World’s most bisexual polycule, but make them tiny <3
@invincibleinck

No title available
official daine visual archive
No title available
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
RMH

@theartofmadeline

JVL

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
YOU ARE THE REASON

#extradirty
𓃗
art blog(derogatory)
Keni

No title available
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
occasionally subtle
Cosmic Funnies

roma★
cherry valley forever
$LAYYYTER
seen from United States

seen from Maldives
seen from Lithuania
seen from Lithuania
seen from Morocco

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from China
@allronix
World’s most bisexual polycule, but make them tiny <3
@invincibleinck
i hate when I see people try to reason why the Jedi couldn't free shmi by saying that it would've dragged them into a war with the hutts and slavers on tattooine and/or that it would've brought political unrest between the republic and the hutts and the outer rim.
like...are you seriously telling me that freeing one (1) single enslaved woman that's owned by some random guy would really have affected the entire galaxy and caused widespread unrest or war. It's not like shmi was still owned by gardulla or that she was owned by jabba. Besides, the Jedi could've literally just bought shmi from watto and there would be no need for any problems.
Also...the Jedi are supposed to be peacekeepers of the Galaxy. You know what goes against peace in the Galaxy?? Slavery. And it's not like the Jedi have never freed slaves before. One of the things Anakin asks Qui-gon in tpm is if he's there to free the slaves, so the Jedi obviously had a reputation for freeing enslaved people. There's many examples of Jedi freeing slaves in other media including in TCW when they freed the colony of Togruta people from the Zygerrian government, which would've had a much bigger effect than freeing one single woman from a toydarian junk dealer, especially because that took place during an actual war.
It's one thing to say that the Jedi somehow didn't know that Anakin's mom was still enslaved (which is...idk) because qui-gon died with that information, but to try to justify how they could've known but chose not to do anything is terrible.
"What radicalized me? Basic empathy." -a person who hates white people, men, straight people, Jews, Christians, anyone who makes six figures or more per year, autistic and/or mentally ill people who don't want their disorders treated as a trend by obnoxious tenderqueer tiktok influencers, thin people, feminine women, housewives, Iranian disapora, Cuban diaspora, women who have one or more sons, and people who draw pictures of women with big boobs.
You forgot "anyone who disagreed with me, especially if they are part of the groups that are supposed to agree with me."
Scratch the veneer of "basic empathy" in social media context and there's lot of greed, rage, envy, and selfishness. Bloodthirsty sadism as well.
So umm.
Star trek AND star wars.
But also farscape, Andromeda, and Babylon 5.
Am I alone?
Blake’s Seven and Doctor Who
Blake's 7! Duct tape sets and the LEFTOVER props from Doctor Who, but damn the writing was good. Probably inspired most of the sci-fi coming out of the 2000s and 2010s.
Oh heck, if you liked Rogue One/Andor and aren't put off by the community theater grade production values, you'll probably dig Blake's 7.
Oh, and one of Paul Darrow's last credited roles before his death was playing a Sith overseer (Harkun) in SWTOR. PERFECT use of that droll sarcsam.
Headcanon. I think that after Ace told the Doctor about her first encounter with a certain Sabalom Glitz… let’s just say that he dropped off Ace one time and then went back in time and space to found both Mel and Sabalom and told him exactly what he thought about this encounter….with Mel screaming at him for being an awful human being and he cowering before a wrathful Doctor who is giving him a death glare…
Oh, Seven needn't YELL. That's beneath him. Mel can do all the yelling and keep the sleazeball busy while he sets up something MUCH nastier and appropriate for the kind of space pirate who would take advantage of a teenager. The kind of nasty and appropriate that Ace, Rassilon willing, never finds out about.
'guardians of peace and justice' for the republic leaders and elite maybe
You can't get any more a hard example than Shmi Skywalker being left to in slavery.
Even if you want make the disgusting choice that the Jedi couldn't make a personal example to help Anakin in freeing his mother, Shmi helped and sheltered a Jedi knight to much personal cost to herself.
The Jedi Order owed the woman.
And there is every other excuse under the sun, it would a war with the Hutts (killing Jabba didn't seem to do that in RotJ), is morally wrong to free one slave and not all (morally cowardice you mean), and the dumbest one, the Jedi didn't know she existed!
