unfortunately, Sky High was only (1) 1hr 30 min Disney film and not the 6 season so-bad-itâs-good CW series it couldâve been
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Discoholic đȘ©
sheepfilms
I'd rather be in outer space đž
Jules of Nature
h

No title available

â
No title available
Game of Thrones Daily
Sweet Seals For You, Always
NASA
No title available
RMH
hello vonnie
we're not kids anymore.
macklin celebrini has autism
Cosimo Galluzzi
Fai_Ryy

Origami Around
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Netherlands

seen from Austria

seen from Spain

seen from Ecuador
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Thailand
seen from Italy

seen from Belarus

seen from Germany

seen from Australia

seen from Belarus
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Malaysia
@souridealist
unfortunately, Sky High was only (1) 1hr 30 min Disney film and not the 6 season so-bad-itâs-good CW series it couldâve been
its so beautiful to see a coworker high as fuck on the clock
shipping a consensual, safe & sane pairing all the while i'm shaking my head in disapproval so the audience knows i still love wildly toxic abusive fictional dynamics
You know, when I've remarked that a lot of the responses to my posts feel like people are just plucking out keywords they think they recognise based on the shape of them and replying to what they imagine the post says based on that, the possibility never occurred to me that this is actually how many American schools are currently teaching kids to read.
Like, my assumption this whole time has been that when folks go "I misunderstood this post that says [thing] as saying [unrelated thing] because I mistook [word] for [completely different word that happens to start with the same letter]", that was a bit. What do you mean they're teaching kids a reading method that's tailored to produce this exact error?
Three cueing. Once you learn about it, a whole lot of very frustrating online discourse with US Americans makes so much sense đ
For decades, schools have taught children the strategies of struggling readers, using a theory about reading that cognitive scientists have
If you were taught to read with the three cueing method, and now struggle to read fluently, you can still learn to read properly!
-> Phonics For Adults <-
If you're a teenager, you can still use this resource.
you're not supposed to wander around appalachia at night bc you'll fall off a sheer drop that you couldn't see coming. this is also a major risk during the day. you really have to watch out for the sheer drops that you don't see coming due to the undergrowth. I suspect 100% of spooky missing persons cases in appalachia have the spooky explanation of "sheer drop disguised by undergrowth"
really cannot overstate how many utterly invisible ravines we got here and also how big the woods are. they can't find people because the woods? are big
in seriousness you can learn about the isolated Appalachian communities that were up here until quite recently by checking out the foxfire books. it is true that there were many isolated communities that remained pretty separate from mainstream American life for a longish time but most of the last ones were my grandpa's generation. and they were regular? can't overstate how regular they were. just rural and isolated with their own culture. do check out the foxfire museum if you want to learn more about them and their lives! those books are based on real interviews conducted by local high schoolers and college students of the old folks in their communities and they are very interesting windows into day to day rural life up in the mountains in the early to mid 20th century.
I absolutely 100% do not mean this in a like derogatory city slickers way; I myself grew up mostly in a city and I think that it is morally neutral to not have experience with The Outdoors. having said that, I have noticed that a lot of people who do not have regular interactions with "landscape that can kill you" do seem to have an internalized idea that "landscape that can kill you" is something that only happens to other people, or not very often, or only under extreme circumstances. which I think often leads them to assume that there must be something else out here that can kill you. but I fear I must inform the people who wanna believe scary Appalachian woods monsters are real that it's Landscape. inclusive of the beasts that dwell there such as the cougars and bears. its Landscape! (GRASPING EVERYONE ON THE SPOOKY APPALACHIAN TRAIL SUBREDDITS) IT'S LANDSCAPE THAT KILLS YOU! ITS ALWAYS LANDSCAPE! Old Man Hidden Ravine and his best friend Exposure!
If Ratatouille mechanics were real, there would be a whole market of businesses offering the services of operating rats to people who want them, and it'd be like how bees produce honey. People in the rat business would be so exhausted of having to explain over and over again that no, the rats aren't being exploited. If the rats didn't like how they're being treated, they would simply not return. There's no goddamn way to force a rat to be so passionate about playing the saxophone that they'll figure out how to puppeteer a human to do it for them. All that the business does is finding a way to put that specific rat in the hair of someone who's about to go on stage.
The rats 100% think the businesses are being run for their benefit and worry about the humans being exploited.
A rat manager who is a rat and deals on their end of the deal is exhausted of having to explain over and over again that look, an average fully grown adult human being is like 200 times your weight, their hands are very fast and they can throw things better than you want to imagine. If one of them things didn't want you in their hair, you're not going to stay there for long. You'd be yote out the window in two seconds flat.
