Friends, romans, people who are nonbinary except at work, lend me your ears,
occasionally subtle
RMH

No title available
d e v o n
Phantogram Three
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

Product Placement
The Bowery Presents
Fieri Frames
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
The Stonewall Inn
Interview Vampire Daily
taylor price
Claire Keane

PR's Tumblrdome

Discoholic đȘ©
todays bird
cherry valley forever
đȘŒ
No title available
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Argentina
seen from Brazil
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Finland

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Saudi Arabia
@idontevenwantanymore
Friends, romans, people who are nonbinary except at work, lend me your ears,
person who genuinely hates themselves so much they can barely look anyone in the eye: i must remain humble lest my hideous ego spiral out of control
I am aware that the annoying vegans bothering me lately arenât representative of the vast majority of vegans.
To the annoying vegans though, believe it or not Iâm generally on your side and think people should eat less red meat if they can. When itâs my choice what Iâm eating, Iâm vegetarian like six days out of the week.
If you want to make an impact in my opinion, the way to convince people to reduce their meat consumption is to point out how cheap and tasty vegetarian and vegan food can be. Convince people with their stomachs and their wallets. Donât die on your âhoney is evilâ hill.
Harm reduction reduces harm more than absolutism every time.
Exactly! Fastest way to a personâs heart is through their stomach and veggies can be so freaking tasty if you do it right.
yourveganfallacyis.com
This website has blatant misinformation on it. For example it claims that in honey farming Queen bees have their wings ripped off which is just untrue. Not every honey farmer clips the wings of their queens and for those that do the standard practice is to clip a part of the wing that causes the least amount of pain for the queen bee.
It also just kinda dismisses the experience of plants in a way I find to be kinda weird. Yeah plants donât feel pain or have nervous systems in the same way that animals do but they sense things and become stressed. You canât really eat things without causing harm to something alive and coming to terms with that seems kinda necessary in my opinion.
It also completely ignores the environmental benefits of hunting in certain regions, indigenous land preservation practices related to meat eating, and certain health conditions that make veganism difficult for some people.
I understand why somebody would go vegan but Iâm not going to and this website hasnât done anything to convince me. If anything itâs just pissed me off that so many people are likely being fed misinformation by it.
Hereâs something for vegans to consider.
My younger brother is allergic to beans and nuts. All nuts, all legumes.
If he only eats grains without any beans or nuts he will only be getting half of a protein.
Whatâs your answer to that? He just doesnât get to have complete protein? He at the very least needs eggs or something. Your little website there doesnât address that.
people who are like your brother just shouldn't be vegan and that's what 99,(9)% of vegans would tell you.
there are very few physical conditions that make it impossible/very hard to be vegan (despite what many doctors would tell you - they're not impartial and were studying medicine, not nutrition).
how is somebody's singular brother even relevant to the whole point.
You think my brother isnât relevant? Where would he get his protein in the world that extremist vegans want?
Blatant disregard of nuance isnât helping your case. Besides, as Iâve stated on this blog before Iâm mostly on the vegans side when it comes to these issues despite being a meat eater and being an absolutist about these things isnât helpful.
Also, the misinformation. Thereâs misinformation in sources people are sending me as I pointed out earlier in the post.
need a hat that says I WONT SPEAK UNLESS SPOKEN TO AND ITS NOT BECAUSE IM DISINTERESTED AND DONT LIKE YOU I JUST DONT UNDERSTAND SOCIAL INTERACTION AS WELL AS MOST PEOPLE AND ASSUME BY DEFAULT MY PRESENCE IS UNWELCOME AS A PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE SO I KEEP TO MYSELF BUT I DONT MIND IF YOU INITIATE so i can wear it to work
this summer i recommend shower wipes or body wipes to people who struggle with hygiene due to disability, mental or physical. yes i know it produces unnecessary waste. yes thereâs the argument of âif you buy the wipes then youâll never shower,â but chances are most people who are struggling would Not Have Showered with or without access to wipes. i know it isnt a full shower but wiping yourself down can make a big difference in how you feel!!
along these lines you can think about buying mouthwash and getting any kind of friction at all on your teeth when itâs too hard to brush fully, dry shampoo if itâll help keep your hair less oily when washing your hair is overwhelming, etc. you deserve easier ways to care for yourself and feel clean. also remember you are not a failure for struggling with hygiene even if society tells you otherwise!
It's really hard to pull off blue overalls these days. Wear a red shirt and suddenly you're Mario, green shirt and you're Luigi. Well, there are only two mario brothers and Wario's got purple overalls over his yellow shirt so you're safe, right? Wrong. blue overalls yellow shirt and suddenly you're a Minion.