So the Jedi have the attention span of a comcussed gold fish where they don't bother to get an after action report from their knights or bother to open their mouths to ask where the kid came from or... they just didn't care.
And the next excuse of Watto didn't take Republic credits. Well, then. Go over Watto's head. Find out which Hutt owns HIS ass, because with the way he gambles? Yeah. some Hutt owns him.
Hutts are a lot of things. However, they shockingly pragmatic in matters of business. If they don't take Republic credits, they likely have a currency exchange on Nar Shaadaa to encourage Republic citizens to blow their cash in the casinos and other vice. So, a trip to the currency exchange would be the simplest means to not get a Hutt involved.
If you do need to involve the Hutt owning Watto's ass? Well, Hutts are again, pragmatic. They know good help is not easy to find and is not cheap. Compensating good service is part of the cost of doing business. A petition to the Hutt saying "We have encountered a dilemma, Your Eminence. This slave aided one of our own in a time of need but her lazy, stupid owner did everything in his power to delay us and refuse to do business. We would like to compensate the slave but not her owner. Surely your wisdom could help us reach a satisfactory conclusion."
(This is a Hutt. Weld those lips to the copious ass for best result)
Oh and the next excuse "We can't involve ourselves in the buying of a slave!" Well, the Jedi sure didn't seem to have much in the way of protest when assigned to be the overseer-commanders of a slave army. So between Shmi and the Clones, they seem pretty okay with slavery. Heck, if they were worried about the optics, then I'm sure someone with slightly dirtier hands owes the Order a favor and can be trusted to act as a proxy.
Or there are local slave freedom networks to work with. "Look, we can't free them all, but we have a golden invitation to free one and we can add some aid under the table to your network so you can free even more." (love the @fialleril mythos that the Lars family was in on this network because it explains a whole lot)
Thing is, if some nobody bum of a farmer that was (or ended up) sweet on her could scrape a few pennies to buy her for domestic labor and remove the bomb from her neck, what was stopping the alleged beacons of peace and justice?
You know who takes Republic credits?
Bounty hunters.
Freeing a slave mother and threatening her sleaze bag owner not only would be an easy payday, a feel good job, and maybe they could swing the Jedi Order into owing them one.
Subcontracting to a Bounty Hunter is beneath the dignity of the PT Jedi..some Old Republic ones would swing for that option.
But yeah, there's probably a licensed hunter, smuggler, mercenary, or other shady type who would take the job.
Star Wars pro Jedi fans saying Filoni started the Jedi bashing and mischaracterization trend confuse me because (I haven’t read a lot from EU , but from what I read as books and comics and the video games I played) so much of the EU was already lowkey criticizing and ridiculing all Jedi pre Luke’s new EU order. In every single gooddam era. Literally every second story with Jedi is how they have so many problems despite being good people trying their best, kiss political ass too much , alienate people and eventually that leads to infighting. Like Mandalorian wars and Knights of the old republic era set 4000 years before Luke shows that , Old republic era 3000 years before shows that, the Jedi order around Darth Bane’s time 1000 years before shows that. The whole prequels and clone wars even before Filoni point to that. Not to mention any time the galaxy is saved by some organized big threat pre Luke in EU it isn’t really the Jedi as an order saving anyone, it’s mostly individual people with a death wish and a RPG team of buddies , Jedi going rogue, or even the bad guys killing each other on their own. And the Jedi order is portrayed as an obstacle. Actually with the whole High republic era stuff (haven’t read them yet) it seems they’re even trying to portray Jedi in a more positive light than a lot of what EU had portrayed before.
And the whole idea of the originals is to show Luke tries to break away from ALL their original jedi dogma , goes against SOME of the advice of Yoda and Obi-Wan, and ultimately wins and succeeds. EU later tries to solidify that Luke has different ideals because dude gets MARRIED . And later in the EU his Jedi order is allegedly more stable than the prequels one at least. Like I don’t like a lot of dumb shit written by Dave Filoni either, but he isn’t the og Jedi bashing agenda mastermind. Half the EU writers are lollll
Filoni is downright a stan compared with...Chris Avellone who made the most magnificently bitchy old hag to express those criticisms , Karen Traviss who wouldn't have become the meme she did if she wasn't pointing out some uncomfortable truth, David Brin who was so fire breathing that he got Karen Traviss to defend the franchise, and Athena Andreadis who wrote the most heartbreaking analysis of the Prequel Trilogy I've read.
