Sometimes I’m looking for something online - often “how to” articles - and I want to filter for - like - a website that was clearly built in 2010 at the latest, which may or may not have been updated since then, but contains a vast wealth of information on one topic, painstakingly organized by an unknown legend in the field with decades’ worth of experience.
I don’t want a listicle with a nice stolen picture in a slideshow format written by a content aggregator that God forgot. I want hand-drawn diagrams by some genius professor who doesn’t understand SEO at all, but understands making stir-fries or raising stick insects better than anyone else on this earth. I don’t know what search settings to put into Google to get this.
search.marginalia.nu is the search engine you want!
The search engine calculates a score that aggressively favors text-heavy websites, and punishes those that have too many modern web design features.
This is in a sense the opposite of what most major search engines do, they favor modern websites over old-looking ones. Most links you find here will be nearly impossible to find on a regular search engine, as they aren’t sufficiently search engine optimized.
“It is a search engine, designed to help you find what you didn’t even know you were looking for. If you search for “Plato”, you might for example end up at the Canterbury Tales. Go looking for the Canterbury Tales, and you may stumble upon Neil Gaiman’s blog.
If you are looking for fact, this is almost certainly the wrong tool. If you are looking for serendipity, you’re on the right track. When was the last time you just stumbled onto something interesting, by the way?
I don’t expect this will be the next “big” search engine. This is and will remain a niche tool for a niche audience.“
i clicked around for a few minutes searching various things and I now have two fourteenth century pie crust recipes and an apple filling recipe i want to try, so thanks!
it has been twenty minutes and I am deeply in love with this search engine.
INCREDIBLE. I *do* want to know how to test Windows 95 for Y2K Compliance and I am glad that someone is still hosting step by step instructions for that.
tl;dr: search.marginalia.nu for the old or old looking and just plain serendipitous stuff that google or Duck duck go are gonna not find/bury on the 20th page. For perfectly good reasons, but …
My absolute favorite part of having made this post - other than causing people to be introduced to this site - are the people in the tags/comments talking about their interests and stuff they found about their hobbies.
Good luck out there surfing the cyberweb, you crazy cats. I love the shoelace website too - Ian’s Shoelace Site [link], unless there’s another. My personal favorite old-school site is Alysion’s string figure collection [link].
[Description: a looping bouncy animation of grace and Rocky from project hail mary. Grace throws himself onto rocky for a hug, smiling and nuzzling his face to the top of Rocky's xenonite covered carapace. Rocky brings a claw up to ruffle Grace's hair and grace throws himself even more on top of rocky, rocky wrapping his arms around grace. End description.]
Restricting food Does Stuff To Your Brain. "Restricting" doesn't mean stopping when you're full. I feel like this is what gets misunderstood a lot. It means placing rules and limits on food that supercede what your body is signalling that it wants. Let's use cookies as an example. Restricting would be:
- I can only have cookies when I deserve them.
- I can only have cookies when I'm alone.
- I can only have two cookies.
- I can only have low-calorie cookies.
- I can only have cookies on set days, or so-called cheat days.
- I can't have cookies.
- I can't have cookies in the house.
- I'm bad when I eat cookies.
- Cookies are a bad food and I must compensate for having eaten them.
Whether or not you stick to the restrictions you set, your brain is learning to be an anxious mess around cookies. It might want to avoid anywhere that has cookies. It might feel shame for wanting or eating cookies. It might get exhausted from suppressing the craving and decide to binge. It might go into binge mode every time you eat cookies because you've taught your body that This Will Not Be Available Whenever. It might feel ridiculously important to eat all the cookies while you can.
I know we're all so used to constantly talking about food, diets, weight and bodies, and it's completely normalised to look at absolutely everything you eat and assign it the level of guilt you're gonna feel for eating it, and to brag about not eating this and that, and to announce that you know it's a Naughty Indulgence when you eat anything sweet.
But oh my god, it's such a huge weight off your shoulders to just let yourself eat cookies because you wanted cookies and stop when you feel satiated and know that the cookies will be available next time you want cookies because you don't need to earn them in any way. Because a brain that knows it can have cookies whenever it wants cookies, doesn't crave cookies all the time. Nor does it feel any self-loathing when it does crave cookies.
And I just wish everyone a very chill brain and some cookies
"This week I discovered the same pattern, executed by Google. Google Chrome is reaching into users' machines and writing a 4 GB on-device AI model file to disk without asking."
Google Chrome is downloading a 4 GB Gemini Nano model onto users' machines without consent, with no opt-in, no opt-out short of enterprise t
Y'all for real please do these. Even if you're certain your posture doesn't suck. One day you will wake up with impinged shoulder pain like I did and let me tell you it fucking HURTS. Do these exercises even just once a week and it will make such a difference. Especially my fellow creatives out there, stop shrimping over your work and go do these right now. RIGHT NOW.
Also, if you’re even a little concerned about getting a hump or having trouble standing fully upright in your old age, this is how you prevent that. If you want to be up and about when you’re old you have to start when you’re younger. And keep in mind there is no bad time to start and it’s never too late. Starting today is way better than never starting at all.
Japanese is an incredibly fun and rewarding language (if you’ve ever wanted to learn it for ANY reason, most importantly including the “silly” reasons) but the fearmongering and capitalist intervention involved in the language learning process have given it a reputation as an “impossible task” for English speakers, leading to confusion and dkn learners and weird pessimist attitudes about the whole thing. In this thread I will explain how to effectively learn and retain Japanese. This is a tried, tested and true method; probably 99% of all people who try to learn Japanese give up, but everyone I’ve met who has tried and stuck with this has been at or above N3-N4 after 6 months or less including me
You can teach yourself Japanese for free if you have a little free time every day and a computer
1. Drill yourself on hiragana and katakana. These are the phonetic building blocks of Japanese, think of them as equivalent to english letters. This site is a good resource in general. Once you have a solid grasp on this, DO NOT LINGER HERE; move to step 2. You will master kana later.
2. Download Anki. This is a flashcard service. They have a paid app if you’re willing to invest for it, but if not, they have a mobile website (create an account and sync it with your computer).
This is the deck you’re going to download. Import it to Anki and do this every day. I have learned the hard way (twice) that skipping this is bad. If you become overwhelmed, you can change the number of new cards and reviews by clicking the cog next to the name of the deck!
