Just 2 days left, we can't wait to see our TL full of love for Ranma and Akane.
Solo 2 dĂas mĂĄs. No podemos esperar para ver nuestro TL lleno de amor por Ranma y Akane.
Oooh, I can't wait to stretch my newfound artistic ability.
No title available

titsay
đ

pixel skylines

#extradirty

bliss lane
noise dept.
h
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

blake kathryn
EXPECTATIONS
Mike Driver
ojovivo
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

tannertan36

ellievsbear
Stranger Things

No title available
Fai_Ryy

Discoholic đȘ©

seen from Indonesia

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Mexico
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from France
seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States

seen from France
seen from Germany

seen from Australia

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
@clericalerror87
Just 2 days left, we can't wait to see our TL full of love for Ranma and Akane.
Solo 2 dĂas mĂĄs. No podemos esperar para ver nuestro TL lleno de amor por Ranma y Akane.
Oooh, I can't wait to stretch my newfound artistic ability.
I get in theory why people complain about het ships or whatever, I get wanting to watch queer media I really do, but I guess where yâall lose me is like. I saw some asshole on a post about Sinners complaining it was âhetslopââthis person was specifically doing so while also claiming Remmick was a queer character and thus they were justified in caring more about him than the Black protagonists. which is a whole other disgusting can of worms that has been well addressed by others at this point. but even in the absence of that part of the argument, like, no, i actually donât think that a hunger for queer stories is an especially good excuse to deride and dismiss a piece of landmark Black filmmaking, especially as a non-Black person. I have a post thatâs been going around encouraging folks to engage with more Native stories and characters, and I had someone come onto that post saying in the tags that theyâd need these stories to be queer in order to care. and I just think that, you know, sucks! like obviously as a queer Native I also want to see more of those stories too. but idk how else to put it other than to say that Black people and people of color shouldnât have to be like you in order for you to care about our narratives and experiences. and I think some of yâall are using this disdain for heterosexuality as a cover for your unexamined racial biases. itâs not okay to be racist to people just because those people happen to be straight, and you continue to be white before you are queer.
on an even more basic level than that, also, I simply just think some of yâall NEED to learn how to interact with media and storytelling without ships and fandom in mind. like if not being able to write fic about two men kissing is genuinely going to be a dealbreaker for you I think thatâs actually something you need to work on within yourself because at that point I think youâre no longer really interacting with art and themes and narrative so much as just kind of playing with toys. which is, like, fine I guess. have fun. but it wouldnât kill you to disengage from that from time to time. especially if would allow you to actually appreciate rich and deeply moving cultural stories from communities of color that you desperately need to learn how to see as human
The beautiful art of Yoshitaka Amano
Gooseworx didn't deactivate, she was banned
Recently, you cannot access Gooseworx's blog anymore, and people thought she deactivated her Tumblr. However, she was actually banned. When someone deactivates their main blog, a string of numbers and letters is attached to their username: "-deactivated[year][month][day]"
When you look at posts made by Gooseworx, there's no "deactivated" and no numbers
Some speculate that this might have been a sideblog, since there's no "deactivated" string if you delete a sideblog, but it was her main blog. You can't use sideblogs to like posts. If you search "Gooseworx liked this" on google, you will find proof ithat she liked multiple Tumblr posts.
All of this adds up to one thing: Gooseworx was banned from Tumblr. And why? Gooseworx is a trans woman, and Tumblr staff hates trans women and bans them for no reason, and also, there is an ongoing harassment campaign against Gooseworx, so I bet they must have mass-reported her blog and gotten her banned. Fuck the "tadc critical" community, anyone in the "anti tadc" or "anti gooseworx" tags is NOT to be trusted!!!!!! They weaponized staff's transmisogyny to ban a successful trans woman off the platform all because the show didn't end the way they wanted it to.
I know I said I'd watch kill la kill after murder drones but. counterpoint. I don't care
watching onimai now
holy shit, no one told me this show involved mad science
