Arien
Beautiful!
art blog(derogatory)
Today's Document

pixel skylines
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Claire Keane
tumblr dot com
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸

Kaledo Art
RMH
Three Goblin Art

blake kathryn

shark vs the universe
$LAYYYTER
One Nice Bug Per Day

Janaina Medeiros
i don't do bad sauce passes
AnasAbdin
hello vonnie

Product Placement
wallacepolsom
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Greece

seen from Argentina
seen from Latvia
seen from Germany

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from South Africa

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from Russia
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from TĂźrkiye
@thatpaperlife
Arien
Beautiful!
I'm a big fan of wizards-as-programmers, but I think it's so much better when you lean into programming tropes.
A spell the wizard uses to light the group's campfire has an error somewhere in its depths, and sometimes it doesn't work at all. The wizard spends a lot of his time trying to track down the exact conditions that cause the failure.
The wizard is attempting to create a new spell that marries two older spells together, but while they were both written within the context of Zephyrus the Starweaver's foundational work, they each used a slightly different version, and untangling the collisions make a short project take months of work.
The wizard has grown too comfortable reusing old spells, and in particular, his teleportation spell keeps finding its components rearranged and remixed, its parts copied into a dozen different places in the spellbook. This is overall not actually a problem per se, but the party's rogue grows a bit concerned when the wizard's "drying spell" seems to just be a special case of teleportation where you teleport five feet to the left and leave the wetness behind.
A wizard is constantly fiddling with his spells, making minor tweaks and changes, getting them easier to cast, with better effects, adding bells and whistles. The "shelter for the night" spell includes a tea kettle that brings itself to a boil at dawn, which the wizard is inordinately pleased with. He reports on efficiency improvements to the indifference of anyone listening.
A different wizard immediately forgets all details of his spells after he's written them. He could not begin to tell you how any of it works, at least not without sitting down for a few hours or days to figure out how he set things up. The point is that it works, and once it does, the wizard can safely stop thinking about it.
Wizards enjoy each other's company, but you must be circumspect about spellwork. Having another wizard look through your spellbook makes you aware of every minor flaw, and you might not be able to answer questions about why a spell was written in a certain way, if you remember at all.
Wizards all have their own preferences as far as which scripts they write in, the formatting of their spellbook, its dimensions and material quality, and of course which famous wizards they've taken the most foundational knowledge from. The enlightened view is that all approaches have their strengths and weaknesses, but this has never stopped anyone from getting into a protracted argument.
Sometimes a wizard will sit down with an ancient tome attempting to find answers to a complicated problem, and finally find someone from across time who was trying to do the same thing, only for the final note to be "nevermind, fixed it".
Volume One is out!
It lives! The first 42 short stories in the series, collected in one volume. There will definitely be more to come.
It's in both paperback and ebook form, available everywhere except Amazon. (Because of that pesky "already available for free online" rule.) Thankfully other stores don't have Amazon's issues. You can order this in from your local bookstore!
If you're in the US, Barnes&Noble is handy, along with several other big retailers. If you're elsewhere, bookstores closer to home will have it in their catalogues too. I'm keeping an eye on some in the UK and Canada to see when they have both formats listed.
Anyways, for those unfamiliar with the series, here's the text from the back cover:
Robin never planned on a career gallivanting about space. Sheâs just taking a bit of a break between veterinarian jobs back on Earth when an opportunity pops up thatâs too good to ignore ⌠and it leads to one thing after another. No regrets. Someday sheâll settle down to a permanent job somewhere planetside, possibly as an Earth animal expert on an alien world. But thatâs a concern for the future. Right now, there are space goats to wrangle, cats to rescue, adventures to be had, and alien coworkers to introduce to the many baffling joys of having a human onboard.
Watership Down by Richard Adams
Stop me if you hate the concept: short, fat, hairy lady gets isakai'd into a high fantasy, and instead of "oh look at all these ethereal elves woe for I am but a flawed mortal" routine she lands in Dwarf territory and is immediately revered as the most enchanting and desirable maid in all the land. This immediately becomes a zesty romantic drama. Thoughts
There's a tournament arc with different Dwarven forgemasters competing to create an artifact worthy of her affection. She secretly helps the underdog guy she's already into complete his project.