3. Cure Dolly (Youtube, grammar) + transcript. She has kind of a posh accent, you might want to turn subtitles on. Watch a few videos when you feel like it but most importantly set up 4 and 5 as soon as possible
4. Yomitan (must have) is a browser extension that functions as a pop-up dictionary. you need to install dictionaries for it to work. here are some dictionaries you can use with yomitan and explanations of what they do
5. READ. DO NOT LET YOURSELF GET STUCK BEFORE THIS STEP. JUST READ!!!! Most people who fail to learn Japanese do so because they are afraid of not being ready to move on, which is counterproductive. Just read. When you were a child did you spend years on vocab and grammar before reading? No I bet you did not. Pick something to read and learn what you don’t already know by reading in Japanese.
Jiten.moe has a list of novels and visual novels that you can read on your computer sorted by difficulty. So does jpdb. There’s also this document. There’s also this document. Hey look this website is cool too
For visual novels: download LunaHook. It “hooks” to your VN and allows you to use Yomitan on words you don’t know. Turn off the translation feature, it does nothing to help you learn
For literary texts: ttsu e-reader supports epub and htmlz files.
You can also learn Japanese by watching anime, but it’s a little more convoluted and requires a lot more patience.
For manga, utilize Mangatan, but I don’t recommend this right out the gate because when you’re first learning sentence structure you’ll want something with complete sentences.
Set your computer up for mining vocab before you start reading. Once you finish your kaishi deck, you can drill your mining cards (I didn’t do mine until after finishing kaishi because it was too much).
Most importantly: reading is going to be hard at first. It is going to piss you off. You need to muscle through with this because this is where the bulk of your learning will happen. After a while you will just feel like reading because you love reading! Try not to pick something too hard for your first read, but if you’re interested in the story you might be able to muscle through something a little tougher.
Remember to consult yomitan and cure dolly where needed, that’s what it’s there for. As you can see I am quite normal about the Japanese language, so if you have any other questions or need help with anything else feel free to shoot me an ask and I will get back to you promptly. Japanese is not your enemy and it is not impossible. It is your friend
Wanikani (GREAT kanji-learning system! A massive chunk is free - trust me, if you manage to make it through all the free content, it will be worth it to continue, and if you can't/don't then you still have a good foundation!)
Lorenzi's Jisho (JP-EN dictionary, can interface with Anki flashcards)
According to the CDC, in 10 percent of those drownings, the adult will actually watch the child do it, having no idea it is happening. Drowning does not look like drowning—Dr. Pia, in an article in the Coast Guard’s On Scene magazine, described the Instinctive Drowning Response like this:
“Except in rare circumstances, drowning people are physiologically unable to call out for help. The respiratory system was designed for breathing. Speech is the secondary or overlaid function. Breathing must be fulfilled before speech occurs.
Drowning people’s mouths alternately sink below and reappear above the surface of the water. The mouths of drowning people are not above the surface of the water long enough for them to exhale, inhale, and call out for help. When the drowning people’s mouths are above the surface, they exhale and inhale quickly as their mouths start to sink below the surface of the water.
Drowning people cannot wave for help. Nature instinctively forces them to extend their arms laterally and press down on the water’s surface. Pressing down on the surface of the water permits drowning people to leverage their bodies so they can lift their mouths out of the water to breathe.
Throughout the Instinctive Drowning Response, drowning people cannot voluntarily control their arm movements. Physiologically, drowning people who are struggling on the surface of the water cannot stop drowning and perform voluntary movements such as waving for help, moving toward a rescuer, or reaching out for a piece of rescue equipment.
From beginning to end of the Instinctive Drowning Response people’s bodies remain upright in the water, with no evidence of a supporting kick. Unless rescued by a trained lifeguard, these drowning people can only struggle on the surface of the water from 20 to 60 seconds before submersion occurs.”
This doesn’t mean that a person that is yelling for help and thrashing isn’t in real trouble—they are experiencing aquatic distress. Not always present before the Instinctive Drowning Response, aquatic distress doesn’t last long—but unlike true drowning, these victims can still assist in their own rescue. They can grab lifelines, throw rings, etc.
Look for these other signs of drowning when persons are in the water:
Head low in the water, mouth at water level
Head tilted back with mouth open
Eyes glassy and empty, unable to focus
Eyes closed
Hair over forehead or eyes
Not using legs—vertical
Hyperventilating or gasping
Trying to swim in a particular direction but not making headway
Trying to roll over on the back
Appear to be climbing an invisible ladder
So if a crew member falls overboard and everything looks OK—don’t be too sure. Sometimes the most common indication that someone is drowning is that they don’t look like they’re drowning. They may just look like they are treading water and looking up at the deck. One way to be sure? Ask them, “Are you all right?” If they can answer at all—they probably are. If they return a blank stare, you may have less than 30 seconds to get to them. And parents—children playing in the water make noise. When they get quiet, you get to them and find out why.
Can I just say thank you to OP for putting such a detailed description on this?
I’ve been a lifeguard for 6 years now and of all the saves I’ve done, maybe two or three had people drowning in the stereotypical thrashing style. And even those, like the save I made last weekend, it was exactly like OP describes where the person’s head is going in and out of the water but it isn’t long enough to get any air. Mostly you recognize drowning by the look on someone’s face. If someone looks wide eyed and terrified or confused, chances are they’re drowning. That look of “oh shit” is pretty easily recognizable. And even if you can’t tell for sure: GO AFTER THEM ANYWAY. I’ve done “saves” where a kid was pretending to drown and I mistook it for real drowning, but that’s preferable to a kid ACTUALLY drowning.
Also please remember that even strong swimmers can drown if they have a medical emergency, get cramps, or get too tired. If your friend knows how to swim but they’re acting funny get them to land. And even if someone can respond when you ask them if they need help, if they say they do need help? GO HELP THEM.
However . If the victim is a stranger, I can’t recommend trying to get them. Lifeguards literally train to escape “attacks,” because people who are drowning can freak the fuck out and grab you and make YOU drown as well. If you do go in after someone, take hold of them from the back and talk to them the whole time. IF YOU ARE GRABBED: duck down into the water as low as you can get. The person is panicking and won’t want to go under water and should release you. Shove up at their hands and push them away from you as you duck under. Don’t die trying to save someone else.
Please guys, read and memorize this post. Not all places have lifeguards. Being able to recognize drowning is such an important skill to have and you can save someone’s life.
