[neonscrapyard]

you can do it, magikarp!

[art by me - neonscrapyard]

instagram || etsy

[howelljenkins]

having to come to terms with the fact that love is not an everlasting performance in which you attempt to retain the attention of your significant other but rather a release of control and putting faith into them and trusting them to choose to stay with you no matter what you have to offer

[howelljenkins]

to love and be loved is to rest

[mothercain-deactivated20231124]

radfems don’t bother me because existing on the internet as a trans woman is getting used to the same mind-numbingly boring rhetoric they pass around like a blunt in their echo chamber but it is mildly irritating to try and come on tumblr and have the algorithm and your for you page randomly decide to show you some pretty nasty posts about yourself lol. i guess tumblr thinks anything with my name in it is something i’d want to see. anyways, i stand by what i said, i just deleted the posts so the notifications would stop flooding my inbox lol. i don’t have any respect for near-masturbatory levels of wallowing in victimization in the same way i have zero respect for people who seem to think that they’re the only people who have ever suffered in this lifetime. i’m never going to exploit the depths of my own trauma for the public to rip apart as they so choose, i’ll leave the music to them for that. but to anyone who actually thinks im demonizing cis women for having body hair or genuinely thinks i find “women” equated to “breedable anime girls”, you have a severe willful lack of reading comprehension. either that or you very well may be retarded after all.

[back-not-broken]

So now we’ve gone from “radical feminists believe women only count as women if they’re little breedable girls, but actually you women are hairy beasts and slugs and having a vagina doesn’t absolve you of being beastly”

to “actually I meant that last post for my followers, not the degenerate gang of militant broads that I’d never have sex with, you psychos”

to “I didn’t actually mean any of it, you self-righteous women with your masturbatory self-victimization, and you’re posts are getting mean 🥺 but I don’t care what anyone says about me anyway 😏 also you’re still retarded and I do stand by what I said but I did delete it also.”

Is that a good summary?

[mothercain-deactivated20231124]

you know what, maybe i will just sit in the weeds with you toads a while.

to preface everything i’m about to say, i understand that radfems love to provoke and antagonize just to sit back and cry MALE MOMENT when a trans woman reacts with even the slightest bit of irritation. that fact is not lost on me whatsoever. so call me a pedophile, call me a man, tell me i have a big forehead. whatever. one of those three things is true so you got me there. 

in my first post, i am obviously referring to the tradwife babydolls who equate womanhood to femininity in that big scary trannies will never know the delicate pleasures of being a woman (eg: shaving their legs, being “girly”, being tiny and petite and soft) because that’s a group of radfems constantly nipping at my ankles, as many people are aware by how often i’m complaining about them. if pointing out the pedophilic standards created by men and internalized by some women is, inherently, pedophilic, well i don’t see how any progress will ever get made at that point. the lengths some people, often certain subsects of radical feminists, will go to shut trans women out of womanhood have taken the narrative to extreme lengths, and yes, that does appear to reduce women as a whole to hairless children only good for sex and gawking at. which is concerning. 

now, did i used to eat that little coquette shtick up for a minute or two in the early days of my career? sure. i was 19-20. god forbid i be young and grow out of harmful mindsets. maybe i just watched little house on the prairie a little too much and, OH NO, fetishized being a wheat farmer’s wife. someone call the executioner, a tumblrina is being an edgelord.

in the second post, well... if you read “touching with a 10 foot pole” as “wanting to fuck” and not “wanting to kick the hornet’s nest”, maybe you’re a touch porn-addled as well. sorry you can’t sexualize me any further than you already have and accuse me of preying on women but i like dick, cock, and balls on GROWN men so idk what to tell you there. i’m sure some of you will take that and run with it as an admittance that i hate or have no need/respect for “biological women” at all now but that’s a sacrifice i’m willing to make for my point. 

as for my third post, yeah. you all exhibit willful ignorance and refuse to listen to what i’m actually saying so you can cram everything i say into one of your 10 pre-determined talking points that you’ve been indoctrinated into believing and perpetuating. there’s no winning with any of you because you don’t listen. you exist to preach. forget the lived experience of someone different than you, that doesn’t matter. you are the only story that matters and that is a dangerous mindset and i truly wish all of you well because i can’t imagine any of you are happy.

i shouldn’t even be engaging with this as much as i am but i don’t wanna reinforce the idea that trans women can’t be articulate and only exist to MANMODE and be aggressive. honestly though, with all the talk of female rage and violence, immediately crying male at someone for being even the slightest bit retaliatory seems a little counterintuitive but... that’s for y'all to figure out.

in closing, for those who choose to listen, i would never shame women for having body hair, the reproductive organs, or the overall biology that they do, so let me be clear on that. i love my mother, my sisters, my dear friends, and even strangers too much for that. this is not about that and never has been. now, go forth and twist my words some more. i've said what i have to say.