oh she's TRANS trans.
everywhere I've seen it mentioned onimai is treated like some scandalous pornographic forcefem adult show but I'm five out of twelve episodes in and so far it's a perfectly normal and even mostly clean show about a trans girl. this aired on live tv just fine and everything. it mentions horny topics, but like. the show itself isn't horny in its own right at all, let alone scandalously so like how everyone talks about it. and even when it does touch on something horny, it's pretty tame about it.
onimai is actually a remarkably unhorny show, especially considering some of its subject matter.
just finished episode 7 of 12. they put the mc in middle school. this is barely even a comedy show anymore, it's transitioned to just being slice of life
in theory I should be going to bed about now, but there are only two episodes left, sooooo
Onimai: I'm Now Your Sister! is a comedy slice-of-life anime about a shut-in named Mahiro who is used as an unwitting test subject for his little sister's sex-changing drug. After waking up to find himself in the body of a middle-school-age girl, Mahiro embarks upon a coming-of-age story and a journey of self-discovery, making close friends along the way. In the end, Mahiro decides her new life, and her new self, are worth keeping.
Onimai: I'm Now Your Sister! is most often talked about as if it were a porno or some form of fetish content. at worst, I can only see it as wish fulfillment. it's just queer. get comfortable with that.
reblog the full version, please
oh yeah no absolutely. kill la kill is a very horny show. not explicit, strictly, but definitely well into the territory of "check out these high school girls in skimpy outfits" type of horny show. absolutely one hundred percent a horny show on purpose where they all knew what they were doing.
but kill la kill doesn't get branded as fetishistic outside of being included in racist "all anime is pornographic" tyrades. onimai on the other hand, a show that basically only acknowledges horniness and related topics as Something That Happens Sometimes, is constantly branded and even billed to people as fetishistic and horny. people use that as a fucking selling point for onimai.
I'm not well-versed in this sort of thing, so I don't have very many detailed thoughts on this, but after sitting on it for a little bit my take is that onimai's branding as fetishistic is transmisogyny
From the University of Kentuckyâs Art Museum, William Welshâs grand painting Burlesque Queen (1941) ⊠I like the Universityâs official description: âShe wears her corpulenceâand skimpy costumeâwith confidence and ease.â
This is the best ad for Project Hail Mary I have ever seen. Like if I was on the fence about watching or reading it, this would convince me to do so.
Man I miss free the nipple. Its getting warmer and we donât even have free the nipple anymore
feminism has backslid so hard in recent years people don't even know what free the nipple means anymore
To clarify for those who don't know, "free the nipple" isn't about going braless, it's about going topless
No shirt, no bra, completely bare torso, just like cis men are allowed to
It's about desexualizing breasts and "female presenting nipples" and not being criminalized for our bodies if we want to go topless because it's a million damn degrees out. This was a popular growing movement that was still widely known a decade ago!
And the fact that not wearing a bra is so discouraged and stigmatized that people think the movement was about being able to go braless under your shirt in public rather than about being able to not wear a shirt at all says a lot about how far we've backslid in the past decade
Getting down on my knees and thanking the humans who invented dishwashers and washing machines.
InsNe that dishwashers are more efficient and easier than just washing them manually but they also use less water. Itâs a win win situation
They ALSO sterilize dishes, due to operating at a far higher temperature than human hands could ever tolerate. It's a win every way.
Made this post about 15 minutes after the repair guy who fixed the pump on my dishwasher packed up his tools and left, as the dishwasher was whirring along doing my dishes from that morning.
He said the exact same thing, which I did not know before that, so spreading this knowledge.
Ranma's being a little condescending prick here, tho something important to notice is that the author agrees with him, having both his statement prove true and the fact Akane knew it all along
Takahashi when writing Ranma 1/2 poured some of her old fashioned views in, but they may not be what you're thinking rn
Her writing "Kuno was actually stronger than Akane all along, he was just going easy" was not made to disrespect Akane as a fighter
I mean yea it kinda does, but it wasn't the intention