In a water park once, I was suddenly grabbed by a child and he dragged me under the water without warning. I was going to get angry with him when I resurfaced because I thought he was being an ass, until I looked at him go back in and out hyperventilating the entire time. I grabbed him under his arms and began trying to drag him out while screaming for the lifeguard.
When the lifeguard got us both out, a woman came running down and accused me of harming him and said he had been completely fine in the water. That there was no reason to drag him out of there. The lifeguard had to explain to her that her son had been drowning, to which her response was to say that she didn’t hear him call for help.
“I always remember having this fight with a random dude who claimed that ‘straight white men’ were the only true innovators. His prime example for this was the computer… the computer… THE COMPUTER!!! THE COM-PU-TER!!!
Alan Turing - Gay man and ‘father of computing’ Wren operating Bombe - The code cracking computers of the 2nd world war were entirely run by women Katherine Johnson - African American NASA mathematician and ‘Human computer’ Ada Lovelace - arguably the 1st computer programmer”
- Sacha Coward
Also Margaret Hamilton - NASA computer scientist who put the first man on the moon - an as-yet-unmatched feet of software engineering, here pictured beside the full source of that computer programme. #myhero
Grace Hopper - the woman that coined the term “bug”
Grace Hopper did more than coin the term “bug”. She invented the first program linker in the early 1950s, for the UNIVAC I. A program linker translates instructions from one language to another (for example, numerical codes that represent instructions translated to machine code that computers can read), which is the very foundation of how computer’s operate independently. she also pulled a steve rogers and tried to enlist in the military a bunch of times and was denied. then, an exception was made for her when she joined the navy reserves, and she ended up serving for over 40 years (half of which was active duty). she retired from the navy Rear Admiral Grace Hopper. she was born in NYC in 1906. Grace Hopper was a fucking badass.
also computing was typically a job for women (many of whom were black women that made incredible contributions) back in the day, so it’s absolutely fucking wild that straight white men think they are the foundation of computer innovation. men PUSHED women out and took the credit.
Also, just about every computerized device outside of desktops is running ARM chips now. Your phone, your keyboard, your car, your watch. Basically everything.
And ARM was primarily designed by Sophie Wilson, a trans woman.
Also gotta throw on Lynn Conway, whose work brought about VSLI [Very Large Scale Integration] in chip design in the early 80s. Basically all modern microelectronics depends on Conway’s work, which got logic gates on a single chip up from thousands to millions.
BTW all of this was after IBM fired her in 68 for disclosing she wanted to transition. They apologized in 2020.
School assignment was about playing with the formatting of text while writing so I did what I always do and made it about living with anxiety and depression baybeeeeeeee
Anyway now I have something to show people who are blessed enough to not deal with this and maybe they’ll get it!!!!
Attraction Types, Aspec Identities, & Other Orientations
[PT: Attraction Types, Aspec Identities, & Other Orientations.]
(Check out sex & gender terms here [link], gendered attraction terms here [link], and relationship orientations here [link.])
---
Attraction Types
[PT: Attraction types.]
Social Attraction: An umbrella term for any attraction that is social in nature. What is considered under this umbrella is up for personal interpretation, but oftentimes it includes platonic and familial attraction.
Emotional Attraction: An umbrella term for any attraction that is emotional in nature. What is considered under this umbrella is up to personal interpretation, but oftentimes it includes platonic, familial, romantic, queerplatonic, and alterous attraction.
Platonic Attraction: A platonic desire for someone/something. What is considered "platonic" varies from culture to culture, however it typically includes desires such as sharing hobbies, sharing emotions, and oftentimes some degree of physical touch (though that is not always necessary.) It is often described as "a desire for companionship." The platonic desire for someone/something is a Squish (ie; "I have a squish on Dustin.")
A Passionate Friendship/Affectionate Friendship is a platonic relationship that holds a high level of commitment and/or energy, and is ranked towards the top of an individual's personal relationship tier list. The platonic partner of someone with a passionate friendship is called a PF. The desire for a passionate friendship with someone/something is a Pash. Some people consider passionate friendships to be QPRs.
Familial Attraction: A familial desire for someone/something. What is considered "familial" varies from culture to culture, however it typically includes similar desires to platonic attraction, except it usually has more focus around starting traditions and sharing assets. Familial attraction is not limited to blood/legal relatives, nor is it necessarily always felt towards blood/legal relatives either.
Romantic Attraction: A romantic desire for someone/something. What is considered "romantic" varies from culture to culture/person to person, however it typically includes desires such as sharing hobbies, sharing emotions, having dates, potentially living together/sharing assets, potentially marriage/legal partnership, potentially starting a family together, and/or intimate physical or emotional interactions that the person would not be comfortable doing with people they have non-romantic feelings for. The romantic desire for someone/something is a Crush.
People with romantic attraction often have physical sensations around their crushes. This might include fuzzy/tingling feelings in the stomach or chest, heart-racing or heart-pounding, feelings of warmth in the stomach/chest or neck/face/shoulders, goosebumps or an electric feeling when touched by them, difficulty breathing (or an easier time breathing around them), and lightheadedness.
They may also have emotional responses to being around their crush, such as increased anxiety in comparison to when they are around non-crushes (typically worries of embarrassing themself, seeming weird, or offending their crush) or lessened anxiety/a feeling of ease and comfortability they don't experience around non-crushes.
A Soft Romo is a romantic relationship that holds a low level of commitment and/or energy, and is treated rather casually. The desire for a soft romo with someone/something is a Fluff.
Queerplatonic Attraction: A queerplatonic desire for someone/something. “Queerplatonic” generally describes attraction that is intensely platonic with traditionally romantic qualities (while having no romantic attraction involved), or somewhere in-between romantic and platonic attraction. A queerplatonic relationship is often called a QPR. The queerplatonic partner of someone is sometimes called a Marshmallow/Mellowfriend or Zucchini. The queerplatonic desire for someone/something is a Squish, Squash, Plush, or Crish.
Alterous Attraction: An alterous desire for someone/something. “Alterous” generally describes a deep emotional attraction that is not distinctly romantic or platonic, but from an outside lens is misinterpreted in that way. Sometimes queerplatonic attraction is considered to be under the alterous umbrella, however alterous attraction can also describe emotional attraction that is completely disconnected from platonic and romantic attraction whatsoever. The alterous desire for someone/something is a Mesh or Hush.
Physical Attraction: An umbrella term for any attraction that is physical in nature. This includes aesthetic, sensual, and sexual attraction.
