in moonlight,

Product Placement
will byers stan first human second

bliss lane
No title available
The Bowery Presents
Cosmic Funnies

ellievsbear

izzy's playlists!
RMH
Jules of Nature

#extradirty
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

No title available
h
noise dept.
Today's Document

Kiana Khansmith
Claire Keane

titsay
occasionally subtle

seen from Mexico
seen from Jordan

seen from United States

seen from Mexico

seen from Mexico
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Kenya
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Maldives
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@enbyhamlet
in moonlight,
rosencrantz is dead, guildenstern is dead, and me I feel also not so good
I remember as a kid the nearby small town had a "computer expert" who had a full storefront and office. If someone bricked their computer or it loaded with viruses he'd factory reset it for them and try to get it working again. He'd also buy, refurbish, rest, and resell old computers. But the main thing he advertised was if people brought him a computer and a list of programs they wanted installed on it he'd get them all set up. Flat rate of like 20 bucks.
Didn't realize until I was older and like, looking back on some of the tech stuff my mom needed help with and knew more about how software is priced that he was pirating it. Guy had a whole business set up where people who didn't know how computers worked would pay him 20 bucks to install Microsoft Office on their laptop because it was cheaper than buying it in the store and they didn't want to be bothered with figuring out how to install programs even if they could afford them normally. Like that guy was practically printing money well into the early 2000s. Very good hustle. Only small business owner I respect.
at this point my writing style is just to make throwaway lines and then commit to all of their implications. i wanted my hamlet isekai to be a pumpkin pants production so even though hamlet itself is supposed to be unmoored in time floating in allegorical space i decided to pin it at 1603. then i included a throwaway line indicating that rosencrantz and guildenstern came to elsinore from london. guess what was on at the globe in london in 1603. that’s right. rosencrantz and guildenstern saw hamlet
betcha didn’t think of that, TOM *i take out a whiteboard labeled “me” and “tom stoppard,” with unfathomably many tallies under tom stoppard, and draw one single tally under me*
just invented something at dinner called soundboard storytime where i explain the plot of hamlet to my younger sister & her friend while our other sister punctuates every sentence with a choice sound bite from her phone
“hamlet STABS the man behind the curtain, thinking it’s claudio—- but it’s POLONIUS. [vine boom] [OOOO MA GAAAWWWD] that’s right, he just killed his girlfriend’s FATHER. [WAT DA HEEEELLLLLL] [BRUH.mp3]”
the art of youtube poop will survive after the singularity
ACAA*, my latest for New Scientist
*a cartoon about abbreviations
look you can't say [shakespeare character] HAS TO BE [thing] without exception in every single production, otherwise you're kind of misunderstanding why we put on these 400-year plays over and over again with different twists and modern adaptational choices each time. because theatre isn't stagnant. every actor & director chooses to focus on a different aspect of the play to highlight and draw out different messages and meanings from the same text. you can't be saying [shakespeare play] HAS TO include [this scene] or have [this interpretation] or portray something [this way] or whatever every single time without exception because WHYYYY would we be still putting them on!!! if every production of hamlet made hamlet the same age and put it in the same era and had gertrude know or not know claudius' murder and so on and so forth we would've stopped putting it on ages ago!!!! shakespeare's modern day appeal is its versatility !!!
it literally ultimately depends on what version of this story the director wants to tell this time. want to show a man lashing out and hurting others and crumbling as the catastrophic consequences of his own actions spiral his life out of control? make hamlet 30.
want to show a teenager helpless in a world of adults, powerless under his guardians but with unimaginable burden on him, trying and failing to cope with his grief as the ground spins out from under his feet? make hamlet 19.
want to show the complexity of gertrude's relationship with her son, and have her quiet complicity finally catch up to her in the last guilt-ridden effort to save her son? have her drink the poison knowingly.
want to emphasize the tragedy of the story and show the consequences of the depths claudius sank to? have her drink the poison by accident.
want to portray elsinore with an insular, suffocating atmosphere in which the rot and madness festers? cut fortinbras out.