The intention was to say that while bokken boy's an idiot, he's not seriously dangerous, which is a lot more important than you think to properly set the tone
I understand the itch to write Akane as actually stronger and all her victories on him as more "legit", as vindication, but be aware that it shifts the tone dramatically to say the only reason Kuno was stopped is that he couldn't do what he actually wanted to do
Takahashi respects the idea of men who are very strong but wouldn't actually use that strength on women, it's charming to her
not only respects it and finds it charming, in her stories it's the basic trait any man should have to be called such
everyone in Ranma has it
It's the reason why Mikado, even with his kissing habits, tried to stop Ryoga when he attacked Ranma in the middle of the match
Also the reason why Happosai refused to train Ranma before finding out about the curse
not (just) because "women can't be real warriors on par with the guys", but also because his methods are rough and he legit doesn't want to use them on a girl
When the Herb arc starts and dragon boy himself tries to throw Akane against a wall, the page is telling you "this is serious, this is not like every arc so far, the limit has been passed"
And indeed, even with all the jokes the Herb arc has, it's the second most serious-shonen storyline after the final one, with Ryoga dying on screen, having a dramatic resurrection, he and Mousse getting that little redemption moment helping out Ranma in a final fight with an actual climax (instead of ending with a joke), "girl I love's tears give me the strength to raise once again" moment included
This is all of course pretty old fashioned reasoning, "men must be protectors" and stuff
It's why Nodoka accepts the curse, because Ranma acts protective towards her even when transformed, therefore he's "Manly no matter what"
It's also why back in UY, Takahashi considers Nagisa a manly gentleman despite wearing skirts, acting giddy and crying at every occasion, because Nagisa wouldn't lay a hand on Ryu (despite what people with 0 reading comprehension think, you know who you are) and "that's the single most important trait a man should have to be good"
Again, old fashioned reasoning
It's well intentioned, but "the girl fighters are never taken seriously" is a pretty common critique of the series by many
I would argue that giving all guys basic tact is for the better for a manga that uses harassment as a joke, otherwise it'd be much worse, even if yes it'd be cool if girls could also defend themselves
For the author's writing style, removing this little bit of tact creates a being who's truly rancid
even Happosai needs to have this trait if he wants to be in a story that, at the end of the day, must be light hearted
A guy who would actually no joke force himself on a girl is someone that has no place in Ranma 1/2 for Takahashi
That's a trait reserved for Onigumo
A guy who wanted to own a woman against her will and it was such a wicked desire that he attracted an army of demons who fused their souls with his and created the Literal Most Evil Guy in the Story
Also, the jewel from Inuyasha, the macguffin who turns demons into bigger, eviler demons and promises to grant a wish only to warp it negatively to create more conflict and war throughout history, was also created because a guy wanted a girl against her will in a twisted way (if you're unfamiliar with this backstory it's because the anime removed it for some reason)
Mermaid Saga also has terrible men who would use violence on women, described as monsters and demons without a soul
both Mermaid Saga and Inuyasha have scopes that Ranma doesn't have, different moods, different genres, they do stuff that Ranma doesn't need or want to do
Takahashi's not gonna give this trait, that she thinks only belongs to real scum, to the random goober who thinks he's a samurai
he's annoying and sucks, but it would alter the story dramatically to make him like that
even in the watermelon arc where they do a fake out where it looks like he has truly bad intentions (to the point Ranma has nightmares about it), the punchline is that he just wanted a date and is very bad at communicating it
I have sometimes read fics where Akane's had actual fears that the hentai horde was gonna gang up on her and do very bad things with kuno on top, and maybe you think you're being serious and cool with it but it just comes off as an edgy teen who thinks adding rape to every backstory is deep
can't believe i have to defend Kuno of all people lmao
Mousse is also a victim of this
i've had the displeasure of reading very stupid takes about the fact Shampoo must be stronger than him, because if she wasn't he'd force himself on her, which is not only completely misunderstanding him as a character but completely misunderstanding Takahashi as a writer, and makes me wonder what are you even doing here