Aesthetic Attraction: An aesthetic desire for someone/something. “Aesthetic” (in this context) generally describes a person’s physical characteristics (hair, eyes, shape, voice, etc), a person’s presentation (fashion, hairstyle, etc), and/or how a person carries themself (body language, “vibe”, etc.) The aesthetic desire for someone/something is a Swish or Thete.
Sensual Attraction: A sensual desire for someone/something. “Sensual” generally describes non-sexual physical touch, however it can also include voice and scent. A sensual relationship is often called a Senseship. The sensual desire for someone/something is a Lush.
Sexual Attraction: A sexual desire for someone/something. This generally includes a desire for touching/groping and/or enacting kinks/fetishes that provide sexual pleasure. A purely sexual relationship is often called an Intimaship, while a sexual & platonic relationship is often called a Casual Relationship/Friends With Benefits.
Libido describes a body’s physical desire for sex. This differs from sexual attraction, because sexual attraction is directed at someone/something, meanwhile libido is the body craving sexual release. Libido and sexual attraction can align for people who experience both, however they can also occur unaligned.
Allolibidoist/Normolibidoist describes a person who experiences regular spikes in their libido. Hyperlibidoist describes a person who experiences more spikes in their libido than most other people. Hypolibidoist describes a person who rarely experiences spikes in their libido, or whose libido spikes are dull and don’t last very long. Non-Libidoist describes a person who has no libido.
Sexual Arousal describes the body’s physical response to touch in a sexually sensitive area, or the body’s physical response to sexual attraction or libido. This includes genital arousal (wetness, erections, heat, etc), and/or physical responsiveness elsewhere in the body (ie; blushing.) A person can experience sexual arousal while not experiencing sexual attraction or a libido spike (ie; a person who is accidentally touched on their crotch may grow aroused, even if they do not find the person who touched them to be attractive.) Arousal is not the same as desire, as a person can be aroused and distressed or uncomfortable by their arousal.
Waveric Attraction/Waverous Attraction/Fluidic Attraction: A fluid desire for someone/something. For example, a person who feels platonic attraction towards someone one day, and romantic attraction towards them the next. The waveric desire for someone/something is called a Wish.
Nonrose Attraction: An umbrella term for any attraction that is not romantic or sexual ("ro" being for romance, and "se" being for sexual attraction.)
Loveless: A person who feels disconnected to the word “love”, and wishes to describe their enjoyment or attachment towards things with other words (ie; appreciation, admiration, connection, etc) or with no words at all. This could be due to neurodivergence, feeling rejected by the culture surrounding love, etc. Heartless is a similar term, describing a person who feels disconnected from love and romance.
Attraction Stances: A collection of terms to describe how a person feels about attraction-based experiences/actions. The stances are generally sorted into five categories - favorable, indifferent, averse, repulsed, and ambivalent.
In terms of experiences/actions, it is generally sorted into the following categories - social, emotional, friendship/plato (platonic attraction), family, romance, queerplatonic, alterous, physical, look (aesthetic attraction), touch (sensual attraction), and sex.
A person's stances may sometimes change over time, either randomly or due to psychological exploration and/or traumatic experiences.
-Favorable describes a person who has positive feelings towards the experience/actions. For example, a friendship-favorable person enjoys platonic interactions.
-Indifferent/-Neutral describes a person who has neutral feelings towards the experiences/actions. For example, a look-indifferent person who has no strong feelings about aesthetic attraction.
-Averse describes a person who experiences personal dislike towards the experience/actions, but not necessarily dislike towards it as a concept. For example, a sex-averse person who dislikes the idea of being in a sexual setting (ie; strip club), but doesn’t mind hearing about other people’s experiences there.
-Repulsed describes a person who experiences repulsion towards the experiences/actions, often to a point where they feel physical distress (anxiety, nausea, etc) at even the concept. For example, a romance-repulsed person who feels visceral discomfort at romantic actions, even when it's exchanged between other people.
-Ambivalent describes a person who experiences complicated or fluid feelings towards the experiences/actions. For example, a touch-ambivalent person who feels extreme discomfort towards touch sometimes, while seeking out touch other times.
---
Aspec Identities & Other Orientations
[PT: Aspec Identities & other Orientations]
Allo-: A person who experiences regular, strong levels of attraction. Allo- people feel attraction in either a burst of attraction (ie; instant sexual attraction) or a gradual progression (ie; progressively experiencing more and more social desire for someone), and the attraction levels do not dissipate unless they are experiencing personal unfulfillment (ie; an alloromantic person whose partner is not making time for them resulting in a loss of romantic feelings, an alloplatonic person whose friend is growing apart in life, etc.) Allo- people do not require deep connections to develop the initial attraction, however they may require a deeper connection in order for that attraction to remain.
Asocial (Aso): A person that does not experience allotypical social attraction. Bold Stripe Asocial describes a person who feels no social attraction whatsoever. Bold stripe asocials can have any attraction stance, including being socially-favorable. The Asocial Spectrum (Aso-Spec/Asospec) describes people who are asocial and/or greysocial, though it may also sometimes include allosocial people who are socially-indifferent, socially-averse, socially-repulsed, and/or socially-ambivalent.
Aemotional (Aemo): A person that does not experience allotypical emotional attraction. Bold Stripe Aemotional describes a person who feels no emotional attraction whatsoever. Bold stripe aemotionals can have any attraction stance, including being emotionally-favorable. The Aemotional Spectrum (Aemo-Spec/Aemospec) describes people who are aemotional and/or greyemotional, though it may also sometimes include alloemotional people who are emotionally-indifferent, emotionally-averse, emotionally-repulsed, and/or emotionally-ambivalent.
Aplatonic (Apl): A person that does not experience allotypical platonic attraction. Bold Stripe Aplatonic describes a person who feels no platonic attraction whatsoever. Bold stripe aplatonics can have any attraction stance, including being friendship-favorable. The Aplatonic Spectrum (Apl-Spec/Aplspec) describes people who are aplatonic and/or greyplatonic, though it may also sometimes include alloplatonic people who are friendship-indifferent, friendship-averse, friendship-repulsed, and/or friendship-ambivalent.
Afamilial (Afam): A person that does not experience allotypical familial attraction. Bold Stripe Afamilial describes a person who feels no familial attraction whatsoever. A bold stripe afamilials can have any attraction stance, including being family-favorable. The Afamilial Spectrum (Afam-Spec/Afamspec) describes people who are afamilial and/or greyfamilial, though it may also sometimes include allofamilial people who are family-indifferent, family-averse, family-repulsed, and/or family-ambivalent.