Oh my gosh. I just found this website that walks you though creating a believable society. It breaks each facet down into individual questions and makes it so simple! It seems really helpful for worldbuilding!
Heads up that this is a very extensive questionnaire and might be daunting to a lot of writers (myself included). That being said, it is also an amazing questionnaire and I will definitely be using it (or at the very least, some of it).
Bookmarking thisâŚ
This inspired me to see if Patricia C. Wredeâs Worldbuilding Questions are still online, and not only are they, theyâre on the exact same page I saw them on in 1998. Somewhere thereâs a binder of the Word doc I made of all of them and the answers I filled in for Babyâs First Fantasy World
Zoom In, Donât Glaze Over: How to Describe Appearance Without Losing the Plot
Youâve met her before. The girl with âflowing ebony hair,â âemerald eyes,â and âlips like rose petals.â Or him, with âchiseled jawlines,â âstormy gray eyes,â and âshoulders like a Greek statue.â
We donât know them.
Weâve just met their tropes.
Describing physical appearance is one of the trickiest â and most overdone â parts of character writing. Itâs tempting to reach for shorthand: hair color, eye color, maybe a quick body scan. But if we want a reader to see someone â to feel the charge in the air when they enter a room â we need to stop writing mannequins and start writing people.
So letâs get granular. Hereâs how to write physical appearance in a way thatâs textured, meaningful, and deeply character-driven.
1. Hair: Itâs About Story, Texture, and Care
Hair says a lot â not just about genetics, but about choices. Does your character tame it? Let it run wild? Is it dyed, greying, braided, buzzed, or piled on top of her head in a hurry?
Good hair description considers:
Texture (fine, coiled, wiry, limp, soft)
Context (windblown, sweat-damp, scorched by bleach)
Emotion (does she twist it when nervous? Is he ashamed of losing it?)
Flat: âHer long brown hair framed her face.â
Better: âHer ponytail was too tight, the kind that whispered of control issues and caffeine-fueled 4 a.m. library shifts.â
You donât need to romanticise it. You need to make it feel real.
2. Eyes: Less Color, More Connection
We get it: her eyes are violet. Cool. But that doesnât tell us much.
Instead of focusing solely on eye color, think about:
What the eyes do (do they dart, linger, harden?)
What others feel under them (seen, judged, safe?)
The surrounding features (dark circles, crowâs feet, smudged mascara)
Flat: âHis piercing blue eyes locked on hers.â
Better: âHis gaze was the kind that looked through you â like it had already weighed your worth and moved on.â
Youâre not describing a passport photo. Youâre describing what it feels like to be seen by them.
3. Facial Features: Use Contrast and Texture
Faces are not symmetrical ovals with random features. Theyâre full of tension, softness, age, emotion, and life.
Things to look for:
Asymmetry and character (a crooked nose, a scar)
Expression patterns (smiling without the eyes, habitual frowns)
Evidence of lifestyle (laugh lines, sun spots, stress acne)
Flat: âShe had a delicate face.â
Better: âThere was something unfinished about her face â as if her cheekbones hadnât quite agreed on where to settle, and her mouth always seemed on the verge of disagreement.â
Let the face be a map of experience.
4. Bodies: Movement > Measurement
Forget dress sizes and six packs. Think about how bodies occupy space. How do they move? What are they hiding or showing? How do they wear their clothes â or how do the clothes wear them?
Ask:
What do others notice first? (a presence, a posture, a sound?)
How does their body express emotion? (do they go rigid, fold inwards, puff up?)
Flat: âHe was tall and muscular.â
Better: âHe had the kind of height that made ceilings nervous â but he moved like he was trying not to take up too much space.â
Describing someoneâs body isnât about cataloguing. Itâs about showing how they exist in the world.
5. Let Emotion Tint the Lens
Whoâs doing the describing? A lover? An enemy? A tired narrator? The emotional lens will shape whatâs noticed and how itâs described.
In love: The chipped tooth becomes charming.
In rivalry: The smirk becomes smug.
In mourning: The face becomes blurred with memory.
Same person. Different lens. Different description.
6. Specificity is Your Superpower
Generic description = generic character. One well-chosen detail creates intimacy. Let us feel the scratch of their scarf, the clink of her earrings, the smudge of ink on their fingertips.
Examples:
âHe had a habit of adjusting his collar when he lied â always clockwise, always twice.â
âHer nail polish was always chipped, but never accidentally.â
Make the reader feel like theyâre the only one close enough to notice.
Describing appearance isnât just about what your character looks like. Itâs about what their appearance says â about how they move through the world, how others see them, and how they see themselves.
Zoom in on the details that matter. Skip the clichĂŠs. Let each description carry weight, story, and emotion. Because youâre not building paper dolls. Youâre building people.
YALL. Holly Black has a list of resources she's used for writing her books on the fair folk. I'm OBSESSED. I love her work and world building. it's so true to the heart of faeries
Some other resources that might be worth checking out (not strictly about faeries but related):