I was also judged badly for disagreeing like I wasn't respecting Shampoo as a fighter, like I'm sorry but the manga's the one who doesn't do it, it was written in the 90s
Remember the lens of invincibility arc
Mousse finds magic glasses that make the person in front of you prostrate at your feet in tears saying "i'll do anything for you to forgive me", he uses them on Cologne and Ranma, notably not on Shampoo, and gives them up once Shampoo tells him she's disappointed in him, using them on himself to get back in her good graces (what good graces? Only he knows)
No? Doesn't ring a bell? Makes sense, Shampoo fans don't read with their eyes open after all
Bro is the only one aside from Akane and Ranma who gives a damn about what the person of his desires thinks about him, while Kuno thinks defeating Ranma will give him the automatic right to have Akane, Mousse thinks defeating Ranma will prove to Shampoo he's worthy and change her mind, a small difference but a big one too
Akane Ranma and Mousse are the only ones who pass the egg test I fear, sorry Ryoga and Ukyo but you tried using the rod and the umbrella
Also here's Mousse restraining a brainwashed Shampoo who's currently giving her all while in duck form
Ducky boy would never lay a finger on her despite his obsession, it's what Takahashi finds endearing about men
"i'll use violence on her" is a trait not even Happosai has in this manga, and you think the glassed man has it? Be for real
especially as a Shampoo fan you have no right to act like you're above Kodachi, Ryoga, Kuno and Mousse, there's 0 moral high ground there
Accept that you like the second worst Michelle Molesty offender in the manga after the old guy and stop acting like you're any better than the other characters, self awareness would do wonders to admirers of the purple haired menace
Wake the hell up
ngl kinda hate that "this has been discussed extensively you're just 21" tweet cos it was directed at a trans woman who was getting dogpiled for saying that the "dangerous man in a dress" horror trope is shitty
she was born in 2005, the right wing culture war against trans people has been going on for half her life, if she independently arrives at a correct take then how is that something worth mocking?? you got flowers sprouting through concrete, water them dumbass
my dipshit six year old: if the earth is round how come we don't fall off??
me: lol we learned that in science class 20 years ago đ€Ł prick
infinite strangers online: okay this is an all time dunk
Itâs Fourth of July Eve so make sure to leave some milk and cookies out for Captain America
I THOUGHT AFTER FOUR YEARS YOU PEOPLE WOULD LET THIS DIE AND YET AGAIN I OPEN THIS CURSED APP TO FIND MORE NOTES ON THIS POST
Oh, yeah, I wonder how that map's progressed si--wait MISHA COLLINS?
Tags passing peer review, gonna share.
Anyway, homie is, like all wealthy white dudes, egregiously imperfect, but heâs definitely fucking trying. So in that regard, heâs valuable because heâs reaching audiences that you personally probably wouldnât be able to reach, and if you find he has specific stuff on topics you need to persuade people on, heâs a valuable avenue.
it would be so awesome
it would be so cool
edit: idk if edits show up like this on posts but like. i have an educational reblog on this post. and. it is linked in the comments for easy finding. also added tags for filtering because this is my first containment breach i kinda half assed the tags when i posted this. i might add more if i see others add tags that make sense or if yall ask.
âAuthors should not be ALLOWED to write aboutââ you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative
âThis book should be taken off of shelves for featuringââ you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative
âSchools shouldnât teach this book in class becauseââ you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative
âNobody actually likes or wants to read classics because theyâreââ you are an anti-intellectual and an idiot
âI only read YA fantasy books because every classic novel or work of literary fiction is problematic and featuresââ you are an anti-intellectual and you are robbing yourself of the full richness of the human experience.
"you are functionally a conservative" is such a good and clarifying insult
Literally right after I saw this post, I saw another post in a discord chat for BOOK EDITORS in which an outspokenly liberal editor talked about how Nabokov should have never been published because he wrote about p*dophiles and described women's bodies in ways that made her uncomfortable. She described his writing as "objectively terrible" and said she wanted to burn his books. And other editors were bringing up classics they didn't like and talking about how they wanted to throw them in the trash. This wasn't like a light "unpopular opinion!" conversation. This was actual book editors talking about how books should be destroyed and censored.
