by stating that any variation of xx and xy are somehow another sex, you are in fact taking away their classification as intersexual syndroms, denying them as medical diagnosis alongside the underlying conditions asociated to said variation, DENYING THEIR TREATMENT SINCE YOU CONSIDER IS NOT A MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS WHICH IS ABLEIST. Besides that, most (if not all) intersexual syndromes affect one sex SPECIFICALLY. For example XXY (Klinefelter syndrome) and XYY (Jakob syndrome) only affects MALES.
Also, the terms "male" and "female" are as natural to humans as being a "mammal". There are variations across all humans, that won't change the fact that we are mammals, primates, chordata, etc, etc. Male and female is a biological clasification present in every animal who reproduces sexually, such as humans and every other primates. To act like somehow we don't enter said classification is denying the basis of our biology as mammals.
Finally, transwomen are adult human males. Stating that somehow a woman is something else than an adult human female, you are in fact stating 3 things:
1) that being a woman is some abstraction/idea/stereotype/feeling, etc. All things that are subjective and impossible to determine which itself leaves real women unprotected in areas like law and medicine. This also implies that women with cerebral palsy, severe autism, or any kind of neurological condition that keeps them from expresing themselves or communicate their feelings to her peers are not women because they don't actually have an expression of womanhood, which means that they are left in the blank for legal and medical purposes.
2)This also means whatever crime a transwoman commits, is somehow now added to the statistics of women, while any male criminal can simply state that he "feels like a woman" and end up in women's jails, even sexual predators (Lets remember that 96% of sex crimes are commited by MALES). Or like in sports, where somehow transwomen are exceeding in female spaces, while SOMEHOW transmen are not. Is like...the differences between male and female has given MALES an advantage over females while a part of the population keeps pushing for said advantage in the name of transwomen (WHO ARE MALES), while actively keeping women and transmen (WHO ARE FEMALES) in the dark.
3) Also, by stating that you only have to identify as a woman to be one, means that whatever misogyny a woman faces, she only had to stop identifying herself as a woman and she woul be out of it, which is false because the point of opression is that you cannot identify out of it. And no, transwomen don't experiment misogyny because misogyny is sex based. Women are discriminated for being FEMALES from the moment we are born no matter our expression, culture, or character. If a transwoman takes away the make up and the clothing, is just a male. If a transwoman decides to wear simple pants and a white shirt, then somehow is free from misogyny. That's not how opression works. If you can pass out from opression by changing clothes, then you are not opressed in the first place. Besides, that "trans people never chooses to be trans" but somehow gender is a social construct they IDENTIFY THEMSELVES INTO IT is very contradictory.
It is really fucking easy to claim that "definitions are rigid and patriarcal" instead of actually explaining how the lack of definitions will improve our lives, while i can very easily point out how its disappearence generates INEQUALITY.
vaporwave
blakekathryn
gamechangershow
discoholicmusic
jimmyeatworldofficial
s-u-f-j-a-n-s-t-e-v-e-n-s
ellievsbear
theartofmadeline
stormborns
