
@theartofmadeline
d e v o n
noise dept.

Janaina Medeiros
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

⁂

Product Placement

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Jules of Nature
tumblr dot com
Monterey Bay Aquarium

No title available

JBB: An Artblog!
No title available
h
Mike Driver
taylor price
Cosmic Funnies

No title available
hello vonnie

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Greece
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada
@stabby-the-ace
evil infodumping where you just tell lies
TikTok
5 Minute Crafts
Resume
this is a message for everyone who is 22. if you’re 22 please stop worrying. take a deep breath eat a bagel maybe. everything that feels impossible is going to work itself out. have a great day
do u have a message for 25 year olds
uhhhhh 2 bagels?
I'm 32. When I was in my early twenties, I overheard a pair of 50ish year old women talking about the ideal age to stay at permanently. One said, "Everyone says 25. I wouldn't want to be in my twenties forever. Everything is hard and you get upset too easily."
Hearing her say that helped me so much. I thought about it countless times. Every time things felt overwhelming, I remembered what she said. The words of this total stranger, who wasn't even talking directly to me, brought me a lot of comfort, so I hope they can help you, too.
this was so wild
Someone explain
The first sentence says 32 and 13 implying that the speaker is 32 years old and their girlfriend is 13 years old, which is both highly inappropriate and illegal. The next sentence reveals the speaker was talking about their game levels, not their ages, which is perfectly okay.
In their reply to the audience they then say they are picking her up from middle school, again implying that their girlfriend is underage, but quickly state she’s grading papers letting us know she’s a teacher, definitely an adult, and there no reason to be upset.
The rollercoaster gif portrays how switching from upset and worried to relieved in such a short period of time feels emotionally.
The next meme shows the guy panicking from misunderstanding, then feeling relieved and calm realizing the truth, only to panic over the next misunderstanding and then calm again when hearing the end.
the above explanation is followed by a picture of data from star trek with a speech bubble's tail coming out of him, implying he's the one saying all of that, which is humerous because the above text is written in a style similar to his speech patterns, and with a subject matter he would enjoy
This is the worst website ever and I love it.
I’d rather see Tumblr die than see it stop being like this.
Posts like this will be lost if Tumblr goes through with their "no more threads" plan.
Posts like this will be
lost if Tumblr goes through with
their “no more threads” plan.
Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.
Haiku-bot chiming in makes this gold
i come from the 8tracks generation where you weren't allowed to just dump three and a half twee indie folk/tswift records into a fanmix and call it done. on 8tracks you had 8+ handpicked songs in rigid chronological order and an accompanying mission statement and thesis defence detailing exactly why each one applied to your derek x stiles coffee shop au AND cover/track-list art hodgepodged from stolen pinterest/tumblr aesthetic photography, and all of this was done under constant threat of death because it was the DMCA wild west and the site was in a constant state of gradual collapse.
“you’re quiet” yes I’m trying to gauge how weird I can be in this new social situation
You know what I realize that people underestimate with Pride & Prejudice is the strategic importance of Jane.
Because like, I recently saw Charlotte and Elizabeth contrasted as the former being pragmatic and the latter holding out for a love match, because she's younger and prettier and thinks she can afford it, and that is very much not what's happening.
The Charlotte take is correct, but the Elizabeth is all wrong. Lizzie doesn't insist on a love match. That's serendipitous and rather unexpected. She wants, exactly as Mr. Bennet says, someone she can respect. Contempt won't do. Mr. Bennet puts it in weirdly sexist terms like he's trying to avoid acknowledging what he did to himself by marrying a self-absorbed idiot, but it's still true. That's what Elizabeth is shooting for: a marriage that won't make her unhappy.
She's grown up watching how miserable her parents make one another; she's not willing to sign up for a lifetime of being bitter and lonely in her own home.
I think she is very aware, in refusing Mr. Collins, that it's reasonably unlikely that anyone she actually respects is going to want her, with her few accomplishments and her lack of property. That she is turning down security and the chance keep the house she grew up in, and all she gets in return may be spinsterhood.
But, crucially, she has absolute faith in Jane.
The bit about teaching Jane's daughters to embroider badly? That's a joke, but it's also a serious potential life plan. Jane is the best creature in the world, and a beauty; there's no chance at all she won't get married to someone worthwhile.
(Bingley mucks this up by breaking Jane's heart, but her prospects remain reasonable if their mother would lay off!)
And if Elizabeth can't replicate that feat, then there's also no doubt in her mind that Jane will let her live in her house as a dependent as long as she likes, and never let it be made shameful or awful to be that impoverished spinster aunt. It will be okay never to be married at all, because she has her sister, whom she trusts absolutely to succeed and to protect her.
And if something eventually happens to Jane's family and they can't keep her anymore, she can throw herself upon the mercy of the Gardeners, who have money and like her very much, and are likewise good people. She has a support network--not a perfect or impregnable one, but it exists. It gives her realistic options.