Now the key on all these people is that they walked in like I did, as adults with no pre-existing warm fuzzies or being little kids pretending sticks were lightsabers. They saw what they saw and wrote their pieces accordingly.
'guardians of peace and justice' for the republic leaders and elite maybe
You can't get any more a hard example than Shmi Skywalker being left to in slavery.
Even if you want make the disgusting choice that the Jedi couldn't make a personal example to help Anakin in freeing his mother, Shmi helped and sheltered a Jedi knight to much personal cost to herself.
The Jedi Order owed the woman.
And there is every other excuse under the sun, it would a war with the Hutts (killing Jabba didn't seem to do that in RotJ), is morally wrong to free one slave and not all (morally cowardice you mean), and the dumbest one, the Jedi didn't know she existed!
So the Jedi have the attention span of a comcussed gold fish where they don't bother to get an after action report from their knights or bother to open their mouths to ask where the kid came from or... they just didn't care.
And the next excuse of Watto didn't take Republic credits. Well, then. Go over Watto's head. Find out which Hutt owns HIS ass, because with the way he gambles? Yeah. some Hutt owns him.
Hutts are a lot of things. However, they shockingly pragmatic in matters of business. If they don't take Republic credits, they likely have a currency exchange on Nar Shaadaa to encourage Republic citizens to blow their cash in the casinos and other vice. So, a trip to the currency exchange would be the simplest means to not get a Hutt involved.
If you do need to involve the Hutt owning Watto's ass? Well, Hutts are again, pragmatic. They know good help is not easy to find and is not cheap. Compensating good service is part of the cost of doing business. A petition to the Hutt saying "We have encountered a dilemma, Your Eminence. This slave aided one of our own in a time of need but her lazy, stupid owner did everything in his power to delay us and refuse to do business. We would like to compensate the slave but not her owner. Surely your wisdom could help us reach a satisfactory conclusion."
(This is a Hutt. Weld those lips to the copious ass for best result)
Oh and the next excuse "We can't involve ourselves in the buying of a slave!" Well, the Jedi sure didn't seem to have much in the way of protest when assigned to be the overseer-commanders of a slave army. So between Shmi and the Clones, they seem pretty okay with slavery. Heck, if they were worried about the optics, then I'm sure someone with slightly dirtier hands owes the Order a favor and can be trusted to act as a proxy.
Or there are local slave freedom networks to work with. "Look, we can't free them all, but we have a golden invitation to free one and we can add some aid under the table to your network so you can free even more." (love the @fialleril mythos that the Lars family was in on this network because it explains a whole lot)
Thing is, if some nobody bum of a farmer that was (or ended up) sweet on her could scrape a few pennies to buy her for domestic labor and remove the bomb from her neck, what was stopping the alleged beacons of peace and justice?
Star Wars The Black Series Knights of the Old Republic Mission Vao and Carth Onasi (Gaming Greats) 2-Pack Hasbro G3196
Link para compra BR: *Possível importar pelo Link abaixo
Buy here: https://amzn.to/4tynxsD
They make sense to be a two pack, especially if Big Boy Zaalbar needs his own box. They're your first party members and the highest LS score.
Plus, y'know, the fanon of them becoming dad and daughter.
“Anakin had so many red flags, like omg he admitted to killing a whole village of people and she still married him??”
Everyone ignored his fears and told him to never think about his mother, he had visions, he finally went to find her, she died in his arms, he killed the people who killed her and then went on a rampage to slaughter the whole village which was wrong, and then freaked out about it in front of Padmé, didn’t try to conceal his anger or the actions he took (refreshing to her after the senate I’m sure), and then broke down crying about how he shouldn’t have and he’s better than this.