Aromantic (Aro): A person that does not experience allotypical romantic attraction. Green Stripe Aromantic/Bold Stripe Aromantic describes a person who feels no romantic attraction whatsoever. Green stripe aromantics can have any attraction stance, including being romance-favorable. The Aromantic Spectrum (Aro-Spec/Arospec) describes people who are aromantic and/or greyromantic, though it may also sometimes include alloromantic people who are romance-indifferent, romance-averse, romance-repulsed, and/or romance-ambivalent.
Aqueerplatonic (Aqp): A person that does not experience allotypical queerplatonic attraction. Bold Stripe Aqueerplatonic describes a person who feels no queerplatonic attraction whatsoever. Bold stripe aqueerplatonics can have any attraction stance, including being queerplatonic-favorable. The Aqueerplatonic Spectrum (Aqp-Spec/Aqpspec) describes people who are aqueerplatonic and/or greyqueerplatonic, though it may also sometimes include alloqueerplatonic people who are queerplatonic-indifferent, queerplatonic-averse, queerplatonic-repulsed, and/or queerplatonic-ambivalent.
Analterous (Analt): A person that does not experience allotypical alterous attraction. Bold Stripe Analterous describes a person who feels no alterous attraction whatsoever. Bold stripe analterous people can have any attraction stance, including being alterous-favorable. The Analterous Spectrum (Analt-Spec/Analtspec) describes people who are analterous and/or greyalterous, though it may also sometimes include alloalterous people who are alterous-indifferent, alterous-averse, alterous-repulsed, and/or alterous-ambivalent.
Aphysical (Aphys): A person that does not experience allotypical physical attraction. Bold Stripe Aphysical describes a person who feels no physical attraction whatsoever. Bold stripe aphysicals can have any attraction stance, including being physical-favorable. The Aphysical Spectrum (Aphys-Spec/Aphyspec) describes people who are aphysical and/or greyphysical, though it may also sometimes include allophysical people who are physical-indifferent, physical-averse, physical-repulsed, and/or physical-ambivalent.
Anaesthetic (Anae)/Nonaesthetic (Nonae): A person that does not experience allotypical aesthetic attraction. Bold Stripe Anaesthetic describes a person who feels no aesthetic attraction whatsoever. Bold stripe anaesthetics can have any attraction stance, including being look-favorable. The Anaesthetic Spectrum/Nonaesthetic Spectrum (Anae-Spec/Anaespec/Nonae-Spec/Nonaespec) describes people who are anaesthetic and/or greyaesthetic, though it may also sometimes include alloaesthetic people who are look-indifferent, look-averse, look-repulsed, and/or look-ambivalent.
Asensual (Asen): A person that does not experience allotypical sensual attraction. Bold Stripe Asensual describes a person who feels no sensual attraction whatsoever. Bold stripe asensuals can have any attraction stance, including being touch-favorable. The Asensual Spectrum (Asen-Spec/Asenspec) describes people who are asensual and/or greysensual, though it may also sometimes include allosensual people who are touch-indifferent, touch-averse, touch-repulsed, and/or touch-ambivalent.
Asexual (Ace): A person that does not experience allotypical sexual attraction. Black Stripe Asexual/Bold Stripe Asexual describes a person who feels no sexual attraction whatsoever. Bold stripe asexuals can have any attraction stance (including being sex-favorable) as well as any libido. The Asexual Spectrum (Ace-Spec/Acespec) describes people who are asexual and/or greysexual, though it may also sometimes include allosexual people who are hypolibidoist, non-libidoist, sex-indifferent, sex-averse, sex-repulsed, and/or sex-ambivalent.
Aroace: A person that does not experience allotypical romantic and sexual attraction. Black Stripe Aroace describes a person who feels no romantic or sexual attraction whatsoever. Bold stripe aroaces can have any attraction stance, including being sex-favorable and romance-favorable.
Anattractional: A person who does not experience allotypical attraction. Black Stripe Anattractional describes a person who feels no attraction whatsoever. Bold stripe annattractionals can have any attraction stances.
The Anattractional Spectrum (A-spec/Aspec) is an umbrella term for the asocial, aemotional, aplatonic, afamilial, aromantic, aqueerplatonic, analterous, aphysical, anaesthetic, asensual, and asexual spectrums. It may also sometimes include non-partnering people.
Being aqueerplatonic and analterous is considered a social norm for alloromantics in most locations, however there is often societal pressure for arospec people to experience queerplatonic or alterous attraction as a “replacement” for their romantic attraction. An alloromantic being aqp/analt is generally considered a nonqueer experience, while an aromantic being aqp/analt is generally considered queer.
Grey-: A person who experiences attraction on low levels and/or only under specific circumstances.
Pseudo-: A person who has an experience that mimics a form of attraction which they do not experience. For example, an asexual person who experiences sensual attraction that is so strong that it mimics sexual attraction may use the label pseudosexual.
-Flux: A person whose level of attraction fluctuates. For example, an anaeflux person who fluctuates between being bold stripe anaesthetic, greyaesthetic, and alloaesthetic.
-Spike: A person who is usually bold stripe or grey-, but experiences rare intense spikes of attraction, which dissipate soon after. For example, an asenspike person who is usually greysensual, but every few months experiences strong sensual attraction.
-Jump: A person who usually experiences allo- levels of attraction but experiences rare intense drops of attraction for a short period of time, before their usual levels of attraction return. For example, an apl-jump person who is usually alloplatonic, but every few years experiences a week or two of aplatonicism.
Aego-: An a-spec term for a person who enjoys/experiences an aspect of attraction, but feels repulsed or indifferent about engaging with others in real life. A person may be aego in all forms of attraction, or only in one form (ie; being alloromantic but aegosexual, allorose but aegosensual, etc).
Some aego- experiences may include…
- Craving/indulging in attraction-based acts in private, but feeling distaste or disinterest about including others (ie; An aegosexual person who masturbates, but feels repulsed about having sex.)
- Having fantasies, but only ever imagining other people, never themself (ie; An aegosensual person who imagines people cuddling, but feels disinterested at the idea of themself being involved.)
- Having fantasies, but every other person is faceless or unidentifiable (ie; An aegoromantic person who imagines a wedding with a blacked-out figure, but the idea of marrying someone in reality repulses them.)
