there is a light and it never goes out~
DEAR READER
Claire Keane
taylor price
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Love Begins

izzy's playlists!
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Stranger Things
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

blake kathryn
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

Andulka
NASA
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
d e v o n
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
$LAYYYTER
Xuebing Du

Origami Around
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
seen from Germany
seen from Canada

seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Japan

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from Kuwait

seen from Japan
@jocorvus
there is a light and it never goes out~
A good thread on whether “queer” is a slur and if it should be used or not.
“If I am unashamed of being queer, you do not get to give that word BACK to the fuckwits who made it a slur.”
you do not get to give that word BACK to the fuckwits who made it a slur
EVERYBODY WHO CAME OUT BEFORE YOU HAS TAKEN THE ROCKS AND BOTTLES AND MADE THEM INTO SHIELDS AND WINDCHIMES
Holy motherfucking shit. Don’t fucking come at me about Queer is a slur. I FUCKING KNOW IT IS. It was hurled at me like a fucking spear all through my youth. I know it’s a god damn slur. And it’s mine. You don’t get to take it away from me because you can’t take also away the scars it gave me while I was standing in front of my younger queer siblings in this community.
always, always reblog this one.
If my enemy swings a sword at me and I take that sword away from them, it’s my sword now. And the person telling me I can’t use it because it belongs to my enemy and I have to give it back to them sounds quite a bit like an enemy themselves.
^^ god that analogy
@deadcatwithaflamethrower
Yesssssssssss.
This came around again, but it’s worth sharing and remembering. You have the right to only accept certain words be used to describe you, but so does everyone else.
I have this bookmarked to through at people who DM me about using the word Queer.
emergency commissions
long story short, i got a lot of stuff going on. one thing being i need a dental crown that’s going to cost me $528 to get done (and that’s with my insurance). plus other mandatory expenditures that’s making it hard to get by comfortably right now.
i’m opening up commissions and am taking as many as i need to cover my dental care and help me get through the rest of this month.
i can draw your OC’s (including anything from MMOs), anthros/furries, any kind of creature, as well as well fandom stuff or illustrate scenes from your fic!
please visit my commission page for prices, more info, and examples! and don’t hesitate to reach out if you have questions about something.
i also have a ko-fi. any boosting is much appreciated 🤍
Accurate
Lmao you’re an adult, you shouldn’t be using the word squick. Use trigger. Use your grown up adult words to explain how you feel instead of leaning on a cutesy uwu term that no one outside of tumblr uses. It’s embarrassing.
Idek if this is serious or ironic honestly
#like...why use this baby word when you can just say how you feel about it
Found this in the original post tags and I just... SIGH
Here’s the thing, anon. Squick isn’t just ‘I don’t like this’, it’s ‘I think this is gross and it makes me deeply uncomfortable but I pass no judgement on those who enjoy it, because I acknowledge that everyone is different and those same people may have the same visceral reaction some of the things I enjoy’ and was originally made popular in the kink community.
So yeah, if you want to say that every time you come across a trope or whatever you find icky then go ahead, say that every time.
Also, this term dates back to Usenet in the early nineties, so sure, go off.
This frustrates me so much because squicks and triggers are fundamentally different things and as someone with PTSD, the distinction is super useful!
Squicks are things I find personally gross but may not be gross to someone else. They don’t upset me or provoke my PTSD, they simply do not pop my corn. Example: Omegaverse. I don’t like it, it makes me uncomfortable and I’m not going to read it, but if you like it, you do you.
Triggers are things which directly provoke my PTSD. This means that my triggers may seem completely normal and innocuous to someone else, because my triggers are so personal and intrinsically linked to a specific event in my life. My reactions to these triggers can include panic attacks and flashbacks to this traumatic event. Sometimes being triggered can affect me for several hours or even days.
Describing something as either a squick or a trigger allows me easily establish the difference in my potential reaction to something without having to go into painful detail about why bodily fluids might make me back button quickly but poker games might leave me a crying wreck.
