How beautiful is butch identity that it includes cis women, trans men, trans women, nonbinary people, and bruce springsteen.

shark vs the universe
occasionally subtle

Love Begins
d e v o n

Discoholic 🪩

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Monterey Bay Aquarium
★
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
The Stonewall Inn
Doug Jones
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
art blog(derogatory)
hello vonnie

gracie abrams
Mike Driver

tannertan36

#extradirty
One Nice Bug Per Day
seen from Antigua & Barbuda
seen from Canada

seen from Singapore
seen from Russia
seen from Uruguay
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Colombia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Iraq

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Italy
@shy-magpie
How beautiful is butch identity that it includes cis women, trans men, trans women, nonbinary people, and bruce springsteen.
I wanted the movie to test the capabilities of every single craft in moviemaking. There are huge sets, huge props, complex wardrobe. I wanted it to feel like an old movie that was made in the heyday of Hollywood. Luscious, and beautiful, and operatic and all that. [...] 'cause I didn't want the audiance to go, "Oh, it's digital," because once you introduce that, it's like a license for people not to believe things. [...] If you do it for real, people have a sense.
FRANKENSTEIN 2025 Dir. Guillermo del Toro
i LOVE the idea of "i can't win, but you can lose" in fictional confrontations it is SO fucking tasty. the human nature to self destruct and the human nature to survive by any means necessary combined at its finest.
So it turns out the "Renaissance women use belladonna eye drops to dilate their pupils because that was considered beautiful" thing is probably not true either
The earliest known source to mention deadly nightshade as a beauty product, which is from the 17th century, describes women using it topically to reduce redness and swelling on the skin and says that that's where the name "belladonna" comes from – and that's all. In fact, eye dilation is mentioned as an annoying side effect people stumbled upon by accident, as late as 1894. Which implies that even the MYTH didn't exist until the 20th century, let alone the practice
I keep trying to give grace to various ideas about dangerous historical fashion trends, because God knows nowadays we have things like reckless use of filler, Brazilian butt lifts, etc., but. It just seems like so few of them were ever actually real, or if they were, not to be extent that everyone thinks(i.e. yes white lead face paint was a real thing, but no, not everyone was using it all the time, and they were aware of the dangers much earlier than most people nowadays realize)
... which I guess is kind of like how unsafe filler use and Brazilian butt lifts are far from universal nowadays, so the trend holds of things getting over a blown when in reality only a small number of people are doing them and most people know how dangerous they are
Really we should be talking about the long-standing trend of tanning for fashion dating back to the 1920s and how dangerous that is (also, of course, skin-bleaching creams on the other end of the color spectrum and with a longer history more rooted in racism, but thankfully people do talk about those a bit more), but no one wants to admit that that is harmful because it's still relatively popular- or imply that any women's fashion trend to come out of the 1920s was anything but Liberating And EmpoweringTM 😬
Edit: apparently the belladonna myth is mentioned in Louisa May Alcott's 1870 book "An Old-Fashioned Girl," so it seems it my have originated earlier than I'd thought. thanks for the info, commenter!
Honestly, for most historical beauty trends we do have evidence for, you can usually just say ‘but mostly it was only really rich people on the bleeding edge of fashion who did that’ and be right more often than not.
right so reportedly we got the karaoke scene in the movie because ryan gosling overheard sandra hüller singing to herself in some downtime on set and approached the directors to say "if we have her here and don't ask her to sing in the movie then we're insane," so the scene was hastily planned and recorded during the last day they had with that set; stratt grew up singing in an east german youth choir because hüller did, too. a fun meta textual wrinkle this adds is that gosling is also a singer but grace doesn't take a turn with the mic, so you can read the scene not just as stratt saying "I am a full human being, I just can't be for this project, you get to see it for two minutes before I turn it off again" but additionally "you could be doing this exact same thing but you aren't even willing to give us two minutes." his doomed work friend the trained choral singer, his fated bestie the being who communicates only through song, his world-saving probes named for the most famous musicians ever, his choir-based soundtrack underpinning all his actions, and his unwillingness to sing himself.