The Corpus of Electronic Texts, or CELT, a collection of Irish cultural materials. This includes English translations of Irish myths.
Mary Jones - similar to CELT, and a resource we used for translations in the Irish mythology class I took in undergrad.
An Encyclopedia of Fairies by Katherine Mary Briggs, a British folklorist.
The Folklore of Cornwall by Ronald M. James. Unfortunately this book is harder to access and is often only in university libraries, but if you're interested in piskies it's a potentially very helpful read.
Traditions and Hearthside Stories of West Cornwall by William Bottrell.
10 Writing Things That Have Saved My Creative Soul (and Sanity)
âł If your characterâs arc isnât making you slightly emotional or existential, itâs probably not finished. If they start and end the story the same person, thatâs not a character arcâitâs a flatline. Make them squirm, learn, lose, grow. Bonus points if they make you question your own moral compass in the process.
âł Worldbuilding is not a license to drown your reader in lore like itâs Game of Thrones on steroids. If you have to write a wiki page to understand your own plot, fine...but that doesnât mean your reader has to read it. Give us breadcrumbs, not a 12-course feast on page one.
âł If the theme of your story canât be summed up in one slightly aggressive sticky note, youâre probably overcomplicating it. (âThis book is about choosing yourself even when no one else doesââboom, theme. Now go make your characters suffer for it.)
âł You will hate your manuscript somewhere between 30k and 50k words. Thatâs your cue to keep going, not quit. Itâs like the literary version of hitting mile 18 in a marathon. Everything hurts, but that means you're doing it right.
âł That âgenius ideaâ you had at 2 a.m.? Save it. Write it down. But donât drop everything for it. New ideas are seductive chaos demons. Your current project deserves monogamy⌠at least until the second draft.
âł A characterâs greatest fear is a shortcut to their heart. Forget favorite color or coffee order...what keeps them up at night? What would destroy them if it came true?
âł If you donât know how to end your story, figure out what question itâs been asking the whole time. Once you know the question, the ending becomes the answer. Maybe not a happy answer, but a satisfying one.
âł No oneâs going to write your weird little story the way you will. Thatâs your superpower. So go ahead and write the morally gray necromancer love triangle in space. Your people are out there. And theyâre hungry for it.
âł You are allowed to be a slow writer. You are allowed to be a fast writer. You are not allowed to be a cruel writerâto yourself. The world will criticize your art for free. Donât do their job for them inside your own head.
âł Some stories just arenât meant to be novels. And thatâs okay. Maybe it's a short story. A play. A fever dream disguised as a poem. The shape doesnât matter. The story does. Let it tell you what it wants to be.
I hope every writer who sees this writes LOADS the next few months. Like freetime opens up, no writers block, the ability to focus, etc etc you're able to write loads & make lots of progress <3
Passing along for all the writers out there!
So... I found this and now it keeps coming to mind. You hear about "life-changing writing advice" all the time and usually its really notâbut honestly this is it man.
I'm going to try it.
I love the lawyer metaphor, because whenever I see âJohn knew that...â in prose writing I immediately think âhow? How does he know it?â Interrogate your witnesses. Cross-examine them. Make them explain their reasoning. It pays dividends.
All of this, but also feels/felt. My editor has forbidden me from using those and itâs forced me to stretch my skills.
This is your "show not tell" advice explained!
Editor here.
First, let me preface this with something very important: you can treat all of this advice as SECOND-DRAFT ADVICE. It is so much easier to rewrite this kind of stuff once you have words on the page. Telling yourself the first draft is totally appropriate and acceptable.
What weâre talking about here are FILTER WORDS (and to some degree verbs of being). Yes, âthoughtâ words are included. But so are âheard, saw, looked, tasted, smelledâ etc.âmost words having to do with the senses.
This isnât black and white advice; sometimes youâll use these words and thatâs okay. Theyâre not WRONG. Theyâre just weaker. And theyâre weaker because they create distance between the reader and the experience of the character.*
If you want your reader to feel like theyâre experiencing the story right alongside the character, you want to cut down on filter words.
*This is particularly important with first person and close third POVs. The reader always knows whose eyes theyâre seeing through and thoughts theyâre privy to. So you donât need to tell them âI saw X.â Or âI heard X.â Or âI thought Y.â You can just jump into the action/observation as itâs happening.
This is also where you want to pay attention to verbs of being.
âIt was rainy.â Versus: âThe rain pounded against the roof.â Or âThe rain howled like an injured animal.â Or âThe rain tapped against the window like an anxious lover.â All of these are inviting the reader deeper into the experience of the story by using stronger verbs and similes. And, at the same time, they stir feelings (instead of TELLING feelings). And feelings keep your reader engaged. Engaged readers keep turning pages; engaged readers become FANS.
