12 Musical Acts to Follow in 2014
With 2013 coming to a close, we wanted to highlight some of the acts that we think you should catch live or listen to next year. Weâre eying some groups with a simpler sound, and have included bands that - if you donât already know them - youâll be sure to recognize them when they crop up on the radio in the next few months.
Who: Majical Cloudz
What: Minimalistic sound with such simple and stark lyrics that you may be taken aback.
Why: Lorde has tweeted about this duo before, placed them on her Top 10 Songs of 2013 list and as popâs queen bee, thatâs got to count for something.
Who: Doe Paoro
What: Pair heavy bass beats with a clear, piercing voice and add some synth.
Why: Sheâs on this yearâs SXSW lineup, was featured on Stereogum in February as a band to watch, and has drawn up comparisons to James Blake and Lykke Li.
Who: fyfe
What: Everyone likes a mystery. This bloke may have three different identities but this last one is curiouser than the rest. Luckily, he retains the distinct sound of previous projects.
Why: Under Davidâs Lyre, he won a decent amount of attention before he ditched it for this moniker. His quiet releases, the most recent of which was Lies Pt. II, have not only received many a good word from critics, theyâve also slowly built up buzz.
Who: IYES
What: Pronounced âeyes,â Brightonâs co-ed electronic duo has hints of The xx, and MS MR and are simply irresistible.
Why: Last month, The Guardian drew readersâ attention to this pair, and they certainly have the potential to be all over music blogs in a few months.
The Bon Iver Sound-Alikes
Who: Ăsgeir
What: This Icelandic artist and Bon Iver may just as well be twins separated at birth. It sounds like it, anyway. Except this guy is bit less mopey.
Why: Looking to our Scandinavian friends for the next big hit is not a new idea, and Ăsgeir has proven his worth with a track that stuck at #1 on the Icelandic charts for 6 weeks.
Who: RY X
What: A more electronic-y, space-y feel than his folky American counterpart. But heâs got that beard look down.
Why: First, nearly all heâs put out has about half a million YouTube hits. Second, weâve had our eye on him for a while now (he was our Jam back in October) and featured him in our vowel-less moniker post. Lastly, heâll be touring Europe in February, where we expect him to win over some more hearts.
Who: Luke Sital-Singh
What: Hailing from Britain, heâs got a similar multi-layered harmony over soft guitar strumming approach thatâs been the winning combination for Bon Iver.
Why: The comparisons to Wisconsinâs soft-voiced crooner coming from left and right and a spot on BBC Radio 1âs New Music We Trust back in March all sound very promising for Mr. Sital-Singh.
Tomorrowâs Pop-tastic Hit Names Â
Who: NONONO
What: Bound to bring you to the dance floor.
Why: Another Scandinavian band, theyâre so irresistibly catchy and upbeat that BBCâs Zane Lowe premiered their track.
Who: Betty Who
What: The kind of in-your-face pop with a taste of 80âs throwback.
Why: You know her - you just donât know it. Her track was the one in that adorable Home Depot marriage proposal you saw a while back. You know, the one with 10.1 million views that got her that RCA deal. And yes, sheâs been on multiple up-and-coming lists.
Who: Vance Joy
What: Taking a hint from Aviciiâs acoustic + electric dance hit, Riptide is the next Wake Me Up!
Why: Heâs won over the folks down under and we think heâs already movinâ on up.
Who: BANKS
What: Intense, brooding, and soulful vocals you wonât soon forget. Â
Why: Sheâs well on her way to being the next big thing. Â Not only is the web done more than its fair share creating buzz about her, everyone from the BBC to Katy Perry is spitting praise about this young lady.
Who: Miriam Bryant
What: Swedenâs answer to Adele. Enough said.
Why: If her wait-thatâs-not-Adele? hit doesnât take her anywhere, her work with now-household-name Zedd (which is also reflected in her more pop-y numbers) certainly will.
From the soft lullaby sound of Luke Sital-Singh to the dance-floor theme song by NONONO, we think weâve got a pretty good idea of who we should all be watching out for. Agree or disagree?