One Hell of a Place @bloden-2 - Tumblr Blog

I guarantee you that any man who hates radical feminism — who hates & derides the ideas radical feminists put forth — hates women. - Radfem Meghan Murphy

zanthador64

That awkward moment a rad-fem interchanges radical feminist and woman even though less than 10% of women identify as feminists, let alone radical ones. Drink a shot.

To be fair, regular feminists do this exact same thing all the time.

dogsforwhiteboysummer

Have you guys ever heard of a thing called projection?

Yes.

seed-of-impurity

One radical feminist put forward the idea that men, upon reaching 15 years of age, should be removed from society and forced to live alone. They were not to be allowed to congregate in numbers greater than 3 and not to interact with women unless the woman explicitly allowed them to look at, speak to, and touch them. They were not to be allowed to live in urban areas and were to be relegated to distant, subsistence-only farms. They were not under any circumstances to have any contact with children, theirs included.

Apparently, to have issue with this idea is to have issue with all women everywhere. Who knew?

feminismisahatemovement

“If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males“ - Mary Daly

“The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race” - Sally Miller Gearhart

“Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear” - Susan Brownmiller

“I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig” - Andrea Dworkin

“Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage” - Sheila Cronin

“The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist” - Ti-Grace Atkinson

“When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression” - Sheila Jeffrys

Anyone who takes issue with any of the above radical feminist teachings just hates women.

rainbowloliofjustice

Many prolific radfems literally advocate for treating males like they’re subhuman.

And they’re too damn self-unaware to actually realize “Wow! When we advocate for treating someone like animals, they hate us!”

I mean, a world without men would be lit though lol 😂😂

cheshireinthemiddle

“I mean, a world without [black people] would be lit though lol 😂 😂”

#feminism

Fuckin racist lol

Why am I not surprised you missed the point of the analogy?

I didn’t miss it, dude. I understood it just fine. I see this comparison all the fucking time, it would be ridiculous if I didn’t understand it at this point.

It’s cute that you think you have the high ground.

And that’s just precious

Actually no, feminism is about female liberation. I see you fell for the re-branding of it just like everyone else lol.

Ah yes, because it’s misogynist to call out bigots for being bigots. Truly, I must hate all women everywhere for the crime of criticizing you. People like you are the reason feminists don’t get taken seriously-what’s even the point of having a movement if you deliberately doom yourselves to failure?

Ah yes, I must be a misandrist for wanting women to have the option to disconnect from men all together.

Yes, I must be misandrist for centering women in my life and prioritizing them.

Yes, I must be a misandrist for stating the fact that men commit the vast majority of atrocities, have historically and still, dominate women and actively harm us on the basis of our sex.

Yes, I must be a misandrist for saying that a movement, ONE movement, for once, doesn’t fucking cater to men. Boo hoo. Cry me a river.

I also want to remind you that we, as a society, have come to a point where you, as a man, (assuming) can, at any given time, throw on a dress and a wig and makeup and claim to be a woman and have instant access to women’s spaces. And you will have people crawling from the fucking woodworks to support you and will actively wish death and even go as far as doxxing women who don’t agree. You, as men, have yet again earned another privilege in society.

If pointing these things out and actively making sure that women are safe first and foremost, makes me a misandrist, then…so be it.

You anti-feminist egalitarians aren’t my main concern right now anyways, so I don’t even know why I’m wasting my time anymore.

You’re a misandrist because you call yourself one. Was that not obvious? And I highly doubt you actually care about wasting time, since you clearly don’t mind throwing so much bile into defending a tiny minority of hateful people through talking points you should know I won’t bother reading. It was funny the first time, but now it’s just old.

Okay well go be an anti-feminist egalitarian somewhere else, then.

Also, if you’re a woman, tell me now.

“Wahhhhhh the evil radfems advocate for treating males as though they’re subhuman…. It’s not like men have stated women are subhuman and inferior to men for millenia :((( only the men are allowed to choose who is subhuman and who isn’t!! Fucking feminazis!”