"ryan gosling can sing?" yeah mate! he had a band, la la land was a musical, he had that song in the barbie movie, and I think there was a lot of singing involved in being a mouseketeer but idk I'm ten years too young to have ever seen any of that. I'm quite partial to this clip from lars and the real girl because that is some very good control and support for someone lying on their back with their legs propped up. if you haven't seen the movie then don't even worry about the life sized doll btw she's great she works as a hairdresser.
#i normally headcanon that he's tone deaf #but ykw the idea that grace CAN sing and chose not to in the karaoke scene.... it really fits......... #he doesn't wanna embarrass himself. he doesn't wanna be vulnerable. very typical grace moment. #he keeps making these brief little grabs for human connection then walking it back. he'll go a certain distance but no further. #it would fit really well with the scene before that where he and stratt are talking #which is framed in the directors' commentary as another bid for connection from him but like. it kind of isn't? #or if it is then it's not a very good one. #he says she's mysterious. she shares a personal fact about herself. #which he does not react to or respond to in any way #then proceeds to bulldoze over the conversation just talking about whatever he was planning on talking about anyway. #like. i guess he is reaching out to stratt in his own way? #but it pretty clearly demonstrates that he doesn't really see her or know her as a person and isn't that interested in doing so. #like. he's in there sitting at the bar doing paperwork. #staring wistfully at other people Making Connections then avoiding their gaze when they catch him at it. #he won't go over to join any of these people he's known and worked with for possibly YEARS at this point #and he won't get up there and sing. because that necessitates trying‚ which carries the implied possibility of failing. #being part of something means maybe getting hurt when you don't have it any more. (via @grimark)
hope you don't mind me pulling this out of the tags (edit after writing this rest of this: and sorry for hitting you with a wall of text, this was meant to be two paragraphs max 😭) because that is an internal contradiction in the scene that really grabs me. I think it is an honest bid for connection, grace is trying to do a "haha it looks like we're both a little uncomfortable with the party dya wanna talk about that maybe..." and he wouldn't have approached her in the first place if he weren't interested in trying to make something happen there, but he fumbles it because a) he's still scared of connection even when it's what he's looking for so keeps hedging instead of being direct, and b) he fundamentally misunderstands that her reason for being a wallflower is different than his.
first, you're completely right, he's making a series of grabs here and keeps walking them back. what he wants is to bond with the only other person who looks like she's also uncomfortable over how interacting with people is difficult and makes them both uncomfortable, and he demonstrates his difficulties with interaction very elegantly by failing to start small-talk like four times in a row and apologizing for even trying to initiate a conversation before getting to the one thing he's there to say. he wants to stand close to her, but he chooses the side of her the puts a big metal pole between them. he asks her a few personal questions and gets sincere answers, but then he feels awkward and looks away and pulls his hat over his eyes. he wants to connect with her but no he doesn't. he wants what he wants but no that's scary.
