evolution, a known terf, inventor of biological sex
Interview Vampire Daily
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
todays bird

shark vs the universe
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Fai_Ryy
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
official daine visual archive
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
The Stonewall Inn
tumblr dot com
taylor price

Origami Around
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

#extradirty

ellievsbear
Keni
art blog(derogatory)

bliss lane
Color Me Curious

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from Italy
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Malaysia
seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from India
seen from Japan
seen from Canada
@mothernaturedisciple
evolution, a known terf, inventor of biological sex
many such cases
Yeah cis guys and transwomen get along really great alsomost like they are the same social class or something.
He didn’t have to make it about trans :/
this is the lgbtqia wiki. is it even possible for these people to get a single thing about us right.
we don't believe that genitals or chromosomes determine anything. we recognise that there are two gametes required for sexual reproduction and that there are two biological growth pathways aiming towards generating bodies that are specialised for the production and preservation of these gametes (and one of which is further specialised to produce a whole human being once the two gametes have been united). there is plenty of natural and harmless variation in this process, but there is also some harmful variation in the form of DSDs (disorders of sex development). regardless, none of this determines 'gender'.
we literally do not believe assigned sex determines interests and personality
whilst believing that male people are inherently oppressive and dominating is something many radfems engage in, it is but one potential conclusion one could come to from observing the consistency of male violence across populations, throughout history, and accross species. however there are many radfems, myself included, who recognise the deep power of socialisation - in fact, if these people had engaged with any of feminism they would know that the vast, vast majority of feminist literature is literally dedicated to dissecting the very human motivations men have to dominate. feminism has its roots in leftist class analysis, so we have no interest in mincing our words - when we say 'men are violent', we are not necessarily describing some biological essence of men any more than poor people say that 'rich people are greedy'. that's literally it. shock horror, one's personality is deeply affected by one's environment and upbringing. it just so happens that unlike rich people and other such oppressors, there are real unavoidable physical realities that will impact men's relationship with the world. if you develop a penis, and the world around you says that as a penis-owner you can rape and impregnate a woman and get away with it, that's a specific experience that will impact your personality.
it's really not that hard to grasp these concepts, and it speaks to iron-clad grip that patriarchal thought has over our collective consciousness that an easily comprehensible and observable truth is suddenly treated as agenda-driven nonsense. this is a clear example of how despite how consistent and clear radfems are when we describe what we recognise about the world, we will be willfully misinterpreted to a comical degree. then other people will read this as a 'resource' and think they never have to engage with what we actually. fucking. say. on the plus side, it really speaks to how powerful and truthful or words must be for people to try this damn hard to ignore us.
this is the lgbtqia wiki. is it even possible for these people to get a single thing about us right.
we don't believe that genitals or chromosomes determine anything. we recognise that there are two gametes required for sexual reproduction and that there are two biological growth pathways aiming towards generating bodies that are specialised for the production and preservation of these gametes (and one of which is further specialised to produce a whole human being once the two gametes have been united). there is plenty of natural and harmless variation in this process, but there is also some harmful variation in the form of DSDs (disorders of sex development). regardless, none of this determines 'gender'.
we literally do not believe assigned sex determines interests and personality
whilst believing that male people are inherently oppressive and dominating is something many radfems engage in, it is but one potential conclusion one could come to from observing the consistency of male violence across populations, throughout history, and accross species. however there are many radfems, myself included, who recognise the deep power of socialisation - in fact, if these people had engaged with any of feminism they would know that the vast, vast majority of feminist literature is literally dedicated to dissecting the very human motivations men have to dominate. feminism has its roots in leftist class analysis, so we have no interest in mincing our words - when we say 'men are violent', we are not necessarily describing some biological essence of men any more than poor people say that 'rich people are greedy'. that's literally it. shock horror, one's personality is deeply affected by one's environment and upbringing. it just so happens that unlike rich people and other such oppressors, there are real unavoidable physical realities that will impact men's relationship with the world. if you develop a penis, and the world around you says that as a penis-owner you can rape and impregnate a woman and get away with it, that's a specific experience that will impact your personality.