This is also where
you want to pay attention
to verbs of being.
Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.
Less magic schools. More magic universities. Unlearn the simplified models of your secondary education. Discover how to reference scrolls written by a wizard possessed by a different wizard. Identify bias in the voices that whisper from beyond the veil. Have your institution be accused of promoting a Merlinist agenda. Become addicted to energy potions.
Honking Trouble
This job was a pain from the start. The customer was pushy, giving Captain Sunlight a run for her money on the diplomacy front â not bad enough for us to refuse to make the delivery, but pushing the boundaries â and the cargo was awkward.Â
And since it was animals, that was my problem.Â
âKeep your distance,â I told Zhee. âI think it can get its beak between the bars.â The cage was large and rickety, with bars a few inches apart. As if to prove me right, a long furry neck with a beak at the end stabbed outward and hissed at us.Â
Zhee flared his pincher arms and hissed back, but the creature wasn't impressed. It just spread its batlike wings as far as the cage would allow and made a surprisingly deep honk that echoed through the cargo bay.Â
if you're trying to get into the head of your story's antagonist, try writing an "Am I the Asshole" reddit post from their perspective, explaining their problems and their plans for solving them. Let the voice and logic come through.
We had a lot of fun with this one on the discord so reblogging it here as well!
I'm a big fan of wizards-as-programmers, but I think it's so much better when you lean into programming tropes.
A spell the wizard uses to light the group's campfire has an error somewhere in its depths, and sometimes it doesn't work at all. The wizard spends a lot of his time trying to track down the exact conditions that cause the failure.
The wizard is attempting to create a new spell that marries two older spells together, but while they were both written within the context of Zephyrus the Starweaver's foundational work, they each used a slightly different version, and untangling the collisions make a short project take months of work.
The wizard has grown too comfortable reusing old spells, and in particular, his teleportation spell keeps finding its components rearranged and remixed, its parts copied into a dozen different places in the spellbook. This is overall not actually a problem per se, but the party's rogue grows a bit concerned when the wizard's "drying spell" seems to just be a special case of teleportation where you teleport five feet to the left and leave the wetness behind.
A wizard is constantly fiddling with his spells, making minor tweaks and changes, getting them easier to cast, with better effects, adding bells and whistles. The "shelter for the night" spell includes a tea kettle that brings itself to a boil at dawn, which the wizard is inordinately pleased with. He reports on efficiency improvements to the indifference of anyone listening.
A different wizard immediately forgets all details of his spells after he's written them. He could not begin to tell you how any of it works, at least not without sitting down for a few hours or days to figure out how he set things up. The point is that it works, and once it does, the wizard can safely stop thinking about it.
Wizards enjoy each other's company, but you must be circumspect about spellwork. Having another wizard look through your spellbook makes you aware of every minor flaw, and you might not be able to answer questions about why a spell was written in a certain way, if you remember at all.
Wizards all have their own preferences as far as which scripts they write in, the formatting of their spellbook, its dimensions and material quality, and of course which famous wizards they've taken the most foundational knowledge from. The enlightened view is that all approaches have their strengths and weaknesses, but this has never stopped anyone from getting into a protracted argument.
Sometimes a wizard will sit down with an ancient tome attempting to find answers to a complicated problem, and finally find someone from across time who was trying to do the same thing, only for the final note to be "nevermind, fixed it".
"This spell causes the hair to fall off cats." "It works with my tome"
"This spell causes the hair to fall off cats." "That's fixed in Xaranthius' latest publication, you just have to rewrite your entire spellbook for compatibility."
"This spell causes the hair to fall of cats." "Magister Olaus of Writhington uses it to help with his allergies. WORKING AS INTENDED."
I want to see wizards snarking at each other over different magical languages/scripts, the same way programmers do it over different languages.
Sure, "High Tower is a powerful language, but it's such a pain to write. I just use Unity* as it's simple to write and can do nearly everything I need" "cranky because you can't memorize all the conjugations and declensions, aren't you?" "LOOK MAN, I CAN MEMORIZE ANYTHING, INCLUDING THE FACE OF YOUR MOTHER IN ECSTASY. IN FACT, BEHOLD!" *a little time window appears between them, demonstrating exactly that. The first wizard (seen through the window) turns around and winks at the "camera".