Like I’m not saying it wasn’t one of The Signs for those of us who know about Darth Vader but like. How is anyone surprised that Padmé, a very compassionate individual who values honesty, didn’t cut him off after that
i think a lot of people don't realize that gffa is a very cruel world, even before the empire: violence of all kinds, war, the death of entire systems, slavery, corruption in the senate — padme is familiar with all of this personally. padme's handmaiden was just brutally murdered in front of her because someone in the senate didn't like her speaking out against the military creation act. in tpm, padme's planet was attacked, her people were being killed and she was forced to take on the responsibility of saving them while being a little girl since the senate refused to help them. coruscant is a city planet where billions of people live in poverty on the lower levels, never having a chance to even see the sun. tatooine is a planet colonized by the hutts, where slavery is thriving and even small children are forced to work because they have bombs in their bodies. and with all this, a brutal war is literally about to begin
what i'm trying to say is that what anakin did was of course bad, but it wasn't unusual for gffa; padme sees that at least anakin's actions were a cruel reaction to another cruelty (let me remind you that the tuskens not only tortured shmi to death, they killed 20+ people who came out to look for her and crippled her husband), and most importantly, anakin regrets his actions and even the very fact that he feels anger towards his mother's killers, anakin is honest about what happened and doesn't try to justify himself — this and the fact that anakin had never done anything bad before, but on the contrary, has a good reputation in padme's eyes (he helped save her planet, risking himself; expresses a desire to make the world a better place) are the ultimate reasons why she decided to sympathize with him. this does not mean that she condoned, justified, or even encouraged his bad actions, but she knew that he could be better and that his dark moments didn't define him, which is compassion and unconditional love
i've also seen a lot of people suggest that it would have been more logical for padme to 'hand anakin over to the authorities and cut him off', but like, let's be serious, what 'authorities' are we talking about? on tatooine, it's the hutts, and i'm sure you're smart enough to know they wouldn't care if some jedi massacred a tusken raiders village. and what else could she do? sue him in the republic? because they certainly wouldn't care about this, just as they don't care about the thousands of human trafficking victims in the same region. well, of course, she could have turned him over to the jedi council, and then anakin would have probably been expelled from the order with no one to turn to except his evil sith abuser, which i think would have been the just ending to this situation and would definitely not have had any dire consequences /sarc
i think what padme did, namely, calm anakin down and assure him that he could still be a good person after what happened, was the most logical choice in her situation that could have been made. yes, there is grayness in it, but the alternatives were worse and padme had no reason to believe that something like this could ever happen again, and honestly, if palpatine didn't exist, it wouldn't have
Exactly. EXACTLY.
All people can see is “ooh the imperial march played because he is being Evil and therefore why would Padmé want to be with someone Evil?” and it just disappears their literacy for what’s actually happening in the movie.
Padmé is a politician, she hears people minimize their cruelty every day. Anakin EMPHASIZES his in this scene. He WANTS her to know how horrible it was. He wasn’t seeking comfort, he was beating himself up about it, in fact it was almost like he was actively pushing her away, trying to see how she’d react to this horrible thing, and she doesn’t go for it, instead she gives him the comfort he wasn’t seeking, because she respects his character and his honesty.
And you’re so right—what authorities? Hello? It’s like people don’t even pay attention to what’s actually happening in the Star Wars they have so many opinions about.
i'm 100% sure that anakin's confession was at least partly an attempt to push padme away, especially considering that anakin started talking about the massacre after padme had already begun to sympathize with him, as if it was a response to her compassion. i think he expected her to scold him and confirm his negative self-image. after anakin finishes talking about what he did, he sinks to the floor, and there's a brief moment where padme takes a few seconds to process what she heard, and anakin glances at her periodically. the way he turns his head toward her and jerks it back while shaking could indeed suggest that he thought she would turn away from him after the confession, but was afraid to face it
honestly, i think hayden christensen played that scene really well, but a lot of people don't pay attention to how anakin talked about what he did, only to what he did. i know g-lucas specifically asked the actors to give slightly exaggerated performances because he wanted to make sw 'basically silent movies', which is why the dialogue can seem a little wooden or unrealistic, as the films can be experienced entirely without it. like, if you watch this scene in a language you don't understand, you can see how anakin's emotions, his facial expressions, and his body language change — even without dialogue, you can still get the basic idea, which is 'anakin did something really bad and it scared him and he confesses it to padme, who calms him down'. i mean, he starts with grief and guilt, and then, trying to rationalize what happened, he moves to anger ('it's all obi-wan's fault'), but when he gives in to anger, it scares him: he looks at his hands in shock, you see how he is shaking, how he looks around, trying to fully comprehend what he did (in the script, g-lucas writes "anakin focuses on her like someone returning from far away", which suggests that he is still dissociating), and only then does he begin to talk about what he did, and he starts sobbing right after that — this scene conveys so much guilt, regret, self-fear and self-hate :/
and then i go online, and see people post that anakin didn't regret the massacre at all and was racist and padme 'should have dumped that maniac who bragged about committing mass murder' and red flags and all that, and i'm like. bro.
i don't know how else to say it but IMO the fact that palpatine successfully blackmails him with it in the first 20 minutes of ROTS is pretty solid evidence that he regrets the massacre
@chronologyxxx has the right of it. The GFFA is a brutal, violent, crime and war ridden shithole. Life there is the Hobbes description of life without strong government, "continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short."
