Blog Intro
TL;DR: I think about stuff to figure out all forms of happiness and dedicate my existence to foster a universal harmoniously all-inclusive life. My blog is omni-onthological, that is, covering potentially any topic in existence as long as I think I have some reasonable, useful, or fun thoughts to share, mostly through writing.
About me: primordial polymorph soul, current vessel is 20+ Earth years, with life plans 1000+ years forward. She/they in this mess of a 21st century general public English, with Finnish hÀn being my favourite 3sg pronoun, because why tf make personal genderization the default in a public language?!
A heartfelt bow and smile to: loveful people, polymorphs and plural identity systems (monoconscious or otherwise, monocentric or otherwise, of diverse creation origins), non-binary and ace-spec and queerplatonic folk (I think there are underlying correlations), lesbians, transfems, lesbimbos/enthusiastic hyperfem experimentalists, witches, scholars and venerators of femininity, identity theorists, philo-sophers/sapio-philes, linguists, etymologists, conlangers, mathematicians, and supporters of the Langlands project ambition (aimed at discovering underlying common elements between hitherto separate domains of mathematics to create a broader unified fundamental model, which is a smaller scale example of what my personal ever-progressing ambitious study of everything is all about).
I tag my personally commented or original contributed posts with a 'utmost open mindedness' tag. Feel free to send asks or reblog or whatever, though do not expect me to be readily and indiscriminately available for multiple reasons. Aside from compassion-driven social anxiety, it so happens that I have never had financial and domestic independence, having earned and spent exactly $0 money in the last 2+ years. My life support depends on 'caretakers' who give me limited physical supplies required for survival in exchange for personalized acts of service, and I have long-lasting untreated bodily and mental health problems, further strengthening the feedback loop keeping me from gaining a more independent livelihood.
Due to my blog's domain being omni-onthological with no respect for some human legislators' enforced unholistic opinions on select topics suppression, I am nevertheless 'obliged' to add: minors DNI...
...until balanced and harmonious forms of anarchism prevail at last on Earth and personal sovereignty is the norm worldwide, and all forms of censure are written about in population control theory textbooks to help prevent future social disasters. And for those who are not yet aligned with experiencing certain ideas, safe spaces will be lovingly set and upheld, with widespread practice of responsible upfront space/community descriptions and safety protocol guidance, mitigating personal harm of naivety or recklessness upon entry.
Due to having personally analytically determined certain circulating clusters of public thought to be provably unholistic if not downright absurd, here's my actual DNI boundaries (concerning only those STUBBORNLY possessed by the associated ideas): religious bigots, misogynists, terfs, anti-lgbtqia+, anti-endo (in plural identity discourse) â f off! (labels used are approximate pointers, such is our shared English language)
5 Q&As:
1. Q: What do you mean by 'primordial polymorph soul'? And what's the deal with the emphasis on feminity and... bimbos..?
A: Primordial soul, as in, my existence is essentially independent from this or any shared universe. Always has been, always will be. I am a visitor here, and yes, by 'me' I by no means imply the body/vessel, but the consciousness currently housed in it on this Earth. That, is me. And polymorph, meaning simply that my identity is complex enough to include 1000+ forms of self-expression, and given the ability to shapeshift, I would do it daily, and living without that power for me equals suffering complex body/form dysphoria.
As mentioned in one of my posts on Tumblr: "'Bimbo' in this text relates to a concect pertaining to my vision of a harmonious version of Earth, and approximately means: sovereign and intelligent, predominantly sensually pleasure-orientated person, particularly in terms of their own bodily self-expression and preferred activities, typically human and especially extravagantly ~feminine."
Bimbo, particularly lesbimbo (lesbian bimbo), is a subcategory of ~feminity (this term itself is in need of further research, along its constituents, I'm working on it) that in my investigation of all existence has turned out to be surprisingly fundamental, and powerfully correlated with utopian world harmony, with intelligence (especially social and emotional intelligence), and more peripherally, with poignancy and compassion, among many other things.
2. Q: Have you completely lost your mind, or is there some hope left?
A: Why, thank you very much, critical thinking is the foundation of a free and healthy life, and I share your concern in principle. I strive to always be of sound mind, routinely checking my personal universal ontology, local worldview, and the analysis and functioning algorithms themselves. I keep extensive records of my mind's performance and error correction history, with tons of private notes, essays, and other materials aimed at improving my knowledge and functioning, more and more of which I am ready to publish for the benefit it might cause for others, bless them.
3. Q: Are you trying to be funny or is this for real?
A: I am not trying to be funny per se, I merely acknowledge the possibility of some of my actions having a sideffect of seeming to be funny, and all things considered, I am pleased no matter if that happens or no, so it's semi-intentional at most. I suppose one could label this 'quantum humor'.