[back-not-broken]

“You toads” thanking you for gracing this toad with your presence, I guess.

First off, you did not make your post to “tradwife babydolls”. You made your post after you called a radical feminist retarded and she screenshot it. This whole “I meant that post towards my followers for being obsessed with being a little small girly and dainty femininity” is a lie. You’re trying to give yourself a whole new excuse to call women hairy beasts, and it’s a lie.

Second of all, you’re the one who said “he’s still not gonna fuck you” and “waiting for some old man to come along and fuck them and tell them they’re so teeeeeny tiny and worth it” and then pointed out our hairy assholes and pussies before making a response post about “not touching you broads with a 10 foot pole”. If someone made the posts sexual, that would be you, the author of the posts, and all your references to fucking and hairy pussies.

No one is calling you male in retaliation to anything. We’re calling you male because you’re a male. And we’re calling you out for misogyny because you’ve behaved like a misogynist. Acting like your post was a reaction to misogyny is laughable. You were angry a radical feminist screenshot you calling her a retard, and in your anger you acted like a misogynist and referred to women in a bunch of terrible ways, and now you’re upset that you got caught before you could delete it. And even now you’re still referring to women as toads.

Again, I don’t know why you’re upset. Your followers are fawning over the way you called women bitches, and beasts, and slugs, and breedable anime girls waiting to be fucked by old men, and called out our hairy pussies and assholes. They love that you called a group of radical feminist women retards and broads. They understood the meaning behind your first post and they loved it, you don’t have to pretend.

Go take this post to your agents and use it to prove you should get a better record deal. Cash in on your popularity. Misogyny has never better seller than it is right now, and I bet that “Formaldahyde jar” line will make bank.

[broadlybrazen]

you can’t imagine the amount of vile racist shit that he’s getting because he said that rape & desecration is wrong.

he’s a lebanese journalist who has spent 15 years writing about IDF crimes against the palestinian people, and psychotic westerners are yelling at him for sticking to the moral stance that Atrocities Are Wrong

[broadlybrazen]

i’d also like to point out that people have overthrown their oppressors without rape & desecration. rape & desecration are not a requirement for liberation. (it’s also clear that some people don’t imagine that liberation also includes women.)

the genuine JOY over rape & murder that some folks have, the sheer glee with which they justify sexual violence as a legitimate political tool… and then to have the unbelievable gall to say that this is simply what liberation entails.

no. no it fucking does not. sexual violence has been used in conflicts since time immemorial, and some piece of shit has justified it since time immemorial. it has always been wrong; the justification has always been evil. kingdoms fall, nations rise, the political rhetoric changes, but nobody ever updates the justification: the bitch always deserved it, and her rape is always noble and righteous because her rapists said so.

some of you just really, really want to revel in brutality against women without being condemned for it. all of your supposed beliefs and ideals are just a smokescreen for that.

[sprinkledsalt]

It fundamentally dehumanizes women to think rape is a legitimate political tool, because women’s bodies are basically seen as land or a resource to be conquered. Nothing more. With that video of the dead, raped woman paraded through the streets, half of the people cheering that on only see her body as a win for their political ideology—they don’t see that body as having belonged to a human being. The other half? Well, I think it’s like you said: they’re just celebrating complete brutality against women, because they like it.

Anyway, I said it yesterday but you’d be surprised how many enemies you make online by saying rape is always wrong, and civilian massacres are always wrong. A lot of people really, truly think rape and terrorism are acceptable as long as it’s against people they hate and/or carried out by people they support, and that’s such a twisted, dangerous path to go down. If someone doesn’t have “rape and civilian mass murder are always wrong” as their baseline, they cannot be trusted.

[rametarin]

To really stick it to those people, you have to word it, "Rape and mass murder of 'your oppressors' is wrong." Because they only see the world through the dichotomy of "those that are oppressors," and, "those that are oppressed."