Ah yes, the Eric Cartman method: “The only way to combat hate, is with more hate!” Nice strawman by the way.

Ah yes, the Morally Righteous™ perspective. Whenever the oppressed start treating their oppressors with the same form of disdain, suddenly it’s all about “you can’t fight fire with fire! You’re just as bad as they are :(”

It’s not a strawman argument, lol. It’s role reversal. Radfems view men the same way men as a class have viewed women since humanity’s inception. Die mad about it 🤷

magister-christophe

A role reversal is a good experiment if used to help understand someone else’s problems and correct them. The overall lesson you’re supposed to get out of it is “you wouldn’t like it done to you, so don’t do it to others”. It loses its usefulness if you actually want to have the roles reversed.

If you just want to do the same thing in reverse, you sacrifice the right to call it immoral. You don’t care about right and wrong, you’re just upset that you’re not the immoral ruling class at this point.

In which case, you can die mad about it 🤷🏻

To all the men reblogging from me:

Your pinions are worthless; I literally do not care what you have to say; you’re all subhuman; men are trash; come to terms with the fact that radfems hate you and couldn’t care less about your opinions 🙏

Radfem starts saying things actual literal Nazi’s said during the Holocaust, thinks she’s not a human dumpster fire, more at 11.

tzimiscelord

@sillylandblaze Such unabashed hatred and absolutely evil and prejudicious contempt is the reason so many people walk away from feminism. People (including the majority of women) avoid the label “feminist” like the plague to avoid being in the same group as people such as you.

If feminism keeps shrinking until it disappears, know that it won’t be from any external threat, but by people like you eating it from the inside out like maggots and pushing people away.

Thank you for chiming in and offering your brilliant perspective, you’ve certainly changed my opinion of radical feminism!

I am hereby a certified Good Woman™ and the Men must Respect me, for I now know my place 🤪

burningonthestake

These people r so embarrassing…like get ur heads out of your asses and listen to what is being said. The idea that liberation from our oppressors is seen as such an offence to men is really telling.

Haven’t you heard? These neckbeards are saying women aren’t oppressed so it must be the truth.

Women wanting liberation from men is Nazi rhetoric, duhhhhhh

burningonthestake

@y33tcann0n do you honestly expect me to believe that women aren’t oppressed? Why is it always thay get to establish what a woman is or isn’t…

Yes, that’s what anyone who isn’t a full blown moron is saying. You think being able to say what you want to the people supposedly oppressing would be tolerated if you actually were oppressed? And no, someone disagreeing with you is not oppressing you.

“You think being able to say what you want to the people supposedly oppressing would be tolerated if you actually were oppressed?”

Yes, because as this thread has revealed, any commentary made by radfems is being received by these men very well and there is no defensiveness happening at all here.

Nice self, drag, dude.

Like how you left off the part where I said someone disagreeing with you isn’t oppression. Or that your very first post was you firing off insults and hate at men for being men. Way to have zero self recognition, twat.

Like how you’re continually implying women aren’t oppressed. Read a book. Watch the news. I would say get outside more but clearly you’re better off inside trapped in your own little bubble. I said I have valid reasons for hating men as a class, it’s not my problem if you have an issue with that, neckbeard.

In the Western Hemisphere, you’re not. I do watch the news, that’s how I know things like Amber Heard getting away with abusing Johnny Depp for 5 years, or Amy Schumer turned raping a guy into a bit, or Lena Dunham admitting to molesting her sister for pretty much her entire childhood, or how the Duke Lacrosse team had to endure after being falsely accused of rape, or how the coronavirus spread so wildly in Spain because a bunch of women just had to have their little march. There’s that projection again. “I have valid reasons” That’s what every bigot says. I guarantee my neck is cleaner shaved than any of your unwashed body parts.

we-are-the-reckless-youthhhh

> There’s that projection again. “I have valid reasons”

That’s not projection. That’s just plain bigotry.