it's really not that hard to grasp these concepts, and it speaks to iron-clad grip that patriarchal thought has over our collective consciousness that an easily comprehensible and observable truth is suddenly treated as agenda-driven nonsense. this is a clear example of how despite how consistent and clear radfems are when we describe what we recognise about the world, we will be willfully misinterpreted to a comical degree. then other people will read this as a 'resource' and think they never have to engage with what we actually. fucking. say. on the plus side, it really speaks to how powerful and truthful or words must be for people to try this damn hard to ignore us.
i'm gonna be honest the tras have lost me at "terf". the fact that their biggest most heinous insult automatically includes feminists as the primary target of hatred is so telling, and it makes it so difficult to take them seriously. "oh no this feminist woman wants bathrooms for women only. how horrible and cruel. let's all write gory fantasies about her." do they hear themselves speak. how is any feminist woman supposed to take them seriously.
I’m not transphobic, Im genderphobic. Nobody should have a gender identity. Gender is an oppressive social hierarchy invented by patriarchy that is rooted in sexism and women’s oppression. Stop “identifying” with it.
transwomen on twitter when you ask them to not be literal klansmen
what pronouns do you use?
i don’t refer to myself in the third person or care to control how other people talk about me actually
Okay, i don't always reblog those (because they sadly get repetitive), but this deserves to be seen because of the video attached. It should be shown to anyone who ever says that trans identified males won't use gender ID to get access to victims. Listen to what this man is saying, starting at 0:50. He's VERY well informed about the power his legally obtained "female identity" gives him to masturbate in front of little girls (here it seems he was caught lurking around county recreation centers, which may include pools, fitness rooms, a gymnasium, etc) and threatens to sue the public servants who threw him out, for looking up his name in the publically accessible sex offender register and making the rational decision to ban him. This is not a mentally ill person, this is a man who is articulate, manipulative, and knows how to twist the law to his advantage.
Guess who's been charged with child pornography and caught with the schedule of children’s swim lessons and gymnastic classes on this phone since then? Some of the kids he masturbated to were toddlers, by the way.
An Arlington County judge decided to dismiss the loitering charges against Richard Cox, who is a registered child sex offender.
A male juror said there were no outliers and that all the jurors came to the guilty verdict on their own before deliberations.
I made collage in under a minute because that’s how easy it is to get these exact search results in this dystopia we live in
adding some more dystopian images..
Kink.com is a Hell on Earth rape on tape corp
Kink has been at the center of multiple lawsuits alleging the studio failed to ensure a safe work environment. In one lawsuit, a former employee of Cybernet Entertainment, the company that owns Kink.com, alleged that she was "placed in an unsafe work environment" during a bondage scene and was fired when she brought her complaints to Kink.com management.
In three other lawsuits, performers Cameron Adams, Joshua Rodgers and an anonymous John Doe allege that they contracted HIV on a Kink.com set as a direct result of the company’s negligence[…]
Kink.com has videos of women getting waterboarded. They have videos of women getting suffocated with plastic wrap.
Their stuff is so brutal and dangerous, I wouldn’t be surprised if they kill a woman one day. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if they already have and covered it up. This isn’t just harmless sexual fun, this is deep and deadly hatred for women.
I remember when the mainstream was questioning the ethics behind torturing prisoners of war in Abu Graihib and Guantanamo Bay
Where are the ethicistists when it comes to torturing women in bdsm?
Prisoners of war during the height of imperialist wars are given more consideration than women on your own side
They also have several videos where the whole concept is a lesbian being gang raped until she likes men.
it’s okay to have preferences but I’ll emotionally blackmail you if you do
Tbh the response to these men should just be “ohhh I would date trans women but all the ones I know are really ugly :(“ I’m evil asf now
this !!!!
women are female does not mean women are walking vaginas. saying that deaf people have full or partial hearing loss does not mean deaf people are walking non-functioning ears. saying that asian people are from asian countries or of asian descent does not mean asian people are walking genealogy. these are called definitions.
even if literally every single person in every single country capitulated and viewed both women and men as mixed-sex groups identified into on the basis of gender rather than sex, misogynistic males would still know who to rape, murder, beat, demean, deny abortions, not let run for office, oppress, put burqas on, etc. whether they call those people afab, female, she/her, women, or whatever. do you think that if misogynists accept that women is a mixed-sex group, they will suddenly forget that some people are female and have vaginas and can get pregnant and tend to be smaller and weaker and other people have penises and can get people pregnant and tend to be stronger and bigger? do you think that suddenly they will include males who identify as female in their female oppression? will they be shoving males in menstrual huts, raping them, forcibly impregnating them, not letting them get abortions, blaming them for when males are sexually attracted to them, forcing them to be modest and subservient to their husband? would a male and female be lashed or stoned or imprisoned for same-sex-relations if one of them identified differently?