Making this distinction, and having a specific word for something that is not your slice of pie, but also not an actual psychological trigger, is also REALLY important for making sure that the word “trigger” can retain its original, specific, purposeful, and collectively understood clinical meaning (both inside and outside online fannish communities).
If we encourage everyone to lump things that just make them slightly uncomfortable or simply aren’t to their taste in under the word “trigger”, it actually dilutes the meaning of the word. It makes it harder for us all to, for the most part, collectively agree on and understand what exactly is being described when the word gets used.
And that destruction of shared precise definitions is a problem! It is really useful to have the communal language to be able to clearly and quickly delineate between “this grosses me out, no thanks” and “this is going to set off a trauma episode, rattle my brain, and probably throw off the rest of my day/week as a result” while also maintaining your privacy, and to know that you will be understood in what you are saying. Not having it is actually detrimental to the effort of making our communities safe and navigable for people living with trauma. Which is a goal that is much more important to me, personally, than the idea of not being “cutesy” (a word which in this case which sounds a lot like it’s being used as a euphemism for “cringe”).
(Also, one has to wonder if people told Shakespeare he was being childish when he made up entirely new words that are still widely used in the English language today...... 🤔)
My understanding is that “squick” was also created to avoid using more judgmental terms like “gross” or “disturbing”--like yeah, I do find X kink gross or disturbing, but that’s my personal feeling, not an objective fact about the world, and if I’m explaining to my friend who is super into X that I’d prefer they leave it out of the story they’re writing me in the fic exchange, I want to use politer language!
“Squick” does sound silly, like onomatopoeia, but I think that’s part of its role--it’s a word that defuses if, again, you’re saying something squicks you in front of an audience that may include its connoisseurs. When I say I’m squicked, I’m clearly not getting onto a high horse of dignity and moral righteousness. At the same time I’m not being so indirect for the sake of politeness--”oh, it’s not my favorite thing, I’m not sure it works for me, I haven’t found a fic about it that clicks for me”--that someone could misunderstand how much I do not want to see it.
And, to reiterate, it is a grown up word made by grown up nerds in the 90s so if you think it was somehow born on and limited to Tumblr I'm going to need you to actually do some fandom history research before you ever speak authoritatively again about anything fandom-related or adjacent.
I love and deeply miss the term “squick” and really want to see it brought back. It allows dislike for its own sake and without judgement. It’s polite, gentle, and has an air of “you do you.” A squick is not a trigger. Triggers are related to trauma. You’re allowed to not like things and not have them related to anything other than just finding them unpleasant. And that aversion can be strong! That’s okay! I really don’t like watersports. Like, gag-reflex levels of aversion, but it’s not triggering. I just really don’t like it. I feel like we’ve lost the right/ability to just... quietly not like things and move on with our lives. Not everything is for everyone, and you don’t need a reason to not like something. Just politely and quietly excuse yourself. No need to draw attention, and if someone asks you why you just say, “No, it squicks me out.” No judgement. No narrative necessary.
There is a sad trend of trying to make everything you personally dislike morally reprehensible in some way to justify your dislike of it. You're allowed to just not like something for no real reason. You do not have to justify why you dislike something, and the word "squick" is perfect for that. It say "look I really really don't like this thing, but it's ok if you do" and that is useful.
I think the biggest problem is that a lot of these kids are VERY into the whole fandom purity culture thing, so they actually DO want to make it out to be morally reprehensible, and they DON'T think it's ok that other ppl might be into it.
Cheerfully using “squick” since 1992, because it means a specific thing and other words do not mean that thing.
Very much SAME.
I intend to use the word squick until the moon goes blue from cold.
This info needs to be out there, it turned the tide against cryptocurrency in the public eye it might fit so too
Hello, I saw your article entitled "WHY DEFEND FREEDOM OF ICKY SPEECH?" And I'd like to ask... Are you normalizing lolicon now? It's not just a made-up story where there's inappropriate content with children, where it's portrayed as something terrible. It's portrayed as something normal and sexy😦
This article?