The GFFA has maybe half a functional government. The Republic, for all its copious fuck ups, at least has to give lip service to citizens' rights and rule of law. That makes it far nicer than the alternatives (Sith, Hutts, Vong) that don't have to pretend to give a damn about any of that. It's still de facto feudal with an hereditary aristocracy in many places. For the average nobody, the local crime boss is more a presence than their Senator. Hell, add the chaos worshiping Sith, abominations like Vitiate and Ableoth, and freaky shit like the Vong into it and you pretty much have Warhammer 40K with nicer paint and pretty laser weapons. It can be fun if you're playing a power fantasy video game, but no one sane would want to live there.
The closest anyone comes to a "good" faction is a well intentioned but ruthless bunch of enforcers who dress like monks, recruit their members from the cradle, force separations from families, and raise them in the cold brutality of institutional care to have this vague love of the concept of people while the ideal is seeing NO individual life as important - even their own. Death is something to be celebrated and embraced. Being a healer of broken bodies and blighted land is a position of failure. Killing enemies of the State to enforce the top down vision of goodness and order (everyone in their place and keeping quiet) is considered the height of goodness. Love of an individual person is treated as the highest threat - which is why they mandate the brutal forced separation of families and allow physical release but not emotional connection. No love but love of Order (in all senses of that word). Rational response for a universe constantly under Chaos, but not exactly warm fuzzies.
Tatooine is a Rakata-blighted, Hutt-run, lawless litter box even by the marginal standards of the Star Wars universe. An incidental conversation in SWTOR sums it up nicely. A citizen in Anchorhead reports being robbed and wants to speak to the magistrate. the local militia guard just laughs. "We're a long way from Coruscant, pal. Got a problem with the locals? Pick up a blaster and do it yourself."
We also know this particular set of "locals" are violently xenophobic and absolutely unwilling to negotiate with anyone, even a Hutt's slave woman bought for her domestic labor and "freed" so her new owner could legally marry his slave. (Thank goodness the EU writers made this a lot less disturbing than what it looks like, given slave wives and bride buying are things in real life) They proceeded to slowly torture and brutalize her to death for weeks just for the lulz and if the women and children weren't in on it, they were totally fine with their menfolk and warriors DOING that.
This is not a universe that values light and life, no matter how much lip service Yoda and company give to the idea. There was no justice for Shmi.
And well? We got a different movie franchise where we cheer on a protagonist laying waste to an assassins guild and several crime cartels because some mobster's idiot son shot said protagonist's dog. Anakin had even less recourse for justice than John Wick did.
tbh i don’t think any aesthetic or fandom is inherently leftist. people will say “you can’t be goth/punk/emo/alt/whatever if you’re not a leftist!” and “how do conservative star trek fans exist?” and like. it’s simple. they’re literally just aesthetics and fandoms. there is nothing inherently leftist about dressing a certain way, or listening to certain music, or watching certain tv shows.
i think a lot of people want to believe that performing a certain aesthetic or being in a certain fandom makes you a better leftist, because they’re at least semi-aware that they aren’t doing enough. but instead of going out and trying to improve anything, they just reframe something they’re already doing as radical and leftist.
Also, a lot of right wingers are just amazingly obtuse. They can watch a show or sing along to a song with a heavy-handed message and just completely miss the point in a way that is staggering.
Like, Star Trek has historically included 100% intentional political content-- not very far leftist political content, but metaphors, allegories, morals, and casting choices that were meant to be progressive for their time. Participating in Star Trek fandom does not make you progressive or center-left, just like participating in Tolkien fandom does not make you a conservative Catholic. And if conservative dudes who love space lasers and hate "wokeness" were just going, "Jim Kirk is a badass. I don't care about all that diversity bullshit," they would be pretty much equal-and-opposite to progressive-leaning Tolkien fans. But no, every time a new Trek comes out, there's somebody going, "Keep politics out of Star Trek! Make Trek apolitical again, like it was when I was watching TOS/TNG/DS9!" They didn't just notice the message and disagree-- they apparently didn't pick up on it at all, even though Star Trek is not subtle. There are Republicans who will say that their favorite band is Rage Against The Machine, and instead of adding "I don't agree with their politics, but the music slaps," they'll claim that the band's early lyrics had no obvious political content, and not even seem to realize what an own goal it is to admit they missed that.
