♀

Side blog

[timteractions]

“her feminism focuses on women and not gender” oh well thank god

[latinaradfem]

[harrypotterfuryroad]

do you think people are gonna stop running the john mulaney chris fleming uwu bean routine with this guy now

[lovelycranium]

I love this thing about men being able to say that porn is problematic and that no one wants to do it, AND that's why men love it, and that's ok for society. But when feminists say that women only go into porn for the money and are digging themselves into even greater mental/physical/financial problems, AND that's why we want to change that so that this doesn't happen, then suddenly for society they're feminazis and fascists

[finnishrogue]

i cannot. physically. comprehend. the idea that a man would find it hot that he knows the people he watches have sex / has sex with do not want to be there and regret everything. like it's not just against my moral backbone but it's like. so fucking UNsexy. the least sexy thing in the whole fucking universe. you cannot physically present anything that is that uninteresting to me than that, it's such an immediate, disgusting turnoff that it would keep me unable to experience arousal for the next five months.

i. do. not. fucking. GET. it.

[capricorn-season]

[preposterousblasphemy]

OP turned off reblogs after this was pointed out, so I'm putting it back on the market

[thesinisterspinster]

Yeah i wouldn't trust them either. Stay away from kids.

[cheesyradfem]

The Shinigami eyes creator they love so much on here—Alison Woolbert—is one

[preposterousblasphemy]

He's actually responsible for TERF Tracker, not Shinigami Eyes.

[cordycepsfem]

But the creator of Shinigami Eyes is a rapist and FBI snitch, so again, not somebody you want around children.

[kanelia]

Such a strange thing to complain about. Why does he think it is a common thing for people to just spend time with random kids? No, people who don't have kids, whose close relatives or friends do not have kids, or do not interact with kids because of their profession do not just "spend time with kids".

[quinntheestallion]

You spend time with kids by making them yourself (and dedicating your life to nurturing them) or having family members who made kids (your relatives who you’re also dedicated to nurturing) . These sterilized freaks who are isolated from their family want to spend time with kids like they’re visiting a Japanese pet cafe. An attitude which quite frankly screams a tendency towards molestation.

[radiant-spirit-guardians]

Can you imagine if the feminists Evil TERFs™ acted like trans activists regularly do? If we went around saying trans identified males should get punched, curb stomped, set on fire? If we walked around wearing patches and badges and t-shirts calling for violence against them? (I mean, wearing one of those "adult human female" t-shirts is considered an act of violence by some...) If we threatened to bomb famous trans people's houses? If we crashed trans only events and sued them if they denied us access to their spaces? If we nailed a dead rat to their door?I'm not saying trans people don't get threats, but when they receive this sort of treatment most lefties jump to defend them.

Gender critical feminists are send pornography and gore videos for stating men can't have periods. We get death threats, rape threats, accusations thrown our way. No one cares. If you call any attention to the abuse JKR has received, you're immediately called a fascist transphobe, and trying to tell people you don't actually condone her actions or her words won't save you from it. There's no reforming a TERF either, which is a ridiculous notion coming from a group known for welcoming former incels, abusers, nazis with open arms. You can't pretend the single most dangerous threat to you is opinionated women when your argument for why you must share the same space as said threat is "but men are violent :(". Which is it? Are we dangerous or are we a safe haven away from men? You're so scared of other males you think it's ok to use us as a shield, all the while claiming we are violent.

You're either ok with women getting this sort of treatment, or you're a cog in the TERF laser machine set to "genocide all non TERFs" mode. Opinionated women are dangerous

And what a stupid word, TERF. Blergh.

[radiant-spirit-guardians]

women can't say twink but gay men can say I love your axe wound you whore serving cunt looking fishy being a bad ass bitch cuntyyyy? mmmkay

[romqncesh]

[girlpatches-deactivated20250530]

"who cares, just let people do what they want" you have never thought about anything in your life

[butch-reidentified]

it's usually followed by "as long as it's not hurting anyone," but anyone never includes women lmao

[opalescentfem-deactivated202604]

It’s not okay to be a misogynist, unless that’s your kink, in which case it is okay.

It’s not okay to hit women, unless that’s your kink, in which case it is okay.

It’s not okay to be racist, unless that’s your kink, in which case it is okay.

It’s not okay to cut someone with a knife, unless that’s your kink, in which case it is okay.

It’s not okay to choke someone until they are unconscious or close to it, unless that’s your kink, in which case it is okay.

It’s not okay to be homophobic, unless that’s your kink, in which case it is okay.