secondly, and this it where I think the Internal Contradiction secret sauce is hidden, his small-talk keeps failing because stratt negates nearly everything he says in this scene. "permission to board?" "you're already aboard" / "did you get a free hat?" "I bought them" / "you don't sing?" "yes I do" / "you're mysterious" "no I'm not" / "sorry for bothering you" "you aren't bothering me" / "this is a weird party" "is it?" / "this must be hard for you" "no it isn't." he's making a lot of casual assumptions about the kind of humor she responds to, her recent activities, her hobbies, whether she even likes him, etc., every single one of them is wrong, and they all underpin his main wrong assumption about her in this scene: why it is that she's hanging back from the party. he thinks it's the same as his reason, i.e., that she finds social interaction and vulnerability difficult. she doesn't. he gets tongue-tied trying to make conversation with her and feels awkward about it because he thinks it makes her feel awkward, but she doesn't mind it at all. he's being a wallflower because connection is difficult for him, but she is being a wallflower out of a choice not to connect. it won't help her do her job, so she's abstaining. this is a bona fide bid at bonding from him, he's saying "want to bond about how neither of us can bond?", but because he hasn't bonded with her he's blind to the fact that she isn't bound to not being able to bond.
he gets the closest to really talking to her and learning more about her as a person in the last moments of the scene by asking some big questions that he doesn't try and pre-answer, but then he averts his eyes, falls back on trying to make a joke with his salute, and leaves. he's actually doing it there for a second! he directly says what's on his mind and stops autofilling who he thinks she is, and she responds positively by hitting him with that big smile, and then he just. shrinks away again. he works out how to stop fumbling this conversation and gets exactly the connection he'd come to her for and then balks at it. the existential questions about god and humanity's future are suddenly too much. when he's on his A-game he can successfully bait her into breaking her "no camaraderie for me" rule, but he won't respond to her in kind. she'll take a turn at karaoke to show everyone that she can; he won't.
movie!grace's central character flaw is that he thinks he just can't, he believes that he lacks the secret sauce that makes other people full, competent individuals who are capable of doing hard things and being meaningful to each other. this is untrue, he absolutely can, he just hasn't figured out how. to bring this back to the singing, his bid to her here is basically sidling up to say "hey, you also Can't, right?", having difficultly accepting it when it seems like she actually Can, aborting the mission when he also Can for a few seconds in a row, and then watching in silence as she demonstrates that, yes, she absolutely Can. he goes into the interaction thinking they're alike in both being unable, she finishes the interaction by suggesting they're alike in both being able. he might not know how to steel his nerves and get on the mic just now, but fundamentally he could make the exact same choice as her and do the exact same thing if he so chose to motivate himself.
people have said it before but if you read a lot of historical literature you do begin to just sort of think in that style of language. I’ll put down the 18th century journal I’m reading and have to resist the urge to send academic emails with every Noun capitalized and punctuated only by the profuse Usage of the Em-Dash — it is a deceptively challenging Instinct to resist, & worse is that Instinct when spelling certain Words to utilize what would, some Centuries prior, be an appropriate Spelling, excepting that my Correspondence occurs in the Twenty-First Century, where Men are inflexible and uncreative in their Methods, & this Propensity of mine would appear only foolish & incorrect, instead of suggesting what it in actuality reflects, which is that I am simply an Incorrigible Nerd — O! the Woes of modern Sociability! Why should I be compelled to conform to these d——d modern Conventions! Is it not enough to be unabashedly and impudently Autistic?
bringing back my too woke opinion that you should be allowed to change labels without the previous one being incorrect
i think you should be allowed to identify as trans without retroactively saying you were also trans in the past. i think the "born this way" rhetoric is limiting and you should be able say stuff like "i was fully a girl when i was a kid and now im a boy" without it invalidating your current identity but maybe that's just me
NEW FISH JUST DROPPED
I KNOW that playing God is morally wrong, but holy HELL, it looks fun.
Why is it playing God? We aren’t violating any natural laws. God set the parameters of the universe to allow these things. There’s nothing wrong with it, there’s no hubris in learning more about how to manipulate the universe around us.
We made a whole-ass fish.
The reason this was accidental BTW is because they used paddlefish eggs as a negative control group for a breeding experiment on sturgeons because the scientists, quite naturally, assumed that they were SO unrelated it would be genetically impossible for them to mate. Like. I cannot stress enough to you how these creatures last related ancestors were
