A Futile Effort to Win a Lost Battle
A couple of days after last week’s post was published, I came across this quote in a tweet, and I think there has never been a quote more appropriate in the context of free will, or more appropriately what we perceive as free will. Also, one mustn’t argue with Einstein.
In 1931, Einstein, in response to questions about his belief in free will, said: “If the moon, in the act of completing its eternal way around the earth, were gifted with self-consciousness, it would feel thoroughly convinced that it was travelling its way of its own accord.”
Without spoiling any consequential detail of the plot, when the Enlightenment happens, if it does happen, the dilemma will not be about free will. It will not be about a mother’s choice of bringing a new life into the world as we know it – the good, the bad, and the ugly of it. It will nor be about the pain of forgetting the relationships we treasure neither will it be about the void thus created in our lives as we live today. Because at the end of the day, in the post-enlightenment time the life we will live will be devoid of the knowledge of the past. Our brains will be pure, blank, and ready to learn in the new reality, or at least that’s the goal.
Let me not get ahead of myself and spill my thoughts without bringing you, the readers, up to a reasonable understanding of Enlightenment. There will be minor spoilers, but since I am talking about a past season of a rather famous TV show, I will assume that you wouldn’t mind the small details. If you do, then I would suggest revisiting this post once you manage the time to binge through 23 episodes of season four of the series. You only need to Netflix and chill.
The Thinker, one of the Flash’s more formidable enemy who has the power of thinking through every possible path between the two points on the timeline and identifies the most likely outcome. Since thinking is no bar, he could piece together a series of such outcomes and predict the future with high accuracy. Unfortunately, he is also a psychological maniac whose view of this world is tainted by the bad he sees in everyone. Pardon my digression for a moment, but the strange irony, as is with all the villains, is that the logical mind that can proof Riemann hypothesis and assess all the possible outcomes of an event, cannot see the humane part in humankind. Anyway, the supervillain wants to rid this world of everything that, according to him, is an obstacle to the progress of humanity. His solution is to reset everyone’s brains back to simpler times when our species was more willing to learn and evolve than to waste time on technology. And he would be there to teach the willing. The collateral damage was that the reset is not a selective reset which means existing knowledge, knowledge of the past, language, relationship, science, history – everything would be gone with one wave of the magic wand.
The hope is that, in erasing everything that defines us today as not only individuals, but also as a society, and restarting from the basics, the future would be different in the most positive ways.
The adage that comes in mind, in this case, is “History repeats itself.” Technically speaking, by the denotation of the word “repeat,” it doesn’t. However, when we take the word metaphorically or consider the connotation, it does. The overarching patterns and stories repeat. If those didn’t, we wouldn’t have been able to study them to the detail we have thus far. That is to say that no matter how far back we go and retry to establish our history on a different path, like an alternate universe, the most significant issues and effects will manifest in some form or shape which will bring us back to the state that the Thinker was trying to rectify in the first place. We have seen it happen in front of eyes. The racism, slavery, civil war, war, poverty, colonialism, sexism, each have repeated in a different form following an eradication effort. The thing is, our astonishing shortsightedness and greed will follow us to any path we take which will eventually manifest as effects the Thinker is trying to tackle.
Call me a pessimist, but no matter how far back we go, or by virtue of “free will” how many ever different paths we take, the defining milestones in human history will repeat itself. Those will be studied, documented and presented as lessons that, like today’s us, will fail to heed. So, if the Thinker with his mad plan, manages to take the people of this planet back to the time of the cave people, he although would have achieved the intended outcome, yet would have spectacularly failed at achieving the perfect humankind he was dreaming. Because eventually, our basic instincts would have brought us to where we are today albeit in a distinctly different way but a similar destination nonetheless. Then what is the point of going through the elaborate plan, and waste precious power in a futile effort? At the end of the day, then, the debate mustn’t be around the much-celebrated concept of “free will,” but the worthiness of the cause, and the path taken to advance the cause. Pardon my blunt summarization, but to me, it seems like a colossal waste of time and effort.
Read the other part of this Duolog(ue).
Is our advancing IQ and the resultant technology the cause of humankind’s problems? Are we incapable of using the technological advancements for the good of humanity? Albert Einstein famously quoted that "technological advancement is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."