antisemites r so dumb ong
trying on a metaphor
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

@theartofmadeline

Andulka

Origami Around
Claire Keane

pixel skylines

if i look back, i am lost
Show & Tell
sheepfilms
🪼

Product Placement
Fai_Ryy
Mike Driver
One Nice Bug Per Day
Cosmic Funnies
almost home
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
hello vonnie
The Stonewall Inn

seen from Chile
seen from India
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany

seen from Algeria

seen from Jordan
seen from Türkiye
seen from Pakistan
seen from Italy

seen from Netherlands
seen from Morocco
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Colombia
@someotheruser
antisemites r so dumb ong
antisemites r so dumb ong
This is gonna be from a chinese "Long March" rocket I wager, maybe Rocketlab, since they launch from NZ.
Stroopwafel Cheesecake
Per @spoonstrek
every so often something nice happens on the other hellsite 𖹭
the default way for things to taste is good. we know this because "tasty" means something tastes good. conversely, from the words "smelly" and "noisy" we can conclude that the default way for things to smell and sound is bad. interestingly there are no corresponding adjectives for the senses of sight and touch. the inescapable conclusion is that the most ordinary object possible is invisible and intangible, produces a hideous cacophony, smells terrible, but tastes delicious. and yet this description matches no object or phenomenon known to science or human experience. so what the fuck
this is what ancient greek philosophy is like
False! “Sightly” is a positive word, so the default way for things to work is good as well.
The true most ordinary object is beautiful, horrible sounding, very smelly, intangible, and delicious.
I still don’t think it matches anything in existence but to truly understand a thing one must know its true nature.
"touchy" is also a word! however it's mostly used for things that aren't objects, like subjects of conversation. it either means "oversensitive and irritable" or "requires careful handling/wording, delicate"
i think the second one works well for our hypothetical object. so we can use that.
therefore, the Default Object is:
beautiful
makes a horrendous sound
smells absolutely awful
is very fragile
tastes delicious
and i still cannot think of anything that matches this
behold, the default object!
this is what ancient greek philosophy is like
I am begging "most men are good, the small percent makes them look bad" proponents to spend ten minutes in an unmoderated male community, especially if porn is allowed in the community. Go where men hang out and listen to them in their rawest.
Fast track to misandry.
Did that. Was the sole lower enlisted female in my unit, living in a tent with a bunch of dudes in Afghanistan.
There were dirty jokes and yelling BILLY MAYS HERE at each other at 3am to be an asshole and wake people up.
The horror? My poor weak female sensibilities I guess...?
op i dare you to look up the percentage of women who willingly enjoy pornography. I also dare you to look up what the most common sexual fantasy for women is.
Literally just fixing yourself some food and then eating it is "unpaid labor", apparently. Feminists put a dollar price on everything.
Also parenting. It's "The hardest job in the world" when women do it and "the bare minimum" when men do it.
You guys love to lie. Who even is the woman on the right?
Laken Riley. I'm not surprised you don't know her, your side did everything possible not to report on her murder because she was killed by an illegal.
Laken Riley was found murdered in a wooded area on the University of Georgia's campus on Feb. 22.
Here's a source on her case, for anyone who wants proof that this isn't a lie.
... Cases like this are why I will never let people convince me that opposing illegal immigration is wrong.
"I don't even know who this second woman is, but I'm sure you're lying." -a logical person
Can you believe there are people so completely ignorant and disgusting like @siryouarebeingmocked and @ironobservationgoatee to say that this is a lie. Talk about pieces of shits that want to protect criminals that rape. They are probably the same kind of deviants and think rape is fun, so they try and make it sound insignificant.
They seemed to take your quote as your actual position, while they were pissing on the poor.
So you know that trope where like people find out about a child sex predator and rally to beat them up or run them out of the neighborhood, only to change their tune once they find out the predator is a woman?
It's in stuff like George Lopez, Shameless, South Park, etc.
I mean:
This is reflected in real life. Female criminals, women who commit the same crime, are treated much more gingerly than men who do the same. This is even reflected in the law and in our crime definitions. It's reflected in government programs for victims.
When I see people post about sterilizing all child predators or killing all rapists/abusers; more likely than not, they only mean the men.