This is a bit long. Apologies. I'd meant to talk about other things, but I started writing a reply this morning to the letter that follows
As I point out in the article, I'd not actually read any lolicon, and 16 years later, I still haven't. As I say in it:
Still, you seem to want lolicon banned, and people prosecuted for owning it, and I don't. You ask, What makes it worth defending? and the only answer I can give is this: Freedom to write, freedom to read, freedom to own material that you believe is worth defending means you're going to have to stand up for stuff you don't believe is worth defending, even stuff you find actively distasteful, because laws are big blunt instruments that do not differentiate between what you like and what you don't, because prosecutors are humans and bear grudges and fight for re-election, because one person's obscenity is another person's art.
Because if you don't stand up for the stuff you don't like, when they come for the stuff you do like, you've already lost.
vegans make peace with honey
no shut up do it
vegans will pretend not to hear when natives tell them their agave products are unsustainable because they have whimsical feelings about, and i cannot stress this enough, the freedom of hive insects
Prove it.
I have not seen any evidence tonsugges they are harmed or die in the process of production. They do regurgitate the nectar as part of the process to concentrate it into honey (an interesting process) but they do not suffer any injury during this process. If they did, the cost to produce honey, which is done naturally as a measure to survive over winter and through times of lower availability, would outweigh the benefits. If you kill several bees to produce enough honey to make one more bee, It makes no sense. Any animal that did that would die, even with human intervention.
Do you have any sources which suggest otherwise? I’d be interested to hear of this (relatively publicly available) information was false or misunderstood.
Bee farmers use whats called a honey maker. It’s a crude devices. It similar to a meat grinder. They force the bees in and grind them up. What comes out is a paste. That paste is later filtered into what we know as honey
This is the funniest thing I’ve ever read
@zoologicallyobsessed please show us pics of your bee grinder
they might be falsely thinking about a honey extractor machine. but all these do is you place the beehive frames inside and a motor rotates it at a speed that removes the honey, which is then tapped through a tap at the bottom.
…do they think they put bees in that and spin them around until they vomit…?
bee carnival
bad and naughty bees get put into the b e e c e n t r i f u g e to extract their honey
Vegans coming after beekeepers is one of my major teeth grinding annoyances. For many reasons, because there’s so many lies. And to go one step further because it’s such a waste. You see, the strongest vegan argument is that they don’t want to exploit animals or take from them without their consent.
… but… Bees consent. NO. I’M NOT KIDDING.
How? Bee hives aren’t kept on leashes. They’re outside, the bees can travel miles every day. They follow their queen. Who is also outside, not on a leash, and can travel miles every day. If she doesn’t like the hive for any reason - for example: it got too hot, too cold, too messy, too filled with sugary stuff and they need more space… then the queen leaves. And with her the hive.
The queen stays in the hive because the hive is the best place to live. Period. Done. End of. If the hive is staying with the beekeeper it’s because the keeper is doing their job correctly and keeping them happy because the bees can, and do, leave bad beekeepers.
Of all the animals we have domesticated as livestock, bees are the ones you can most easily argue are consenting participants in their keeping.
Here it is. The bee post is back
I feel compelled to explain the misconception part for anyone who doesn’t know anything about beekeeping and finds any of this confusing. This might be a little redundant, but I’m scratching an itch.
Harvesting honey does not murder bees.
The device pictured above does not mash up bees or their hives.
There’s no ethical concern when it comes to eating honey, it’s totally ethical as food is concerned.
Bees manufacture honey using pollen. They store it in the cells of their hive, where it’s used as food for the colony, particularly the larvae growing into the next generation of bees.
When you harvest honey, you remove parts of the hive that are being used to store the honey, without taking any bees along for the ride. Those parts of the hive are then put into a device, like the centrifugal extractor shown above by gemstone-gynoid, where the parts are spun really fast to pull extract the honey. The honey gets collected on the walls of the extractor, drips down, and can then be filtered and bottled for human use.
So.
It turns out that bees love making honey and can make more of it than they’d ever need. It also turns out that beekeepers taking care of hives and harvesting their honey keeps bees healthy and thriving, more so than they’d normally accomplish on their own. And we really need bees healthy and thriving because they help us grow an astonishing amount of food by pollinating plants.