It’s not okay to control everything about someone’s life, unless that’s your kink, in which case it is okay.

Interesting logic!

[seagullgal]

so hard to be sex positive in a "women and even men should be able to healthily masturbate and enjoy physical pleasure" kinda way while also being very very anti sex industry is hard sometimes.

Ahh but porn has always existed!! Look at cave paintings! Okay. Masturbate to cave paintings. I really want you to masturbate to cave paintings. If it's the same thing, you should have no issues masturbating to cave paintings. I'm dead serious when I say I have no issues with anybody masturbating to cave paintings, or even written smut or anything that doesn't rely on the rape of real people and profiting off of it. I'd be fine with hentai if so much of it didn't try to up the shock factor as much as possible to get people hooked on various fetishes.

People have masturbated forever, and they didn't need HD violent videos to do so. You can do it with your mind, or a nice lil story, I promise. Make your own horny cave painting, idgaf

[the-pink-economy-crit]

This is exactly the distinction that gets lost in the "discourse." Being anti-industry isn't about being anti-pleasure or anti-human nature; it’s about being anti-commodity.

​The "it’s always existed" argument is such a lazy reach. There is a massive structural chasm between a cave painting and a multi-billion dollar tech industry that uses predatory algorithms to keep people scrolling through increasingly extreme content. One is a human expression; the other is a profit-driven machine that relies on the financial desperation of real people.

​You can be 100% in favor of people having healthy, liberated sex lives while still recognizing that a massive, unregulated industry built on the extraction of labor from vulnerable populations is a net negative for society.

Promoting imagination or ethical, non-human-based media isn't "puritanical" it's just asking for a world where someone's survival isn't tied to being recorded for a stranger's subscription fee.

[anjomecanico]

I can't stand these pro-porn dumbasses who think feminists are scared of seeing boob pics when we are obviously talking about the horrible brutalization, dehumanization and torture of women that happens behind the scenes and directly in porn media. And that is of extremely easy access even for children

[the-pink-economy-crit]

Exactly.

They try to frame the critique as "prudishness" because it’s easier to dismiss a Victorian stereotype than it is to address actual labor violations and human rights abuses. It’s a classic derailment tactic to make the conversation about "freedom of expression" rather than the material reality of the production chain.

​When we talk about the industry, we aren't talking about "boob pics" we are talking about a system that incentivizes the escalation of violence to keep up with market demand. We are talking about "survival sex" being rebranded as "empowerment" to mask the fact that most people enter the trade due to a lack of viable economic alternatives.

​The fact that this extreme content is a click away for kids isn't just a parental failure; it's a massive corporate failure by tech monopolies that prioritize traffic and data harvesting over the basic safety of both the people in the videos and the people watching them.

It's not about being "scared" of bodies; it's about being rightfully disgusted by the exploitation of them for profit.

[g1rluninterruptedd]

this is such a non issue and it irritates the fuck outta be. i already fucking hate porn but then complaining it’s “censored” because you need to include incest and some sort of childlike behavior is beyond me.

[the-pink-economy-crit]

The irony is that these platforms aren’t "censoring" out of a sudden moral epiphany. It’s a desperate attempt to stay palatable for payment processors and advertisers.

​They’ll micromanage the word "stuffed animal" to avoid liability, yet they have no problem with the actual structural risks like the lack of healthcare, the absence of real contracts, or the algorithm-driven pressure to produce more content for less pay.

​It’s the ultimate "pink-washed" corporate strategy: sanitize the aesthetics while keeping the exploitation fully intact. It’s not about protection; it's about optics.

[newlyy]

That Ethel Cain Instagram post just made me feel asexual. Why are his balls so big. Is that normal

[newlyy]

It’s………a man exposing his penis. That’s it.

[jolakottinnn]

he is flashing them and they are thanking him lol

[itdoobielikethat]

[reneradbler]

It's very interesting to listen to history lectures that first say that there was no slavery at a certain period of time, and then follow it up with something like: "women didn't have the right to marry at their free will, property was passed down from father to son..." and so on.

you are absolutely sure that there was no slavery, right?

[femsolid]

People are extremely reluctant to use the term slavery when it comes to women's oppression. But it was and is slavery.

[thearthistorianblogoffa]

Can you please name times where woman are not allowed to own property and where udes as bredings stocks?

I am pretty sure most of times this rules only applied to rich woman.

Common woman always had to work/earn money until the 19 th centry, where the housewife was invented.

[femsolid]

2025.

Men are buying little girls and marrying them. It's called "child brides" and it is slavery. So is prostitution.