- Having unachievable fantasies that cannot be recreated in reality (ie; An aegoalterous person who imagines having an astronaut x extraterrestrial relationship with their hush, but feels indifferent about having a real relationship with their hush.)
- Only ever experiencing attraction towards unachievable people (ie; celebrities, sub-celebrities, fictional characters, historical figures, etc). This is also known as being Procul-.
Procul- subtypes include Cele-/Celeb- (primary attraction to celebrities/sub-celebrities), Ficto- (primary attraction to fictional characters), Anime-/Manga- (primary attraction to anime/manga characters), Carto- (primary attraction to cartoon/comic characters), Inrea- (primary attraction to live action characters), Booklo-/Novelo- (primary attraction to book characters), Gamo- (primary attraction to video game characters), and Imagi- (primary attraction to characters that have no visual reference, such as characters from podcasts, audiobooks, books without photographs, etc.)
Litho-: An a-spec term for a person who experiences attraction, but loses it once it’s been reciprocated. If it is reciprocated, it will either gradually fade away with time, or immediately dissipate.
Aliqua-: An a-spec term for a person who experiences attraction under specific circumstances. These circumstances can be anything, and vary from person-to-person (ie; a person who only feels attraction during autumn.) Aliqua- subtypes include recipro-, poten-, loqui-, noeti-, demi-, fray-, apex-, valis-, den-, daleko-, blisko-, and chronosa-.
Recipro- describes a person who can only reciprocate attraction, meaning that they only experience attraction towards people who confess that they are attracted to them first, or people who they notice are attracted to them first. Their newfound attraction could either flood them all at once, or it could slowly begin building once they discover the person is interested in them.
Poten- describes a person who only feels attraction towards someone who they know has the potential to reciprocate. For example, a gay man who discovers that their coworker is achillean, and begins to develop attraction towards their coworker as a result. The coworker doesn’t have to confess first, and may not actually be interested in them; it is simply the potential of a relationship that allows the attraction to develop.
Loqui- describes a person who only feels attracted towards someone that they have individually interacted with before. This does not mean that they will be attracted to every person they interact with; it’s just that interacting with someone is what opens the potential for attraction. Some loqui- people are only able to experience attraction towards people they have one-on-one interactions with, while other loqui- people can develop attraction to people they’ve interacted with in group settings as well. They cannot develop attraction towards peers they’ve never spoken to, strangers they haven’t spoken to, celebrities/sub-celebrities that they’ve never met, fictional characters, historical figures, etc.
Noeti- describes a person who only feels attracted towards someone that they have a mental connection with. This mental connection could be religious beliefs, political beliefs, moral beliefs, special interests/hyperfixations, shared hobbies, or just general shared mindsets. Emotional closeness is not necessary for attraction to develop - only mental closeness is necessary.
Demi- describes a person who only feels attraction towards someone that they have a deep personal connection with. It may take weeks, months, or even years for a demi- person to develop attraction towards somebody, depending on how often and in-depth they talk to this person. It differs from noeti-, because demi- people can develop attraction towards people with vastly different mindsets to oneself (so long as they have an emotional connection), while noeti- people cannot.
Fray- describes a person who only feels attraction towards someone that they do not know well. As they get to know someone, their attraction fades away. It is considered the opposite of noeti- and demi-.
Apex- describes a person who only feels attraction towards someone that they have a deep personal connection with - however, once the relationship deepens even further, the attraction fades away again. The attraction is brief and inevitable to fade every time they develop feelings for someone they grow close to. Apex- is considered a mix of demi- and fray-, where demi-attraction leads into fray-attraction.
Valis-/Igcedimus describes a person who only feels attraction towards someone that they do not know well. As they get to know someone, their attraction fades away - however, once the relationship deepens even further, the attraction begins to return. Valis- is considered a mix of fray- and demi-, where fray-attraction leads into demi-attraction.
Den-/Ochi- describes a person who only feels attraction towards someone they are not interacting with. Once they interact with a person again, the attraction either pauses, begins to fade, or instantly dissipates. It may or may not resume/return again as they spend time apart.
Daleko- describes a person who only feels attraction towards someone they are physically distant with. Daleko- people tend to prefer long-distance relationships and calls/texting over meeting in-person. If they meet in-person, their attraction either pauses, begins to fade, or instantly dissipates. It may or may not resume/return again as they go back to long-distance.
Blisko- describes a person who only feels attraction towards someone they are in the physical presence of. Blisko- people may only experience attraction during face-to-face interactions, or they may also experience it during video calls or while looking at photos.
Chronosa- describes a person who only feels attraction towards someone after a long amount of time. Unlike demi-, it doesn’t take knowing someone well; just knowing them for a long time. Sometimes chronosa- people can tell that they will develop attraction towards someone before it happens, and can take steps to prepare for it.
Cupio-: An a-spec term for a person who does not experience a specific type of attraction, but desires a relationship/experience based upon that attraction (ie; a bold stripe aromantic person who desires a romance-based relationship.) Fray- or apex- people might identify as cupio- if they decide to continue a relationship with someone, even after their attraction fades. People with attraction-based/relation-based jobs may use this label as well (ie; sex workers who have sexual interactions with people they are not attracted to.)
The cupio- label may be applied to specific genders. For example, a person who is triaqueerplatonic, but cupioqueerplatonic towards binary genders.
Cupiohex describes someone that is mono straight/strayt, but engages in sapphic/achillean (possibly certain types of diamoric) relationships/experiences. Cupiogex describes someone that is mono uranian or mono lesbian, but engages in straight relationships/experiences.
Orchid-: An a-spec term for someone that feels attraction, but is incapable of acting upon it due to mental or physical disconnect. Orchid- people have never felt the desire to act upon their attraction.
Nopota-: An a-spec term for someone that feels attraction, but does not have the energy to act on it. This could be due to neurodivergence, trauma, disability/dysfunction, or it could have no specific reason. Unlike orchid- people, nopota- people do desire to act upon their attraction; they are simply incapable of it.
Woland-: An a-spec term for someone whose attraction decreases based upon their disability. For example, someone who becomes fully asexual whenever their chronic pain spikes up. Not all disabled people are woland-.
-vague: An a-spec term for someone who has limited attraction due to their neurodivergence. For example, a person who is touch-repulsed due to being a germaphobe, and feels as though their touch-repulsion limits their ability to feel sensual or sexual attraction. Not all neurodivergent people are -vague.