terfs did not invent that idea that women are female. everyone on earth knows that some people are male, and some people are female, and male misogynists will not stop being misogynistic towards females or start including males in their misogyny just because some people assert that woman is a mixed sex group based on gender identity. even if we all accepted that, everyone would still know that there are two sexes, as is demonstrated by the trans community who never shuts up about the difference between afab nonbinary, amab nonbinary, tme, tma, theyfabs, trans women and trans men. you all know it too.
trans women who try to forcibly include themselves in womanhood basically admit to seeing women as stereotypical, two-dimensional caricatures. you know, like misogynists.
A play in three acts
potentially controversial but i don't think "male sexuality is inherently predatory (and so if you don't want to be predatory, you're probably a girl) is a winning feminist take. i actually think it's exactly the opposite and we should really be avoiding the implication that predatory misogynistic behavior is biological and not social in nature
the single most popular comic artist on tumblr decided to make one about a grotesque stereotype of... women who play an online video game despite constant sexual harassment. a hobby that can't possibly be construed as harming anyone.
except the grotesque stereotype then commits the cardinal sin of trying to talk with another woman about her experience. its played as a joke, that she's just crazy and obsessive and spiteful, unable to act like a normal person due to her obsession with hating men.
and im just taken aback by the unthinkable level of hatred it would take to draw a comic like that.
shen gives me the creeps. i feel like his female characters are weirdly fetishistic now…….in like, a very online pervert sort of way.
i also looked sideways at the comic you’re referencing. it’s another one of those “maladjusted man-hater is FIXED by a good man!” stories i guess. such stories are not really as benevolent and wholesome as men like to think.
it’s interesting that shen’s gamer girl is so chronically online that she is executively and socially dysfunctional, while his male lead, by comparison, comes across as healthfully & sensibly offline—even though femboy culture is steeped in the internet. (it’s steeped in some uniquely toxic parts of the internet, too.)
personally, i have never known a femboy to have a healthy web/life balance. they are all very “logged in,” so to speak. conversely, it’s pretty uncommon for a woman to be caricature levels of chronically online. female game-addicts and self-identified femcels exist, but they do not mirror male game-addicts and incels.
It’s actually even worse than him being just straightforwardly a tra and going after radfems, because what he’s actually doing is openly pandering to a trans audience to exploit them financially, and they know it and don’t care
A month ago he posted a comic facetiously suggesting that he’d get more patreon traffic if he drew himself female, and it clearly worked for him
He made basically zero effort to hide what he was doing, even joked about it and confirmed it
And now almost exactly a month later he’s posting a multipart comic about a “femcel radfem gamer” who gets harassed online and hates men
The depiction is clearly supposed to be someone who is an absolute nightmare, chronically online, openly cruel and ignorant
The character encounters someone at her local cornerstore who looks like a cute girl but when she tries to connect with her about men making our lives worse, the person claims to be a man
Our radfem character expresses exaggerated disgust and leaves without her things, and continues to spiral about it and grapple with confused attraction
It’s offensive and stupid on almost every conceivable level, but parts of her dialogue do sound like it could have almost been lifted from a real black pill, and it makes me wonder how much research the artist did to portray such a caricature. He had a month to spin this up, if he knew it was going to be wildly profitable for him i wouldn’t be surprised if he put in the work to familiarize himself with some actual talking points.
Also the ambiguity of the cashier character was clearly deliberate on the artist’s part, as the notes are chockablock full of readers gleefully debating whether the cashier character is supposed to be a “gnc trans man” or a “femboy”, all wondering what the subtitle “the boy from venus” might be referring to
I think the saddest part of this is how excited trans and tra audiences are for it and how at the bottom of each comic he’s got an entire panel with an advertisement for his patreon enticing them to pay a few dollars to get bonus panels and access the next installment faster. This is so obviously an opportunistic cash grab, and it’s insulting enough to see women so thoroughly dismissed and vilified, but to know it’s not even bc he believes it is such a slap in the face.
He made the most incendiary, controversial, hateful thing he could think of, knowing they would eat it up and pay him for it. It’s so slimy and greedy. What an absolute pig
"what if someone regrets transitioning" if you are 18 or over in free country usa you can walk into any tattoo parlor and ask for a tattoo that will be on your body forever and ever and ever and they will give it to you with the understanding that if you dont like the result or you regret it later that's your fucking problem and not theirs
There are also avenues to get tattoos removed. You don’t get shunned by the tattoo community for being vocal about regretting your tattoo. You also can’t get a tattoo in many places if you’re a minor, because if given the opportunity they would get a Hazbin Hotel tattoo or some shit, because kids are immature.
So yeah, I’m in favor of comparing tattoos to transitioning
i thought we weren’t allowed to acknowledge that