neopets forum posts i reference all the time but nobody gets

@theartofmadeline

shark vs the universe
Cosimo Galluzzi
Xuebing Du

JVL
cherry valley forever
KIROKAZE

pixel skylines
Jules of Nature
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
todays bird
Sade Olutola
Acquired Stardust
wallacepolsom

Product Placement

titsay

izzy's playlists!
Three Goblin Art
Misplaced Lens Cap

#extradirty
seen from Finland

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany

seen from China

seen from South Africa
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Lithuania
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@iloveleslove
neopets forum posts i reference all the time but nobody gets
i think fundamentally i'm gender-critical because i'm an athiest. i don't believe in souls. "i was Meant to be the opposite gender" wdym 'meant'? by whose design? gender theory is a set of beliefs i don't believe in. and that's why it's so frustrating that it's framed as being hateful and spiteful because like. no i just don't believe you are who you say you are. i don't believe you have a "woman soul" or whatever because i don't believe that's a thing. and in my mind, what you're doing is hateful, as my oppressor pretending to be a member of the oppressed class. i refuse to play by the rules of your ideology, just like i don't follow the bible because i'm not christian, or i don't follow a jain diet because i'm not jain, or i don't pray or fast on muslim holidays because i'm not muslim. and if you do believe in woman souls in male bodies, i don't think you should be thrown in jail for a thought crime or whatever, but i do think you're a misogynist, just like members of any other patriarchal religion
*me, answering a girlchild who asked:* yes, that [wild animal] is a girl! Actually, about half the animals you see outside are girls!
*Parents, getting visibly uncomfortable*
*boychildren, continuing to refer to the animal as a he despite my continued emphasized use of she pronoun*
*trans/gendie coworker, getting emotional as he realizes he is just as bad as the rest of the men in calling every animal a he*
*senior staff, annoyed at me for being better at our job than him*
*supervisor, watching me carefully to make sure I am not "rocking the boat" *
*girlchildren, excitedly asking me more questions*: how can you tell she is a girl? Does it taste good when she eats [food]? Is she strong? Does she live in [habitat]? I want to be a marine biologist when I grow up and study only girl animals! Is she a mom? Can I pet her? Does she sleep? Does she dream?
Does she know there is more for her out there? Does she know the world of men can easily be escaped by simply loving wildlife? Does she see herself in nature? Has she killed the mystic man in her mind? Does she know religion, even female-centered religion, was invented to erase the natural world? Does she know she is inherently a part of this world? Does she sleep? Does she dream?
why must the good blogs deactivate young
we're going to a frankly weird and bizarre amount of effort to make sure that a teenager never sees a boob on the internet.
Have you ever thought about the fact it’s because it isn’t just teenagers viewing porn? 🤯 Teachers have stated that elementary school-aged kids are watching porn.
i'm so sick of porn addicted fetishists misrepresenting porn as "a boob". actually kevin, we're putting still way too little effort into making it less likely that a 12 year old can watch "tiny teen anal destroyed" and "ebony slave roleplay BWC" in HD for 2 hours each night before he gets up in the morning to go to school, where he is supposed to be able to see his fellow pre-teen female classmates as real human beings and treat his black female teacher like an authority.
genuinely would be fascinated to learn what some people think "socialisation" means
Lmao, even
I didn’t self-identify my way into being called a slut, a whore and a bitch when I was a teenager. It wasn’t my self-identification that got me sexually assaulted, degraded, and treated as lesser than. It was my sex. TRAs have lost the plot. I used to be a huge advocate, but it’s clear they hate women just like the rest of this women-hating society. My gender was forced on me by society. There is no difference between race and gender in that regard.
Leftists turn into the biggest pro-lifers if the fetus is disabled. They'd NEVERRR take on that child themselves of course, but they'll be DAMNED if they don't try to use guilt to force women into birthing disabled babies. It's crazy, they'll be like "abort that thang" about """abled""" fetuses but as soon as there's a Downs diagnosis or something then that fetus must be born. Like why. What changed
Like when a child is likely to be perfectly healthy its cool to abort the fetus for any reason but when a child is likely to suffer or live in hardship all of sudden its important to preserve that life else you're a nazi. Lmao
Actually demented and ass backwards, as usual.
Genuinely, does anyone know why they do this? Even back when I was religious and pro-life, I was most sympathetic to women in these situations out of all the reasons to abort. At fifteen I could understand that disabled babies would have a much rougher go of it so it was reasonable to abort the fetus, so why can't these grown-ass adults?
Like most left-wing discourses, anti-ableism started with the reasonable and necessary attempt to counter-act the discrimination and mistreatment of people with disabilities.
And it kind of snowballed into "actually, being disabled is awesome and you're a nazi fascist if you want your baby to be healthy". And so they started branding women who don't want to/can't dedicate their lives to caring for severely disabled children as Hitler.
So it's cool to yeet a perfectly healthy fetus for any reason but if you abort primarly because the fetus will be a severely disabled child- youre scum. So they want women to have disabled and diseased babies to virtue signal ideological purity.