You're supposed to be a historian blog and you're not aware that women were and are sold as property. What have you been doing?

Did Men Own Women?

Women have been exchanged in trade by men since before written history—does this explain why they are unequal in the economy today?

[really4rbrowsing]

Just because women were working doesn't mean they had much input on who they married.

Can't comment on other cultures but at least in mine who a woman could marry has up until very recently been controlled by family. This has held true regardless of class. Also women weren't allowed to own property until very recently either (depends on religion – Hindu Succession Act allowed women to become direct heirs and get equal shares. Travancore Christian Succession Act of 1916 which governed the Kerala christians did not let daughters inherit until it was overturned in 1986).

[medusiad]

It also doesn't mean they were earning money. Yes, most women have always been expected to work, but they weren't necessarily paid. Slaves are also expected to work.* And even when women's work generated any kind of income, they didn't necessarily have any control over or rights to the money they earned.

To give just one example, in England, prior to the Married Women's Property Act of 1870, any income which a woman earned legally belonged to her husband. In fact a married woman, rich or poor, did not even exist as a separate legal entity.

Caroline Norton, who was instrumental in gerting this Act passed, also campaigned successfully for divorce reform. The following is an excerpt from her testimony to Parliament.

And while English women did gain some property rights in the 1870s, it wasn't until 100 years later that the Sex Discrimination Act actually made it illegal for banks to refuse to let a woman open an account without a man's signature.

Of course, this doesn't even touch on all of the unpaid work which women in nearly every time and place have been expected to do for their husbands. Including providing him with children.

*The whole premise that 'expected to work and earn money' = 'not a slave' is a pretty embarrassing argument to make in the first place. Slaves are absolutely expected to work. And indeed to earn money, albeit not for themselves. Though in the Roman world, for instance, it was also common for slaves to earn a small amount of money which they were allowed to hold and manage as if it were their own.

[hugewoman]

[sapphicgem]

funny how they never realize how men would NEVER do the procedures they list. maybe because these cosmetic surgeries target vulnerable women and are products of an oppressive patriarchy🤔

so which is it? is transgenderism natural and has always existed, or is it — like botox and breast augmentation — a product of sexist oppression?

[cyber-junkyard]

So you agree? Transgenderism is a social contagion fueled by the cosmetics industry?

[forwomenbiwomen]

Ok, following her logic, for breast augmentations and such to be affirming for "cis" women, the "cis woman" gender has to be a bimbofied, makeuped, shaved ideal of womanhood.

And apparently, "cis" means what's typical or expected, where your gender matches your sex. So let me get this straight: the female sex, the typically "woman" gender, what cis women strive to be, is a makeuped, shaved bimbo. Ideally.

And! On top of all this, this is inherent and not social because males can also experience this female womanly gender and literally become suicidal if they don't fulfil this expectation because their brain... wants to be seen as a woman?

Womanly-brained people just feel compelled to do this because of their innate gender, not the system of social norms and oppression, saying women should be feminine.

And we shouldn't get rid of the system because then how will men with womanly-brain feel good? Surely, we should just keep gender for these people, at the expense of "cis" women.

And all of this logic proves that mastectomies, hormones, bottom surgeries, and more are actually just as innate as... female insecurities. Right.

[hugewoman]

[evenlesssentimentaltranslator]

When I tell autogynaephilic males that they deserve to be put to death for using violent oppression against women as a prop to validate the cosmetic surgery they want to get for their fetish

[quixoticrobotic]

i agree that "dumbass useless husband hypercompetent wife" is a bad trope but also I think non-disabled people are really weird about the concept of caring for someone as a way of showing love

[evenlesssentimentaltranslator]

Then make media and fanfiction about men caring for their disabled wives, or yaoi where one husband is disabled and the other is the carer or something. Y’all have gotten way too comfortable telling feminists “this other axis of oppression exists, therefore you can’t talk about your oppression without making a million caveats” but never returning the favour by saying “i agree that non-disabled people erasing home care for disabled people is bad but also I think middle class men are still clinging to the days where they got to purchase a tradwife even though their wives now spend 40+ hours a week at outside jobs too, and that working class men have always treated their wives like tradwives despite the fact that their wives always spent 40+ hours a week at outside jobs too.”

[angelicgarnet-moved]

i love girls…. in the gay way yes, but also in other ways, i love being friends with women and talking to them and i love being one 

[mudaship39]

Im nonbinary nonconforming but most of this is true except for the being one

[cocksmasher69]

Can yall ever shut the fuck up for like half a second