140 MILLION YEARS BACK.
If you don't know how far that is, that's basically the start of the cretaceous. Let me simplify that for you even further. Chimpanzees and humans seperated, what, 5 or 6 million years ago?
This is basically like if humans could hybridise with THESE THINGS.
This is the sort of thing that should be impossible. They used those eggs to be ABSOLUTELY 100% SURE NOTHING WOULD HAPPEN.
And then THEY GOT FISH OUT OF IT.
Like. You can quite clearly understand why they didn't think anything would happen. WE ARE MORE RELATED TO BLUE WHALES THAN THESE THINGS.
THE AMERICAN PADDLEFISH AND THE STURGEON ARE SO COMPLETELY UNRELATED THAT THIS IS NOT PLAYING GOD. IF ANYTHING THIS IS AN ACT OF GOD.
THE SCIENTISTS HAD NO BLAME IN THIS BECAUSE NOTHING LIKE THIS HAD EVER HAPPENED BEFORE
It sort of goes against the rules of genetics a bit.
Oh i forgot to add
THESE THINGS, FOR HYBRIDS, HAD A REALLY HIGH SURVIVAL RATING. LIKE 70% OF THEM SURVIVED.
To put that into perspective, getting a blue whale and a squirrel and trying to hybridise them is more sensible, and that wouldn't produce anything but getting you banned from science. Most animals that aren't plants can barely hybridise two degrees away from each other.
BUT THESE TWO ENTIRELY UNRELATED FISH create PERFECTLY HEALTHY HYBRIDS.
the scientists literally had to do the tests AGAIN just to be like "okay this is real right. This is actually like, not a fluke, this works right" and it worked again. They just Can!
So for those who don't know what the original fishes look like, this is an American Paddlefish:
And this is a Russian Sturgeon:
So honestly, saying the hybrid is "weird looking" is a bit fort de café when you see its parents. I think the sturddlefish looks cute.
"these creatures last related ancestors were 140 million years back"
(glances at fish)
Yeah that's exactly what I thought you'd look like, you Mesozoic fuck
#Holding a red squirrel in my left hand and a blue whale in my right desperately hoping to make a purple squale (via @dykepuffs)
Hadestown Proshot Cast (from the trailer)
i love you mirror versions i love you possession i love you cloning i love you simulacrums i love you shadow selves i love you digital copies of a mind i love you alternate timeline versions i love you tropes that play with identity and what it means to be a certain person
@definitelynotshouting
Look, it’s a weird hill to die on, especially when I don’t really explain, but children deserve to experience fear, disgust, and discomfort in safe scenarios where they can process those sensations.
Media for children used to be scary and that’s important.
Doctor Who - The Family Of Blood
"He never raised his voice, that was the worst thing. The Fury of the Timelord. And then we discovered why. Why this Doctor, who had fought with gods and demons, why he'd run away from us and hidden. He was being kind."
Doctor Who Moments that give me chills 1/?
shoe restoration
And brother, thus begins the tale of Orpheus and Eurydice! every principal orpheus and eurydice on broadway, 2019-2025
I am begging you. Please learn about stress/discomfort tolerance. Practice raising it. You need this to survive. If someone online can ruin your day with a throwaway comment, you desperately need to understand discomfort tolerance and consciously, systematically build that shit.
Also! Stress tolerance is such an important skill that having a learning disability in that area is a major symptom of a whole lot of other disabilities/mental illnesses! Struggling with it is a huge part of life! It sucks!
Am I saying everyone with misophonia needs to listen to chewing noises all day? No. But you need to find ways to tolerate it enough that you don't treat others like shit if they make a mouth noise near you.
No, you don't have to read the fic with your trigger tags. But you do need to be able to handle scrolling past the tags without being upset.
It is hard! But not having it also makes you so so so easy to manipulate. That grandma is racist AF because her mom raised her to be uncomfortable around black people and she never fought that discomfort. Trans people make so many cis people uncomfortable and that discomfort turns into bigotry real fast.
Letting your discomfort dictate your actions and beliefs about things is a great way to become a terrible person. Learn. Discomfort. Tolerance.
someone used the phrase “bits dysphoria” in my notes and I initially misinterpreted it as “feeling like your jokes should be funnier”
If it's true what they say, I'll be on my way