This ride from sane and useful anti discrimination ideas- to absolutely deranged, useless, perversion of basic common sense- can be seen everywhere in leftists movements, unfortunately.
Another thing to consider is that it comes from "leftists" who are functionally just like conservatives that only ever identify with the fetus instead of the woman in the situation. The same way pro-lifers always tell stories where they are the fetus that wasn't aborted, supposed pro-choicers with any kind of disability see themselves as the disabled fetus that could've been aborted and do not extend similar empathy to their mothers or women in any number of situations that require an abortion.
☝️
She's right
“Porn Has Completely Destroyed Me There was a time - I’d say pre 1999 - when I would have tolerated a girl with an errant fat roll, a mildly problematic ass, or even non-porcelain veneered teeth. And come to think of it, I might have even green lighted a B cup chest. But with the installation of the high speed cable modem, alas, I am sad to say that those times have now passed. I now only want - and will only solicit affection from - girls with killer porn star looks and behavior. I am ashamed and I do not like what now stimulates me, but the Internet, with all of its quick fix, crack-like vices, has made me extraordinarily intolerant. Are you a Tufts or Harvard grad and a great conversationalist? Not important. Do you have a quirky sense of humor and a knack for cooking Asian Fusion cuisine? Don’t care. Would you like to discuss the sub-text meaning of the whip sawed brush strokes of that Kandinsky painting at the MFA? Fuck off. Be the source of a blood rush and make me throw a rod in my pants or kindly turn into anti-matter. I am ruined. I am dead on the inside. I am ashamed and embarrassed of what now stimulates me and I know that I am irrevocably changed for the worse. For all practical purposes, Internet porn has destroyed me. So who am I? Not who you’d think. Not the dandruff-haired blob of shit in the cube next to you. Not the UES Michigan frat boy. Not the faux disheveled Downtown hipster with the silly retro Puma sneakers. Sadly, I am the “normal” one that you’re actually interested in. Cultured, eloquent, well dressed. I am the one you discuss with your girlfriends over Sunday brunch. I am the one you hope to bump into at Karen’s pajama themed apartment party. I am the one who takes the lead, holds doors, and hails cabs. Shit. Do you dream of a man who will “love you just for you?” Do believe that you have peripheral, intangible qualities that men of substance will key upon and gravitate to? Do you shun the gym in favor of The Apprentice and a pint of Ben & Jerry’s Chunkey Monkey, thinking that your black cigarette pants will sufficiently mask any belly spillage or ass expansion? Then forget it. It’s game over. You’re a walking, talking non-compete clause and you’re going to end up alone with a slobbering oversized Rotweiller named Chuckles. Pull your head out of your ass and be advised - porn viewing/obsession is spreading like the plague amongst my gender - upping the already unrealistic physical expectations, pushing boundaries in the bedroom (you’re down with anal, right?), and providing instant, customize-able sexual highs with the push of a button. If you’re female and you don’t posess prodigal, Einsteinian caliber intelligence that would propel the cause of humanity forward, and, if you don’t relish the idea of being alone, then … … throw every last dollar you have at your physical appearance. I’m serious. Personal trainer. Porcelain veneers. High-end boob job. Get scared and get it done. Do not extend my gender any credit. Do not hope that a guy will be in awe of your cello playing, your VP title, or your cute apartment. I promise you he won’t care. Don’t kid yourself into thinking he will. Men are programmed to respond to the visual. Look good or you’re alone.”
— Anon dude on craigslist, April 2005 Found at oneangrygirl.net
if you don’t relish the idea of being alone
The fact that men could be this despicable but still think their company is preferable to being alone. He literally just said he’s full of nothing but degenerate lust and values nothing except what will make his dick hard. This was very well written, though-props to him for that.
I think it’s funny how these men will be like oh woe is me I’m so sad that I’ve been ruined by porn and I’m ashamed of myself…. and then their absolutely intense hatred of normal women and how they imagine normal women behave and think shines through in every sentence. You seem to enjoy the feeling of power it gives you to say “get scared and get a boob job you vapid stupid idiot foid unless you want to be invisible and alone”. You don’t seem very ashamed at all.
I mean honestly, it's less that "mentally ill men are stereotyped as rapists" and more that rapists are stereotyped as mentally ill. It is an attempt to pin the blame on anything other than maleness
funny how people can admit that "penetrative sex has to hurt women" is a myth, created and spread with the purpose of conditioning women to expect and accept sexual violence from their male partners, but refuse to even consider how "hurting your partner (usually a woman) during sex is normal and fun" might have the same purpose. their violence-as-a-sexual-baseline belief is evil and stupid. my violence-as-a-sexual-baseline belief is good and smart.
in the notes. literally so predictable. as if women don't consent to piv sex "knowing" that it's "meant to hurt"?? so it's irrelevant anyway! the same script no matter what anyone is actually saying, cultish istg
i think harming someone via bdsm should be a strict liability crime. if you strangle someone you are just automatically liable for anything that happens bc that’s crazy