They pathologize and fetishize which group is which, dehumanize them by applying these class lenses, and then celebrate the underdog succeeding over their overlord. It doesn't matter how little truth there is in this relationship. They refuse to see it in any context but class struggle theory.

[obeliskandmetronome]

[neetlesbian-deactivated20240403]

I typed out a response to a "Are you going to do genital inspections at the entrance to the women's bathroom?" post but OP turned of reblogs before I could post it so here it is I guess:

It [the idea that women's spaces are pointless because female exclusivity is unenforceable] is such a telling argument because all that's really being asked for when we demand single sex spaces is for men to VOLUNTARILY self-select out. For males to understand that, though they may not fit in well with other males, female spaces are still not theirs.

The suggestion from feminists is never genital inspections at the bathroom entrance, but that males voluntarily refrain from entering and that females have the right to expel violators when we can identify them. Some males do pass as females, and our request is that they respect our space regardless.

Males truly cannot conceive of the idea of simply respecting the space and boundaries of women. It literally doesn't cross their minds, so their minds immediately jump to whether or not women can forcibly stop them. The belief is that if a woman cannot forcibly prevent it, you may take anything you like from her with impunity.

"You can't force us not to enter!" They shout. Of course we cant! Forgive us for believing in your humanity and thinking that you might simply respect us. We thought too highly of you.

[legitime-demence]

[tributary]

Is there any info on Hamas and the misogyny within them? Like I heard somewhere they also systemically mistreated Palestinians.

lol yeah man there’s plenty. start here

hamas supports forced marriage and shutting women out of public life. this is not unusual for authoritarian religious fundamentalists, but it is unusual for people who consider themselves feminists to praise these fundamentalists.

hamas receives much of its funding from iran and acts as its proxy in the region. you may recognize iran as another country run by misogynist fundamentalists. maybe you heard about it on the news.

hamas regularly tortures dissenters. recognizing this does not detract from recognizing war crimes committed by israel and the palestinian authority (PA); we do the victims a disservice by ignoring their suffering, regardless of who perpetrates it.

[penguicorns-are-cool]

Whispered in Gaza — The Center for Peace Communications

Palestinians expose life under Hamas - a series of video testimonials

[claudiaprocula-deactivated20240]

"Hamas has placed Palestinians in Gaza under a communications blockade. Whispered in Gaza helps them breach it." <- this is very good!

I hope it is okay to add onto this, and I know I have said it before, but I am repeating it for/ against the choir.

Saying "we shouldn’t focus on Hamas right now" (as like 600 posts are saying) obviously translates to "we shouldn’t focus on antisemitism" right now, whether you realize that that is what you are saying or not.

No one on this (USAmerican settler colony centric) bloody site understands Hamas, at all. Two of the easily dismissable claims are 1) Hamas was directly created by the Israeli government to divide by Palestine (bullshit) and 2) Palestinians see Hamas as their resistence organization. Over 50% of Palestinian Gazans report being afraid to speak out against Hamas. (Source: The Atlantic - What is Hamas? Article <- essential read.) Palestinian women are particularly vocal against / in fear of Hamas for the above reasons.

This attack is convenient, too, since Gazans began protesting against Hamas months ago. (Similarly, Israelis have been en masse protesting Benjamin Netanyahu.)

Hamas is funded by Iran, it is an elitist organization run by billionaires whose sole goal is and has always been a Second Shoah. It is not a "Marxist" or "anti-West" resistence. The Western left-right politics do not fit with Hamas, a terrorist group. Iran ran out Iranian Jews from their country (see the Israeli Black Panther Party) and are hellbent on their continued terrorism towards Jews. Civilians, not IDF in Gaza, WERE the primary targets, so it's not that "collatéral damage" argument I am seeing. (Then the Hamas spokesperson sits & denies it all from the comfort .....IRAN!)

"Focusing" on Hamas is focusing on antisemitism. This attack has everything to do with antisemitism. This is irrefutable if you know anything about the historical and cultural context of the region, conflict, JUDAISM, and illegal West Bank occupation.

Nevertheless, although the overwelming majority of those harmed were Jews as indended, Palestinian-Israelis have been captured, tortured, and killed by Hamas the last few days.