Like, there’s no need to have a conversation about this, anyone who claims that harvesting honey requires that you kill bees is lying. Either they don’t know anything about beekeeping and are just repeating a lie someone else told them, or they know that they’re lying and they’re just straight up trying to deceive people. Neither is a good look.
And just one more point of clarification – “cells of the hive” doesn’t mean the anatomical cells of the bees’ bodies, it means the little holes in the honeycomb of the physical structure of the hives, which they build using beeswax. Think of it like a bee pantry. They put their honey in the pantry, but since they’re working hard every day, they often make wayyyyyy too much of it. So the beekeepers come along and take the extra honeycomb that the bees don’t need and aren’t going to use, but they leave plenty behind for the bees to eat. Additionally, if anything happens to the hive’s honey supplies in the winter, the beekeepers can supplement their food by either giving some honey back or giving them sugar water. Also, fun fact! When beekeepers extract the honey from the comb, they often leave all their equipment out afterwards so the bees can come along and clean up, re-collecting any traces of honey or wax left behind, which get put back into the hive and recycled. Any leftover waste (dirt and grime from old comb, for example, or bees that died natural deaths of old age) makes great fertilizer for the plants that produce the pollen the bees make next year. No waste!
Vegans, the bees are not going to stop making honey if they’re left to their own devices in the wild. The bees are just doing a thing that bees do. Eating honey is not exploitation, it’s sustainability. That said, if you’re still worried about the ethics, I’d recommend looking up some local beekeepers/honey farms in your area and reaching out to them for more education! I’ve known a lot of beekeepers that are really excited about doing education and outreach to teach people about the importance of pollinators, the partnership between bees and beekeepers, and the process of how honey is collected. Some honey farms will even give you a tour of their process so you can see in person how it’s made and that it’s not a harmful or exploitative process for the bees at all! (and of course eating local honey gives you an amazing connection to your local environment, both spiritually and physically?? like apparently eating local honey can help with seasonal allergies??? it’s really cool)
Shuffle your favorite playlist and post the first five songs that come up. Then copy/paste this ask to your favorite mutuals.
Thank you @sayuri-of-the-valley for the tag.
I've been brainstorming an AU that has taken over my brain and there are 7 playlists for it. The one that is for Crowley is an angsty/giant 'fuck you, I survived" vibe and I've been jamming to it instead of my usual Ineffable Idiots playlist so gonna share from it.
Joke's On You - Charlotte Lawrence
We Are The Champions - Queen
Funhouse - P!nk
This Is Me - The Greatest Showman Ensemble
This Mountain - Faouzia
Open tag for anyone that wants to take part. @grimmchild28 @ariestess @blairamok @gingerhaole
"Lets play a game. A really fun game."
There is something so dirty about Peter using Killian's own hook on him.
Miss seeing you around. 💚
Good omens tag game
Name two things you have in common with Aziraphale and two things you have in common with Crowley
More reasons to love them!
Crowley
1.- Taste for black clothes and... I WANT TO BELIEVE that I look good too
2.- I love Aziraphale Dramatic
Aziraphale
1.- I love books
2.- Stubborn. Really stubborn
No pressure tags: @fearandhatred @bildads-shoes @harbinger-of-existential-dread @di-42 @sayeverythingwillbefineplease
And of course, open tags!
ohhhh cuuuute game!! ty for the tag @radish-sprout! 🥰
Crowley: 1. APPEARANCE. All black. Long and lithe. Resting scowl face. Snake for a spine. Can't sit for shit. 2. I too wish to sleep for a century for both fun and profit.