There is something so scary and toxic in global culture right now. The revival of fascism is influencing everyone's mindset and approach to art, regardless of where they fall on the political spectrum.
I see far more books being censored today than when I was a kid. Librarians handed me The Catcher in the Rye, The Sexual Politics of Meat, and Animal Farm when I was literally 8-11. My mom would never have taken a book away from me. I read everything from the Tao Te Ching to the Qur'an to atheist texts under my desk at school. Teachers thought nothing of it or encouraged it. Books seemed universally acknowledged as sacrosanct to me.
Now I can't find any adults who don't hesitate or want to make exceptions when it comes to censorship. Even the most liberal social activist librarians I know go, "well except for book X..."
Functionally conservative. It's so important to have the language to express that.
Thank you for this addition!
I did a report on book banning once.
Actually, I did reports on book banning three separate times with three separate teachers, with three separate sets of parameters so I was able to write about the same topic in different ways, but this is specifically about the report I did in university. The actual specs for the report included that we were supposed to complete some kind of study or poll (this was not a science class). I put the questions out on a couple of forums I belonged to at the time and asked a few IRL friends as well. A lot of the questions were standard for this sort of thing, I think - were you ever assigned to read a banned book, did you ever read banned books on your own, did you read/were you assigned them BECAUSE they were banned or did you find out about them being banned later, what's your opinion on banning books, etc.
But there was one question I asked that ended up reshaping the entire thrust of my presentation: "Are there any books that you think SHOULD be banned, and if so, why?"
Here's the thing. Most of the forums I was posting on were fan spaces for a book series that, at the time, was one of the most banned/challenged books out there. It's a fandom that I have since entirely distanced myself from, that I one hundred percent do not recommend to anyone, that I will actively attempt to dissuade people from reading or talking about, and that I would like to not be popular anymore. I'm sure most of you reading this can guess which one I'm talking about (I won't name it or go into specifics because I don't want to trip any filters unnecessarily). But it was KNOWN that these books were banned in a lot of places. A lot of people wore the "I read banned books" badge with pride. I fully expected that the answer to that question would be a resounding "no" from the forums, and that I'd maybe get a few affirmative answers from one of the other spaces.
I was shocked. Not only did a lot of people come back with either "not exactly but I think we should keep [author] or [book] out of the hands of children" or "yes, [book]/anything by [author] should be banned because XYZPDQ", but not a single person who responded gave me the same answer. The only one I remember - keep in mind it's been almost twenty years - was that one person specifically said The Bone Collector, and for the "why do you think it should be banned" question, they only said, "No. I'm not explaining it. It's too horrible to even think about. Just believe me when I say nobody should ever be allowed to read this book."
I highlighted that last comment in my presentation, along with several other of my "favorite" official reasons for banning books - the Alabama school board that banned The Diary of Anne Frank in 1984 because it was "a real downer", the district that removed A Raisin in the Sun because it was "pornographic", the library that took Charlie and the Chocolate Factory out of circulation because it "might be hurtful to children without parents", and things of that nature - and pointed out that all of these were the same thing. This was somebody saying "I don't like this, therefore nobody should read it, and I shouldn't have to explain why." I also pointed out that if you can't give a good reason, the whole thing falls apart, and then I quoted "Smut" by Tom Lehrer:
All books can be indecent books, Though recent books are bolder, For filth, I'm glad to say, Is in the mind of the beholder. When correctly viewed, Everything is lewd. I can tell you things about Peter Pan And the Wizard of Oz - THERE'S a dirty old man...
Go back to that paragraph I mentioned earlier, about those books that I no longer recommend to anyone. Notice how I phrased that. I don't recommend them. I will tell you all the reasons why I don't think you should buy them. I will tell you all the problems with the author, with the franchise, with the writing. I wish they were out of print, I wish they were deeply unpopular, I wish nobody would ever read them again.