explanatorypower-deactivated201

i dont understand this at all and america scares the fuck out of me

free-market-pluralist-deactivat

This is the america they don’t want you to see

robloxgf-deactivated20190515

i love america

dalaisa-katili-deactivated20170

This is what you call Waffle House at 2 am when the bars close and everyone is drunk and hungry

rasec-wizzlbang-blog

*group of people having fun* this site: wtf this is so scary

wilfulwayfarer-deactivated20220

People having safe fun at a waffle house is scary for most Tumblr bloggers, reports say.

inkandcayenne

Some context for those not familiar with Waffle House Culture:

Waffle House is one of the few chains in America that’s open 24/7/365, and where you can get both breakfast and lunch/dinner options at any time (I have had so many Breakfast Cheeseburgers at Waffle Houses). The food is really good, and people eat there at all times of the day or night, but it’s particularly popular as a late-night post-drinking spot because it’s all that’s open and it’s the kind of food that tastes especially good when you’re hammered.

Part of Waffle House Protocol is that all the servers and cooks greet every single customer as they come through the door. It sounds lame, but I’ve never been to a Waffle House where that greeting didn’t feel completely heartfelt. My mom is a health nut who could barely find anything on the menu she was willing to eat and yet she describes the Christmas Day lunch we had there one year as one of the nicest meals she’s ever had because everyone was so warm and welcoming. That sense of camaraderie gets turned up to 11, of course, at 2 a.m. when everyone’s shitfaced.

The jukeboxes have Waffle-House-themed songs on them (once you have heard “Raisins in my Toast” you will be earwormed forever) and there is an arcane system of hash brown ordering: scattered, smothered, covered, chunked, topped, diced, peppered, and/or capped. The hot sauce bottles say “Casa de Waffle.”

Once, in Oxford (UK), my husband and I walked past a kebab van very late one night and he said “why do I smell Waffle House”

The location of most Waffle Houses means there’s some… classism that tends to get tied up with Anti-Waffle House Discourse, which is probably lending itself, in part, to this being such a fraught topic. (I’m looking at a map and apparently I was born and raised right in the middle of the Peak Waffle House Density Zone)

It is, in the words of chef Anthony Bourdain, “indeed marvelous— an irony-free zone where everything is beautiful and nothing hurts; where everybody regardless of race, creed, color or degree of inebriation is welcomed.”

dank-space-memes

This was adorable lmao

normal-horoscopes

WAFFLE HOUSE IS SACRED NEUTRAL GROUND

garliccigarettes

Did you know that out of 331 million Americans, only two of them are a dog and rabbit couple with a daughter that they love a lot very much? Hi: my name is Andy, and i drew this comic.

cerulean-beekeeper-deactivated2

*liberal voice* Biden would never (things biden has already done)

Trust me, Biden isn’t my first, second, third, fourth...choice but Jesus, Biden would not separate children from there parents and lock them up at the border. Biden wouldn’t decide to deny the pandemic. Biden’s far from perfect, but he’s an improvement to what we have now.

Perfect example, ty

Can someone explain to me why Biden voters do this? No one asked. No, really, criticism of Biden is not an invitation for u all to scream at people to vote for him. It’s not even an invitation to go off about Trump. Is it guilt? Are you trying to justify your own choice? Are u all replaced by bots?

Why are u all defending an old facist rapist? Why are you trying to pretend he’s anything but evil?

bigwordsandsharpedges

BEYOND PARODY

sashibunbun

So, who ya guys voting for in you congress and senate races?

I love that phrasing. "Lock up immigrants". As if the country should have open borders, and it's axiomatically wrong to oppose them. It’s blatant dishonesty, of course, because if they said ‘lock up illegal immigrants’, few would have a problem with that.

I also like how the Obama administration apparently never thought the parents could be a danger and separated the kids. And I happen to know one of the 'kids in cages' photos used to damn Trump was actually from 2014.

Also, I’m pretty sure most of the “craziness” under Orange Man has been coming from the left. Such as, for instance, certain riots.

alright facist

talesandthoughtsfromreality

Locking up people who cross borders illegally is fascist?