Aziraphale: 1. Ev...erythign....... I value kindness and goodness, I get all soft when I see others being good to each other, and try to see the best in everyone, and give even the most frustrating people the benefit of the doubt. I put way too much faith in things working out because i trust people to be good. (But also. wish for everyone to leave me alone at all times) 2. Ok but i love being A Bit Of A Bastard and whipping out the most devastating remarks when ppl least expect it
no pressure tags: @thewolveswolf @foolishlovers
Saw this and thought I might as well add my own-
Crowley:
1. Overly ✨dramatic✨ and loud on occasion, and
2. Both of us don’t like to sit like normal people
Aziraphale:
1. Both of us get easily fed up with stupidity, and yet-
2. Have moments of complete cluelessness
No pressure tag: @starcitrus38 lol
Crowley🐍
1. Stuttering over all my words/mumbling
2. Holding grudges
Aziraphale🕊️
1. Yes
2.
crowley:
curiosity
will simply disregard having a posture until necessary
aziraphale
bookworm who loves humanity
man i fucking love food
tagging: @onceuponapuffin and theyre the only one i know cause this acc is new but anybody else who wants to can join in!
Aaah! I got tagged in a tag-chain!! I feel so special ^_^
Okay, here we go:
Crowley
I think I'm clever and funny. Whether or not I actually am either of these things is up for debate.
LOVE me some wine.
Aziraphale
I love books (going for my Masters in Library Sciences in September, and I'm very pleased with myself for it).
I speak and write very formally, and occasionally use words that make people look at me funny (I know the formal language comes off as pretentious, so I try to compensate, but what actually ends up happening is I swing wildly between formal speech and absolutely cringey slang/casual talk)
MY TURN TO TAG PEOPLE: @gleafer @makewayforbigcrossducks @crowleys-hips @rexsulla @asleepyy @vavoom-sorted-art @gahellhimself-blog @ineffabildaddy
Oh hi! Thanks for the tag!
Crowley
1. Autistic
2. ADHD
3. Ginger
4. Good cheekbones tyvm 😏
Aziraphale
1. Autism
2. Honestly I really don’t know lol. I love books but how could anybody not? :)
@greenthena @komorezuki @lookingatacupoftea @dee-morris @sayuri-of-the-valley @fellthemarvelous
Anybody else who wants to jump in! :)
Oh yay I loved this game:
Some things you have in common with Crowley and some things you have in common with Aziraphale:
Crowley
Ginger
I think that angel!Crowley was kinda like an engineer/researcher and so am I
I love to complain
I too prefer the funny ones
I love Aziraphale
Aziraphale
I love vintage clothes and kick knacks.
Tartan IS stylish
I LOVE musicals
I really try to stick to the rules, it's embarrassing. And then I become a rules lawyer
I love Crowley
@inafever @youryurigoddess @millytherat @jocorvus @theduckwithears @fuckyeahgoodomens
Name two things you have in common with Aziraphale and two things you have in common with Crowley.
Aziraphale:
I love books/reading.
I too have a love affair with food.
Crowley (little cheat here, everything in common basically):
I put on a cool face to the world, and can seem very grumpy, but inside I'm very squishy and damaged and kind and curious to a fault.
Absolutely a simp for Aziraphale.
No pressure tags: @grimmchild28 @ariestess I don't know anyone's tags here, open to anyone that wants to join!
Don't you think you owe it to readers to give them what they want?
No? What an odd take. Read my fic or don't.
What do I look like, Burger King?
I write for my enjoyment. If you'd like to share in that, you're welcome. If not, please move on. This isn't school; nobody's going to flunk you for not reading things.
im sorry but writing enemies to lovers on ao3 is so fucking funny. one of them will go a whole paragraph saying how much they hate, absolutely despise, have genuine burning contempt for the other and we’re all here knowing damn well that enemies to lovers tag is just sat there. like we already know what’s coming bro you’re just embarrassing yourself
the appeal of enemies to lovers though is less “oh will they ever get together?” and more “at what exact point does he go from wanting to kill the bitch to the oh in italics?”
Tweet by John Rogers: “I’m an infamously even-tempered man, but if you take Terry Pratchett’s name in vain for some small-minded bigoted fuckwittery I will push you down a set of fucking stairs and laugh at the bounce.”
Posting this for the people who think that Tolkien's world-building was something complete and entire and finished before he started to write.
You always learn and discover your story and your world as you write. Sometimes you are just the first reader.
I don't give a shit as long as those in need benefit
The badge as well, is it the rainbow badge?