4. Q: This is either one of the most batshit crazy finds ever, or one of the most awesome finds in terms of the sheer rarity and implications of... all of it at once. Can you prove that you are legit, give some tangible examples to show that there is actually solid ground under what you wrote, about the Langlands project or linguistics or something? Do you have ANY IDEA how bizarre this post can be to read without context for someone who is NOT YOU?!
A: I try to imagine what that's like and adjust accordingly for establishing solid rapport, but considering the limitations of written English text and technological limitations of not being able to just instantly upload all my thoughts and reasoning into a single package of thought telepathically... Nah, I don't see any viable shortcuts to eliminate the difference between our personal knowledge bases, and could only advise further examination of my public writing, which currently (again, kind of can't prove this without first doxxing myself) covers only ~0,25% of all my scholastically valuable writings and works.
5. Q: No way, I am not going to check your posts without more decisive reasons that it's worth it. However, I am amused and intrigued just enough to interactively probe you right now, so I'm gonna vibe check you for sanity with some more rapid fire questions first.
A: By all means, question me, as thoroughly as you wish.
5.1 Q: Are you familiar with the concept of cognitive biases?
A: Yes, that and logical fallacies was among the main things I researched at the time in my life when I had a total reset in my worldview, reading the works of Daniel Kahneman and branching off from there into all sorts of fields to cleanse and calibrate my knowledge system and analytic algorithms. I made it my top priority to get rid of as many cognitive blind spots as I could, urgently, after a particularly disastrous event in my life which could have been avoided had I rigourously analyzed my underlying reasoning and discovered that selection bias has perilously skewed my perception, resulting in a great loss for the ones I loved. Never again, I decided, and try my best since then.
5.2 Q: How touching. Care to elaborate on what was that delusion of yours in the past?
A: In short, it was quite extreme christian evangelical indoctrination (will not specify the denomination here) since childhood, which I did dare to question, but failed to do it rigourously enough due to naivety when it came to trustworthiness of various sources. 12 year old me significantly underestimated the sheer maddening magnitude of irrational wishful thinking or plain dishonesty underpinning the words of 'adults', of 'scientists', as if everyone under such umbrella categories could not possibly be shortsighted enough to, say, prioritize monetary gain over accurate research or to enjoy believing in one's own correctness irrespective of veracity, which is bonkers, instead of genuinely aligning oneself with seeking to know the whole truth, and nothing but the truth... Ouch. I was assuming others are quite similar to me. Only at 18 did it begin to really dawn on me, painfully, just how much that's not the case in this world yet.
5.3 Q: Are you a flat-earther?
A: If this question pertains to my circumstantial awareness while living on Earth and whether I act based on the assumption that my daily observable landmass around and beneath me and atmosphere around and above me are... entirely flatly parallel relative to the imaginary static world-water level (even though... constant waves and tides are a thing, and landmasses are obviously uneven themselves, and earthquakes and volcano eruptions are a thing and... idk, you can already induce that flat-earth is not my theory), then no. However, I acknowledge that I personally have observed and learned far from enough to have an evidence-based, foolproof, complete understanding of Earth and all of its features, not to mention its relative position and characteristics in the cosmos. As far as I am aware, the Earth's surface (not atmosphere) is called a geoid, that is, an irregular, somewhat randomly geologically formed shape, so there is no perfectly uniform surface curvature formula, the Earth's topography is a mess.
5.4 Q: Do you believe extraterrestrial lifeforms are cohabitating with us in this universe?
A: I don't think of myself as 'believing' in anything, I only estimate how probable anything is based on the evidence I have at a given moment, and ever flexibly operate from there. To translate this question into a form more compatible with how I operate: "Based on the data you have now, is the existence of extraterrestrial lifeforms in this universe now an important factor in your expectations of how your future will turn out to be?" To that I say, always be prepared. In this case, I have prepared myself, and I will continue adapting anyway. But curiously, I fundamentally don't care whether they are already there. It is yet another possiblity among infinite options of existence, to be made real sooner or later. Personally, I am not in a rush in that regard. Earth alone holds still unexplored infitudes for me, and my life schedule doesn't even come close to suffering from a lack of options.
5.5 Q: I've seen worse. You pass the vibe-check, for now. Still, checking a bunch of your currently topically disjointed posts in hopes of potentially seeing something I would like to research is rather inconvenient, so how about you keep expanding this Q&A section in case you get asked a specific and broadly foundational or otherwise valuable question?
A: Sounds reasonable, will do so. And will meanwhile try to compile and edit all my writings to improve searchability, cross-referencing, and whatever else can be improved.