Hamas sees themselves as marytrs and are using Palestinian civilian blood to realize their fantasy. They know that the far right Israeli government will use their attack as an excuse to kill Palestinians and strengthen the illegal blockade/brutal West Bank occupation.

Unless a person is cognizant of all of this, I have no interest in speaking to them. (Again, preaching to the whole choir!)

[editorialarchive]

“In A Fairy Tale Mood”: Angela Lindvall photographed by Mikael Jansson for Vogue Italia, October 2001

[2peachy]

I didn't think this conflict would bring up such important ethical questions such as Is rape okay? and When is it okay to decapitate a baby?

[she-is-ovarit]

The rape and brutalization of any women—including white women—in any country is not a "response" to colonialism, oppression, slavery, poverty, war, murder, and starvation.

It is done out of hatred of women and the pleasure of female pain, degradation, and humiliation. It is attempted to be justified through cultural relativism, through religion, by blaming women for male violence, blaming women for the actions of male systems of governance, blaming women for being in the wrong place at the wrong time—or around the wrong men. In times of war, the rape and brutalization of women demonstrates male behavior in the absence of rules and law.

It is depraved, shameful, disgusting, and absolutely unforgivable. It does not matter which men are doing it to which women in what place. Rape is never justifiable.

As a Jewish woman, would I shame Jewish men for raping the wives of Nazi men? Yes, I would. Would I shame black male slaves for raping white women? Yes, I would. And I would shame white men for raping black women, Nazi men for raping Jewish women. And I would shame male Israeli soldiers for raping Palestinian women and Palestinian males for raping Israeli women.

The rape and brutalization of any women is not an act of liberation, resistance, decolonization, self-defense, or freedom from oppression.

If your measure of the depravity, immorality, and disgust for rape hinges on what men are doing it and what women they are doing it to, you are a rape apologist. That is sexually predatory thinking, that is male supremacist thinking, and that is disturbing behavior. It is wrong to rape.

Female liberation, now.

[ndiecity-deactivated20241101]

Tumblr users will defend anything, you could make a post that's just like "littering sucks and is bad BTW" and the notes will be like but what if someone doesn't have the spoons to throw trash away

[quinntheestallion]

Younger people who consider themselves progressive have developed a tick where they think the most permissive and non-judgemental approach to anything is automatically the most morally upright. Under religious regimes "judgement" was a virtue that was used in excess to the point of becoming cruelty and hatred. They grew up at a time when people were just learning compassion and understanding in order to counterbalance that excess of judgment in previous generations. But now we're at a point where people exercise no judgment or discernment whatsoever and are willing to excuse and validate almost anything- no matter how obviously wrong-minded something is. Compassion and understanding are the virtues now being used in excess to the point of becoming moral neglect.

[kiefbowl]

men go so hard for men. the most degenerate, disgusting man could enter the room and you could be like “yo that dude is a creep he asked me for feet pics and I don’t feel comfortable around him” and your friend of ten years will be like “he’s not so bad” because they once had a 10 minute conversation about how awesome a film maker tarantino is or w/e

[hyumjim]

Ok Fuck men fr but OP is a terf/radblr girlie and you can tell because of the use of the word “degenerate” in this post which we should all recognize by now as the fascist dogwhistle it is

[kiefbowl]

oh my god shut up lol

[hyumjim]

You are just mad because you are angry

[kiefbowl]

That’s such an amazing sentence

[gendiebrainrotreceipts]

There has been absolutely no studies on what the hell TIMs’ ‘breast milk’ even is, never mind if it’s even safe for baby (in any case I sincerely doubt it has the benefits of actual breast milk). Consider all the artificial hormones in his blood that will then be passed to the baby….breastfeeding mothers aren’t even recommended to have too much coffee. We don’t even know the long term side effects of artificial hormones on adults, we have absolutely no idea what it could do to babies being breastfed with the pseudo breast milk of men on those hormones

[ms-revived-frogs]

Also doctors advise women to not use any drugs while lactating ... meanwhile OP is literally saying they need to use drugs to simulate it. OP literally proves in their own post why they should not be feeding that discharge to infants.

[marmorada]

Considering the horrific things that have happened to babies that were exposed to testosterone gel from their fathers' unwashed hands..... Yeah. This is horror movie territory.

[vintagewoc]

Chaka Khan (1975)

[sailorsenshigifs]

[vile4lesbianvampyres]