Started using the phrase âthatâs cilantro to meâ to refer to the presence of a story element that completely ruins a piece of media for me, disproportionate to its actual badness.
Free service with ads: Well, if I'm not paying for it they have to foot the bill somehow.
Paid service with no ads: Well, if they're not funding it with ad revenue, they need to charge us something.
Paid service with ads: Well that's bullshit.
"We used to be a paid service without ads, but now we're putting ads in it! If you want the ad-free version you have to pay more for preeeeemium": Fuck you fuck you fuck you
Free service with no ads: Okay so these guys are stealing my data
AO3: no ads, no fees. These guys are a not-for-profit that runs on non-begging donation drives.
@horridrabbitcreature said: Ok now tell us how they breed. For educational purposes
Honestly and sincerely, I do not know how Bill's species breeds lmao.
It's a problem of aesthetics, to me. A shape in the style of Bill Cipher has a simple, clean, minimalist perimeter, with perhaps only a couple of arms and legs and (in their home dimension) an eyeball on one corner.
If you headcanon they have the traditional hole or pole anatomy like humans do, it mars their nice, simple perimeter. If you come up with some complicated way to hide the equipmentâsomething like a cloacaâthat still will probably be seen on their edge, which I don't like, and anyway I personally feel like "yeah they've got equipment (it's just perfectly hidden most of the time)" is a little goofy and the coward's way out.
You could incorporate it into their existing anatomyâmake up an alien way to stuff a reproductive system into their eyeballs, for instanceâbut I already do SO MUCH with their eye (it's for seeing AND it's their mouth hole AND they probably hear through there) that trying to find a way to shove in a reproductive system feels like too much, so I'm not doing that.* And they don't have much visible anatomical features OUTSIDE of eyes to work with.
(* "What do you mean you're not putting their genitalia in their eyes, you just wrote a whole chapter about Bill being into weird eye stuff?" The eye stuff is Bill's fetish, not a reflection of normal shapes' sexual behavior, and all Bill's shape buddies think he's a freak for it. Glad we clarified this.)
You could invent an entirely new alien reproductive method that gets around the issue, but unless how they reproduce becomes relevant to the fic I'm writing (doubtful), that's a HUGE superfluous avenue of worldbuilding that wouldn't contribute anything but pointless complicated info.
So I don't know how they breed because right now it just doesn't matter to the story I'm telling.
Here's what I do know about their reproduction:
It requires one line and one polygon (triangle, quadrangle, pentagon, etc). (This is not without purpose; I'm all for alien reproductive methods that don't involve pairing up, but in this case for "Bill keeps accidentally paralleling the human characters' experiences" reasons it was necessary to give him a crummy mom-and-dad like Pacifica, Gideon, and Stan+Ford.) Each kind of shape (lines included) is genetically a separate sex and socially considered a separate gender.
"each shape is a separate sex" actually only goes up so far. Shapes with a ridiculously high number of sides aren't naturally occurring and are the result of selectively breeding for extra sides, and often requires mutations or inbreeding. Creating a circle is like spending several centuries selectively breeding humans for polydactyly until you have a baby with thirty fingers. By Bill's time the practice of selectively breeding for sides was scientifically discredited and effectively dead.
Similarly, "each generation your angles/sides should increase" was proven to be rubbish. It's all sex chromosomes.
I've been toying with the idea of making lines a small proportion of the population rather than 50%, to reduce how much it feels like the species is a binary "50% female (lines) and 50% male of various flavors (polygons)"; but if there's so few lines then to maintain the population there might be some kind of "a line can have multiple spouses" rule; maybe a line can legally take one spouse of each shape but NOT, say, two triangles or something; but then that's verging on "to what end am I making this so complicated? What's the point? Does it have any impact on Bill's life?" so I might just chuck that idea. (A lot of my worldbuilding is driven by "Bill's species is extinct in the wild, so justify why exploring this matters?")
Similarly, I've considered maybe making the way the species experiences romantic feelings vary between sexesâlike, maybe usually only lines fall in love for some reason, or maybe if there's a town that's 10% line 10% square 10% miscellaneous and 70% triangle then newborn triangles are naturally inclined toward being ace/aro to rebalance the population numbers. Sorta inspired by like how frogs spontaneously change sexes if the pond's population is too unbalanced. The reason I'm considering this is because having Bill experience romantic feelings & falling in love at the same rate as allo humans (like, what, every few years? Constantly maybe?) is just ridiculous for a character who's a trillion years old; but if I'm gonna say "oh he only falls in love once a million years or whatever" I want a good reason that isn't just he hasn't met someone ~special~ enough; and I DON'T want the reason to be "he's ace and/or aro and could reasonably identify that way" because having Bill frigging Cipher grapple with that queer experience just does NOT excite me. Basicallyâas an ace/aro myself, I don't want it to be possible for ace/aro-ness to be one of the reasons Bill feels fundamentally Weird. Turns me off. So I'm toying with, maybe I could build his species in such a way that, for him, being aro-ish or ace-ish would be seen as normative & expected, rather than queer; so I could still have him only wanna date once every million years WITHOUT feeling like that's a part of his identity he needed to explore at some point. But idk futzing around with how his species experiences romance might be unnecessarily complicated when I could just, like, not point out that only dating once every million years is unusual, and most readers would just roll with it without question.