the fact that it's even a question whether or not someone should be charged with murder if they kill someone during bdsm is insane. The fact that if a man kills a woman during bdsm strangulation play or whatever and he says "she liked being choked" and people consider that a reasonable defense and consider it not his fault is insane. Why the hell would that even be a defense of that. In any other context they're charged with murder whether it's an accident or not.
I didn't even need to look further into this person to know he was a male, because this is 100% cooked up in his own demented fantasies.
The test is a cheek swab. It's less invasive and less demeaning than the test they do to check for drugs (where you produce a urine sample under controlled conditions)
It is baffling to me how openly pedophilic and perverted TIMs are with zero pushback from anyone.
They dream up these "genital inspection" scenarios because they get aroused from the idea. They would LOVE if little girls were being sexually violated to play sports (which is actually what happens when you put boys on the girls team) because they all have rape fetishes and it gets them off.
I don't think it's just that. Yes that's part of it but I think it's also that they want girls and women to be violated for having the audacity to exclude men. Kinda like karma? "Oh you want to exclude us? Hope you get raped anyways." basically.
It's in a similar vein of women being denied abortions unless it's rape, and the whole "a woman's body must be violated by men before she's allowed to exert any autonomy over it" in a sense.
normal person: maybe female sports should only include females. they can do a quick cheek swab chromosome test.
this guy: little girl's pussies? spreading their legs wide open all over the world?
normal person: ummm.. no sir. I was just saying that maybe the sports organizations could do a quick one-time cheek swab chromosome test.
this guy: oh my god literally little girl clitoris?
it seems you have quite the preoccupation little girl's genitals sir. the entire phrasing of his post is like it's a porn title. "Teen athlete SPREADS LEGS and has CLITORIS POKED by coach just to be allowed to swim laps!!!! watch now!!!!". it doesn't come across as a person who is genuinely concerned about young female athletes being sexually abused, but rather as a man who is wondering where he can click the link to watch it happen. he's not even good at pretending to be normal. what a fucking weirdo.
I hate all these posts moralizing about how it’s not righteous to discuss hurting rapists because you can hypothetically target someone who was labeled a sex offender but didn’t do anything morally reprehensible when most of the time the people saying that are speaking from experience and are discussing their frustrations of wanting the people who personally abused them to die. and yeah sure you can also get into a debate about rehabilitation verses revenge based justice but that’s such a cruel thing to turn the discussion towards when someone said they wish they could have fought back against a pedophile who molested them. or maybe I’m just a sensitive violent freak who knowssss
btw it’s a myth, nobody is on the sex offender registry for public urination. stop letting people repeat that shit
So weird how they try to exaggerate how easy it is to get on the sex offender registry. Like yeah it’s easy if you have a problem taking your clothes off in public. Why do you have a problem taking your clothes off in public?
I want this person to search through their local registry and see what all of their local sex offenders have actually been convicted of.
Here, let's see a sampling, New York City sexual offenders registry, scrolling and hitting 10 random names:
That looks like a lot of real sexual violence, about half enacted on children. I wonder why the original poster wants us to approach the idea of convicted sexual offenders with leniency. They say hit dogs will holler, don't they?
The devaluing of sex to the point that it’s no different than flipping burgers is rape culture rhetoric. If not explicit rape apologia.
If sex is nothing special or unique, rape is just like any other violent crime. If that’s the case, why should a rapist be punished more harshly than a person that punched someone on the street? Why should a rape victim be given any extra care or resources? Or sympathy?
If sex is no different than shaking hands, why shouldn’t that woman let her husband have sex with her even though she’s not in the mood? Why shouldn’t that 15 year old girl have sex she isn’t ready for when her boyfriend claims “blue balls”? She’d give him a hug if he was sad and that might as well be the same as sex. Why shouldn’t children be exposed to sex? If there’s nothing unique about sex, it’s basically the same as watching a sport or Animal Planet show.
100% agree but unfortunately I think its also this perspective that makes TRAs think were 'christian' or Christian adjacent. that if you do not agree with the devaluing of sex for the sake of sexual freedom, then you must be for valuing sex for the sake of sexual restriction-- ie 'waiting til marriage' etc.
and I point that out just because it think its kinda important to understand the TRA perspective however weird it might be. there is a middle ground between those two. you can still see sex as something special or valuable on a personal level without it being something preserved for some picture of spiritual purity. seeing sex as special I dont think has to mean you believe having sex dirties you in some way
Oh, so being a girl is something you can just drop once it starts being hard? Must be nice.
feel free to take testosterone yourself, I guess?
You hear this? Women experienced 5000 years of oppression for nothing. This entire time-they could’ve just grown beards and boom oppression solved.
Skin bleaching is also available - so black people still complaining about racism are just needlessly whining.
All oppression will be solved when we’re ALL pretending to be white and male. Why didn’t we think of that