
I could’ve taught it to all the other ladies at the shelter and Darlene could’ve sucked a sour one because she never would have been able to bitch at us for “having too many clothes.”
reblogging this to have it forever because holy god damn
from observations, I feel like many people took “history books are full of propaganda” and ran with it and instead of more deeply investigating history from varying sources, they just don’t know jack shit about history
I need everyone that has ever talked about “overthrowing capitalism” to understand that
people have tried to create a peaceful, oppression-free society before, but it turns out that’s really hard.
The reasons it’s really hard are almost entirely practical and many of them are the boring and logistical sort of practical.
Change happens incrementally. Revolutions and revolts...they happen when people hit the breaking point. But the idea that they throw out an old society completely and create a new one from scratch is itself propaganda. They don’t always result in a better society. They always result in a deeply flawed society. Also people die. Very often the most powerful people don’t die, and sometimes they end up powerful in the new society.
also there are things you didn’t learn about in history class that nobody was trying to hide from you
(there are definitely things some people sometimes ARE trying to hide from you, and that was even more true in the pre-Internet days when it was easier. I’m not saying it never happens. but it’s not always the reason)
if your teacher is trying to cover all of...I don’t know, Modern European History(TM), they might not have time- between wars and economic crises that impacted the fate of nations -to get into Virginia Woolf’s gay love letters. that doesn’t mean they’re ~hiding her as part of a homophobic conspiracy~. it just means they have a lot to cram into like six months to give teenagers some vague understanding of the events that shaped our society
I see a lot of people on here like “why didn’t I learn about [historical figure who is important in the history of an oppressed group but didn’t have a huge impact on the Big Picture of the world] in school?” and other people responding “you know why...” and like
sometimes. but definitely not always
THIS. I saw a post the other day that literally said if you do it to a fictional character, you’ll do it in real life.
No. Just NO.
I’m so glad someone put it into words.
Lin-Manuel Miranda is a legend, and he’s absolutely right.
And I really feel like there are parts of fandom that don’t get or don’t believe this, and I think that’s troubling. I’ve seen arguments that people shouldn’t have dark fantasies, or that bad impulses in themselves make a bad person. I’ve seen so much shaming over thoughts.
And if you get to a point where it’s bad to have dark thoughts and it’s bad to wonder what something would be like and it’s bad to put yourself in the shoes of anyone who isn’t “pure”, if fiction is no longer a realm where you can confront and explore, but an ongoing test of moral purity… well, maybe not everyone’s brain works like mine, but I feel like that takes away something incredibly important to being human.
Purity culture is gonna kill art if y’all let it.
Fiction is a safe place to explore whatever fucked up or dark desire that you have. You can write the most vile and fucked up shit in fiction and it be absolutely nothing you desire in real life. You can write about a serial killer who gets away with it. You can write about someone who goes on moral crusades to purge the world of all evils and still be the protagonist. You can write anything in fiction because that’s what it is meant for.
It isn’t meant to be a social commentary unless you create it to be.
It isn’t meant to be educational unless you create it to be.
Sometimes a story can be just that, a story. Entertainment. Nothing more, nothing less.
Not everything has to be deep, or have meaning, etc. unless the creator wants it to be and a lot of the purity types end up forcing something to have deep meaning or social commentary where it isn’t meant to. Is this inherently bad? No, but these people don’t just say “But this is my interpretation of it.” they go as far as trying to force that interpretation onto everyone else, including the creator, as a means of saying “See? It means that they promote/condone xyz so they’re bad and shitty people who should spend the rest of their life in jail with/are the same as people who’ve actually committed acts of violence against other people.”
THANK. YOU.
@ all the people in the notes saying “yes except u can’t write about (list of immoral things they don’t want to see in fiction)” congrats on missing the point so spectacularly I’m not sure I could create better performance art if I tried