Companion Cubed

raine...why are we still here? just to suffer? 

[hotvampireadjacent]

[campsis]

Eden Kalif, Good Cats

[fwizard]

I’m getting threatening scam emails from author john green

[ammnontet]

the ultimate weapon

[butch--dan]

tv from the mid 2000s was so good. if you can look past the everything

[only-cat-memes]

[flufflecat]

almost time

[recoiled4]

[lypsys]

"Write character relationships that are normal" WRONG ☝ CODEPENDENCY BEAM 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥

[lichqueenlibrarian]

Which could mean nothing.

[lacystar]

Jeff the spiller 🫗

[lacystar]

I said Jeff the spiller 🫗

[lacystar]

is this thing on

[mevil]

[motherfucker-somewhat-limited]

tiktoks with vine energy pt. 3

[aromanticduck]

I came up with this three-way table to help me (and now you, if you want) to rate things out of 5 stars. I was thinking of books and films when I made it, but you can probably use it for other stuff.

The idea is that you rate the thing on how much stuff you loved and how much stuff you hated, and those things weight against each other. There's only one way to get 5 stars or 1 star, so those should end up as the rarest ratings, wtih 3 stars being the most common.

'Spicy' means that the thing inspires emotion, whether positive or negative, while 'bland' means it doesn't affect you much either way.

An example of a 3-star (spicy) - for me personally - would be the Twilight series, because there's plenty of garbage in there but also some things that are like crack to me. I can't think of an example of a 3 star (bland) because by nature they don't stick in the mind.

(This also assumes giving 0 stars isn't allowed. That'd throw it out of whack...)

[thegrimcaptain95]

I absolutely love this bc it’s so like the risk assessment matrix for hazards

[aromanticduck]

Assessing your risk of enjoying a piece of media

[spindash]

my beautiful toxic mold spore

[golongbyjoannanewsom]

obsessed w this person in the replies

[everythingfox]

DOG

dog dog dog

dog dog dog

dog dog dog

[svlc]