
Janaina Medeiros
dirt enthusiast
art blog(derogatory)

JVL

No title available
Keni
Not today Justin
Show & Tell
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
wallacepolsom
RMH

Origami Around
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Peter Solarz
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Love Begins
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
AnasAbdin
will byers stan first human second
seen from United States

seen from Brunei
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Japan
seen from Spain
seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@superhandle-blog
seduce me with ur history knowledge
vikings made their woman handle the finances because they thought math is witchcraft
I don’t understand this thing about the vaccinated and non-vaccinated kids...
Like, if your child is vaccinated, how would they be in danger if there are non-vaccinated kids? If they’re vaccinated, they’d (theoretically) be protected. So, do you not trust in your vaccinations or am I missing something here?
It’s not their vaccinated kids they’re worried about. It’s their baby at home, who hasn’t had the full complement of shots yet because they’re too little to have had them all (some shots are only meant for kids over a certain age), but who’ll still be exposed to the disease just the same if they interact with their big brother or big sister’s classmates on a play date, or even if the older kid who WAS vaccinated interacts with the unvaccinated kids and brings whatever germs they’re carrying home on his clothes or hands or toys. It’s possible to transport germs without coming down with a noticeable case of the disease yourself.
If this baby goes to the doctor for a standard checkup and there’s an unvaccinated kid (who may not even know they’re sick yet, diseases take time to show clear symptoms and for many of them you can still be contagious even if you’re asymptomatic) with as yet undiagnosed whooping cough or measles in the waiting room, if they go to the shops with Mummy or Daddy to pick up a pack of toilet paper and some milk and there’s someone who wasn’t vaccinated against the flu that year, got sick and hasn’t realised they’re contagious yet…there might be a problem there, huh?
There are people who legit CAN’T be protected by vaccinations as well. Not because their parents don’t want them to be, not because they’ve got some religious objection. They’re sick - for example, they might have cancer or be an organ donation recipient or be on certain medications - and have such cruddy immune systems as a result that they’re too vulnerable to risk even tiny exposure. Go play with your friends, Timmy, and then we can go visit Granny who‘s between two rounds of chemotherapy and must not under any circumstances get sick. Better hope Timmy’s friends are all vaccinated and won’t leave him carrying flu germs on his clothes after he leaves them, or Granny’s in real trouble.
(This was a thing for my family when I was little. There’s a letter that my dad wrote to my kindergarten teacher, saying “please confirm all the kids in baby!Alamut’s class are up to date with their shots? I know it’s intrusive, but my wife/Alamut’s mother is undergoing cancer treatment…if baby!Alamut brings some bug home, even a cold, my wife WILL get it and her immune system is so fucked at present that she couldn’t fight her way out of a wet paper bag. Please do this for me.”)
They may be looking at the big picture, rather than their own individual kids. Do you know how herd immunity works?
Herd immunity works by reducing the size of the pool for possible carriers of a given disease - if there are twenty people, and fifteen of them are vaccinated and protected, then only five of the twenty will be at risk of getting a full-on dose of that illness, and only those five will be able to be potential carriers to spread it to other people through coughing/sneezing on them or however else that disease spreads. The smaller a potential pool of carriers is, the less likely it is that any given person OUTSIDE that pool will develop the disease through contact with one of those carriers. If you never interact with anyone who has measles, you’re not particularly likely to get measles yourself, right? It’s POSSIBLE, maybe, but it’s not very likely that you’ll spontaneously come down with a horrible plague without having that contact and interaction somewhere along the way.
Anyway, there’s a certain threshold that has to be reached for herd immunity to work. It varies by disease, but it’s usually somewhere between 85 and 95 percent. If 95 percent of a given population is vaccinated against a disease (everyone who can be, basically) then the small minority of people who can’t be vaccinated (too young, too old, too sick already, whatever the reason is) are safe from that disease by default just because they so rarely meet anyone who’s carrying it. They avoid being exposed just because there’s no one in their life who could expose them.
If people who COULD be vaccinated decide not to and go “lol no, I’m not into that”, then they increase the risk for everyone around them who can’t be…and once the percentage of people with immunity drops below that threshold, the herd immunity that protects all the most vulnerable people stops working altogether. If there are enough carriers to keep passing the germs around - and there really don’t have to be very many - then you can’t avoid being exposed. If you leave the house, you’ll meet SOMEONE who can pass it on.
It’s not the vaccinated kid they’re concerned about. It’s everyone else.
This is very well stated, and the information about people who cannot be vaccinated for health reasons, and the concept of herd immunity are 100% correct.
But there also is, in fact, a small risk to vaccinated children. You see, vaccines work very well. They have a very high efficacy rate–most well over 90-95%. But no medical intervention, including vaccines, has a 100% efficacy rate.
Take Tylenol (or paracetamol in the UK) for instance. You may take some if you have a headache and generally it helps you feel better. But not necessarily ALWAYS. Doesn’t mean Tylenol is a worthless drug. It just doesn’t work for everyone 100% of the time. Vaccinations have a better efficacy rate than Tylenol! (But still not 100%.)