And none of the "don't seperate families" crowd seems to object when it's an American kid being seperated from their parent. American kids have parents in jail, yet the same people who object to seperating foreign children brought here illegal from people who are sometimes not even their parents, don't object to this seperation.

whitepeopletwitter

dashaibo

You’re assuming all of those hinged on a single person. A single person that spent 27 years in a single high-ranking government position, spitting in the face of any kind of representative democracy. The same person who authorized pipelines through sacred Native lands.

Americans and their idol worship, I S2G…

rametarin

.. many of these things existed before Ruth Badger Ginsburg was alive. And yet, continuing that tradition of attributing 100-150 year old freedoms to modern people in Their Tribe.

dashaibo

The more I read the list the more laughable it becomes

nachtfaust

morlock-holmes

I think we can all agree that in the three years since Richard Spencer was punched on live TV America has gotten much less fascist and we're all quite a bit less frightened of the threat of fascism in this country then we were back in 2017.

We did it!

aksemmi

fascism was already a threat in 2017, like theres [punching richard spencer will singlehandedly stop fascism] and [punching richard spencer will help stop or slow or weaken fascism]

im p sure the people who punched him believed the latter, and they are probably right

marlbororeds100s-deactivated202

Except for the part where it was the best thing that ever happened to him, because it turned his name into a household word and got him lots of free publicity.

And didn’t actually shut him up in any significant way.

Not to mention the many innocent people who’ve been attacked by copycat blackhoodies.

noblepeasant

You know when Richard Spencer collapsed into irrelevancy? When he was recorded making that big rant about how his ancestors enslaved black people.

It wasn't when he was punched. That was what gave him popularity in the first place.

kaldicuct

The way to deal with dicks like Spencer is to laugh at him. Or we can take a page from Daryll Davis and talk to him to convert him into a better person.

switch-up-snowfox

There’s also the debate where sargon of akkad basically revealed Spencer more or less believed in a form of monarchism and clearly had no clue what he was actually on about.

cplus902

So to summarize: Spencer was catapulted into the public consciousness when he got sucker punched, and faded into irrelevance after he was allowed to speak and everybody learned how much of a moron he is.

I feel like that shows the right way to deal with assholes like him.

im sorry but this is so funny this is like. the epitome of white liberal women in this country shfhdjdhdj

emmaubler

whitepeopletwitter

brunhiddensmusings

education is not claiming these things never happened because you disagree, dont like it, or actively support it

The irony is this was posted on /r/whitePeopleTwitter. Which regularly ignores or excuses leftist violence.

> which quite a few people criticize because why have her breasts be so exposed then, when she could be using her arms and thighs instead.

So she either has to lose the use of one of her arms while she’s drawing whatever out, or bend over and slow down. Not a good idea in a combat situation.

You could’ve at least argued her hips, which has some of the same problems as thighs, but it’s at least a little handier.

And her costume also includes her stomach. Between that and the breasts, she has quick access to two of the biggest fat stores on the body, especially since she doesn’t appear to have much fat on her bones anywhere else, as you’d expect from someone in a job that requires fitness.

I figured this out from scratch. I don’t even watch the show. But the Wiki does say the show treats it like a joke; she doesn’t actually care about how much skin she’s showing, and she’s quite innocent, especially when people act pervy toward her.

Just think of her as a slutwalk participant.

>Also Quiet from MGS, but that’s justifiably bs, saying “oh she needs to expose as much skin as possible because she breathes through her skin”.

You mean exactly like a dozen or so other characters in the same game, or the guy with a similar condition in MGS3?

You’d think a pure “fanservice” character wouldn’t be the one who spends most of the game far, far away from the player. And has an actual character arc. Heck, I’d say she might more of an arc than the player character.

The fanservice is there to make the player distrust Quiet. She’s not even the first covert agent in the series to use her - or his - sexuality to try and compromise targets, targets which have already included Big Boss himself. Heck, the first time the player sees her up close, she’s sprawled on the ground, and you can just put a bullet in her head, because, after all, she just tried to kill you.