So, these are the thoughts I've had about how reproduction works in Bill's species.
Still have no idea how they fuck.
Okay, if you need one line and one shape, and there are no externally visible orifices or other noticeable features for the genitalia, what I am imagining is: a line attaches its ends to a non-eye corner of the shape, one of each edge, and then the shape rips apart at that corner, with the line bridging the gap between sides. This results in an empty pocket in which to do.... whatever. Mix spores or rub flagella or combine fluid or otherwise provide the material to assemble a new shape. Assuming no prolonged internal pregnancy, the parents then coat the results with a protective lining, open up again to expel the new egg and then reverse the process to safely close the shape parent again.
couldn't they just build their kids like they do in the robots movie?
or even rip off a scale or 2 of their surface coating glue it together with blood or whatever and breathe it to life like it's a paper bag and pop new shape baby just like magic
it doesn't gotta be like biological equivalence, they are shapes.
final mental illness musing of the night but as you all know, iâve suffered from an extremely severe case of depression since i was a toddler. and one of the most infuriating things about growing up this way was how many adults seem to just not understand that children can be depressed. sure, you may associate depression with teen years, but there are plenty of kids 12 and under who are deeply, deeply depressed and itâs just completely overlooked. When I talk about how early my suicidal behaviors started, people go âwow! i had no idea that it could start so young?â but i have several friends who were also depressed as kids and i donât think itâs that uncommon. i mean, bullying is frequent in childrenâs lives and yet you donât think an 8 year old can get suicidal? It all goes back to people not seeing children as people, of course. Considering them not capable of complex emotions. I just feel for all the kids who go untreated because their parents havenât stopped to think if theres a reason why their kid spends all their time in their room.
why would you ever outsource fun to chatgpt? are you stupid? you can make mediocre shit by yourself too.
you're missing out on all the crazy euphoric moments where you execute an idea flawlessly, sending it to your friends and feeling the genuine happiness at their reactions to something you made authentically. you're robbing yourself of something beautiful.
and I get it, writers block, artists block, depression can really be terrible, but once you break out of it (and you will) it will feel like climbing Mount Everest.
peace and love on planet earth! you are saving the environment AND youâre cool!
WE ARE PROUD OF YOU!!!!
"I have never seen a cat that showed affection/love for it's owner" is the pet ownership version of "I don't believe in Female Orgasms they don't exist, after all, my wife has never had one"
In early July, a dispute began between two writers; Rachel Hope Cleves, author of Charity and Sylvia; A Same-Sex Marriage in Early America,
An absolutely wild ride with a final twist that objectively doesnât matter but will make you do a serious double take.
You should read this, its masterful, but a summary:
Rachel Hope Cleves, who is an academic historian, wrote a nonfiction book about two women- charity and sylvia- who lived as a married couple in early America.
She then claimed a graphic novel about those same women- also titled Charity and Sylvia- was based extensively on her own work without credit.
This was complete and utter horse shit.
And the above article beautifully outlines all the evidence to prove that claim.
The article isn't paywalled and is a masterclass in how to understand and get to the bottom of a baseless internet dogpile.
if you, like me, are hesitant to enjoy what kinda sounds like "relaxes food standards" on the surface, I'm happy to report that this isn't "everyone can do what they want with your food supply without oversight" but rather a case where in NYC you had to have a permit to sell food and a second, superfluous permit to sell frozen desserts. This action simply removes the need for the second permit, rolling it into the first permit in order to help small businesses. Yay!
Mayor Mamdani Announces "OPEN for Small Business," Over 50 Reforms to Slash Red Tape and Increase Support for Small Businesses
âwhich could mean nothingâ is my favorite sentence ever bc on the surface it describes something that COULD indeed mean nothing. but we use it to emphasize the other side of that coin i.e. that it could also mean something. it keeps us grounded bc we are technically focusing on the liklihood that the information given doesnât necessarily imply gay sex is happening, while still silently acknowledging the possibility that it might.
s