I've sorta realized radqueers and transIDs feel like an inherently right-wing concept, because it seems like the concepts were made to make fun of the queer and trans community as well as disabled people. It also just feels like an excuse to try to make everyone live in alabama, metaphorically.
wait no it is an excuse. These people have advocated for some genuinely crazy shit that I don't wanna see these kinds of people again, and yet apparently a lot of people don't understand that willos are NOT "TransDID" or "TransOSDD" or whatever the FUCK ELSE labels have been created to make fun of the disabled and trans communities.
All the hate The Mandolorian and Grogu is getting on YouTube is making me SAD. It's over the dumbest stuff too. What, are all of you hard core Starwars fans intimidated by a sad bounty hunter and his alien baby?? Is it too soft for you??? Do you have no fracken whimsy???? >:V
Piss off. Let me have my dad/son space adventure movie.
I'd like to talk about something that's been on my mind a lot recently, and it's something that I've been meaning to bring up.
Littles! Stop taking advantage of CGs!
I'm tired of being taken advantage of by littles who only want someone to coo at them and say nice things and someone who they can dump their trauma on randomly (this is not in relation to my last post. I don't mind if people come to me for advice or for a place to vent, but I need them to ask first!). I want someone who wants a 3 dimensional relationship! Where we are friends first and then we move on to being in a agere relationship. But I get so many littles who claim to be looking for a caregiver, but they only ever want to talk while they are little, and aren't interested in taking it slow and building that very special relationship between carer and little.
I'm not some person who has infinite energy, I'm not some person who is a fanfic where I'm always ready to listen to your worries and anxieties, I'm not this flat, 1 dimensional person who can fit your fantasies of a cg.
I'm a human too, who wants a relationship with the littles I meet /p. Please, littles, please stop taking advantage of online cgs. We aren't your fictional story book that you can leave and come back when you feel like it. We have feelings too, and it's not fair that you play on our natural caring nature.
The terms misogynoir, lesbophobia and trans-misogyny highlight 2 forms of bigotry and how they intersect with each other to create one form of bigotry. They don't specifically describe 2 forms of systematic oppression and how they intersect with each other to create one form of oppression.
For example "merrian webster" defines the term misogynoir as follows: "Hatred of, aversion to, or prejudice against Black women" This definition only requires the intersection of 2 forms of bigotry. In the case of misogynoir the bigotry against people for being women and the bigotry against people for being black create one form of bigotry together. They didn't write in the definition the forms of bigotry need to be systematic.
Also transandrophobia does indeed exist. Trans men OFTEN get discriminated against on the basis of their manhood and transness together. For example some people discriminate against trans men on the basis of them transitioning to the "evil gender." This is discrimination against them for their manhood by calling manhood evil and discrimination against them for transitioning. This fits the criteria for transandrophobia. This example denies your claim, that transmisandry/transandrophobia can't exist.
Also misandry sometimes is a structural force in some cases, which means it exists. Especially towards men who are disadvantaged like trans men. For example the written in the law discrimination of male victims/survivors of SA/CSA in MANY COUNTRIES is misandristic.
This means transmisandry/transandrophobia exists, even according to your definition of it being an intersection of 2 systemic forms of oppression, which creates one form of oppression, which isn't it's real definition by the way. Because sometimes misandry affects some men structurally obviously not nearly to the extent misogyny affects women structurally, but you get my point.
Also this isn't MRA shit, which makes trans men hate trans women. It's the reality of what trans men live through.
Please don't deny the reality of trans men with your own bigoted view of the world. You yourself are going down a harmful pipeline of radical feminism. I hope you can one day get out of that pipeline.
Bro the more I read the worst the GHOST situation gets
Sorry for posing about this so much...
Im just trying to get all the info, and Im getting madder about it cause it just gets worse and worse like jesus fuck ghost how horrible are you?
It kinda makes me disgusted I looked up to this person in a way
Oh yeah heres a master doc I stumbled across (In someones post on yt[?] about it):
Saw a mutual reblog some bullshit about "autism representation in media bad because it's not my autism!!11!!1!1"
If you genuinely believe that then I don't think I can be comfortable around you.
You think that showing more severe autism is "infantilization"
You think that showing more severe autism is "inaccurate"
You think that showing more severe autism is "stereotypes"
Well guess what. The show you're bashing, the movie you're trashing, the characters you call stereotypes and inaccurate and fake, those are the characters I relate to the most. Because I am not you.
There is more autism than level one autism you know. I hope you know that.
I hope you know that level 2 people are on the internet and can see the shit you say about us and how characters like us are "inaccurate to autism"
I hope you know that level 3 people and/or parents/caretakers of level 3 people are seeing you talk about them or their child as if they don't exist just because you don't like the severely autistic character in the hallmark movie you just watched.
In your journey to have more autism representation, you actually DECREASE autism representation because you're saying level 2 and 3 rep isn't allowed. Moderate and Severe autism rep isn't allowed. Only mild is allowed guys!!!!! Only Quinni is allowed guys!!!! We're not allowed to have other characters chat!!!! Chloe says that only Quinni is accurate so that means we're only allowed her guys!!!!!!!!!!
We're not allowed to have characters with severe meltdowns, speech differences, echolalia/scripting, constant stimming, "childish" special interests, live with parents, can't get jobs, nonverbal, eloping, AAC, or anything relates to level 2 or 3 guys! Remember! That's the rule!
Fuck you, I have plenty of OCs with moderate and severe autism. But I'm also nice and I DON'T FUCKING EXCLUDE PEOPLE so I also have some Level 1 OCs as well.
Maintagging some things because this message needs to get spread.
Gabriella is very fucking annoying and not in a character way but in a ‘she’s terribly written’ way. She’s flat as fuck and one note as fuck and I don’t want to hear how it’s because we’re only seeing her through Lestat’s eyes or whatever the excuse of the week is because we’ve had MALE antagonists in the past who have a fraction of the screen time but still more personality and depth. Tom fucking Anderson was more well rounded
I have little hope that the writing for women is going to improve in this season but the writers need to get their fucking act together for season 4 and what and WHO comes next. They’re going to have a lot of women in this world soon so they better start learning how to fucking write them