Star Trek has histoircally included a lot of stuff that would be considered very progressive for its day, but would be mainstream and middle-of-the-road today.
Also, you are literally the sort of person OP was talking about.
I think also that part of the issue with people arguing everything in Trek was left-wing is that... Not everything in trek was left-wing. Hell, if you described the major plot arcs in DS9 outside of Trek context A lot of people would start having 'issues' with it. Like, just as a meta-example...
The actual Son Of God comes to Not-Israel to help them after being oppressed by the bigoted fascists, and then has to work to keep the traumatized genocide survivors from constant civil war. The major foes are Fascists who've held control over the planet and consider it more theirs than the natives, and later Collectivist fascists who see people as interchangeable and spend all their time infiltrating groups to suborn them.
The Greedy Capitalists are trusted allies and comic relief, often critical help. The Plucky Underdogs have a chip on their shoulder. The local Fascist(2) Cop is a popular support, the Plucky Doctor is an arrogant Poonhound, the local representative of Fascists(1) is a conniving spy. The Son of God gets his hands dirty to win the war.
And when everything is said and done the Son of God beats up the Antichrist and ascends to Heaven, and all is right with the world!
Now, in 2026, do you think you'd be able to get away with a story like that?
Trek was a very "classic liberal" thing.Roddenberry himself? Genius and visionary who famously allowed fanfic as we know it to exist...and also a raging drunk pervert, serial womanizer, and walking "#MeToo" case.
There were some pretty far out leftie aspects, and attracted a lot of lefties because it was a future we wanted to live in (I knew about Judith Butler from her K/S fanfic before I knew she was this big figure in Gender Studies), but overall it had little to do with the current (TikTok era) flavor of leftie. Worf, for example, is not pulled aside every three minutes and scolded for toxic masculinity (though that would have been kinda funny).
They'll celebrate the rioting and violence in "Past Tense" but forget how "Past Prologue" and "Duet" showed how that righteous anger and thirst for blood destroys EVERYONE. Or how the Dominion's shapeshifters were oppressed by the "solids" and felt the only way they could be safe was to put EVERY OTHER life firmly under their heel. A lot of DS9 actually boiled down to "Revolutions are fun. The inevitable clean up? Not so much."
Oh my god I have it in my 1946 Lily Wallace New American Cookbook too I’m screaming
This is it! This is the white culture we’ve been looking for!
I’m sorry are we just not gonna mention “Beef Tea” “Raw Beef Tea” and “Cooked Raw Beef Tea” one after the other
#WHY
Because the majority of human existence has not been to the knowledge and supply level we are at now. You can’t just give someone electrolytes in the 19th century, you have no idea what the fuck they are. Someone is sick, and can only keep weak liquids down, but you know enough at this point to realise that man cannot live on water alone. So you work out really weird ways to infuse foodstuffs into liquids they can handle to try and keep food into them. A lot of these also come from a way to stretch nutrient sources in times of poverty and scarcity.
Thank you for this addition. People are curiously comfortable assuming everyone in the past was stupid and illogical, and it’s always struck me as showing a sad lack of empathy for fellow human beings. It’s like people in the past aren’t seen as, you know, people
Your local 19th century PhD researcher popping in here to add to this. Toast water is 100% a drink for treating illness. It turns up listed in several household medicine guides in the 19th century, and is listed as for treating people with fever, diarrhoea and vomiting, who can’t keep anything down. It’s essentially oral rehydration therapy.
It interestingly starts turning up in literature in the period covering five major cholera outbreaks in the UK and US (this was obviously an English language Ngram search).
And peaks several times at epidemic peak points (1830s, 1850, 1880s), including its first peak in 1831/2, which corresponds with the first cholera epidemic in the UK.
It also corresponds with the year William Brooke O’Shaughnessy discovered that a lot of people who were dying of cholera were severely lacking water and salts in their blood and urine. Dehydration was found to be a major cause of death in cholera patients. “Toast water” was suggested in the Lancet medical journal in 1832 as an initial treatment for cholera patients.