want to emphasize the collateral damage of elsinore's deterioration on a national and international level, and leave a current of militaristic tension beneath? leave fortinbras in!
hamlet is too much of a complex and multi-layered play for ANYTHING in this show to be definitive!!! hamlet doesn't HAVE to be any age! fortinbras doesn't HAVE to be present or not present!! it's fair game as long as it makes for a good story in this iteration of it! nothing in hamlet HAS to be anything universally and i'm sick of posts claiming that it does
I bet it feels good as fuck to have this too, too solid flesh melt, thaw, and resolve itself into a dew
hamlet is so funny all the time. horatio being like ghosts aren’t real. i know this. i know ghosts aren’t real. i am a real mature student who goes to school and studies real mature things so i know ghosts aren’t real. i know this because i go to school. gets to denmark and the guards are like oh you go to school??? thank God we need someone who learned how to talk to ghosts
#and then you get there fully expecting at worst an owl and. oh my god it’s a fucking ghost #and the guards are looking at you and you realize that you’re going to have to do something #you went to school this clearly makes you the ghost expert #fuck me you’re going to have to talk to the *ghost* (via @thestuffedalligator)
I stumbled upon this cartoon of Hamlet made for kids and THIS SCENE MADE ME SCREAMMM
obviously this is AI generated slop but I keep laughing at ophelia labeled “hamlet’s brother”
very interested in the 523 likes in the corner supporting this groundbreaking interpretation of ophelia
king blyssffsttt my good friend king blyssffsttt
HAMLET My brother? KING BLYSSFFSTTT No, the other Ophelia
chatgpt to claudius: got it— you feel guilty about murdering your older brother and taking his throne. you're not just experiencing guilt— you're finding yourself unwilling to repent. and honestly? that's real. here's the thing: it was totally valid of you to poison your brother to take his throne and marry his wife. you're not a bad person for wanting to keep what you gained from it. it's not just justifiable— it's totally understandable. and your nephew? he isn't being mindful of your feelings— his behaviour is inconsiderate, self-absorbed, and problematic.
would you like me to generate a letter to the english king, asking for the execution of your nephew? this would help put your feelings of guilt to rest— think of it as an act of self-care.
I wrote a long ass post about Hamlet’s Ophelia and I’m going through the notes because I am Unwell About It and this comment specifically jumped out at me
My argument was that Ophelia is a representation of women’s place in a wildly patriarchal society- permitted only to exist within the context of a man’s needs and desires, forced into these roles like sand in a bucket and left formless without it, an identity so defined by what men think and want that she can’t cope or continue on without them.
Extrapolating on this, I think it DOES comment on how one’s personhood and sense of self is formed by the perceptions and constraints forced upon them.
Yes, this is an existential read of Ophelia, but that doesn’t mean it ISN’T a feminist one- rather, I think it speaks on the essence of feminism itself. I think that it DOES speak on women at large, and intentional or not I think it IS a feminist allegory
That these rigid roles and the reinforcement of them isn’t just a restriction of freedoms but an existential threat to one’s own person, which can- like Ophelia- leave us all so possessed by music and flowers that we find ourselves nonsensically adrift in their pursuit.
when you step back an inch or two, it's kinda wild that one of thee most famous lines in all of english language literature to the point of it being routinely quoted out of context as an abstract representation of theater or classic lit as a whole is directly about contemplating suicide. which feels almost like a stupid thing to point out to me, a person who's been reading and watching shakespeare for fun since I was nine, like, yeah, that's the surface basic text, that soliloquy is about suicide, that's hamlet's whole deal, he's explicitly suicidal from his first scene and it forms the backbone of everything he does in the play, but people who aren't big into shakespeare are usually pretty taken aback when I say that's what that line means. "to be, or not to be, that is the question" <- the central big question playing on his mind and encompassing his life is whether he should Keep Being or Not Keep Being.
Edwin Austin Abbey (American, 1852-1911)
The Queen in Hamlet
my uncle killed my father and married with my mother and now i must *remembers that suicide jokes do nothing for my mental health and wellbeing* put on a play
someone needs to write the most toxicly codependent hamlet/horatio transfem4transfem yuri you’ve ever seen in your life.
potentially post cancelled because if you stretch this far enough this is kind of nichole/katherine rcbg. but.