You’re probably supposed to go “wait a second. Isn’t this the second time she tried to kill me? Or does the hospital thing count as two attempts?”

There’s really no logical reason to trust her or let her live.

Incidentally, OP, toadprince, implied men’s gender problems don’t matter because they’re all other men’s fault. Somehow, I doubt they’re exactly rational about gender issues.

powerfulwizard

Cringe

wilmotfornow

Momo could wear a coat or loose fitting clothing and she’s underage and literally a fictional character completely in the control of a grown man acknowledgement challenge haha

thespectacularspider-girl

> Momo could wear a coat or loose fitting clothing

It’s like you didn’t even read my post.

If she’s using her power to save lives, I think people can deal with a little skin.

The funny thing is that Momo, as a character, is so practical about her quirk that she wouldn’t hesitate to go naked to save lives. Her quirk requires skin to show so she doesn’t CARE about modesty when her quirk is called for.

This is offset by the fact that she’s extremely modest when her quirk ISN’T needed. She wears practical clothing, she doesn’t flaunt her body.

The absolute irony is that these people judge Momo entirely by what she wears when the entire POINT is that how little she wears is irrelevant to her hero work. She isn’t dressed that way to be sexual, she’s dressed that way to be practical.

Contrasted to, say, Kirishima who doesn’t NEED to go shirtless into fights, but chooses to do so anyway for (relatively) arbitrary reasons (to be manly).

silent-calling

But you can’t thirst after guys, Spidey! It’s different! Something, something, unequal sexual standards!

And then there’s Bakugo’s remarkably buff arms.

ngsb3

I’m pretty sure I’ve seen Slutwalk participants wear LESS than Momo or Quiet.

IIRC, Kojima said he designed Quiet to be easy to cosplay, in part.

silent-pirate-hunter

Just add in the fact that people despise the fact that Momo is thin into there while we’re at it despite them having no problem with the literal dozen of teen boys with washboard abs.

She literally can’t get fat unless she sat around not using her quirk and just eating constantly because as soon as she uses her quirk she’s using up a ton of fat and lipids. She’d make a canon and lose five pounds. Honestly it’s amazing she’s not malnourished constantly from how much she uses her quirk during training and fights

I’d totally end up using my fat to make minor objects.

On the negative side, TSA would hate me.

> which quite a few people criticize because why have her breasts be so exposed then, when she could be using her arms and thighs instead.

So she either has to lose the use of one of her arms while she’s drawing whatever out, or bend over and slow down. Not a good idea in a combat situation.

You could’ve at least argued her hips, which has some of the same problems as thighs, but it’s at least a little handier.

Just think of her as a slutwalk participant.

>Also Quiet from MGS, but that’s justifiably bs, saying “oh she needs to expose as much skin as possible because she breathes through her skin”.

You mean exactly like a dozen or so other characters in the same game, or the guy with a similar condition in MGS3?

You’re probably supposed to go “wait a second. Isn’t this the second time she tried to kill me? Or does the hospital thing count as two attempts?”

There’s really no logical reason to trust her or let her live.

Incidentally, OP, toadprince, implied men’s gender problems don’t matter because they’re all other men’s fault. Somehow, I doubt they’re exactly rational about gender issues.

powerfulwizard

Cringe

wilmotfornow

Momo could wear a coat or loose fitting clothing and she’s underage and literally a fictional character completely in the control of a grown man acknowledgement challenge haha

thespectacularspider-girl

> Momo could wear a coat or loose fitting clothing

It’s like you didn’t even read my post.

If she’s using her power to save lives, I think people can deal with a little skin.

This is offset by the fact that she’s extremely modest when her quirk ISN’T needed. She wears practical clothing, she doesn’t flaunt her body.

Contrasted to, say, Kirishima who doesn’t NEED to go shirtless into fights, but chooses to do so anyway for (relatively) arbitrary reasons (to be manly).

burningabyss572

The irony of removing the character’s agency to complain about how the character didn’t choose to dress like that, the author chose it is so lost on them it hurts.