Most of the recipes in household medicine guides I found suggest sweetening or flavouring the toast water with something if the patient could keep it down in order to cover the terrible taste.
People in the past were just people. And in this particular case, they were trying to keep their loved ones from dying of cholera.
Yup. Recognized the book! Max Miller had a whole video on beef tea and its role as something given to the ailing. This is a page out of a household management book in the section for first aid.
Even today, toast is part of the BRAT (Bananas, Rice, Applesauce, Toast) diet for those suffering from food poisoning or other gastrointestinal issues as those are the foods that tend to be easiest to digest. Bananas and rice were not readily available in 1800s England, given neither will grow there. So, apples and toast are left. Someone suffering from food poisoning, cholera, or other life threatening gastrointestinal issues will also not be able to handle many spices (which get their flavor from compounds that are actually minor irritants), so food for the ailing has to be bland. This is hospital food. We've all or heard of (or had) hospital food.
Psychometry being an uncontrollable thing you're born with, has to be some sort of hell.
Like. If you use the restrooms, and you touch the toilet seat... what are you going to see exactly?
What about food untensils? Hell, what about food?
If you lay in the bed of an AirBnB, are you going to know somehting you wish you hadn't?
I get we want to give folks unique force abilities, but holy shit.
I know this was intended for Star Wars and a certain Q Vos...
But there was a character from one of my oldest fandoms (Galaxy Rangers 1986, which could be a bit SW adjacent, given several EU writers were involved) with this power, and oh, boy...
I should probably watch that series again and see if any fanfics went there.
poor Mission losing her home planet tho :(
love that Carth immediately thought of her
There is a fanon idea in KOTOR fic that Carth and Mission totally become dad and daughter and those stories are like my sugar cookies
like he 100% adopts her the dad energy is going off the charts
Carth desperately needs to be a dad. It made so much sense once I saw Dustil; Mission is almost the same age as his own son.
It also made sense when I heard the details about his home planet in KOTOR 2; the whole planet was the dump site for the redundant/unwanted children the Jedi took in as recruits but for one reason or another were not advanced to Padawan. These confused adolescents were essentially given a pink slip and a one way ticket to Telos to "seed the planet with farmers and laborers."
It looks like a good deal; low-risk, low status useful labor to support the Jedi and able to live more or less a normal life (able to have friendship and family) because colonies need a labor pool. It just gets a little messy on the details...like Force Sensitivity running in families and how much it has to suck to be one of these bewildered kids trained for a singular purpose all your life and then dumped out on the ass end of the Rim because you're no longer wanted.
So not only is Carth a bereaved father who sees a child the approximate age as his own missing son, but he comes from a planet that would develop a culture that centers around taking care of and integrating these abandoned children into their community, and the Sith took away that community along with his family.
this was insane honestly
Anyone catch the weird contrast that at nine years old, he was too old for the Jedi...and too young for the Sith?
The Jedi Path: A Manual for Students of the Force by Daniel Wallace
This really is indicative of the mindset that lead to Obi-Wan Kenobi which I discuss in my post: Obi-Wan’s Snobbery. How do you define “civilised?” If it does not conform to your cultural norms, does it automatically become uncivilised? Clearly, in the Old Republic they thought so. The Inner Rim represented the end of most “civilised” planets, because most worlds further out received less influence from the Core. They were useful only for their resources. If you aren’t from the Core, honey, you’re just not a part of “civilisation.” Seriously? It’s rooted in a lot of arrogance, the backlash from that helped destroy the Republic. A lot of Separatists were from angry Outer Rim worlds.
You can see Anakin’s shock and horror at such a passage about the limits of civilisation being written in a a guide for young Jedi, which suggests that it is a widely excepted belief. Wait, Naboo isn’t civilised? What about Tatooine? I mean, it’s not the fault of the citizens that the Hutts and their gangs run everything. The vast majority of the population are either Tusken, farmers, or enslaved. They don’t have the means to go up against the Hutts, and govern themselves as of yet, but does that mean that the people aren’t civilised? Don’t have a vibrant culture? Seriously? Imagine being an intelligent, ambitious, multi-lingual, talented, and insightful individual like Anakin, and being told “You’re not civilised.” What?!