This is another reason herd immunity is so important. If a measles outbreak hits my kid’s school, and there are 150 unvaccinated kids and say 800 vaccinated kids, a large number of those 150 will likely get sick because measles is HIGHLY infectious. But as it spreads through that group, it’s entirely possible that 2 or 3 of the 800 will get sick, too. As a group, these children are FAR safer than the unvaccinated ones, but not 100% safe. And that is how these parents who CHOOSE not to vaccinate their children (who are healthy and have no reason not to be vaccinated) put EVERYONE ELSE’S children at potential risk–even those whose parents have responsibly gotten every single vaccine for their kids right on time.
Vaccines work extremely well. But for them to work their very best, everyone who can get them needs to get them. Period.
Ammo for those awful conversations we somehow still need to be having
Tbh I can’t believe that this is something that still has to be explained
They OP tagged the original post as being a personal choice, like circumcision. Why are things that affect the health, safety and lives of children deemed “personal choices” when it is about children?
Yeah like all the above posts (minus OP) are good and important, but even if these children didn’t pose a threat to other people, it’s still not okay for parents to put their own children at risk just because they don’t understand vaccines and/or disgustingly believe that the possibility of autism is worse than the possibility of death by measles. Children have a right to be healthy, and I’m really tired of how rhetoric in these discussions–from both sides, although the anti-vaxxers are usually worse–implies that these unvaccinated kids are parents’ property and aren’t entitled to health and safety.
tl; dr–Yes, OP, you’re missing something here.
Vaccinate your fucking kids.
I told you I didn’t mind hanging out. I told you I’d feed you once in a while. But I’m not adopting you. And you can’t lick me.
BLACK WIDOW #1
willow smiths “whip my hair” was better than iggy azaleas entire career and she was 10 at the time
Hawkeye #14
Last thought I remember thinking was just that it was so unfair. Like I’m being benched before I even get to play the game.
I love that the second shit starts going down, Charles knows it’s Erik.
#he always the first to know #believe me
(yuushishio)
wait im getting some kind of telepathic interference something massively dramatic and destructive is happening could it be yes its the return of my dbag ex and his bullshit anti-me helmet i thought i could sense a hUGE FUCKING DISAPPOINTMENT (via jabletown)
back in my day we didn’t call it “shitposting”, we called it “nightblogging” and blamed the australians
waiter: how’s your meal? shakira: it’s wonderful thanks shakira’s hips: she hates it shakira: son of a
PLEASE DON’T MAKE THIS INTO A MEME
a mystery wrapped in an enigma drizzled with conundrum
see that bit of grey, faded text?
mystery solved.
Barry Allen || The Flash #5
Mad Max: Center Framed from Vashi Nedomansky on Vimeo.
One of the many reasons MAD MAX: FURY ROAD is so successful as an action film is the editing style. By using “Eye Trace” and “Crosshair […cut for length]
It occurs to me that one of the reasons Mad Max is so remarkably effective at eschewing the male gaze may be because of this approach. If you listen to this pre-release talk by the cinematographers, he talks about how challenging it was for him to follow Miller’s edict to keep the centre on whatever was meant to be the focus of the scene because, and this is from memory and it’s a two hour talk, ( but I think it’s in the first twenty minutes or so, and he says it twice, so if anyone wants to go check?) his instinct was to include the beautiful girls in the back of the cab.
Like, he literally mentions how gorgeous Rosie Huntington-Whiteley is, and how it went against all his instincts to leave her out, even though the scene was supposed to be about Furiosa, or Max.
And I think we the viewers noticed that.
As someone who has no training in film or video, I would have to see some counter-examples, to see how not-on-center more conventional cinematography is. And to see some more exploration of what it has to do with male (or other) gaze.
Most film composition and photography composition is off-center for visual interest. Specifically they aim to hit one of the golden ratio ‘points of interest’, all you have to do is google “Golden Ratio” or “Rule of Thirds” and the word “composition”. This is the golden ratio:
The blue lines are where it would appear on a rectangle the ‘points of interest is roughly where the lines cross perpendicular. You can ‘cheat’ by using ‘thirds’ (black lines) instead of the golden (blue lines) REMEMBER THESE POINTS:
This is (mostly) center frame:
This is more classically composed:
You can see especially how she literally shifts from one point of the golden ratio to another. Your eyes are immediately drawn to her eyes. (San Andreas trailer which is mostly clean of male gaze)
Max is, as a still shot, in comparison more ‘boring’. Your eyes aren’t ‘led’ anywhere. There’s nowhere for it to go…which is a good thing because your attention needs to be about right there because Max is going to nearly get his head taken off.
And then you have the Age of Ultron trailer. (Fuck you Marvel):
If you’re framing this by the golden ratio, one of the points of interest is at her eyes, the other is her cleavage. I BARELY HAD TO GO 20s INTO THE TRAILER.
Why don’t we get Steve’s cleavage?
Why don’t we get Tony’s cleavage?
Both their eyes are at the sweet spot of the Golden Ratio.
Natasha’s head and ass are too, however.
Red Witch’s chest instead of her face….
See how there’s almost no headspace for Natasha:
The focus here is literally NOT on her face, it’s on Natasha’s chest and hips
Compare for yourself to how much the frame is centered on the face/eyes of the men instead of, say, their nipples or their crotch. The lone exception is a brief shot of Thor.
Bonus: Let’s see what Mad Max might’ve looked like with this framing.