I'm late to the nsfwhump/noncon kink discussion but as someone who both enjoys Nsfwhump as a form of trauma processing and for Certifiable Sexy Reasons due to having a lot of wires crossed between the two, I feel very strongly if you are someone with a noncon kink and you engage with it through other people's fiction about sexual violence, you should be taking care to read the room/contextual cues before you start commenting overtly sexual things on their work, especially in the whump community. Speaking as a survivor with a hardcore nonconsent kink, it's really not that difficult imo to ascertain the difference between someone who's writing about sexual violence to be titillating vs trying to invoke horror even if you, the reader, technically find the depicted acts to be arousing. Exercising care around this is good practice, especially because for a lot of whump writers, depicting acts of sexual violence in an accurate way is an important practice of truth telling and trauma processing that often gets mistaken for porn/smut.
Personally my favorite brand of whump is the type that strikes a balance between "survivor fiction" nsfwhump and "smut" nsfwhump because my own sexual desires and trauma are very deeply intertwined and I don't necessarily perceive these two types of whump as being two seperate categories but that's just me