But I still won't advocate for banning them.
It's so easy to twist a justification. Look at what I quoted up there! A Raisin in the Sun was banned for being "pornographic". One of the websites I used as a source responded to that accusation with "Did they read the same play I did?" At the time, I thought the comment was funny. Now, twenty years later, I realize: It was a buzzword. It was a convenient label. At the time of the challenge, just saying "it's pornographic" was enough. Obviously you're not some kind of sicko who wants to hear about all the pornographic details, are you? Freak! That's pornography! And they're teaching it in schools! We should get rid of it!
A Raisin in the Sun, for anyone who didn't study it at any point or read it (or watch the movie, which was very good), is a play/movie about a black family in Chicago in the 1960s. The family matriarch has been in domestic service for years, but she's just received a very large insurance payment from her husband's death and is retiring. Wanting to give her family, especially her young grandson, a better life, she goes out and buys a house...in an otherwise exclusively white neighborhood. The head of the homeowner's association (essentially) comes to visit them and offers to pay them a substantial amount of money to not move into the neighborhood, because segregation isn't officially a thing and they can't legally stop them from moving in, but they don't want them there. There's a lot more that goes on in the play, and I highly recommend you go and read it, but the point is that there is nothing sexual or titillating in the entire thing. The closest we get is a scene where the daughter (Beneatha, a college student) is gifted a traditional African dress from her boyfriend, who's Nigerian, and he shows her how to put it on over the clothes she's already wearing, and maybe the scene where the daughter-in-law (Ruth, a laundress) accidentally reveals that, having found out she's pregnant, she's planning to have an abortion rather than bring another child into the world/have another mouth to feed.
It's not pornographic. But someone didn't want it taught in schools, so they called it that to get it banned.
It's so easy to twist labels. If you, a liberal, agree that books with X trait are okay to ban, the people who don't want books to exist will find a way to say they have X trait, and then what are you going to do, admit that you like that sort of thing? Sicko! Freak! Pervert!
You don't have to like the book, or the author, or the topic. But if you're advocating for banning them entirely, you're functionally a conservative.
just casually leaving this here for no particular reason
You know what? Fuck it I'm adding more context. Sesame Street has talked about the topic of death more than once and it's done with such gentle carefulness without watering down or censoring the heaviness of the situations. It treats heavy subject matter with respect and dignity and has been for DECADES. From the early 1980s:
To 2025:
Hell, they even cover the devastating heaviness of MASS SHOOTINGS without censoring or watering anything down.
They've been doing this for YEARS, and it's ALWAYS handled with dignity, respect, seriousness, understanding, and love.
Whenever I see people censoring words because it "might offend" someone or the big ad companies that are currently trying to run everything? I just want to say to them: "What? Is Sesame Street too mature for you?" Because really...what the hell are we doing.
Mister Roger's Neighborhood also covered difficult topics with respect, age-appropriately, and without pulling a single punch. It's crazy that we've worked ourselves up so much that we're self-censoring like it's always been the norm.
This clip is from 1968 and discussed assassination after Bobby Kennedy died.
I'm not sure when this clip originally aired, but it was likely sometime in the 1980s. They talk about murder and, incredibly by today's standards, what sort of emotions (anger, fear, loneliness) might drive someone to hurt or kill other people + how we can manage our own difficult or painful feelings.
The ability to talk about hard and awful things
is the ability to process these things.
taking away the words for bad things
means when they HAPPEN- and bad things will still happen around us-
WE CAN'T TALK ABOUT THEM without the WORDS.
When the word is accurate, USE THE WORD. Say Death. Say Murder. Say Rape. Say Prison, say Riots, say War, Say Famines and Disease. Say Bigotry. Say Hate crime. Say Racism. Say Fascism. Say Abuse. Say Hurt. Say Pain. Say Grief. Say Fear.
We must not lose the Truth of what a word means.
All of these things need to be talked about. Do Not GIVE UP YOUR WORDS.