Asovague is for social attraction, Aemovague is for emotional attraction, Aplvague is for platonic attraction, Afamvague is for familial attraction, Arovague is for romantic attraction, Aqpvague is for queerplatonic attraction, Analtvague is for alterous attraction, Aphysvague is for physical attraction, Anaevague is for aesthetic attraction, Asenvague is for sensual attraction, Acevague is for sexual attraction, Aroacevague/Arosevague is for sexual & romantic attraction, and Awavague is for waveric attraction.
Eras-: An a-spec term for someone who feels as though they used to be allo-, but their attraction was erased. Caed- is the same as eras-, but specifically for someone who lost their attraction due to trauma. For both eras- and caed-, traces of their attraction may still remain.
Eligere-: An a-spec term for someone who can actively choose who they are attracted to, and ignite feelings of attraction at will. They may be able to ignite their attraction on the spot, or they may need time to focus on the person and build the attraction.
Anseqresexual: An ace-spec term for someone that only feels sexual attraction if no romantic attraction is involved. What counts as “romantic” depends on the individual. For example, Zym is anseqresexual, and has a romantic relationship with Alexni, and a sexual relationship with Galaxis. If Galaxis expresses romantic interest (such as offering to go on a date), Zym feels disinterested or repulsed by it - and vice versa if Alexni expresses sexual interest.
Another example is that Zym has a romantic and sexual relationship with Suko, but keeps both aspects separated. If Suko mixes romantic gestures with sexual ones (ie; putting rose petals on the bed, using a romantic nickname, etc), Zym feels disinterested in engaging further. However, if Suko keeps both things separated - such as having a date in the morning, and engaging in sex during the night, with no overlap - Zym would be interested.
Ansequencesexual: An ace-spec term for someone that only feels sexual attraction to people if no romantic attraction is felt. If romantic attraction develops, the sexual attraction fades, as if the romantic attraction is taking its place. They may still have sexual relationships for the sake of libido, physical intimacy with their partner, physical pleasure, etc.
Ansequenceromantic: An aro-spec term for someone that only feels romantic attraction to people if no sexual attraction is felt. If sexual attraction develops, the romantic attraction fades, as if the sexual attraction is taking its place.
Ansequencerose: An aro-spec and ace-spec term for someone that is both ansequencesexual and ansequenceromantic. If they feel sexual attraction to someone first, and romantic attraction develops, the romantic attraction takes the place of the sexual attraction. If they feel romantic attraction to someone first, and sexual attraction develops, the sexual attraction takes the place of the romantic attraction.
Orgasace describes someone who is incapable of orgasming, due to losing their sexual attraction towards the person they are engaging sexually with at the last moment.
Orgasflux describes someone who fluctuates between being capable of orgasming, and being orgasace. Orgasspike describes someone who is usually incapable of orgasming due to losing their sexual attraction last second, but on rare and sudden spikes of being capable of orgasm.
Orgasexceptis describes someone who is only capable of orgasming with one or a few select people, unrelated to the sexual skill of the person/people (ie; a polyamorous person who can only orgasm with one of their partners, despite the other partners being sexually skilled and not doing anything wrong.)
Uni-: An a-spec identity, in which a person is only attracted to a singular person for a very long period of time, potentially their entire lifetime. For example, a uniromantic person who is only attracted to one person for a decade, and once the decade is over, they finally develop a crush on a second person. This does not necessarily mean that they obsessed over their crush for all those years - their attraction may have faded rather quickly - it is just that they did not experience a second crush for a very long time.
A uni- person does not have to be close to the person they experienced attraction towards. For example, they may have experienced attraction towards a stranger.
Soloamare is similar to uni-, but instead of being attracted to only one person, they are attracted to a select few people.
Auto-: A term describing a person that is attracted to oneself. Most people experience small amounts of self-attraction (ie; looking at oneself in the mirror and thinking “I look nice today”), however auto- people experience it at a high enough level that it is considered significant.
Auto- people may be primarily or exclusively attracted to themself, or they may experience attraction to both themself and other people. If they experience attraction to other people, they may use additional labels (ie; a neutrois person that is attracted to themself and women may use the term bi-auto, biauto, auto-bi, autobi, etc.) Even if a person is exclusively self-attracted, these additional labels might be used by multigender autos who are only attracted to themself when they are a specific gender, or autos who are only attracted to themself with specific presentations (ie; a fin-auto person who is only attracted to themself when dressed femininely).
Auto attraction is not the same as selfishness or egoism. An auto person can be humble (or even have low self-esteem), while still finding themself attractive.
Self-Partnering: A term describing a person who dates oneself. They may or may not be auto- as well, or they may be dating oneself for other reasons, such as spiritual reasons, as a political statement, etc. Autoamory describes a person who dates oneself while also dating other people.
Autospec: An umbrella term for all auto- orientations, including self-partnering and autoamory.
Ecto-: A person who is exclusively attracted to (and dating, if they are interested in dating) people other than oneself; the opposite of auto-.
Objectum/Pygmalio-: Attraction towards objects. These objects can be physical (ie; consumable items, cloth items, decorative items, toys, technological items, furniture, plants, buildings, physical art, etc) or non-physical (ie; flavors, music, logos, programs, digital art, etc.) Objectum people may be attracted to specific types of objects (ie; only attracted to plants and wooden furniture), or attracted to any type of object.
Many (but not all) objectum people are neurodivergent in some way (typically with a neurodevelopmental disability or synaesthesia, but other neurodivergence can apply as well), or believe in animism (the concept that objects have souls.) Some objectum people apply personalities and identities onto the objects they are attracted to, while others are attracted to objects without any personality/identity being applied.
Objectum people may be exclusively attracted to objects, or they might be attracted to people as well. If an objectum person is only attracted to objects that they give specific gendered identities to, they may use an additional label to describe that (ie; a woman who is only attracted to objects that they view as “women” may call themself lesbian-objectum/objectum-lesbian/lesbijectum/objectbian.)
Objectum people often refer to the objects of their attraction as Beloved Objects. Beloved objects can be private (objects that a person owns) or public (objects that are publicly available, such as a slide at a public park.)
Idisexual: A label describing someone that is not sexually attracted to sex traits, but is sexually attracted to other traits instead. This could be physical traits (ie; tattoos, skin tags, height, hair color, etc) or non-physical traits (gestures, hobbies, fashion, titles, names, etc.) They may or may not consider themself to be ace-spec.