"you kids today with your lizardman. How can you get anything done in a language without gendered pronouns? It's like fingerpainting. Sure you can learn on it but once you've got the basics you should switch over to a REAL language"
"the Kalic have been here already. We better get out before the rest of their army marches in." "how can you be sure?" "you see that teleport?" "no" "well, if you COULD see it, you'd see it's written in Adevic Yevi. That's the Kalic magic language." "couldn't it be someone else? We saw those Monon traders, maybe one of them..." "no. No one writes Adevic Yevi unless they're being paid to. It's a language written by committee."
Wizards going on a quest to get the spellbooks for a lost spell, only to find out that it was written in skydove cant. No one can read that shit! The creator must have been one of those weird "functional wizards". (They're obsessed with making sure their spells have no side effects)
There's a small library on the outskirts of Freeport which tries to collect versions of basic spells in every language. The Adevic Yevi version of "fireball" takes up 7 pages, mostly boilerplate setting up the interfaces with fire and explosions and ExplodingMagicalBallFactorySingletons. The Lizardman version is basically "AHAHAHA, YOU GO BOOM!"
There's a bunch of wizard apprentices working on porting an old "Summon Bread and Fishes" spell from the absolutely archaic language it was written in. Once it's in Unity, it'll be easy to modify and teach to more wizards, which'll obviously be good for disaster areas. It's just too expensive to keep paying the ancient guys who can still do magic in TRAN-FOR.
Eccentric wizards keep inventing new languages for spells. You look at them and they're neat, but it'll never catch on. And either you're right, or the next time you're applying to be a court wizard, the advisors want to know if you have at least 5 years experience in Tilted Runic and you're like "it only came out 2 years ago!" "aren't you a chronomancer?" "oh good point. Yeah I've been using it for 20-30 years."
There's wizards who will spend incredible amounts of time doing silly things with spells in strange ways. There's this guy (Vorth) who made his own language where there's only one basic spell: fireball. Everything else is basic magic glue tying multiple fireballs together. So like, he's got a breakfast spell. Stand back (good advice for all his spells), and you'll see a fish get knocked out of the local pond, flung through the air by successive explosions, and eventually it lands on his plate, nicely cooked and deboned, if slightly charred (the glass of milk is harder to explain). His magical door locks involve a quicksilver sphere and molten lead changing shape when heated... It's tricky but it seems to work. He's working on a teleport spell, but so far it's mainly just killed test subjects (primarily sheep from a nearby farm).
* so the funny thing here is that this isn't a reference to the unity game engine. The main country in my One Hundred and One Magical Pistols setting is called "the union" and their language is called "unity".
It's wands vs staves vs bare hands.
Wanders are like "they're available everywhere and once you learn how to do it it's so powerful!"
Staffguys always talk about how you can do ANYTHING with a staff. Wanders claim it's a pain to carry around an overpowered device that can do ANYTHING when you just need to cast fireball or a simple one man teleport.
Meanwhile the bare wizards are showing off how they don't need any magical tools and can just do hand motions.
Wanders and staffguys retort that when a spell goes wrong, THEY need to go to store for a new magical tool. YOU need new hands.
Heavenly Tyrant ARCs (Advance Reader Copies) are now up on Netgalley and Edelweiss! If you don't know what those are then don't worry about it. You'll be able to read it upon the official release, which WILL be on Dec 24 this year! So, a little more than 3 months to go. I'm freaking out because I have no idea if you'll like the book; it's very diffrent from Iron Widow in a lot of ways...but here is what to expect!
Preorder links
As an apology for the literal years of delays, beneath the cut is also the entire prologue of HT. Feel free to read it while blasting Bring Me to Life by Evanescence like you're still watching anime in 3 parts on YouTube.
HEAR ME OUT
IT'S GONNA BE A FUN(eral) RIDE!
My friends put together an anthology of stories inspired by the Major Arcana tarot, and it just came out! I'm very excited. There are so many good stories in this, some of which will stick with me for a long time. And I got to contribute three stories, which I'm delighted about!
It's on Amazon as both a paperback and an ebook. As the summary says, you can read the stories in order, "or perhaps take out your own tarot deck and let the cards decide your fate..."
(Mine are Wheel of Fortune, Justice, and The Lovers.)
(AKA, my take on the idea of a second-generation portal fantasy; something inspired by the "desperate cleric slamming healing spells," and what happens when your reincarnating soulmate gets harder to find as the population grows.)
I'm in this one, too! And it is every bit as good as advertised. Everyone brought their absolute A game to this anthology and it shows.
(You can find my stories here for: The Magician, Strength, and Death)