Which makes it feel less about punishing criminals themselves and more like yet another excuse to harm men. Like they get a kick out of it or something.
And I occasionally test this by responding to social media posts about killing all rapists or sodomizing child predators with hot fire pokers by offering a case (and picture) of a female offender, asking if theyre just as fine extending the punishment to women like her. More often than not I get accused of encouraging violence against women.
"We should punish rapists harsher"
You get uncomfortable at the thought of a female criminal getting a slap on the wrist. You arent ready for harsher punishments for abusers/rapists. Youre only ready for even harsher punishments for men.
There was one tumblr post where someone gendered sex offenders, and people asked OP if they included women.
And a bunch of feminists/radfems showed up to claim OP was talking about sex offenders in general and we shouldn't make assumptions even though it's perfectly normal for people to gender "sex offender".
None of them addressed the fact that OP specifically gendered rapists as male.
>The graffiti is crystal clear. And yet you have not once acknowledged that the first grafitti only refers to male rapists. Or at all. >If o
To be fair to South Park, the were very much making the whole 'oh it's a woman not a man' thing being a fucked up reaction, rather than actually being like
South Park itself is satire for this episode, but it's satirizing the actual case of Mary Kay Laterneau.
It was a big case where a teacher raped her student, got a slap on the wrist, then got out of jail to then immediately sleep with (and later marry) the student she groomed.
And a ton of people were making exvuses for her. Mostly that rape isnt rape when women do it or that he must have liked it because (they thought) she was hot.
Either way, we havent strayed too far from that in terms of how we treat female offenders.
I don't recall if it was the same lady above, but I do remember one of the female pedophiles claiming she was an alcoholic and was going to go to rehab, and then everyone just dropped the 'outrage' because apparently drinking too much is an excuse to be a kid toucher..... if the kid toucher is a woman.
It was definitely her. But alcohol was part of her story (even though she continued to see him after the public apology).
What is the point here? That the *mass shooter* didn't look like a nice guy on the day he did a *mass shooting?*
The point of mentioning that his family was killed by Israel before he attacked a synagogue is obviously not to say "he's a poor little uwu he doesn't know any better." It's to say "the reason this guy chose to do evil thing B is because evil thing A happened to him first." It's a relevant explanation of the reason behind his actions, not an excuse (duh).
They changed the headline. Those pics are linked to archives.
>It's a relevant explanation of the reason behind his actions, not an excuse (duh).
Thsoe aren't two different categories.
Also, I don't think the Times profile on him mentions the name of a single person attacked.
Or uses the word "terrorism" at any point.
Or mention his alleged ties to Hezbollah. Maybe CNN scooped them, idk.
I’m not mad, I’m just disappointed…
I’ll go into more detail on Patreon this week
I've already relogged this, but I'd like to appreciate "the existence of magic doesn't remove the rest of the setting". it's such such a succinct way of putting things.
That helmet was designed by Frank Loyd Wright for the cover of Vogue. That helmet drives a Cybertruck. That helmet is teaching me how to apply snatched contours on Tiktok.
It's also just kinda rude? Like, this is a cultural myth, not a random pulp novel. A little bit of respect for the source material ought to be a given.
It's Hollywood. Even before the days when leftists defended the megacorps in the name of "diversity" the odds were always against the idea that anything based on anything else was going to respect the source material, and not just cultural myths either. I know it's got its defenders, and it may have its moments, but was a Judge Dredd movie starring Sylvester Stallone really ever going to be faithful to the source material?
Memes aside, Stallone co wrote Rambo and Rocky, and decided they should edit out most of Rambo's actual lines, I've been told.
He's right though.
I love how not a single one of them has ever cited an actual law for the latter, or acknowledged that cops commonly wear masks to hide their identities, in America and across the world.
FOFA! http://www.facebook.com/pages/p/102416041800702
Leftist, meet Consequences. I'll give you a night in jail to get acquainted.
"I attacked a law enforcement officer (crime) to stop him from doing his job (also crime), and for some reason (committing a crime while working) I got fired and (breaking the law twice) arrested."
There is truly no demographic more self-centered and stupid than left wing women.