Pronoun-/Prono-: A label describing someone who is only attracted to people who use specific pronouns (ie; a person who is attracted to people who use neopronouns.) For some people, this attraction is gender-specific and may be combined with another label (ie; a a prono-triasexual who is only attracted to non-binary people who use xe/xem, xe/xer, ze/zem, or zi/zer, or similar pronouns), while for other people this term this term is used to describe attraction to people regardless of gender (ie; a person who is attracted to people who use she/her pronouns, regardless of whether they are a woman, non-binary, a pronoun non-conforming man, etc.)
Nomine- describes someone who is only attracted to people who use specific names (ie; someone who is only attracted to people who use the name Jess/Jesse, Jessie, or Jessica.)
Idisexual, pronoun-, and nomine- may all overlap with objectum, as part of the attraction may be rooted in the objects/concepts themselves (ie; an idisexual objectum person may be attracted to specific fashion items on a person, because they are attracted to the clothes themselves, which in turn causes them to be attracted to the person wearing said clothes.)
It's not just to have a "do over" that doesn't involve the original cast, it's to cut them out of the royalties. Literally the entire point is to make sure all the money made by Harry Potter goes to transphobes or people willing to work with transphobes.
If you watch it, you are supporting bigotry, hate, and oppression. That's just objective reality. All for a story that you probably have already seen in movie and book form.
#the last point is especially true since the old cast receives royalties for anything with their likeness on it#meaning the original trio still gets money for every mug with their 14 year old faces on it#if they stop making those and replace them with the new cast which they will the old cast gets cut off completely#which is again exactly what rowling wants because she cannot stand those 'ungrateful brats' as she would likely put it#and as she has last say in anything that gets made in harry potter paraphernalia this might also explain the decrease in faces on products
Likewise, the new all-star audio books featuring people like Keira Knightley, Riz Ahmed, Michelle Gomez, Simon Pegg, Nick Frost and more, only seem to have happened because Stephen Fry - who did all the original audio books - said he thought she radicalised and "was a lost cause" (x)
I also wan't to stress how important it is you TELL people IRL why you will not be watching the show. Especially if they know you were a HP fan in the past. I literally had the conversation around the lunchroom table the other day and just said 'Yeah I don't fuck with Harry Potter any more', and that was enough to pique someone's interest, which started a conversation, and within two minutes three people who had no idea about any of this were educated and also were put off continuing to engage with anything HP related, one of whom was like me and previously a big fan for whom the original movies were the top of her comfort watch list.
Don't under estimate the people around you's ability to help make this tank. Getting the normies and less online involved is crucial to ensuring this is more broadly known in general society and not just something people of certain corners of the internet are aware of.
Saw somebody I know share the mugshots of a woman who was purportedly arrested for beating her boyfriend with a belt for not wanting sex. She said "meee I'm not even joking lol." I think about how that's rape. How I've been subject to things like that. Been abused for not providing sex. This isn't the first time I've seen this treated as a joke. I see it a lot, actually. Joking about physically abusing men is an extremely common thing. You don't have to look very far to find it. Even here. There's a particularly high-profile poster that's gained a lot of traction over the past year or so. I followed her early, before I noticed other large and popular blogs cozying up to her. She would post about how she would hit her boyfriends, talking about it like it's just a quirk. She was being honest about it. Sometimes just posting things like "I beat my men." It wasn't super common, but common enough to notice. But she has that sort of chic mean-girl feminist thing going on, so everyone ignored what that really meant and just laughed along with it. I don't think it's productive to call her out. I don't think she's, like, necessarily a piece of shit for it, or deserves to be ejected from the space. By her admission, she has issues she's trying to work on. But it's there, and it's happened, and it's tolerated, even rewarded by the culture on here. And it's not uncommon. It's pretty easy to find a lot of places.
My friend is in a physically abusive marriage. Photos of red marks on their body are saved in my phone. I've thought they were going to be murdered before. The thought has crossed their mind. Their wife constantly accuses them of cheating, among other things, because that's her idea of what a man does. She has stabbed their mattress when she was angry to "see what it feels like." They showed me a tiktok she sent them. It's a woman out in the woods captioned something like "burying him here so nobody will ever find him ♥️♥️". This kind of memetic mean-girl feminist stuff has, as a part of the overall erosion of effective and principled feminist discourse, devolved into truly abusive personalities joking about harming men at its edges. This is rewarded and celebrated. My abusive ex did a lot of the same stuff. Would dig around these quasi-rad or outright radical feminist spaces to essentially find rhetorical ammunition to abuse me over. Then would fall back onto the plucky mean-girl feminist memes when I tried talking to her about the emotional and sexual abuse. I support mens rights to shut the fuck up. Same thing happens to my friend. Doesn't have anything to do with the actual person being hurt. It's just an expression of these gendered resentments. Spending time in communities literally listing off reasons for a woman to be angry at a man, and then taking that out on their partner. Happened to me. Happens to lots of people placed in the social role of "men." It makes a war-like philosophy out of gender. Turns it into an order of violence. Justifies violence.
I recently saw a post going around here about how men suffer abuse so rarely that there's no reason to adjust language about intimate partner abuse to include men. That the suggestion is simply men being big babies and trying to reframe every conversation to be about them. That my experience -- that my abuse on the basis of my perceived manhood, no less -- is literally a marginal experience, an outlier that shouldn't be incorporated in the conversation about other people going through the same things I did. That it just isn't deserving of discussion or concern. And it was being shared by mutuals, long time mutuals, people I respect and enjoy. People who are better than that. This isn't something that makes people irredeemable monsters. I don't want their heads on spikes. But this kind of cruelty is horrifyingly common.
In the end, this is the cost of harshly reifying gender. Resenting men as a class grows into a social infrastructure to justify and even gamify abuse. It becomes fun. It becomes jokes. It becomes blood for blood. There's a perceived justice to the suffering being doled out to the supposed abuser class. And, in doing so, patriarchal masculine standards are recreated and maintained. The abuse is perpetual. Men are belittled for having feelings about the way they're treated, for trying to talk about their emotions, and they are continually expected to simply bear the burden of abuse and not complain. The masculinized body and spirit is a vessel of abuse. This is its purpose.
blakekathryn
dailybridgerton
gummygunk
dededos
izzy806
origamiaround
andulkaphoto
titsay