Spinsterhood was a very dangerous choice; there are reasons you would go to considerable lengths not to risk it.
But Elizabeth has Jane, and her pride, and an understanding of what marrying someone who will make you miserable costs.
That's part of the thesis of the book, I would say! Recurring Austen thought. How important it is not to marry someone who will make you, specifically, unhappy.
She would rather be a dependent of people she likes and trusts than of someone she doesn't, even if the latter is formally considered more secure; she would rather live in a happy, reasonable household as an extra than be the mistress of her own home, but that home is full of Mr. Collins and her mother.
This is a calculation she's making consciously! She's not counting on a better marriage coming along. She just feels the most likely bad outcome from refusing Mr. Collins is still much better than the certain outcome of accepting him. Which is being stuck with Mr. Collins forever.
Elizabeth is also being pragmatic. Austen also endorses her choice, for the person she is and the concerns she has. She's just picking different trade-offs than Charlotte.
Elizabeth's flaw is not in her own priorities; she doesn't make a reckless choice and get lucky. But in being unable to accept that Charlotte's are different, and it doesn't mean there's anything wrong with Charlotte.
Because realistically, when your marriage is your whole family and career forever, and you only get to pick the ones that offer themselves to you, when you are legally bound to the status of dependent, you're always going to be making some trade-offs.
😂 Even the unrealistically ideal dream scenario of wealthy handsome clever ethical Mr. Darcy still asks you to undergo personal growth, accommodate someone else's communication style, and eat a little crow.
Elizabeth counting on Jane is something I hadn’t really thought about before, but makes a lot of sense.
#my one quibble with this post is that it writes off Mrs Bennet #and while I would absolutely Not Cope with her as a partner or parent #and her execution is awful #her priorities are... at least understandable #she wants to know her daughters are going to be provided for after their parents die #and yes it makes her seem silly and frivolous and ruins her relationship *with* her daughters #but 'self-absorbed idiot' feels like it misses the part of this picture she's there to illustrate #she's superficial but she's also the parent who's thinking practically about her children's future #I don't think she does it right but I can't say she's entirely wrong
see several people have said this and they are missing the ball. in a but the same way as people leaning so hard into defending charlotte for her pragmatic match they misunderstand lizzie's goals in life, actually.
mrs bennet is a self-absorbed idiot. the text makes this very clear and it affects the whole story and most of the major characters that this is so.
that doesn't excuse mr. bennet's parenting choices, but it's important that it's true. it's a fact.
her preoccupation with getting her daughters married isn't the problem, that's a sensible goal as far as it goes, with clear economic and social incentives.
the problem is that she puts her own emotions about everything first, at all times, to the exclusion of being considerate of anyone's feelings at all or realistic about the actual circumstances. this makes her a huge emotional and practical burden on her daughters, who must spend a lot of time and energy managing her moods and cannot look to her for any real support, and who in fact get repeatedly sabotaged in the marriage market by her poor judgment and manners.
she's got an anxiety disorder and makes it everybody's problem. she is loudly stupid and determined never to learn anything new. she is not aware enough of other people's needs to even be capable of actual kindness.
there are a lot of elements in mrs. bennet that are pretty clearly drawn from a pool of features of the generic 'most unpleasant without ever being actually abusive' middle-class mother that continue to resonate to this day.
she and mr. bennet have both comprehensively failed to make any actual effort or inconvenience themselves in any way, ever, for the sake of their daughters. they are both very bad parents.
that's what the character is there for. to be awful and unhelpful and embarrassing and in the way and demanding and never, ever any help to elizabeth. to be the absence of a positive role model, and the evidence of what it looks like to tie yourself to someone you cannot hold in esteem.
(actually very deft of austen to pull some of the gender out of the concept by making it be lizzie's father she identifies with and her mother the example case of a terrible choice of partner, so it's clear that the issue here is the human question of sharing your life with a person, rather than the more obvious gendered issue of putting yourself under the power of a man you can trust.)
she's not there to make the point that marriage is important; austen's readers knew that. the relentless trudge of the genteel young woman's need to make a fine match consumed their lives and the bulk of their literature.
we today need reminding that the pressure was real and practical and economic and not at the base of things frivolous at all, but emphasizing that risks overemphasizing it to the point we miss that that was the baseline reality austen was writing against. she didn't need to say it, only to tease it out and hold it to the light and say, what part of this pressure is real? what part of success will really make you happy, and what kinds of happiness will last and not curdle on your tongue?