What’s worse is that all of this is applicable to our world too. Cultural genocide? Colonialism? Imperialism? Cultural relativism? These should all be ringing bells. Just because a culture is different, it doesn’t become inferior. Just because, people are unable to access a better education, it doesn’t mean they’re stupid. Just because people wear different clothes, eat different food, use different utensils, use different weapons, have different beliefs, it doesn’t mean that they’re inferior. It just means that they have been shaped by a different way of life, informed by a different history, a different region, a different set of variables, different obstacles faced, exposure to different predators and prey. There are numerous details that influence the development of culture; it’s often rooted in practicality. Let’s be realistic, if Britain had been a hot, desert island, suits would not have become the norm for formal wear. They’d die of heat. Hence, other cultures are just as relevant as yours. No culture is perfect. Being different doesn’t give you an excuse to take over their resources and economy either, (which is basically why the Trade Federation has a viceroy. Hmmm…) You’re not better, because you’re from the Core. The Jedi/Core Worlders would have done well to remember that. A lot of us could, even me, and I wrote this article. Cultural arrogance is always something you have to guard against, I think, as it’s easier to think that what’s familiar is superior.
I’m quite shocked, not because I wouldn’t expect it from the Jedi (ha-ha-ha, definitely not), but because I’d never imagined to see it put so bluntly and overtly. I mean, whoever wrote this was willing to go to rather impressive lengths to show how the systematic indoctrination of Jedi younglings worked and where the cherry-picking do-gooder superiority complex took its origins (and to draw evident comparisons to our real world.)
Anyway, just, please. How bitterly hypocritical does that Qui-Gon’s comment sound? “Where the Jedi have a true purpose”, and then he ends up telling Shmi he hasn’t come to Tatooine to free slaves.
@thenstartsnow - What Qui-Gon's statement is giving is the same vibe as a scene from the pilot of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
Now, DS9 is a rusted out dump. A former mine processing station/labor internment/seat of Cardassian occupier power over the planet Bajor. The Federation and the former colonial occupiers cut a deal no one likes; the Federation cedes some of their colonies, which...yeah, goes badly. And the Cardassians trade them a few places they were leaving anyway - like Bajor.
And here comes their doctor. Julian is just out of medical school, very full of himself and really came out to middle of nowhere to hide a few secrets of his own. And he's in his new infirmary which pretty much looks like an apocalypse bunker after the zombies ran through. He's raving about how he looks forward to being the doctor here under such harsh conditions because "This is where heroes are made! Right here in the wilderness."
That earns him the most well-deserved dirty look ever because his guide is one of the locals, who spent since she was a child fighting for her homeland. "This wilderness is my home."
Julian has the grace to STFU by this point, but I'm not so sure Qui-Gon would do the same.
STAR WARS EPISODE III: REVENGE OF THE SITH (2005) dir. George Lucas
I love their acting here.
Padme´s eyes(Natalie Portman) tell everything about her fear of Anakin leaving her and her child because while they are married, their relationship looked more like an affair and once kids are involved everything is more complicated, they can´t hide them as they did their relationship, she feared Anakin was going to leave them behind because the cost to him, his reputation and Jedi career as a hero of the clone wars would be in jeopardy, not talking about her own position at the Senate.
Anakin(Hayden Christensen) eyes tell everything about his conffusion of this happening because he is just coming from a long period of war, he noticed her fear of him leaving her so he said the words he knew Padme needed to hear to know he loved her. He also is worried about what this means for them, for Padme as a Senator and him as a Jedi but he ends with that beautiful smile because he is ready to sacrifice his place with the Jedi Order and even his reputation to have this family with Padme.
It´s a beautiful moment between them as a couple.
Also re Padme’s fear/insecurity: When she married Anakin he was just an extreme talented, but controversial Padawan. Now, he is at the peak of his career. He’s a well-respected military leader and war hero. He just rescued the Chancellor and killed Count Dooku. He’s flying high.
Anakin has significantly more to lose when Padme tells him she’s pregnant than he ever did when they first married.
He still stands by her and their child(ren).
His reaction doesn’t just demonstrate that Anakin loves Padme and their family. It demonstrates what his values and priorities are: Love, loyalty, family, compassion.
Not ambition.
I love the combination of "We both wanted to be parents" and "Oh. Crap. We're gonna be parents." And I know we ranted on this before, but when your allegedly spiritual enlightenment path allows for rolls in the hay but not actual partnership...um...pretty sure Lucas hadn't thought about the issue of bastard kids or the gendered way that would play out.