If you were handcuffed to your girl blorbo with magical unbreakable handcuffs for 24h, would you be okay with this?
I trust her, Iâll be fine
I trust her, but itâll be a stressful 24h
It depends on what kind of day weâre having
This is gonna suckâŠ
Other/nuance
was listening to "Lawyers Guns and Money" and it made me think about uhhhhhh the number of Gotham citizens and significantly larger number of mostly pretty online leftists who fucking hate Tim Drake's guts over the No Man's Land extraction thing. if he ever gets outed as Robin and in the city to try and actually do something about the shit the government gave up upon then there's gonna be some egg on some faces about that one.
I love asking people how their parents met. You always get an interesting reply. My best friendâs parents met on the relatively new internet in 1999. My other friendâs parents met at Burger King when one was the manager and the other was a regular customer. My parents met at the beach because they were neighbors in their rental houses, mom was on a church trip and dad was getting blackout drunk every night with his friends next door.
Tell me how your parents met in the tags.
dick screaming at bruce whenever the man is suicidal and self-sacrificing is a level of pot meet kettle no other relationship has been able to replicate. absolutely incredible levels of hypocrisy
everyone in fandoms should get into big two superhero comics at least a little bit just for the sake of encouraging a healthy attitude toward the concept of canon. once you fully internalize that canonically the x-men have existed for about a decade and it's also canonical that the x-men have celebrated christmas around sixty separate times you will never look at canon arguments the same way again
relentlessly funny to me when people treat a relationship between someone in their 30s and someone in their 40s as "age difference". bro i cannot tell you which of my friends are 34 and which are 44. i can probably tell you which ones aren't 30 yet, but it's probable some of them are 50 now and i didn't notice. if you're over 30 and don't have kids, it's kinda all one age until you can collect social security.
but can we TALK about the racialized subtext of "his wife has filled his house with chintz" linking together femininity, indian export goods, commercialism, and superficiality vs "to keep it real I fuck him on the floor" linking together masculinity, AAVE, authenticity, sexuality, and vulgarity? if our aim as critics of poetry is to reevaluate this text and arrive at a feminist interpretation then we must also consider the poem's vexed relationship to race so as to not be anti-black in our criticism of the piece's presentation of masculinized sexuality nor uncritically reproduce and elevate its image of orientalized femininity.
also, from looking at the original post (non-explicit gay sex photo but still a gay sex photo so you've been warned): there isn't even any chintz in the photo. the design elements in the room all look broadly western european with the exception of a tall ceramic vessel that may be decorated with a reproduction of a chinese ink painting. chintz is an indian textile pattern, you'll see it on dresses, bedspreads, wallpaper, tapestries, upholstery, etc., but nothing like that is in the image. to imply that the house's interior design is frivolous, artificial, and unusable, the poem utilizes "chintz" despite the obvious lack of chintz because "chintz," as a popular asian export good that went on to be imitated by european manufacturers, is considered kitsch, cheap, and womanly. and, though the angle partially obscures them, the two men in the photo both appear to be white, so the poem uses the AAVE phrase "keep it real" despite the lack of black people to invoke the perception of AAVE as raw, crass, and primal. in both cases, the racialized language is being ascribed to european/white subjects to impart the white subjects with different moral values.
Alright I want to know something here:
the đ emoji means (approximately)
silly!*
ugh!*
secret third thing you will explain in tags*
*if comfortable doing so, you may include your age range/generation in the tags for helpful demographic data
kindly reblog for bigger sample size, thanks!
I think like 90% of the fandom angst surrounding demonization of various Robins at different points would be resolved if people interacted more with children of that age.
I do work with underprivileged middle and high-school aged children (8-16ish), and a lot of things people label as intrinsic character flaws or unforgivable behavior is actually⊠really common for that age, if not exactly a one-to-one with the Robins, because theyâre not fighting crime or getting shot. But, frankly, the ways in which various Robins lash out, misbehave, or antagonize each other are all pretty admissible. In any scenario where you can cite a character doing something mean, or irrational, or driven by anger, I have witnessed an equivalent behavior that is 1000x less warranted because the catalyst was petty bs rather than the burden of lives and a legacy on your shoulders.
I donât know. Iâm always struck by it when I see people talking about unforgivable actions a character did, and the âunforgivable actionâ in question was that they threw a tantrum or said some cruel things when they were like 10 or 14 or something. Yeah, no shit.
i love sibling estrangement as horror. Only one person in the entire world has been through what youve been through and they deny it . Awesome
âThe Opposites Game,â Brendan Constantine