mrs. bennet is specifically the societal message that marriage is so important you should snatch shamelessly at any one you can get that isn't outright awful; the pressure to chase a man and count on catching one to make your life work out.
and as real as the reasons for that are, austen is also putting forth the argument that you can't let that pressure drive you to make a choice you'll regret.
being stupid gets mrs. bennet off the hook to a certain extent; she doesn't quite get how having neglected to save up money all these years or arrange better educations was cutting their girls off at the knees, or how bad she's making them look. mr. bennet definitely understands better, he's just decided it's too much work to care.
i think he's more morally culpable because his decisions are more conscious. but mrs. bennet doesn't have any bragging rights.
mrs. bennet isn't being selfless in worrying about her daughters' marriages, either. remember that her chances of remarriage are approximately -0 and she has nothing in her own name; she is guaranteed if she lives long enough to find herself in the same state of dependency Elizabeth is risking. These are her own fortunes she's securing, or rather cartoonishly failing to secure.
when she wanted Elizabeth to accept Mr. Collins it was very much because that would mean she got to stay in her house as a widow, and continue acting as the mistress of the place until she died. as far as she was concerned, this would solve most of her problems.
Lizzie's happiness was not particularly on her radar, not in any realistic sense.
If mrs bennet knew for sure she wouldn't outlive her husband, or if Mr. Collins didn't get Longbourne until she was dead as well, I don't think she'd care about seeing the sisters married even half as much. She'd care more than Mr. Bennet, still, because she's interested in marriage and it's a status thing and she has some sense of responsibility toward them, I think, that meddling in their love lives would satisfy.
But if like her husband she could say 'welp, i'll be dead before that's a problem' her intense interest in the subject would not, I think, survive. Because she is a self-involved person with a limited mental capacity and a worse education, and these facts about her are actually kind of important to the plot.
okay that was an awful ramble.
tl;dr mrs bennet being both self-absorbed and stupid in a way that has caused her to be worse than useless to her daughters their entire lives is explicit in the text, and impactful to the point of load-bearing for both the plot and the themes. you can't get rid of it.
both bennet parents are delinquent in their duties of personal care, and mrs. bennet's motives for being invested in the sisters' marital success are somewhat suspect, since unlike mr. bennet who is secure until his death, her own future comfort is likely to hinge on it.
The Barbie movie isn't about girl power. It's not about how women can do everything they set their mind to. It's about how sometimes women are tired and average and that has to be okay too, because you don't have to do everything to be worth anything. (And that this is also true of men.)
here’s a what should be a cold take but i know it’ll be taken as a scalding one:
inter-party conflict is good for storytelling, tension, and characterization and growth. aversion to conflict just creates wet noodle characters that are uninteresting. a story without conflict or tension isn’t a good story.
crazy that anyone thinks barbie is “anti-man” when it literally depicted the ways society also has a set of rules for men and how they feel empty having their worth be defined by their girlfriends, material goods, and their expression of masculinity — and how boys are victim to falling down an alt-right pipeline trying to get that value back. even when it’s all said and done and ken cries, and barbie tells him it’s okay, he’s embarrassed and says he shouldn’t be — but barbie talks him through how it’s important. where are all of the men’s mental health warriors now?? how is it anti-man when barbie acknowledged the emotional suppression men face at the hands of the patriarchy as well?
my coffin shaped locket is the perfect size to fit one singular ibuprofen
this is surprisingly useful actually
stop wasting space and add another
tres ibuprofenitos
¿En este economía?
You know I love how so many people are like “respect boundaries respect consent” until it’s time to respect people w OCD who can’t shake hands or be touched or when an autistic person tells their family member they can’t give hugs or when a chronically ill person tells you “no I can’t do this thing” and you think “maybe if I just make them do it anyway it’ll make them stronger” or when a mentally ill person or someone who has been abused is like “I don’t want to be around this person/thing it’s triggering” and you get people guilting them to “just get over it”
If you’re about consent and boundaries, good, you should be, but remember to keep that energy when moms of autistic kids are like “I still hug my child even tho it makes them have panic attacks” or when someone’s like “yeah they said they don’t want to be around this person cause it’s “triggering” but I’m their friend so they should do it for me” or when a disabled person says they can’t go up the stairs and you’re begging them to “try anyway”
Don’t lose that mindset, or that energy when it’s time to respect the boundaries or consent of mentally ill and disabled people.
I’m gonna start naming things I’ve knit after whatever was stressing me out when I made them. For example:
“Call me back about jobs please”
“Interviews are the devil”
“It’s the holiday season (SCREAM)”
“Nervous breakdown: how did I finish this”
every year I post this meme and every year people get more mad at me than they did the previous year
collage of female characters that people have used to “prove” that there are too many masc women in media